Can Gun Nuts Please Stop Saying You Need Guns to Protect Yourself From A Potential Tyrannical Government!!!

[HandleTheTruth]

I love it when gun huggers say that. It shows how out of touch with reality they are.

 

[Red Front]

Bullshit. Every socialist country throughout time has failed. And murdered well over 130 million people in the process.

The death toll figures are from the Soviet archives, moron.

Just how braindead are you?

You don't have the luxury of claiming socialism doesn't work when capitalist empires are sanctioning socialist countries and threatening them with war.

 

[Red Front]

No it isn't. Where the fuck do you come up with this bullshit.

Slaves don't pursue profits, they work for their masters. Read a book on slavery.

 

[westwall]

The Soviet archives actually falsify those figures.

No, they don't you blithering idiot. Those numbers have been well vetted. As are the 80 million that Mao murdered during the Cultural Revolution, as are the 2 million Pol Pot murdered.

 

[HandleTheTruth]

Had my neighbor that couldn't run fifty feet without passing out say he would kick some government ass. I laughed and shook my head.

 

[westwall]

You don't have the luxury of claiming socialism doesn't work when capitalist empires are sanctioning socialist countries and threatening them with war.

The socialist countries were lauded by the intelligensia here and in the UK. Progressives here declared stin a great guy for having the firtitude to murder 3 million during the Collectivisations of tbe farms.

They weren't sanctioned till after WWII.

DUMMY.

 

[westwall]

Slaves don't pursue profits, they work for their masters. Read a book on slavery.

Read an economic history book of the US. Your claims are laughable.

 

[Red Front]

No, they don't you blithering idiot. Those numbers have been well vetted. As are the 80 million that Mao murdered during the Cultural Revolution, as are the 2 million Pol Pot murdered.

Pol Pot was armed and funded by the US State Dept. As far as those figures you're citing, they've already been falsified. The so-called "black book on communism" is nothing more than capitalist rhetoric against the USSR. The archives never provided evidence for those figures.

 

[westwall]

Pol Pot was armed and funded by the US State Dept. As far as those figures you're citing, they've already been falsified. The so-called "black book on communism" is nothing more than capitalist rhetoric against the USSR. The archives never provided evidence for those figures.

No, they haven't. Even noam chomskey agreed the numbers were correct, he just approved of the killing.

You truly are a moron.

 

[Red Front]

The socialist countries were lauded by the intelligensia here and in the UK. Progressives here declared stin a great guy for having the firtitude to murder 3 million during the Collectivisations of tbe farms.

They weren't sanctioned till after WWII.

DUMMY.

None of those figures are supported by the archives. Did many people die? Of course. In the class struggle, many die. Many died in civil wars in the UK as well in the 1600s. People die in civil wars.

 

[Oldestyle]

It's way more than that.

If the federal government knows where you live?
All they have to do is fly an F-16 at 30,000 feet over your house.
Then drop a JDAM (Joint Direct Attack Munition) on your head.

You will not see or hear the plane.
Or hear the bomb until a few seconds before it hits.
A thousand guns and a million rounds of ammunition would do NOTHING to protect you from it.
And there are dozens of other ways the military could kill you - with ease - if it wanted to.

Anyone who says that guns can protect the masses from government tyranny are utterly and completely clueless about modern, weapons systems.

You really think the military can subdue a US civilian population by bombing individual homes with smart weapons? With all due respect...that borders on farce.

Most gun owners have no desire to use weapons against the Government. They don't. They want to be armed to protect themselves and their loved ones from bad people with no regard for human life. What gives you the right to take that away from them?

 

[Red Front]

No, they haven't. Even noam chomskey agreed the numbers were correct, he just approved of the killing.

You truly are a moron.

Cite where exactly Noam Chomsky in any of his writings agrees with the figures you cited. Go ahead.

 

[Oldestyle]

None of those figures are supported by the archives. Did many people die? Of course. In the class struggle, many die. Many died in civil wars in the UK as well in the 1600s. People die in civil wars.

More people were killed by Communism than were EVER killed by Nazis in WWII! It's not even close.

 

[Red Front]

No, they haven't. Even noam chomskey agreed the numbers were correct, he just approved of the killing.

You truly are a moron.

Citing death tolls is moronic. It says nothing about whether an economic system is effective or not. Capitalism has mountains of bodies, so what? What does that say about capitalism as a mode of production or economic system?

 

[westwall]

None of those figures are supported by the archives. Did many people die? Of course. In the class struggle, many die. Many died in civil wars in the UK as well in the 1600s. People die in civil wars.

The pogroms weren't part of the civil war.


DURRRRRRRR

 

[Red Front]

More people were killed by Communism than were EVER killed by Nazis in WWII! It's not even close.

Evidence. Anyways even if that were the case, and it's not, it doesn't render socialism or communism an ineffective economic system.

 

[westwall]

Citing death tolls is moronic. It says nothing about whether an economic system is effective or not. Capitalism has mountains of bodies, so what? What does that say about capitalism as a mode of production or economic system?

Citing death tolls is bad for communist jackasses, like you, you mean.

You vile fuckers have murdered more people in the last 100 years than ALL of the religious murders over the last 2,000 years combined.

 

[westwall]

Evidence. Anyways even if that were the case, and it's not, it doesn't render socialism or communism an ineffective economic system.

Correct, it makes socialism/communism a catastrophically horrible economic system.

 

[Red Front]

The pogroms weren't part of the civil war.


DU

Correct, it makes socialism/communism a catastrophically horrible economic system.

Not if the deaths are caused by war. Capitalist death tolls are much higher.

 

[Red Front]

Citing death tolls is bad for communist jackasses, like you, you mean.

You vile fuckers have murdered more people in the last 100 years than ALL of the religious murders over the last 2,000 years combined.

It's the capitalists who are the genocidal maniacs.