Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It is surprising that someone would post such a statement.Being attacked by gunboats....and the Vincennes was in Iranian territorial waters when the deed was done.We did shoot a missile at an airliner in Iran air space with a IFF beaconAmericans did not shoot a missile at an airliner taking off from one of its own airports.Oh really? Okay, describe them for us. You can start with our boat, in Iranian waters, shooting down a civilian plane in Iranian airspace.The circumstances surrounding that Iranian airliner accident were way different from this one.
And, go!
We actually claimed......I thought it was an F-14
Do you even realize that you’re trying to justify mass murder by Iranians?
Hostilities occurred in 2002......then we tried to use that to justify invading Iraq you dunce....remember how none of the hi-jackers came from Iraq -- majority of them came from Saudi Arabia -- but we decide to invade Iraq...the Iraq Resolution was in 2002 you dumb ass....and 18 years later we are still fighting the same fight....Did taking out Saddam scare the Iraqis into doing what we tell them??Maybe you have but it's obvious you aren't going to here. Maybe you condemned him saying he was going to pull out of Syria........but that was a lie.
I fully condemn Donald Trump for not taking credit for scaring the living bejesus out of the Iranians so much that they were literally shitting themselves shooting at every thing they saw in the sky, including the Moon and Venus!Next time maybe, the airport will contact the authorities and tell them they want to launch a flight right after a military barrage asking them if it is OK?
Because still fighting the same fight 18 years later tells me that they are not doing what we tell them
Your math needs work. We invaded Iraq in 2003, not 2001. That would be 16, almost 17 years ago, not 19.
When did hostilities actually occur, dumbass?
The AUMF was passed in October, so we have almost a year left to make it even 18 years.
Hostilities occurred in 2002......then we tried to use that to justify invading Iraq you dunce....remember how none of the hi-jackers came from Iraq -- majority of them came from Saudi Arabia -- but we decide to invade Iraq...the Iraq Resolution was in 2002 you dumb ass....and 18 years later we are still fighting the same fight....Did taking out Saddam scare the Iraqis into doing what we tell them??I fully condemn Donald Trump for not taking credit for scaring the living bejesus out of the Iranians so much that they were literally shitting themselves shooting at every thing they saw in the sky, including the Moon and Venus!
Because still fighting the same fight 18 years later tells me that they are not doing what we tell them
Your math needs work. We invaded Iraq in 2003, not 2001. That would be 16, almost 17 years ago, not 19.
When did hostilities actually occur, dumbass?
The AUMF was passed in October, so we have almost a year left to make it even 18 years.
And pussies like you are still trying to defend that dumb shit 18 years later...
Which is why when I see pussies like you try to disavow and claim you never worshipped these 2 guys -- I know you are full of shit....
View attachment 300145
Hostilities occurred in 2002......then we tried to use that to justify invading Iraq you dunce....remember how none of the hi-jackers came from Iraq -- majority of them came from Saudi Arabia -- but we decide to invade Iraq...the Iraq Resolution was in 2002 you dumb ass....and 18 years later we are still fighting the same fight....Did taking out Saddam scare the Iraqis into doing what we tell them??
Because still fighting the same fight 18 years later tells me that they are not doing what we tell them
Your math needs work. We invaded Iraq in 2003, not 2001. That would be 16, almost 17 years ago, not 19.
When did hostilities actually occur, dumbass?
The AUMF was passed in October, so we have almost a year left to make it even 18 years.
And pussies like you are still trying to defend that dumb shit 18 years later...
Which is why when I see pussies like you try to disavow and claim you never worshipped these 2 guys -- I know you are full of shit....
View attachment 300145
Ah, so you wanted to attack Saudi Arabia....I'd bet a years salary that had that happened you'd be bitching about that.
They are so dense that I see why neo-cons can so blatantly run the same play they did 18 years ago.....with little changes to the script....Hostilities occurred in 2002......then we tried to use that to justify invading Iraq you dunce....remember how none of the hi-jackers came from Iraq -- majority of them came from Saudi Arabia -- but we decide to invade Iraq...the Iraq Resolution was in 2002 you dumb ass....and 18 years later we are still fighting the same fight....Your math needs work. We invaded Iraq in 2003, not 2001. That would be 16, almost 17 years ago, not 19.
When did hostilities actually occur, dumbass?
The AUMF was passed in October, so we have almost a year left to make it even 18 years.
And pussies like you are still trying to defend that dumb shit 18 years later...
