For the idiots, nothing runs forever, and the second law of thermodynamics has nothing to do with that simple statement of fact.
Perpetual motion comes pretty close to running forever.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
For the idiots, nothing runs forever, and the second law of thermodynamics has nothing to do with that simple statement of fact.
now take this into consideration...
35 miles takes electricity that comes from oil....
The rest...or 375 miles comes from gasoline...a bi product of oil refining.
So exactly how is that helping our dependency on oil?
What is the cost of dismantling these things when they reach the end of their lifespans? Not like they can go to the crusher.
You take the battery out first. Duh duh duh dittohead. Why don't you find out instead of asking stupid fear mongering questions, Rush?
Did I claim the rebate was from GM? No.$40,000, and then a $7,500 rebate, bringing it down to $32,500.
Still a little pricey for a Chevy with new technology and no track record. The Nissan Leaf is a better deal, and at today's gas prices, you would break even in seven years.
From 2011:
At the $3.54 per gallon national average on Mar. 10, a typical car buyer would break even in seven years and save almost $6,000 over 12 years, according to Bloomberg New Energy Finance.
The 'REBATE' isn't from GM, but taxpayer dollars from the government. IOW, those that can't afford that type of sticker price are helping foot the bill for the RICH. Indeed, Obama wants to make it $10k in taxpayer cash to the buyers.
Wingnut FAIL.
If most people drove electric cars we would eliminate most of our air pollution, green house gases, and we could be energy independent. However, an electric car, such as the Volt has serious drawback, a limited range on battery, lack of a developed network of charging stations, and a higher price than competing gas models. These problems can all be solved once enough of these cars are sold. I think a subsidy which decreases yearly like we did with hybrids is proper. It helps put more of these cars on the road which is good for the country.I see nothing wrong with government providing some subsidy for an electric car, high efficiency light bulbs, recycling, or any new product or service that would benefit society as long as the subsidy has a limited life.yes, congress and namely the pres. have kept the industry in check, providing exploratory licenses is one thing, then granting production leases is wholly another.
The natural gas boom is being driven purely by private domain, federal lands account for less than 15% of the productive fields. Obama has zip to do with it BUT the EPA is doing their level best to interfere, but thats a great deal harder on privately leased land.
now you're just making things up....
peak Oil or fossil fuel peak is BS, period.
the technology is not there yet, we have 5 national laboratories where in we spend billions to foster R&D on Green tech., they are on it.
When the tech. creates an efficient method of electrical power for vehicles, it won't be a secret, we are still at least a decade away.
Ecology has zip to do with it. The Volt is a mess, its cramped, its range is not very good, and the price precludes mass consumption, not even close to that. It is a boutique vehicle, GM did their level best with ala the federal help they needed to make it work, so IF IT COULD WORK, they wold not be pulling it.
Unless of course you are in favor of just paying GM outright to make them, AND then having them via a transfer of tax dollars to them, so they could drop the price to say 15-25k range....thats just nuts, period, why not just give them away.
Yep. Neither does GE. $$$$$$$$$$$$$
If most people drove electric cars we would eliminate most of our air pollution, green house gases, and we could be energy independent. However, an electric car, such as the Volt has serious drawback, a limited range on battery, lack of a developed network of charging stations, and a higher price than competing gas models. I think a subsidy which decreases yearly like we did with hybrids is proper. It helps put more of these cars on the road which is good for the country.I see nothing wrong with government providing some subsidy for an electric car, high efficiency light bulbs, recycling, or any new product or service that would benefit society as long as the subsidy has a limited life.
Yep. Neither does GE. $$$$$$$$$$$$$
That is because instead of providing funding for research to find other alternatives and allowing the free market decide which is feasible. The left chooses to try and force something the market disagrees with and proceeds to throw tax payer money down the drain.
Why are liberals not buying the car? Why are they choosing other vehicles? Why don't they care about the environment, why are they cheering the failure of an alternative fuel vehicle, they just are not going to buy it, even knowing what they are doing to the environment!
They are, but they're only 22% of the country. The rest appear to be the idiot pawns of lying bought off Pub pundits and the cowardly corporate media, and all the laughing hyena moron bigot ugly 'merican dittoheads. Getting it yet? LOL!
Only ignorant dittoheads don't like the Volt, Einstein LOL.
No one bought high efficiency light bulbs when they first came out. Today with government mandates and subsidies we are well on our way to reducing the need for 30 new electric power plants plus we are seeing fantastic developments in lighting technology.If most people drove electric cars we would eliminate most of our air pollution, green house gases, and we could be energy independent. However, an electric car, such as the Volt has serious drawback, a limited range on battery, lack of a developed network of charging stations, and a higher price than competing gas models. I think a subsidy which decreases yearly like we did with hybrids is proper. It helps put more of these cars on the road which is good for the country.Yep. Neither does GE. $$$$$$$$$$$$$
Yeah, never mind that nobody wants them...
