Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I used to take a stance like this, but even in the absence of a welfare state, you run across a Constitutional issue due to our citizenship by birth policy. Open borders mean people can show up and have kids here that become citizens automatically. Even with no welfare state, that can be problematic over time. We need a jus sanguinis policy instead of a jus soli one for open borders to be truly feasible.Regardless, I'm actually for no-passport open borders....If you're a citizen of country X, you can have legit non-counterfeitable ID to prove that you're home is there...100% freedom of travel.
One non-nogotiable proviso: No welfare state, at any level...Then anyone who came to our shores would either have the means to support themselves, or get a job and do so.....You want to be a permanent citizen, that's another set of criteria to meet.
It's contradictory. Some of them can even do it in one post. I just laugh.I don't know why Trump supporters oppose the shot so much. And the weird thing about it, they'll bash anyone who got it, but don't say a words about how Trump pushed it. Then said he saved 10's of millions of lives by getting it out to the public.
If Biden had said something to that effect, they'd have been on him like white on rice. But with Trump, it was crickets.
Yeah, it's not as though convincing me to vote is likely to benefit him in any possible way.Well, I'd like to be part of that problem too. Sign me up!
Some people just care about democracy. A lot!Yeah, it's not as though convincing me to vote is likely to benefit him in any possible way.
Abusive is a very nice way to put it lolSome people just care about democracy. A lot! I can take it or leave it. Inflicting the will of the majority on everyone else is frequently abusive and usually unnecessary.
I could find him saying it but here’s his platform.Do you have a source for him not wanting border patrol agents and to abolish ice? No border restrictions is incorrect. Drag queen thingy, is up for debate.
www.votechaseoliver.com
Love it when they play the hits.Very soon there’ll be the not voting for x is a vote for y fallacy.
That one is taken as a given. Regardless of who gets elected, their election will be blamed on people who didn't vote for them. The whole thing has a real Lewis Carroll vibe to it.Very soon there’ll be the not voting for x is a vote for y fallacy.
That'd be his argument right up until he convinces me to vote for whoever he doesn't like, then I'd be evil or dumb or something.Some people just care about democracy. A lot!
I can take it or leave it. Inflicting the will of the majority on everyone else is frequently abusive and usually unnecessary.
And it says nothing of the sort. He just wants to make it easier. Like we used to do. With a good vetting process. I would like some clarification on that part though.I could find him saying it but here’s his platform.
PLATFORM | CHASE FOR PRESIDENT
A lot of just let everyone in there. And some other crazy shit.
There should be no welfare state for citizens either.I used to take a stance like this, but even in the absence of a welfare state, you run across a Constitutional issue due to our citizenship by birth policy. Open borders mean people can show up and have kids here that become citizens automatically. Even with no welfare state, that can be problematic over time. We need a jus sanguinis policy instead of a jus soli one for open borders to be truly feasible.
Does his platform support your claim?I could find him saying it but here’s his platform.
The states have that call constitutionally but I do agree.There should be no welfare state for citizens either.
Shucks. Seems to me it'd be the people who keep voting for trash and being shocked when they get it.
He has some good policy positions and a lot of bad ones:Very compactly stated...
Libertarians choose Chase Oliver as presidential nominee, rejecting Trump, RFK Jr.
The Libertarian Party nominated party activist Chase Oliver for president, rejecting Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s bid for the nomination.www.cbsnews.com
Oliver is an activist from Atlanta who previously ran for the U.S. Senate and U.S. House from Georgia. On his campaign website, he calls for major cuts to the federal budget with a view toward balancing the budget, abolishing the death penalty, closing all overseas military bases and ending military support to Israel and Ukraine
Well, I'd like to be part of that problem too. Sign me up!
