Can you count the number of Changes Obama has made to Obamacare?

[hjmick]

If he made one it was more than he is legally allowed...


But hey, what's a little cheating and law breaking between the ruling class and the unwashed masses?

 

[J.E.D]

No, idiot. As usual you get it wrong. Dems are undermining the Constitution by allowing Obama singlehandedly to rewrite black letter law they passed. If Dems were truly interested in rule of law they would be pushing loudest for impeachment. Like Republicans did with Nixon.

Democrats are undermining the Constitution by not pushing for impeachment when Obama has not made any impeachable offenses.

That's even dumber than your previous post.

Failing to carry out the oath of office is an impeachable offense. Your ignorance knows no bounds.

RESOLVED, That Richard M. Nixon, President of the United States, is impeached for high crimes and misdemeanours, and that the following articles of impeachment to be exhibited to the Senate:

ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT EXHIBITED BY THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IN THE NAME OF ITSELF AND OF ALL OF THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AGAINST RICHARD M. NIXON, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, IN MAINTENANCE AND SUPPORT OF ITS IMPEACHMENT AGAINST HIM FOR HIGH CRIMES AND MISDEMEANOURS.

ARTICLE 1

In his conduct of the office of President of the United States, Richard M. Nixon, in violation of his constitutional oath faithfully to execute the office of President of the United States and, to the best of his ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States, and in violation of his consitutional duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed, has prevented, obstructed, and impeded the administration of justice, in that:

Obama has committed no high crimes or misdemeanors. Obama has not kept any laws from being faithfully executed. You fail once again.

 

[billyerock1991]

Here is a chart that shows most of them.... And not a single change was approved by Congress.

How can Democrats support this?

Because it's all about power, namely theirs. They're fine with non constitutional exercise of power. As long as they are the ones doing it. Because it isn't about integrity, fairness, or rule of law. It's all about more power for Dems. And for the HNIC.

is it me or is it them ... there seems to be a list missing here or a web site with this invisable list...

finally ... I didn't know ron paul was from kenya

 

[The Rabbi]

Democrats are undermining the Constitution by not pushing for impeachment when Obama has not made any impeachable offenses.

That's even dumber than your previous post.

Failing to carry out the oath of office is an impeachable offense. Your ignorance knows no bounds.

RESOLVED, That Richard M. Nixon, President of the United States, is impeached for high crimes and misdemeanours, and that the following articles of impeachment to be exhibited to the Senate:

ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT EXHIBITED BY THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IN THE NAME OF ITSELF AND OF ALL OF THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AGAINST RICHARD M. NIXON, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, IN MAINTENANCE AND SUPPORT OF ITS IMPEACHMENT AGAINST HIM FOR HIGH CRIMES AND MISDEMEANOURS.

ARTICLE 1

In his conduct of the office of President of the United States, Richard M. Nixon, in violation of his constitutional oath faithfully to execute the office of President of the United States and, to the best of his ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States, and in violation of his consitutional duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed, has prevented, obstructed, and impeded the administration of justice, in that:

Obama has committed no high crimes or misdemeanors. Obama has not kept any laws from being faithfully executed. You fail once again.

Having had your ass kicked, you're back for more. Obama has failed to execute laws on many occasions, on immigration and on ACA. That's the issue here,Sparky.

 

[billyerock1991]

Of course they weren't approved. Why do that? That would be following the constitution they are working so hard to destroy

any time a dem does the same thing that republicans do all the time its now the dems are violating the law... ... go and read the god damn law for once in your life ...

 

[billyerock1991]

He HASN'T changed anything but the timing...he's the ADMINISTRATOR DUH...What's this, the Sean Rushbeck School of Constitutional Law lol...

that was funny

 

[billyerock1991]

He HASN'T changed anything but the timing...he's the ADMINISTRATOR DUH...What's this, the Sean Rushbeck School of Constitutional Law lol...

How do you like your kneepads? Have you worn them out yet?

Some would believe your lies if they were dumb enough.

Molon Labe

Translation=franco handed your head to you.. you had nothing to come back with accept insults ... typical repub-lie-tard

I'm still laughing "What's this, the Sean Rushbeck School of Constitutional Law" with chalk board and everything !!!!

 

[Antares]

Actually, they're delays in administration, which isn't unconstitutional, hater dupes...caused by compter issues and insurer/Pub noncooperation...by November Pubs are going to look awfully bad...

LOL you really are a moron franco.

 

[NYcarbineer]

No, idiot. As usual you get it wrong. Dems are undermining the Constitution by allowing Obama singlehandedly to rewrite black letter law they passed. If Dems were truly interested in rule of law they would be pushing loudest for impeachment. Like Republicans did with Nixon.

Democrats are undermining the Constitution by not pushing for impeachment when Obama has not made any impeachable offenses.

That's even dumber than your previous post.

