Chicago concealed carry gun owner kills robber...

[Rotagilla]

The article fails to give us the whole story, but what they do offer suggests that the customer was well within his right to kill the gunman.

Had the gunman simply displayed a weapon while ordering the clerk to clean out the register there would have been no need for the customer to intervene.

LMAO....that's comical

If they show a weapon, drop them.
Good shoot.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

 

[westwall]

Yes..another shooting for Chicago concealed carry permit holders......one day the criminals will get the point that democrats can no longer disarm the victims of crime...the victims can finally shoot back...

AP News - Police: Concealed carry license holder kills armed gunman

CHICAGO (AP) — Chicago police say a customer with a concealed carry license shot and killed an armed man attempting to rob a neighborhood store.

Police spokesman Anthony Guglielmi said a masked man walked into the store and currency exchange about 7 p.m. Saturday on the city's southwest side, displayed a handgun and announced a robbery to an employ

Didn't know that robbery was a capital offense? Interesting.

ARMED robbery most certainly is. I'm sorry one of your buddies got offed. Maybe you should choose better friends...

 

[westwall]

Yes..another shooting for Chicago concealed carry permit holders......one day the criminals will get the point that democrats can no longer disarm the victims of crime...the victims can finally shoot back...

AP News - Police: Concealed carry license holder kills armed gunman

CHICAGO (AP) — Chicago police say a customer with a concealed carry license shot and killed an armed man attempting to rob a neighborhood store.

Police spokesman Anthony Guglielmi said a masked man walked into the store and currency exchange about 7 p.m. Saturday on the city's southwest side, displayed a handgun and announced a robbery to an employ

Didn't know that robbery was a capital offense? Interesting.

Ordering the clerk into the back room at gun point changes everything.

I disagree. Had he locked them both in a room, taken the money and gone, no one would have been harmed. To really be in the clear here, you have to wait until the guy starts shooting, at a person.

No, you don't. Too many of these assholes shoot the clerks after the clerks have given them everything they want. No more Mr. nice guy with these pricks. If they present a gun they die. Good riddance to bad protoplasm...

 

[Iron Head]

You know, Paint, you really are a despicable piece of shit contrarian. The thug was armed. Not only is he guilty of armed robbery but also aggravated assault. If someone dropped dead of a heart attack during the robbery then the thug would be guilty of felony murder.

Fuck that scum fuck. If you have a weapon confronting someone for whatever reason then you are putting a reasonable person in apprehension of immediate death or severe bodily injury, in which case deadly force is both legal and appropriate.,

Not much good to not take a gun to a robbery like that eh? And armed robbery is still not a capital offense here, and no one was assaulted.

The victims where not executing Justice, they were defending THEMSELVES. Whether it is a capital offense is of no consequence, fuck breath.

They were in no actual danger, more than likely. That is now for the state to decide.

Bullshit. The sub-human was a serial armed robber.

It doesn't matter. If he didn't shoot anyone then he wasn't a threat.

Are you fucking high? He was waiving a gun around, and you think that he is only a threat if he actually pulls the trigger and shoots somebody? That kind of thinking would completely eviscerate self-defense law, you moron.

Son, you need to go think about your position a little more, or sober up.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

ARMED robbery most certainly is.

Nope... Crimes Punishable by the Death Penalty | Death Penalty Information Center

 

[Iron Head]

Bullshit.

Nope. The robber wanted only money, not to kill anyone.

Is that what he told you?

Nope, pretty fucking obvious. That's his history...

and the victims knew his history how?

They didn't so, they had to go with the numbers, which is most robbers just want money. That is what the store policies not fight back are based on.

Paint, your "point" is so fucking stupid that it is not worthy of the time to reply.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Not much good to not take a gun to a robbery like that eh? And armed robbery is still not a capital offense here, and no one was assaulted.

The victims where not executing Justice, they were defending THEMSELVES. Whether it is a capital offense is of no consequence, fuck breath.

They were in no actual danger, more than likely. That is now for the state to decide.

Bullshit. The sub-human was a serial armed robber.

It doesn't matter. If he didn't shoot anyone then he wasn't a threat.

Are you fucking high? He was waiving a gun around, and you think that he is only a threat if he actually pulls the trigger and shoots somebody? That kind of thinking would completely eviscerate self-defense law, you moron.

Son, you need to go think about your position a little more, or sober up.

A guy comes in with a gun asking for money, that is what he wants. He has no plans to shoot so that's not self-defense.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Nope. The robber wanted only money, not to kill anyone.