Which is why when I see pussies like you try to disavow and claim you never worshipped these 2 guys -- I know you are full of shit....
View attachment 300145
Ah, so you wanted to attack Saudi Arabia....I'd bet a years salary that had that happened you'd be bitching about that.
The argument was that it made more sense based upon the reasons we were gave to attack Saudi Arabia as opposed to Iraq. Not that either would have been justifiable.
Hostilities occurred in 2002......then we tried to use that to justify invading Iraq you dunce....remember how none of the hi-jackers came from Iraq -- majority of them came from Saudi Arabia -- but we decide to invade Iraq...the Iraq Resolution was in 2002 you dumb ass....and 18 years later we are still fighting the same fight....Your math needs work. We invaded Iraq in 2003, not 2001. That would be 16, almost 17 years ago, not 19.
When did hostilities actually occur, dumbass?
The AUMF was passed in October, so we have almost a year left to make it even 18 years.
And pussies like you are still trying to defend that dumb shit 18 years later...
Which is why when I see pussies like you try to disavow and claim you never worshipped these 2 guys -- I know you are full of shit....
View attachment 300145
Ah, so you wanted to attack Saudi Arabia....I'd bet a years salary that had that happened you'd be bitching about that.
The argument was that it made more sense based upon the reasons we were gave to attack Saudi Arabia as opposed to Iraq. Not that either would have been justifiable.
Yet most of the world did not buy in to the bluff and would not join Bush’s “Coalition of the Willing”Give me a good WMD joke for a president who ordered an invasion based on WMD's he knew didn't exist???You mean like when Bush was joking about looking for WMD's under his couch or table and saying "No WMD's there..." while tens of thousands of people were literally dying behind that lie -- yea, that was a real hoot....Because he is the President of the United States and we have to trust him to make decisions on our behalf
Nah, you people take it to the literal extreme...Nothing he says can ever be joking, or diverge from what you think he should say, and how he should say it, otherwise you attack....Dispicable...
Bush jokes about search for WMD, but it's no laughing matter for critics
I never said they were good jokes...
Something that families of dead soldiers and Iraqis would have had a good giggle about back in 2005...….
The only joke you have is in your hand when you take a leak!
Bush did not know they existed because the Iraqis created the illusion that they had a full blown WMD program, all of which were lies designed to keep other countries scared of them.
Fuk SaudiHostilities occurred in 2002......then we tried to use that to justify invading Iraq you dunce....remember how none of the hi-jackers came from Iraq -- majority of them came from Saudi Arabia -- but we decide to invade Iraq...the Iraq Resolution was in 2002 you dumb ass....and 18 years later we are still fighting the same fight....Did taking out Saddam scare the Iraqis into doing what we tell them??
Because still fighting the same fight 18 years later tells me that they are not doing what we tell them
Your math needs work. We invaded Iraq in 2003, not 2001. That would be 16, almost 17 years ago, not 19.
When did hostilities actually occur, dumbass?
The AUMF was passed in October, so we have almost a year left to make it even 18 years.
And pussies like you are still trying to defend that dumb shit 18 years later...
Which is why when I see pussies like you try to disavow and claim you never worshipped these 2 guys -- I know you are full of shit....
View attachment 300145
Ah, so you wanted to attack Saudi Arabia....I'd bet a years salary that had that happened you'd be bitching about that.
They are so dense that I see why neo-cons can so blatantly run the same play they did 18 years ago.....with little changes to the script....Hostilities occurred in 2002......then we tried to use that to justify invading Iraq you dunce....remember how none of the hi-jackers came from Iraq -- majority of them came from Saudi Arabia -- but we decide to invade Iraq...the Iraq Resolution was in 2002 you dumb ass....and 18 years later we are still fighting the same fight....
When did hostilities actually occur, dumbass?
The AUMF was passed in October, so we have almost a year left to make it even 18 years.
And pussies like you are still trying to defend that dumb shit 18 years later...
Which is why when I see pussies like you try to disavow and claim you never worshipped these 2 guys -- I know you are full of shit....
View attachment 300145
Ah, so you wanted to attack Saudi Arabia....I'd bet a years salary that had that happened you'd be bitching about that.
The argument was that it made more sense based upon the reasons we were gave to attack Saudi Arabia as opposed to Iraq. Not that either would have been justifiable.