Failing to carry out the oath of office is an impeachable offense. Your ignorance knows no bounds.

RESOLVED, That Richard M. Nixon, President of the United States, is impeached for high crimes and misdemeanours, and that the following articles of impeachment to be exhibited to the Senate:

ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT EXHIBITED BY THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IN THE NAME OF ITSELF AND OF ALL OF THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AGAINST RICHARD M. NIXON, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, IN MAINTENANCE AND SUPPORT OF ITS IMPEACHMENT AGAINST HIM FOR HIGH CRIMES AND MISDEMEANOURS.

ARTICLE 1

In his conduct of the office of President of the United States, Richard M. Nixon, in violation of his constitutional oath faithfully to execute the office of President of the United States and, to the best of his ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States, and in violation of his consitutional duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed, has prevented, obstructed, and impeded the administration of justice, in that:

Why did you stop at 'in that'?

Watergate Articles Of Impeachment

 

[Antares]

Can you count the number of changes made to Medicare or any law for that matter?

Were they made by congress or a tyrant president?

You can't be serious.

There will be many changes made. That's the way its supposed to work.

Jeez, I do get so sick of these constant lies and ignorance from the right.

Funny thing though...CONGRESS is the Legislative Branch....you didn't learn your Civics very well.

 

[The Rabbi]

Democrats are undermining the Constitution by not pushing for impeachment when Obama has not made any impeachable offenses.

That's even dumber than your previous post.

Failing to carry out the oath of office is an impeachable offense. Your ignorance knows no bounds.

RESOLVED, That Richard M. Nixon, President of the United States, is impeached for high crimes and misdemeanours, and that the following articles of impeachment to be exhibited to the Senate:

ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT EXHIBITED BY THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IN THE NAME OF ITSELF AND OF ALL OF THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AGAINST RICHARD M. NIXON, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, IN MAINTENANCE AND SUPPORT OF ITS IMPEACHMENT AGAINST HIM FOR HIGH CRIMES AND MISDEMEANOURS.

ARTICLE 1

In his conduct of the office of President of the United States, Richard M. Nixon, in violation of his constitutional oath faithfully to execute the office of President of the United States and, to the best of his ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States, and in violation of his consitutional duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed, has prevented, obstructed, and impeded the administration of justice, in that:

Why did you stop at 'in that'?

Watergate Articles Of Impeachment

Feel free to read the whole thing. But the articles make clear that violating the oath of office is an impeachable offense. Obama has certainly done that.

 

[oreo]

Here is a chart that shows most of them.... And not a single change was approved by Congress.

How can Democrats support this?

Because if they don't support it, they will be called RACISTS--that's why. The media--all the black leaders will be all over the news painting them as racists for going against our Health Care dictator and chief. They are not going to ruin their chances of getting re-elected by pissing off the black vote in this country.

 

[J.E.D]

Failing to carry out the oath of office is an impeachable offense. Your ignorance knows no bounds.

Obama has committed no high crimes or misdemeanors. Obama has not kept any laws from being faithfully executed. You fail once again.

Having had your ass kicked, you're back for more. Obama has failed to execute laws on many occasions, on immigration and on ACA. That's the issue here,Sparky.

Obama has taken executive privileges on some laws and has instructed his justice dept to de-prioritize the enforcement of some laws that Obama felt violated the rights of some people.

You fail once again. Over and over and over.

 

[hjmick]

Actually, they're delays in administration, which isn't unconstitutional, hater dupes...caused by compter issues and insurer/Pub noncooperation...by November Pubs are going to look awfully bad...

That's okay, you look bad everyday.

 

[driveby]

They had to pass it to find out what's in it............

 

[Antares]

Obama has committed no high crimes or misdemeanors. Obama has not kept any laws from being faithfully executed. You fail once again.

Having had your ass kicked, you're back for more. Obama has failed to execute laws on many occasions, on immigration and on ACA. That's the issue here,Sparky.

Obama has taken executive privileges on some laws and has instructed his justice dept to de-prioritize the enforcement of some laws that Obama felt violated the rights of some people.

You fail once again. Over and over and over.

Another constitutional illiterate.

Of course as the moron that you are would make the pointt that he is free to do that with any law he wants to.

 

[The Rabbi]

Obama has committed no high crimes or misdemeanors. Obama has not kept any laws from being faithfully executed. You fail once again.

Having had your ass kicked, you're back for more. Obama has failed to execute laws on many occasions, on immigration and on ACA. That's the issue here,Sparky.

Obama has taken executive privileges on some laws and has instructed his justice dept to de-prioritize the enforcement of some laws that Obama felt violated the rights of some people.

You fail once again. Over and over and over.

He has not taken "executive privilege" on any law precisely because there is no executive privilege when it comes to enforcing laws. Nor is there any privilege that says he can alter laws at will.
I cannot believe someone this ill informed isn't slinking away and instead doubles down on his stupidity and ignorance.