Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This was a fantastic submission from Trump, thanks for posting it. Trump was standing up for "whites, blacks, asians, and hispanics", and of course there was absolutely nothing that targeted any specific race. It is great that Trump stood up for the entire community like that, and that he condemned murderers and rapists above and beyond the CP5. He was already on his way to being a great leader.
Looks like somebody let you get back to the debate of their innocence or guilt. You can keep righties spinning their wheels for days debating that stuff, and you will never have to answer up to what makes Trump's comments racially motivated.There was no evidence proving them guiltyThey make a big mistake by arguing for innocence of these nasty savages. The evidence clearly shows them to be guilty. They should be re-arrested, convicted AGAIN, and locked up for life. All the money they got from idiot New York politicians, should be seized, and restored back to public funds.People call them thugs because of their brutal actions, you ignorant fucking dumbass.But I got time to day....
First of all.....to continue to refer to these men as thugs is just one evidentiary item of your OWN RACISM.....
Here's what they did, in their own words. Granted they each try to minimize what they did. The one thug says it was his first rape, as if that makes him not such a bad guy, and another says he tried to rape her but couldn't get it in, as if that makes him innocent.
Lefties want to keep the debate about the innocence of the CP5 alive, as if their innocence would somehow prove that Trump's comments about these thugs were racially motivated. Since there is no evidence that would prove that Trump's comments were racially motivated, not even the innocence of the CP5 if they could prove it, lefties will avoid discussing evidence that proves his comments were racially motivated. Lefties will always keep any CP5 discussion limited to debates about their innocence. If you try to steer lefties away from discussions of their innocence and over to evidence that Trump's comments were racially motivated, you will be shocked at what a fight they put up.
July 25, 2018 - CENTRAL PARK RAPISTS: TRUMP WAS RIGHT
Obviously, there was enough evidence to prove them guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. The eyewitness evidence was overwhelming.There was no evidence proving them guiltyThey make a big mistake by arguing for innocence of these nasty savages. The evidence clearly shows them to be guilty. They should be re-arrested, convicted AGAIN, and locked up for life. All the money they got from idiot New York politicians, should be seized, and restored back to public funds.People call them thugs because of their brutal actions, you ignorant fucking dumbass.But I got time to day....
First of all.....to continue to refer to these men as thugs is just one evidentiary item of your OWN RACISM.....
Here's what they did, in their own words. Granted they each try to minimize what they did. The one thug says it was his first rape, as if that makes him not such a bad guy, and another says he tried to rape her but couldn't get it in, as if that makes him innocent.
Lefties want to keep the debate about the innocence of the CP5 alive, as if their innocence would somehow prove that Trump's comments about these thugs were racially motivated. Since there is no evidence that would prove that Trump's comments were racially motivated, not even the innocence of the CP5 if they could prove it, lefties will avoid discussing evidence that proves his comments were racially motivated. Lefties will always keep any CP5 discussion limited to debates about their innocence. If you try to steer lefties away from discussions of their innocence and over to evidence that Trump's comments were racially motivated, you will be shocked at what a fight they put up.
July 25, 2018 - CENTRAL PARK RAPISTS: TRUMP WAS RIGHT
They also make statements based on THEIR often goofy definitions of things, sometimes not even being aware that those definitions are only being accepted by THEM.He thinks that if he lies and says he already posted the evidence, he somehow wins the debate. Its the kind of tactic you might expect from a 10-12 year old. His IQ is obviously very low.I must have missed itYou are talking out your ass and calling it candy. I already gave you the evidence you asked for. Its on you to accept it. Not my job to convince you to accept it.You are asserting that there is evidence that proves Trump is a racist, and that his comments about the CP5 were racially motivated. Your assertions are based on what you want to be true, but you have never actually seen any actual evidence that proves your emotional assertions are true. You have had allegations, gish gallop, dismissed cases, secondhand quotes, and propaganda presented to you by those who want you to believe these things, and you have come to have faith that they are somehow equal to real evidence that can be substantiated, but there is a reason why no lefty on this forum has ever been able to post actual evidence that can be substantiated. You've been duped, and you can't see it even when you cannot find ANY evidence that proves he is racist.
Post it again.
I've been noticing that lefites are counting, unsupported denials or flat assertions as "proving something".
Indeed, I've noted a couple of times, where they structure a sentence, as though the second part of the sentence supports their claim in the first, and it doesn't, not at all.
BUt they pretend it did.
I think, they are getting worse.
They live in a little world of disinformation and information ommission, coming to them from their leftist information manipulated media.
Then they are aghast at anything that doesn't fit into their little left media compartments, and they demand proof from conservatives, while only accepting their "studies" as proof, which really are nothing more than agenda-driven leftist propaganda.
Example:. When I offered as proof of Affirmative Action discrimination, the real bodies of thousands minority ,(mostly black) employees at 2 VA hospitals, and almost total abscence of whites (especially males), + hundreds more examples at 2 govt job centers, they denied this to be evidence.
