Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That you need a copy of the birds and the bees!
Why?
Heterosexual couples have the ability to do a certain something that same sex couples can't do without a cup.
It does not matter what color, ethnic group or distance that they may be apart for a time, male/female couples, as a demographic group are the only couples that can have a child without a third party.
Sorry to burst your bubble, that makes us very.....very..... Different demographic groups.
Critical thinking is not exactly your strength.
Really?Heterosexual couples have the ability to do a certain something that same sex couples can't do without a cup.
It does not matter what color, ethnic group or distance that they may be apart for a time, male/female couples, as a demographic group are the only couples that can have a child without a third party.
Sorry to burst your bubble, that makes us very.....very..... Different demographic groups.
Critical thinking is not exactly your strength.
She and Kilt #2 are Dishonest, Bitter Twats... it's nothing new really.
peace...
douchebag...
Convicted child molesters can get a damn marriage license.
This has nothing to do with "protecting the sanctity of marriage" bull shit.
Folks hate gay folks, are ashamed of them in their families and do not want them to have equality under the law.
The dynamics within a male/female couple is vastly different than within a same sex couple. Only a fool would argue against that fact.
There is NOTHING unique in same sex coupling. There is in heterosexual couplings.
Facts hurt don't they?
That you need a copy of the birds and the bees!
Why?
Heterosexual couples have the ability to do a certain something that same sex couples can't do without a cup.
It does not matter what color, ethnic group or distance that they may be apart for a time, male/female couples, as a demographic group are the only couples that can have a child without a third party.
Sorry to burst your bubble, that makes us very.....very..... Different demographic groups.
Critical thinking is not exactly your strength.
The "dynamics" of a man on death row (no conjugal visits) is "vastly different" than any other couple...and still the SCOTUS had to rule on their RIGHT to marry.
Your imagined differences don't matter.
Demographic groups dear - demographic groups.
Your obsessive compulsions are truly what does not matter.
What are the "demographics" of a convicted murderer on death row, Pops? How come the SCOTUS says that we must let convicted murderers on death row marry if they want to? They can't have kids. There's no "dynamics" at all in the relationship of a convicted murderer.
Your "argument" failed out of the gate, Pops. It stumbled and fell flat at the starting line.
Convicted child molesters can get a damn marriage license.
This has nothing to do with "protecting the sanctity of marriage" bull shit.
Folks hate gay folks, are ashamed of them in their families and do not want them to have equality under the law.
The dynamics within a male/female couple is vastly different than within a same sex couple. Only a fool would argue against that fact.
There is NOTHING unique in same sex coupling. There is in heterosexual couplings.
Facts hurt don't they?
So what do those facts have to do with allowing gay folks to marry?
You support the dynamics of child molesters "coupling".
LOL, pop, give it up. Your arguments are foolish and you are searching anywhere for some reason to deny folks equality.
It does not affect you. Mind your own business.
Why?
Heterosexual couples have the ability to do a certain something that same sex couples can't do without a cup.
It does not matter what color, ethnic group or distance that they may be apart for a time, male/female couples, as a demographic group are the only couples that can have a child without a third party.
Sorry to burst your bubble, that makes us very.....very..... Different demographic groups.
Critical thinking is not exactly your strength.
No Pops, not all heterosexual couples do, many are incapable...as I've pointed out to you in the past. That simple fact renders any "argument" (and I use the term lightly) you think you have, utterly ridiculous.
Demographic groups dear - demographic groups.
Your obsessive compulsions are truly what does not matter.
What are the "demographics" of a convicted murderer on death row, Pops? How come the SCOTUS says that we must let convicted murderers on death row marry if they want to? They can't have kids. There's no "dynamics" at all in the relationship of a convicted murderer.
Your "argument" failed out of the gate, Pops. It stumbled and fell flat at the starting line.
It only fails because you want to take subgroups of the demographic group to fit your argument, not the group in its entirety. But you must to make any rational sense out of your nonsense.
You think because a convicted murder can procreate only in the same manner that you can procreate with your partner it bolsters your case? It's silly at best.
Let's say for example the killer married or is married. Upon appeal it's shown he is innocent, he gets out, he and his wife may be able to have a child that is conceived by sexual activity between the two.
A long shot for sure, but it can and does happen.
Birth as a result of same sex couplings have NEVER happened
You fail again
The dynamics that the convicted murderer and his wife has is still like comparing an fighter jet to a bicycle. Both are modes of transportation, but that's just about where any rational comparison ends.
Heterosexual couples have the ability to do a certain something that same sex couples can't do without a cup.
It does not matter what color, ethnic group or distance that they may be apart for a time, male/female couples, as a demographic group are the only couples that can have a child without a third party.
Sorry to burst your bubble, that makes us very.....very..... Different demographic groups.
Critical thinking is not exactly your strength.
No Pops, not all heterosexual couples do, many are incapable...as I've pointed out to you in the past. That simple fact renders any "argument" (and I use the term lightly) you think you have, utterly ridiculous.
Another subgroup argument. Many heterosexual couples are incapable, many wish they could, but because of a DISABILITY they cannot. It's actually very sad, but even sadder is that a group that can't, even though they are fertile would use these poor individuals as political fodder.
