Are you going to logically argue your position or just continue to make irrational conclusions about a complete stranger?
His question is a very relevant one. You were the one making claims about what waterboarding is like and that SEALS go through much more painful training than water torture and how the psychological effect on them was effective and that's why 100% cooperated.
You've put your expertise about Seals training and response to waterboarding in issue.
Your experience with the Seals is very much a fair question.
So you want to distract from a logical conversation also? My conclusions about waterboarding is in black and white I have posted links explaining my position logically. Now exactly how does military service enter into the conversation?
Because your statements about the Seals is not logical conclusion but assertions as to what their training is like.
You said that they do more painful things that getting waterboarded. How do you know that if you have never been water boarded or gone thru Seal training?