How was he standing up for Blacks when he wouldnt rent to them?This was a fantastic submission from Trump, thanks for posting it. Trump was standing up for "whites, blacks, asians, and hispanics", and of course there was absolutely nothing that targeted any specific race. It is great that Trump stood up for the entire community like that, and that he condemned murderers and rapists above and beyond the CP5. He was already on his way to being a great leader.
People call them thugs because of their brutal actions, you ignorant fucking dumbass.But I got time to day....
First of all.....to continue to refer to these men as thugs is just one evidentiary item of your OWN RACISM.....
Here's what they did, in their own words. Granted they each try to minimize what they did. For instance, the one thug, Korey Wise, says it was his first rape, as if that makes him not such a bad guy, and another thug Antron McCray, says he held her down while others raped her, and he tried to rape her but couldn't actually get it in, as if that somehow makes him innocent.
They left her there for dead after the gang rape and some of them were literally jumping for joy as they left the scene. That's why people think they are thugs.
Obviously, there was enough evidence to prove them guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. The eyewitness evidence was overwhelming.There was no evidence proving them guiltyThey make a big mistake by arguing for innocence of these nasty savages. The evidence clearly shows them to be guilty. They should be re-arrested, convicted AGAIN, and locked up for life. All the money they got from idiot New York politicians, should be seized, and restored back to public funds.People call them thugs because of their brutal actions, you ignorant fucking dumbass.But I got time to day....
First of all.....to continue to refer to these men as thugs is just one evidentiary item of your OWN RACISM.....
Here's what they did, in their own words. Granted they each try to minimize what they did. The one thug says it was his first rape, as if that makes him not such a bad guy, and another says he tried to rape her but couldn't get it in, as if that makes him innocent.
Lefties want to keep the debate about the innocence of the CP5 alive, as if their innocence would somehow prove that Trump's comments about these thugs were racially motivated. Since there is no evidence that would prove that Trump's comments were racially motivated, not even the innocence of the CP5 if they could prove it, lefties will avoid discussing evidence that proves his comments were racially motivated. Lefties will always keep any CP5 discussion limited to debates about their innocence. If you try to steer lefties away from discussions of their innocence and over to evidence that Trump's comments were racially motivated, you will be shocked at what a fight they put up.
July 25, 2018 - CENTRAL PARK RAPISTS: TRUMP WAS RIGHT
Obviously, there was enough evidence to prove them guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. The eyewitness evidence was overwhelming.There was no evidence proving them guiltyThey make a big mistake by arguing for innocence of these nasty savages. The evidence clearly shows them to be guilty. They should be re-arrested, convicted AGAIN, and locked up for life. All the money they got from idiot New York politicians, should be seized, and restored back to public funds.People call them thugs because of their brutal actions, you ignorant fucking dumbass.But I got time to day....
First of all.....to continue to refer to these men as thugs is just one evidentiary item of your OWN RACISM.....
Here's what they did, in their own words. Granted they each try to minimize what they did. The one thug says it was his first rape, as if that makes him not such a bad guy, and another says he tried to rape her but couldn't get it in, as if that makes him innocent.
Lefties want to keep the debate about the innocence of the CP5 alive, as if their innocence would somehow prove that Trump's comments about these thugs were racially motivated. Since there is no evidence that would prove that Trump's comments were racially motivated, not even the innocence of the CP5 if they could prove it, lefties will avoid discussing evidence that proves his comments were racially motivated. Lefties will always keep any CP5 discussion limited to debates about their innocence. If you try to steer lefties away from discussions of their innocence and over to evidence that Trump's comments were racially motivated, you will be shocked at what a fight they put up.
July 25, 2018 - CENTRAL PARK RAPISTS: TRUMP WAS RIGHT
See post #66.Obviously, there was enough evidence to prove them guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. The eyewitness evidence was overwhelming.There was no evidence proving them guiltyThey make a big mistake by arguing for innocence of these nasty savages. The evidence clearly shows them to be guilty. They should be re-arrested, convicted AGAIN, and locked up for life. All the money they got from idiot New York politicians, should be seized, and restored back to public funds.People call them thugs because of their brutal actions, you ignorant fucking dumbass.
Here's what they did, in their own words. Granted they each try to minimize what they did. The one thug says it was his first rape, as if that makes him not such a bad guy, and another says he tried to rape her but couldn't get it in, as if that makes him innocent.
Lefties want to keep the debate about the innocence of the CP5 alive, as if their innocence would somehow prove that Trump's comments about these thugs were racially motivated. Since there is no evidence that would prove that Trump's comments were racially motivated, not even the innocence of the CP5 if they could prove it, lefties will avoid discussing evidence that proves his comments were racially motivated. Lefties will always keep any CP5 discussion limited to debates about their innocence. If you try to steer lefties away from discussions of their innocence and over to evidence that Trump's comments were racially motivated, you will be shocked at what a fight they put up.