No Pops, not all heterosexual couples do, many are incapable...as I've pointed out to you in the past. That simple fact renders any "argument" (and I use the term lightly) you think you have, utterly ridiculous.
Another subgroup argument. Many heterosexual couples are incapable, many wish they could, but because of a DISABILITY they cannot. It's actually very sad, but even sadder is that a group that can't, even though they are fertile would use these poor individuals as political fodder.
What's sad is that you think one set of infertile couples "deserves" marriage while wanting to deny it to gay couples that are not infertile.
Another subgroup argument. Many heterosexual couples are incapable, many wish they could, but because of a DISABILITY they cannot. It's actually very sad, but even sadder is that a group that can't, even though they are fertile would use these poor individuals as political fodder.
What's sad is that you think one set of infertile couples "deserves" marriage while wanting to deny it to gay couples that are not infertile.
You should have been a comedian!
With only one of the two groups is fertility even an issue!
The two groups then are not even close to the same.
My god, I took the horse to water and it still won't drink!
What's sad is that you think one set of infertile couples "deserves" marriage while wanting to deny it to gay couples that are not infertile.
You should have been a comedian!
With only one of the two groups is fertility even an issue!
The two groups then are not even close to the same.
My god, I took the horse to water and it still won't drink!
Wrong, infertility is an issue with some straight couples. They use the same technologies that are used by gays to create their families. There is no difference in the "dynamics" of these couples.
Fertility is an "issue" with any couple that wants children. It's just not an issue with gays that don't want children...like older couples that marry. Again, no difference in the "dynamics".
You're gasping at straws fighting a losing battle with illogical ammunition.
Bumping for Pop to answer.Why?
Heterosexual couples have the ability to do a certain something that same sex couples can't do without a cup.
It does not matter what color, ethnic group or distance that they may be apart for a time, male/female couples, as a demographic group are the only couples that can have a child without a third party.
Sorry to burst your bubble, that makes us very.....very..... Different demographic groups.
Critical thinking is not exactly your strength.
Are those "certain things without a cup" a requirement for legal marriage? Yes or no.
Bumping for Pop to answer.Heterosexual couples have the ability to do a certain something that same sex couples can't do without a cup.
It does not matter what color, ethnic group or distance that they may be apart for a time, male/female couples, as a demographic group are the only couples that can have a child without a third party.
Sorry to burst your bubble, that makes us very.....very..... Different demographic groups.
Critical thinking is not exactly your strength.
Are those "certain things without a cup" a requirement for legal marriage? Yes or no.
Yeah right, there are going to be massive support and lawsuits demanding sisters to legally marry.
Can you believe the nonsense these kooks come up with?
Yeah right, there are going to be massive support and lawsuits demanding sisters to legally marry.
Can you believe the nonsense these kooks come up with?
Yeah right, there are going to be massive support and lawsuits demanding sisters to legally marry.
Can you believe the nonsense these kooks come up with?
Of course I can. Look at the ridiculous things bigots used to say about interracial marriage...
Almighty God created the races white, black, yellow, malay and red, and he placed them on separate continents. And but for the interference with his arrangement there would be no cause for such marriages. The fact that he separated the races shows that he did not intend for the races to mix. Judge Leon M. Bazile, January 6, 1959
"The purity of public morals, the moral and physical development of both races .require that they should be kept distinct and separate that connections and alliances so unnatural that God and nature seem to forbid them, should be prohibited by positive law, and be subject to no evasion." - Virginia Supreme Court 1878
"They cannot possibly have any progeny, and such a fact sufficiently justifies those laws which forbid the intermarriage of blacks and whites." - State v. Jackson. Missouri (1883)
"The amalgamation of the races is not only unnatural, but is always productive of deplorable results. Our daily observation shows us, that the offspring of these unnatural connections are generally sickly and effeminate [...]They are productive of evil, and evil only, without any corresponding good." - Scott v. Georgia (1869)
"By the laws of Massachusetts intermarriages between these races are forbidden as criminal. Why forbidden? Simply because natural instinct revolts at it as wrong." - Senator James R. Doolittle (D-WI), 1863
"Intermarriages between white persons and negroes or mulattoes were regarded as unnatural and immoral." - Scott v. Sandford (1857), Chief Justice Taney
Bumping for Pop to answer.Are those "certain things without a cup" a requirement for legal marriage? Yes or no.
The Answer is no... And in that you support Sisters Marrying.
peace...
What's sad is that you think one set of infertile couples "deserves" marriage while wanting to deny it to gay couples that are not infertile.
You should have been a comedian!
With only one of the two groups is fertility even an issue!
The two groups then are not even close to the same.
My god, I took the horse to water and it still won't drink!
Wrong, infertility is an issue with some straight couples. They use the same technologies that are used by gays to create their families. There is no difference in the "dynamics" of these couples.
Fertility is an "issue" with any couple that wants children. It's just not an issue with gays that don't want children...like older couples that marry. Again, no difference in the "dynamics".
You're gasping at straws fighting a losing battle with illogical ammunition.