Is that what he told you?

Nope, pretty fucking obvious. That's his history...

and the victims knew his history how?

They didn't so, they had to go with the numbers, which is most robbers just want money. That is what the store policies not fight back are based on.

Paint, your "point" is so fucking stupid that it is not worthy of the time to reply.

Nothing stupid about it. It's a well-known and established policy. It's math, and logic. I.e. - 7-11 Worker Fired For Fighting Back Against Robber

And

http://www.restaurantbusinessonline.com/images/pdf/armed_robbery_security_policy.pdf

 

[westwall]

Not much good to not take a gun to a robbery like that eh? And armed robbery is still not a capital offense here, and no one was assaulted.

The victims where not executing Justice, they were defending THEMSELVES. Whether it is a capital offense is of no consequence, fuck breath.

They were in no actual danger, more than likely. That is now for the state to decide.

Bullshit. The sub-human was a serial armed robber.

It doesn't matter. If he didn't shoot anyone then he wasn't a threat.

Are you fucking high? He was waiving a gun around, and you think that he is only a threat if he actually pulls the trigger and shoots somebody? That kind of thinking would completely eviscerate self-defense law, you moron.

Son, you need to go think about your position a little more, or sober up.

PMH is a big criminal supporter. No crime should be punished and he even thinks that humans are a pox on the world so actually adviocates that people be killed. Why he snivels over a criminal getting killed I have no idea.

 

[westwall]

The victims where not executing Justice, they were defending THEMSELVES. Whether it is a capital offense is of no consequence, fuck breath.

They were in no actual danger, more than likely. That is now for the state to decide.

Bullshit. The sub-human was a serial armed robber.

It doesn't matter. If he didn't shoot anyone then he wasn't a threat.

Are you fucking high? He was waiving a gun around, and you think that he is only a threat if he actually pulls the trigger and shoots somebody? That kind of thinking would completely eviscerate self-defense law, you moron.

Son, you need to go think about your position a little more, or sober up.

A guy comes in with a gun asking for money, that is what he wants. He has no plans to shoot so that's not self-defense.

You're funny! Totally divorced from reality, but funny as hell. Criminals far too often kill for their own amusement AFTER the clerk has complied. Fuck them.

 

[Iron Head]

The victims where not executing Justice, they were defending THEMSELVES. Whether it is a capital offense is of no consequence, fuck breath.

They were in no actual danger, more than likely. That is now for the state to decide.

Bullshit. The sub-human was a serial armed robber.

It doesn't matter. If he didn't shoot anyone then he wasn't a threat.

Are you fucking high? He was waiving a gun around, and you think that he is only a threat if he actually pulls the trigger and shoots somebody? That kind of thinking would completely eviscerate self-defense law, you moron.

Son, you need to go think about your position a little more, or sober up.

A guy comes in with a gun asking for money, that is what he wants. He has no plans to shoot so that's not self-defense.

Robbers shoot the clerk all the time. Maybe it does not happen in your world, but it does here on earth, you moron.

There is a reason that armed robbery is a higher grade crime that simply "robbery" or other theft charges. It is inherently more dangerous; it puts the victims in immediate apprehension of death or serious bodily injury. As such, deadly force in self defense is allowed in the law. If you don't get that then you are doomed.

 

[Muhammed]

Is that what he told you?

Nope, pretty fucking obvious. That's his history...

and the victims knew his history how?

They didn't so, they had to go with the numbers, which is most robbers just want money. That is what the store policies not fight back are based on.

Paint, your "point" is so fucking stupid that it is not worthy of the time to reply.

Nothing stupid about it. It's a well-known and established policy. It's math, and logic. I.e. - 7-11 Worker Fired For Fighting Back Against Robber

No. Not really.

 

[westwall]

Is that what he told you?

Nope, pretty fucking obvious. That's his history...

and the victims knew his history how?

They didn't so, they had to go with the numbers, which is most robbers just want money. That is what the store policies not fight back are based on.

Paint, your "point" is so fucking stupid that it is not worthy of the time to reply.

Nothing stupid about it. It's a well-known and established policy. It's math, and logic. I.e. - 7-11 Worker Fired For Fighting Back Against Robber

Yeah, that policy works soooo welll.....

Utah man to stand trial in 7-Eleven clerk's shooting death



Three charged in murder of Glasgow 7-11 clerk

Convenience store murder raises concern over clerk safety in Salt Lake City

Ft. Washington 7-11 murder: Surveillance video shows suspects, masked, holding clerk up

 

[Muhammed]

The victims where not executing Justice, they were defending THEMSELVES. Whether it is a capital offense is of no consequence, fuck breath.