I'm talking about Iran, ya moron.Democrats blamed it on trump. That’s the US. Imbecile. You’re a seditionist.LOLBecause they’re Iranians and they and democrats would blame it on the US, which they did.Idiot, why would the intentionally shoot down a Ukrainian flight mostly Iranians and no Americans?Bullshit!No they weren’t. Both were tragic mistakes in times of heightened tensions.
Who was firing on Iran when they shot down an airliner at their own airport? Nobody.
Your turban’s crooked.
You're an imbecile. They never blamed the U.S.. At first, they denied it was shot down. Then they admitted they did after they crash revealed it was, but said it was an accident.
That you have to lie to make the incident fit your bizarre narrative should have been your first clue you're an idiot.
Fuk SaudiHostilities occurred in 2002......then we tried to use that to justify invading Iraq you dunce....remember how none of the hi-jackers came from Iraq -- majority of them came from Saudi Arabia -- but we decide to invade Iraq...the Iraq Resolution was in 2002 you dumb ass....and 18 years later we are still fighting the same fight....Your math needs work. We invaded Iraq in 2003, not 2001. That would be 16, almost 17 years ago, not 19.
When did hostilities actually occur, dumbass?
The AUMF was passed in October, so we have almost a year left to make it even 18 years.
And pussies like you are still trying to defend that dumb shit 18 years later...
Which is why when I see pussies like you try to disavow and claim you never worshipped these 2 guys -- I know you are full of shit....
View attachment 300145
Ah, so you wanted to attack Saudi Arabia....I'd bet a years salary that had that happened you'd be bitching about that.
Yet most of the world did not buy in to the bluff and would not join Bush’s “Coalition of the Willing”Give me a good WMD joke for a president who ordered an invasion based on WMD's he knew didn't exist???You mean like when Bush was joking about looking for WMD's under his couch or table and saying "No WMD's there..." while tens of thousands of people were literally dying behind that lie -- yea, that was a real hoot....Nah, you people take it to the literal extreme...Nothing he says can ever be joking, or diverge from what you think he should say, and how he should say it, otherwise you attack....Dispicable...
Bush jokes about search for WMD, but it's no laughing matter for critics
I never said they were good jokes...
Something that families of dead soldiers and Iraqis would have had a good giggle about back in 2005...….
The only joke you have is in your hand when you take a leak!
Bush did not know they existed because the Iraqis created the illusion that they had a full blown WMD program, all of which were lies designed to keep other countries scared of them.
What did Iraq have to do with 9/11???Hostilities occurred in 2002......then we tried to use that to justify invading Iraq you dunce....remember how none of the hi-jackers came from Iraq -- majority of them came from Saudi Arabia -- but we decide to invade Iraq...the Iraq Resolution was in 2002 you dumb ass....and 18 years later we are still fighting the same fight....
When did hostilities actually occur, dumbass?
The AUMF was passed in October, so we have almost a year left to make it even 18 years.
And pussies like you are still trying to defend that dumb shit 18 years later...
Which is why when I see pussies like you try to disavow and claim you never worshipped these 2 guys -- I know you are full of shit....
View attachment 300145
Ah, so you wanted to attack Saudi Arabia....I'd bet a years salary that had that happened you'd be bitching about that.
The argument was that it made more sense based upon the reasons we were gave to attack Saudi Arabia as opposed to Iraq. Not that either would have been justifiable.
Ah, so when America is attacked, and civilians die, NO attack is justifiable....However, according to logic displayed by you, when others like Iran attack our interests, they ARE justified because you know.....United States....
Pathetic dude.
A Neo-con would be the one using the much debunked and utterly pathetic argument that you are currently using now...They are so dense that I see why neo-cons can so blatantly run the same play they did 18 years ago.....with little changes to the script....Hostilities occurred in 2002......then we tried to use that to justify invading Iraq you dunce....remember how none of the hi-jackers came from Iraq -- majority of them came from Saudi Arabia -- but we decide to invade Iraq...When did hostilities actually occur, dumbass?
The AUMF was passed in October, so we have almost a year left to make it even 18 years.
And pussies like you are still trying to defend that dumb shit 18 years later...
Which is why when I see pussies like you try to disavow and claim you never worshipped these 2 guys -- I know you are full of shit....
View attachment 300145
Ah, so you wanted to attack Saudi Arabia....I'd bet a years salary that had that happened you'd be bitching about that.
The argument was that it made more sense based upon the reasons we were gave to attack Saudi Arabia as opposed to Iraq. Not that either would have been justifiable.
