Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Monday morning QBing is all the rage now in America. The absurdity level reached it's climax with talikng head lawyers on the networks giving their "analysis" of the case having never read the mountain of evidence, discovery and motions filed during the case.
It is a sad day in America when we have good folks that vote, get summoned for jury duty, do not make petty excuses to avoid their civic duty, serve and sit for weeks without complaint and reach a verdict based solely on the evidence and not TV cable drama ONLY to be second guessed by those with no legal training whatsoever and were not at the trial.
It does not take "legal training" to have common sense. This woman was guilty as sin and she walked. She walked because the jury let her walk. What parent in their right mind does their "own investigation" when their child is missing? Who leads the police to offices where they don't actually work? What parent doesn't frantically call the police, the FBI, the local news, and every family member and friend they have to report their child is missing? Answer: the one who killed the child. Only the killer doesn't want anyone to know that a child is missing. Her grandparents were frantic when they finally realized their granddaughter was missing. Did you hear the panic in the voice of Casey Anthony's mother?!?!? This was as straight forward a case as has ever existed, and the jury inexplicably granted this psyco-path a license to murder.
They convicted Scott Peterson with circumstancial evidence. The prosecution never proved how Lacy Peterson and her unborn child (Connor) died. Yet, He is sitting out here in California on Death Row. The Jurors of the Casey Anthony case have their heads stuck up their asses. They must be on meds like the Anthonys. Somewhere, a village is missing 12 fucking idiots. ~BH
They convicted Scott Peterson with circumstancial evidence. The prosecution never proved how Lacy Peterson and her unborn child (Connor) died. Yet, He is sitting out here in California on Death Row. The Jurors of the Casey Anthony case have their heads stuck up their asses. They must be on meds like the Anthonys. Somewhere, a village is missing 12 fucking idiots. ~BH
And I commend the jury in that case also.
They, unlike you and I, SAW ALL OF THE EVIDENCE.
You watch too much TV.
The burden of proof is on the prosecution, not the defense. That was about the weakest capital murder case I have ever seen.
Not guilty is not innocent. If the government is not forced to prove their case what do we end up with?
Sad day in America when honest citizens are judged by those with no legal training and did not hear all of the evidence.
SCARY.
~BH
The most troubling part of being an American citizen is seeing here and everywhere the complete lack of any legal and Constitutional knowledge citizens have. Outright scary.
First of all, let me be perfectly clear. No doubt there are a lot of mad folks that believe Casey Anthony got away with murder in Florida, and you folks may be right!
She was a liar, a terrible mother and never worked at the places she stated. Folks, that has nothing to do with the burden of proof in a capital murder case. Never has and never will as the Judge's charges indicated 100 years ago, now and 100 years from now.
But most of the folks that are very upset over this verdict would do anything themselves to avoid jury duty and they brag about it when they do.
Maybe Anthony was involved in her daughter's death. For the uninformed masses here: The jury didn't say she was not involved. The finding was not "innocent". The finding was "not guilty". BIG DIFFERENCE which you folks have no clue about.
The jury stated that the prosecution did not prove their case. Something else for the uninformed: The prosecution has to prove each and every count in the INDICTMENT, specifically. In Scottish courts the jury can find "unproven" in criminal cases which is the same as not guilty here.
This case was a definite NOT PROVEN.
And it pisses me off also but I researched it and found out what happened.
The great power of the state was stopped by the people, the jury. And that is a good thing. The government wanted to kill Anthony's sorry ass and 12 common people stopped them from doing it. Just plain folks that stood between Anthony's sorry ass and the vast power of the government. And in America these folks that you legal scholars want to tar and feather were able to tell the government "STOP. You came up short in doing your job. You did not prove your case the way you stated you would in the indictment and opening statement. "
In America the government has the one most powerful exclusive power forbidden to every else. The state and only the state has the power to use deadly force and deprive citizens of life,property and liberty. The scenario you folks want is one that history has shown bringing dictators, kings, monarchies, theological governments and the like. In all of those past societies the accused like Anthony could be punished at the snap of a finger of a king, a preacher or dictator.
Well not the way we do it here and you folks are not appreacitive enough to know the difference.
In The United States of America, A NATION OF LAWS, NOT MEN and their different and various religous beliefs, we have 12 ordinary citizens that have the power, BY LAW, to stop the power of GOVERNMENT. It is called the jury. And we should be just as happy about the outcome of this trial as we are upset over it. Why? I do not want government appointees or bureaucrtats to be the ones that are the last defense AGAINST THE POWER OF GOVERNMENT determined to take the life and liberty away from someone.
Mad as hell? Blame the prosecutors. They over charged the case from the word go. The jury was charged that they had to eliminate every scenario possible concerning the cause of death to convict. They couldn't do that.
If any of your folks are wrongly accused of a crime how would you like it if there were capable jurors ready to hear YOUR CASE and they remembered the mob anger at the jury in this trial and found a way to avoid service as a result of that?
Everyone could be in that situation and everyone needs capable juries just like this one was.
Anytime you would like to be educated on The Constitution of The United States of America, just let me know and fire away. 
nice speech, but we are still entitled to our own opinions. I didn't watch every minute of the trial, but i did hear some things that the jury was not permitted to hear, just as they heard and saw some things that i didn't.
But it is still my opinion that casey anthony is guilty of murder. Possibly not premeditated, but guilty of murder.
I believe the jury screwed up.
And since this is america i'm allowed to say so.
Oh and no doubt the prosecution screwed up too....
Hi BH. Keepin the home fires burning I see.
Dude, where do you find the energy?
A non-profit group on Wednesday served Casey Anthony in jail with a lawsuit seeking to recoup more than $100,000 spent on the massive 2008 search for her 2-year-old daughter Caylee.
Search group sues Casey Anthony for costly efforts
A non-profit group on Wednesday served Casey Anthony in jail with a lawsuit seeking to recoup more than $100,000 spent on the massive 2008 search for her 2-year-old daughter Caylee.
Search group sues Casey Anthony for costly efforts
A non-profit group on Wednesday served Casey Anthony in jail with a lawsuit seeking to recoup more than $100,000 spent on the massive 2008 search for her 2-year-old daughter Caylee.
That will not make it past summary judgement.
You Have a Right To Lie to the Police
In Casey Anthonys case we see an example of a grave injustice in the modern system. Im not talking about her acquittal. When the prosecutor fails to prove someones guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, the only responsible thing for the jury to do is refuse to damn the suspect to time in a cage. An innocent person imprisoned is so much worse than a guilty person let go, as in the former instance the state seduces all of society to cheer on and legitimize an injustice. Also, whereas justice for the guilty is at least a metaphysical possibility outside of prison, it is downright precluded institutionally for the innocent on the inside.
The actual travesty here is the offense of which Casey Anthony has been convicted: four counts of providing false information to a law enforcement officer. This should not be an offense in a free society, and I am struck by how little this horror has gained attention in the last week.
Lying in most circumstances is immoral. And lying to cover up ones crimes might be especially egregious, and arguably criminal in itself. But Casey Anthony was acquitted of the actual crime of murder. As far as the state is concerned, she has not been proven guilty. So why is her dishonesty with the police an offense against the law?
The Right to Lie to the Cops by Anthony Gregory
.
~BH
Payment Due
~BH