They were in no actual danger, more than likely. That is now for the state to decide.

Bullshit. The sub-human was a serial armed robber.

It doesn't matter. If he didn't shoot anyone then he wasn't a threat.

Are you fucking high? He was waiving a gun around, and you think that he is only a threat if he actually pulls the trigger and shoots somebody? That kind of thinking would completely eviscerate self-defense law, you moron.

Son, you need to go think about your position a little more, or sober up.

PMH is a big criminal supporter. No crime should be punished and he even thinks that humans are a pox on the world so actually adviocates that people be killed. Why he snivels over a criminal getting killed I have no idea.

It's called piece of shit scumbag.

 

[Iron Head]

The victims where not executing Justice, they were defending THEMSELVES. Whether it is a capital offense is of no consequence, fuck breath.

They were in no actual danger, more than likely. That is now for the state to decide.

Bullshit. The sub-human was a serial armed robber.

It doesn't matter. If he didn't shoot anyone then he wasn't a threat.

Are you fucking high? He was waiving a gun around, and you think that he is only a threat if he actually pulls the trigger and shoots somebody? That kind of thinking would completely eviscerate self-defense law, you moron.

Son, you need to go think about your position a little more, or sober up.

PMH is a big criminal supporter. No crime should be punished and he even thinks that humans are a pox on the world so actually adviocates that people be killed. Why he snivels over a criminal getting killed I have no idea.

Paint is apparently also a total moron. This is simple stuff. That shooter is not going to be charged with a crime, even in Chicago. You point a gun at someone and a victim or bystander in the vicinity shoots and kills the guy, then it is self-defense. If he is shot fleeing, then you would probably see a voluntary manslaughter charge, but that is not what happened here.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

You're funny! Totally divorced from reality, but funny as hell. Criminals far too often kill for their own amusement AFTER the clerk has complied. Fuck them.

Nope, they almost never do...

 

[PaintMyHouse]

They were in no actual danger, more than likely. That is now for the state to decide.

Bullshit. The sub-human was a serial armed robber.

It doesn't matter. If he didn't shoot anyone then he wasn't a threat.

Are you fucking high? He was waiving a gun around, and you think that he is only a threat if he actually pulls the trigger and shoots somebody? That kind of thinking would completely eviscerate self-defense law, you moron.

Son, you need to go think about your position a little more, or sober up.

PMH is a big criminal supporter. No crime should be punished and he even thinks that humans are a pox on the world so actually adviocates that people be killed. Why he snivels over a criminal getting killed I have no idea.

Paint is apparently also a total moron. This is simple stuff. That shooter is not going to be charged with a crime, even in Chicago. You point a gun at someone and a victim or bystander in the vicinity shoots and kills the guy, then it is self-defense. If he is shot fleeing, then you would probably see a voluntary manslaughter charge, but that is not what happened here.

We'll see, but if there was no threat, it's second-degree murder. Keep that in mind eh?

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Nope, pretty fucking obvious. That's his history...

and the victims knew his history how?

They didn't so, they had to go with the numbers, which is most robbers just want money. That is what the store policies not fight back are based on.

Paint, your "point" is so fucking stupid that it is not worthy of the time to reply.

Nothing stupid about it. It's a well-known and established policy. It's math, and logic. I.e. - 7-11 Worker Fired For Fighting Back Against Robber

Yeah, that policy works soooo welll.....

Utah man to stand trial in 7-Eleven clerk's shooting death



Three charged in murder of Glasgow 7-11 clerk

Convenience store murder raises concern over clerk safety in Salt Lake City

Ft. Washington 7-11 murder: Surveillance video shows suspects, masked, holding clerk up

They have a whole lot of stores, that are robbed a lot. In most cases no one gets harmed. It's a math thing...

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Nope, pretty fucking obvious. That's his history...

and the victims knew his history how?

They didn't so, they had to go with the numbers, which is most robbers just want money. That is what the store policies not fight back are based on.

Paint, your "point" is so fucking stupid that it is not worthy of the time to reply.

Nothing stupid about it. It's a well-known and established policy. It's math, and logic. I.e. - 7-11 Worker Fired For Fighting Back Against Robber

No. Not really.

Yep, really: http://www.restaurantbusinessonline.com/images/pdf/armed_robbery_security_policy.pdf