You need a mirror moron.....Hell you don't even know what a "neocon" is....Hell, by reading how you use the term you seem to use it to describe anyone on the right you find objectionable when it comes to foreign and defense issues. And like most psuedo know it all's, you're lazy with it, and quite wrong.
Hostilities occurred in 2002......then we tried to use that to justify invading Iraq you dunce....remember how none of the hi-jackers came from Iraq -- majority of them came from Saudi Arabia -- but we decide to invade Iraq...the Iraq Resolution was in 2002 you dumb ass....and 18 years later we are still fighting the same fight....
When did hostilities actually occur, dumbass?
The AUMF was passed in October, so we have almost a year left to make it even 18 years.
And pussies like you are still trying to defend that dumb shit 18 years later...
Which is why when I see pussies like you try to disavow and claim you never worshipped these 2 guys -- I know you are full of shit....
View attachment 300145
Ah, so you wanted to attack Saudi Arabia....I'd bet a years salary that had that happened you'd be bitching about that.
The argument was that it made more sense based upon the reasons we were gave to attack Saudi Arabia as opposed to Iraq. Not that either would have been justifiable.
Ah, so when America is attacked, and civilians die, NO attack is justifiable....However, according to logic displayed by you, when others like Iran attack our interests, they ARE justified because you know.....United States....
Pathetic dude.
Agreed, but we need to clarify the point. The American people have no interest there but the 1% does, and since they run the country, they always get what they want.Hostilities occurred in 2002......then we tried to use that to justify invading Iraq you dunce....remember how none of the hi-jackers came from Iraq -- majority of them came from Saudi Arabia -- but we decide to invade Iraq...When did hostilities actually occur, dumbass?
The AUMF was passed in October, so we have almost a year left to make it even 18 years.
And pussies like you are still trying to defend that dumb shit 18 years later...
Which is why when I see pussies like you try to disavow and claim you never worshipped these 2 guys -- I know you are full of shit....
View attachment 300145
Ah, so you wanted to attack Saudi Arabia....I'd bet a years salary that had that happened you'd be bitching about that.
The argument was that it made more sense based upon the reasons we were gave to attack Saudi Arabia as opposed to Iraq. Not that either would have been justifiable.
Ah, so when America is attacked, and civilians die, NO attack is justifiable....However, according to logic displayed by you, when others like Iran attack our interests, they ARE justified because you know.....United States....
Pathetic dude.
Iraq NEVER attacked us. We have no interests in Iraq. Iran can not attack our interests there as we have no justifiable interests there.
Saudi Arabia had more to do with 9-11 than Iraq didFuk SaudiHostilities occurred in 2002......then we tried to use that to justify invading Iraq you dunce....remember how none of the hi-jackers came from Iraq -- majority of them came from Saudi Arabia -- but we decide to invade Iraq...the Iraq Resolution was in 2002 you dumb ass....and 18 years later we are still fighting the same fight....
When did hostilities actually occur, dumbass?
The AUMF was passed in October, so we have almost a year left to make it even 18 years.
And pussies like you are still trying to defend that dumb shit 18 years later...
Which is why when I see pussies like you try to disavow and claim you never worshipped these 2 guys -- I know you are full of shit....
View attachment 300145
Ah, so you wanted to attack Saudi Arabia....I'd bet a years salary that had that happened you'd be bitching about that.
Fell better, idiot?
Like I said...next time these dic suckers try to claim they never worshipped these guys.....
View attachment 300152
THEY ARE CLEARLY LYING......
What did Iraq have to do with 9/11???Hostilities occurred in 2002......then we tried to use that to justify invading Iraq you dunce....remember how none of the hi-jackers came from Iraq -- majority of them came from Saudi Arabia -- but we decide to invade Iraq...When did hostilities actually occur, dumbass?
The AUMF was passed in October, so we have almost a year left to make it even 18 years.
And pussies like you are still trying to defend that dumb shit 18 years later...
Which is why when I see pussies like you try to disavow and claim you never worshipped these 2 guys -- I know you are full of shit....
View attachment 300145
Ah, so you wanted to attack Saudi Arabia....I'd bet a years salary that had that happened you'd be bitching about that.
The argument was that it made more sense based upon the reasons we were gave to attack Saudi Arabia as opposed to Iraq. Not that either would have been justifiable.
Ah, so when America is attacked, and civilians die, NO attack is justifiable....However, according to logic displayed by you, when others like Iran attack our interests, they ARE justified because you know.....United States....
Pathetic dude.
