Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The "general population"? Please humor us with how you have to be part of the "general population" to be counted.
Sure it matters.
A lot of women have more than one child. Shocking I know.
Please humor us with how you have to be part of the "general population" to be counted.
Sure it matters.
A lot of women have more than one child. Shocking I know.
You deranged leftists. People have to be 18 to vote but if they are under 18 they are still a person.Given the right wing's desire to call a fetus a person...it brings up an interesting question relative to the Census.
Check out this graph.
View attachment 535563
Whites are not reproducing very fast compared to other ethnicities. So it stands to reason that at any given time, there are more pregnant Hispanic, black, "other", and Native American women than their are white women.
Are the right wing folks really comfortable with counting every pregnant woman in LA, Atlanta, NYC...twice (at least)?
These are your people. This person believes that a fetus is automatically 18, which is how old you have to be to vote.Going for the theater of the absurd tonight Candy?
Jurisdiction...wow... That's nuts.Well, you technically not IN the US yet. I mean, sure, physically where you are is in the womb, but you've not actually arrived in the US yet. Also, while in the womb, you are under the jurisdiction of your mother, once born, you are in the jurisdiction of the US.
Yeah but the now is all that matters. If someone is pregnant; they will be counted twice. They have 4 or 5 kids in a 10 year period. I'm sure someone could dumb it down further for you.... I just can't reach that depth.No, it doesn't matter. I mean, again, eventually they will all be counted regardless. Whether its now, or in 9 months.
You don't sound like your from one of the intelligent races..The actual issue Candycorn brings up are why are intelligent races having offspring as much as those of lesser intelligent? Or is the question why is it less intelligent races (who rely on intelligent races to pay their expenses via welfare) apparently engage in reckless behavior more than intelligent races? That said, the US Constitution has a remedy for that in counting less intelligent occupants as a percentage (2/3rds ?) of an intelligent citizen.
Well if someone murders a pregnant woman he gets tried for killing 2.You would think so....
But isn't there a movement that would consider a fetus a human being?
If the fetus is a person...they have to be counted right? How you going to do that?
Ok, how about this:Jurisdiction...wow... That's nuts.
Yeah but the now is all that matters. If someone is pregnant; they will be counted twice. They have 4 or 5 kids in a 10 year period. I'm sure someone could dumb it down further for you.... I just can't reach that depth.
Yeah but the now is all that matters. If someone is pregnant; they will be counted twice. They have 4 or 5 kids in a 10 year period. I'm sure someone could dumb it down further for you.... I just can't reach that depth.
For decades prosecutors have charged perps with 2 counts if they kill a pregnant woman and the baby dies. The convictions stand.You would think so....
But isn't there a movement that would consider a fetus a human being?
If the fetus is a person...they have to be counted right? How you going to do that?
Sounds like you can be a person before you’re born? Interesting “logic”Ok, how about this:
"All persons BORN in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof shall be citizens"
So, basically, constitutionally, until you are born, you are not a citizen.
Ok, I guess I don't get it. You're saying count then now, while in the womb, im saying if you count them now, or down the road when they are born, its all the same. If a couple has 4 or 5 kids in a 10 year period, there are going to be 4 or 5 more kids counted in the census whether it be 9 months early or 9 months later.
The whole point of my response was to your question of, "do we count them on the census for representation", and i gave you two answers.
In the second one, I said, if you want to count them in the census, then you admit they are a person, and confer all the rights a person has, which includes the right to LIFE.
So you're also voting "Yes" to the OP. Sounds unanimous. Mother motion carries.For decades prosecutors have charged perps with 2 counts if they kill a pregnant woman and the baby dies. The convictions stand.
Like Santa Claus does, it's always good to check your math. In terms of the census, sure. Take the average number of children born per year per childbearing aged woman and multiply by 10.Should Pregnant Women Count Twice (or more)?
Sounds like you can be a person before you’re born? Interesting “logic”
Are women counted at all in Texas, or if they are perhaps they are a 3/5Given the right wing's desire to call a fetus a person...it brings up an interesting question relative to the Census.
Check out this graph.
View attachment 535563
Whites are not reproducing very fast compared to other ethnicities. So it stands to reason that at any given time, there are more pregnant Hispanic, black, "other", and Native American women than their are white women.
Are the right wing folks really comfortable with counting every pregnant woman in LA, Atlanta, NYC...twice (at least)?
Good griefGiven the right wing's desire to call a fetus a person...it brings up an interesting question relative to the Census.
Check out this graph.
View attachment 535563
Whites are not reproducing very fast compared to other ethnicities. So it stands to reason that at any given time, there are more pregnant Hispanic, black, "other", and Native American women than their are white women.
Are the right wing folks really comfortable with counting every pregnant woman in LA, Atlanta, NYC...twice (at least)?
Sure, you can count them. We'll just have to shut down abortion clinics of the next ten years to make sure nobody cheats. Sound fair?Given the right wing's desire to call a fetus a person...it brings up an interesting question relative to the Census.
Check out this graph.
View attachment 535563
Whites are not reproducing very fast compared to other ethnicities. So it stands to reason that at any given time, there are more pregnant Hispanic, black, "other", and Native American women than their are white women.
Are the right wing folks really comfortable with counting every pregnant woman in LA, Atlanta, NYC...twice (at least)?
I didn't say that, you are insinuating that. I was merely answering your hypothetical question.Sounds like you can be a person before you’re born? Interesting “logic”
Interesting proposition!Given the right wing's desire to call a fetus a person...it brings up an interesting question relative to the Census.
Check out this graph.
View attachment 535563
Whites are not reproducing very fast compared to other ethnicities. So it stands to reason that at any given time, there are more pregnant Hispanic, black, "other", and Native American women than their are white women.
Are the right wing folks really comfortable with counting every pregnant woman in LA, Atlanta, NYC...twice (at least)?
Apparently not.You deranged leftists. People have to be 18 to vote but if they are under 18 they are still a person.