July 25, 2018 - CENTRAL PARK RAPISTS: TRUMP WAS RIGHT
There was no such eyewitness evidence and the person who committed the crime testified to doing so. Therefore all this talk by people like you looking for reasons to continue trying to say they are guilty is built upon psychosis.
Fact: Trump rented to hundreds of blacks.How was he standing up for Blacks when he wouldnt rent to them?This was a fantastic submission from Trump, thanks for posting it. Trump was standing up for "whites, blacks, asians, and hispanics", and of course there was absolutely nothing that targeted any specific race. It is great that Trump stood up for the entire community like that, and that he condemned murderers and rapists above and beyond the CP5. He was already on his way to being a great leader.
Not if he had a choiceFact: Trump rented to hundreds of blacks.How was he standing up for Blacks when he wouldnt rent to them?This was a fantastic submission from Trump, thanks for posting it. Trump was standing up for "whites, blacks, asians, and hispanics", and of course there was absolutely nothing that targeted any specific race. It is great that Trump stood up for the entire community like that, and that he condemned murderers and rapists above and beyond the CP5. He was already on his way to being a great leader.
Not until after he was sued.Fact: Trump rented to hundreds of blacks.How was he standing up for Blacks when he wouldnt rent to them?This was a fantastic submission from Trump, thanks for posting it. Trump was standing up for "whites, blacks, asians, and hispanics", and of course there was absolutely nothing that targeted any specific race. It is great that Trump stood up for the entire community like that, and that he condemned murderers and rapists above and beyond the CP5. He was already on his way to being a great leader.
Maybe he was a black ass hole .. are you Immune to criticism?How was he standing up for Blacks when he wouldnt rent to them?This was a fantastic submission from Trump, thanks for posting it. Trump was standing up for "whites, blacks, asians, and hispanics", and of course there was absolutely nothing that targeted any specific race. It is great that Trump stood up for the entire community like that, and that he condemned murderers and rapists above and beyond the CP5. He was already on his way to being a great leader.
Drumpf has never been Black. An asshole yes but never Black.Maybe he was a black ass hole .. are you Immune to criticism?How was he standing up for Blacks when he wouldnt rent to them?This was a fantastic submission from Trump, thanks for posting it. Trump was standing up for "whites, blacks, asians, and hispanics", and of course there was absolutely nothing that targeted any specific race. It is great that Trump stood up for the entire community like that, and that he condemned murderers and rapists above and beyond the CP5. He was already on his way to being a great leader.
Who said he wasDrumpf has never been Black. An asshole yes but never Black.Maybe he was a black ass hole .. are you Immune to criticism?How was he standing up for Blacks when he wouldnt rent to them?This was a fantastic submission from Trump, thanks for posting it. Trump was standing up for "whites, blacks, asians, and hispanics", and of course there was absolutely nothing that targeted any specific race. It is great that Trump stood up for the entire community like that, and that he condemned murderers and rapists above and beyond the CP5. He was already on his way to being a great leader.
You did. Who were you talking about when you said this?....."Maybe he was a black ass hole"Who said he wasDrumpf has never been Black. An asshole yes but never Black.Maybe he was a black ass hole .. are you Immune to criticism?How was he standing up for Blacks when he wouldnt rent to them?This was a fantastic submission from Trump, thanks for posting it. Trump was standing up for "whites, blacks, asians, and hispanics", and of course there was absolutely nothing that targeted any specific race. It is great that Trump stood up for the entire community like that, and that he condemned murderers and rapists above and beyond the CP5. He was already on his way to being a great leader.
Are you this narcissistic about your race lol follow the postYou did. Who were you talking about when you said this?....."Maybe he was a black ass hole"Who said he wasDrumpf has never been Black. An asshole yes but never Black.Maybe he was a black ass hole .. are you Immune to criticism?How was he standing up for Blacks when he wouldnt rent to them?This was a fantastic submission from Trump, thanks for posting it. Trump was standing up for "whites, blacks, asians, and hispanics", and of course there was absolutely nothing that targeted any specific race. It is great that Trump stood up for the entire community like that, and that he condemned murderers and rapists above and beyond the CP5. He was already on his way to being a great leader.
I did follow the post. You didnt answer my question. Who is this he you are referring to if it wasnt Drumpf?Are you this narcissistic about your race lol follow the postYou did. Who were you talking about when you said this?....."Maybe he was a black ass hole"Who said he wasDrumpf has never been Black. An asshole yes but never Black.Maybe he was a black ass hole .. are you Immune to criticism?How was he standing up for Blacks when he wouldnt rent to them?
You said he wouldn’t rent out to black people I said what if the black people were fucking assholes.. are you not supposed to be treated equally? Do you know what assholes get nothing and that’s with those fucking blacks got nothing assimulate motherfuckerI did follow the post. You didnt answer my question. Who is this he you are referring to if it wasnt Drumpf?Are you this narcissistic about your race lol follow the postYou did. Who were you talking about when you said this?....."Maybe he was a black ass hole"Who said he wasDrumpf has never been Black. An asshole yes but never Black.Maybe he was a black ass hole .. are you Immune to criticism?