![]()
Only ignorant dittoheads don't like the Volt, Einstein LOL.
So over 99.9999999% are ignorant, including yourself because you don't own something you claim you are in love with.
Sure he does - gas savings. It's right there.Did I claim the rebate was from GM? No.The 'REBATE' isn't from GM, but taxpayer dollars from the government. IOW, those that can't afford that type of sticker price are helping foot the bill for the RICH. Indeed, Obama wants to make it $10k in taxpayer cash to the buyers.
Wingnut FAIL.
"wingnut fail"
I notice he doesn't say HOW he gets to 6K saved? what about the battery pack that has to be replaced by year 10?
Behind the wheel, however, it all operates seamlessly. Hit the glowing blue start button, and the seven-inch LCD-screen instrument panel, like the one used for the standard navigation, comes to life. It presents an estimated electric-only range, a gas range, and a total of the two. To the right is a graphic that provides driving feedback; the Volt is operating most efficiently when the spinning, green ball of  leaves stays in the middle. Hit the gas too hard, and the ball elevates, shrinks, and turns yellow. Go for too much brake, and the ball does the opposite, slinging downward because energy that could have otherwise been recaptured regeneratively is being wasted. Its a very straightforward and easy-to-follow setup. The center screen above the array of touch-sensitive controls on the dash keeps track of electrically and gas-driven miles separately, displays fuel economy (more on that later), and rates the efficiency of  your driving.
Whether or not the gas engine is running, the Volt always has an EV-like demeanor. Which is to say theres almost no waitingand no downshiftingas it responds swiftly to throttle inputs. Acceleration is one continuous ooze of thrustsort-of CVT-like, only without the engine drone. In fact, although the Volt isnt slow compared with its peersits 9.2-second 0-to-60-mph time beats both the Leaf and the Toyota Prius by 0.8 secondit feels quicker than the numbers suggest because, off the line, no matter what the driver does, the electric motors 273 pound-feet of torque rolls out modestly and averts wheelspin. The immediacy you feel shows up better in the 3.7-second 30-to-50-mph time, which is just a couple of ticks slower than a V-6 Mazda 6.
Theres not much noise, either. In EV mode, the cabin is as quiet as a Lexus RX350s at 70 mph, and even with the engine running, it matches the Prius at 72 dBA. The point at which the engine fires is barely discerniblethe reconfiguring of the digital dash when it transitions is far more obvious. When the driver hammers the Volt in range-extending mode, the engine revs more assertively but is never harsh or intrusive.
2011 Chevrolet Volt Full Test - Road Test - Car Reviews - Car and Driver
You dupes hate the Volt because Rush/Sean/Pubs etc tell you to- ther IS no othre reason.. You're brainwashed AGAIN!!
The Fisker Karma, that Rush etc has also been trying to sabotage, also can keep going as long as you put gas in it. Gorgeous...
You're a hateful Bigot who supports Corporate Welfare. Shame on you.![]()
The only people against the Volt are brainwashed dittoheads. I hate lies...period.Corporate welfare my azz. I guess you're just for subsidizing Big Oil by bought off Pub cronies, not future industries competing with the highly subsidized rest of the world. A) Corrupt, and B) STUPID.
Bullshit. I would love one, and may buy a Leaf. In most towns in America, you coulc commute to work and back every day and not buy a drop of gas. This would also be great for the dickheads who insist on owning those Fuck You-Mobiles, like Suburbans and Tahoes, because gas prices would lower dramatically.If most people drove electric cars we would eliminate most of our air pollution, green house gases, and we could be energy independent. However, an electric car, such as the Volt has serious drawback, a limited range on battery, lack of a developed network of charging stations, and a higher price than competing gas models. I think a subsidy which decreases yearly like we did with hybrids is proper. It helps put more of these cars on the road which is good for the country.Yep. Neither does GE. $$$$$$$$$$$$$
Yeah, never mind that nobody wants them...
![]()
You're a hateful Bigot who supports Corporate Welfare. Shame on you.![]()
The only people against the Volt are brainwashed dittoheads. I hate lies...period.Corporate welfare my azz. I guess you're just for subsidizing Big Oil by bought off Pub cronies, not future industries competing with the highly subsidized rest of the world. A) Corrupt, and B) STUPID.
You're a deranged Obama-Bot who definitely needs a reboot. I don't hate Electric Cars, i hate Corporate Welfare. So just reboot, and then get back to me.