Does he have to make a nazi cake for nazi customers or a pedophile themed cake for pedos or a yassir Arafat themed cake? Will they order a gay cake shop to make a cake celebrating banning gay marriage?
As much I loathe this poster, he has a point.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Does he have to make a nazi cake for nazi customers or a pedophile themed cake for pedos or a yassir Arafat themed cake? Will they order a gay cake shop to make a cake celebrating banning gay marriage?
When we look at the relevant section of the law as stated above, yes the judge was well within the law to force the bakery shop owner to provide gay cakes. However, a part of the 1st Amendment of the U.S constitution states:I still say the judge was wrong...
Here is the relevant section of the law...
Colorado Revised Statutes
23-34-601 Discrimination in places of public accommodation
(2) It is a discriminatory practice and unlawful for a person, directly or indirectly, to refuse, withhold from, or deny to an individual or a group, because of disability, race, creed, color, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, or ancestry, the full and equal enjoyment of the goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, or accommodations of a place of public accommodation or, directly or indirectly, to publish, circulate, issue, display, post, or mail any written, electronic, or printed communication, notice, or advertisement that indicates that the full and equal enjoyment of the goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, or accommodations of a place of public accommodation will be refused, withheld from, or denied an individual or that an individual's patronage or presence at a place of public accommodation is unwelcome, objectionable, unacceptable, or undesirable because of disability, race, creed, color, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, or ancestry.
1. This is the law passed by the Legislature of Colorado, the case was reviewed by a State Judge in Colorado.
2. The Bakery operated a public business and therefore was subject to the Public Accommodation laws of the State.
3. The Bakery advertized for and routinely supplied wedding cakes to it's customers.
4. The Bakery refused to fulfill a similar order for a couple based on the sexual orientation of the couple
*****************************
Question #1: Please explain why the State Judge was in error for ruling that a place of Public Accommodation was in violation of the State law that required them not to discriminate based on sexual orientation.
Question #2: Do you routinely support "activist judges" and having them ignore the law an rule based on their whim?
>>>>
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof...
Furthermore, the Court has interpreted, the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment as protecting the rights in the First Amendment from interference by state governments.
Read the law..sexual orientation. ...Does he have to make a nazi cake for nazi customers or a pedophile themed cake for pedos or a yassir Arafat themed cake? Will they order a gay cake shop to make a cake celebrating banning gay marriage?
As much I loathe this poster, he has a point.
Read the law..sexual orientation. ...Does he have to make a nazi cake for nazi customers or a pedophile themed cake for pedos or a yassir Arafat themed cake? Will they order a gay cake shop to make a cake celebrating banning gay marriage?
As much I loathe this poster, he has a point.
EXPECT in one hand and shit in the other see which one get's noticed.Lie and fraud? the fraud is the faggots that could have chosen another bakery but did not. They get the worse tasting cake ever. That is not criminal. Now you can whine all you want.
No, the faggots came to the store because they expected to get the same quality product that the store normally sells. It makes no difference why the particular store was chosen. They walked into the store expecting to make a deal, a contract, to purchase a specific product of a specific quality. The store owners didn't want to sell them a product, a cake. They had the ethics, honesty and courage to refuse service because of their personal beliefs. Your solution would have been to make the deal and contract knowing you were going to rip the faggots off. That is the lie. You would have agreed to provide the product as specified in the agreement with no intention of fulfilling the contract. That is the lie and the fraud part. The use of sand would be the crime part. Sand is not an edible product. It is a non-edible product. If you used sand and the faggots took the cake to a lab the faggots would end up owning your store and you might end up in jail. It is against the law in most places to contaminate food on purpose.
Your whining is making you say shit that had not happen.
Use sand? I did not say anything about using sand. I said I would make them a terrible tasting Gake, now go whine to someone else.
I am aware you cannot discriminate against people because of their orientation, but if I was a baker, and a person came in wanting a cake celebrating Hitler or something, I would refuse - no matter what the consequences. It might be acceptable to discriminate against that person, but it shouldn't matter.
His business, he can do what he likes. Just put a sign on the door stating his beliefs so people don't get offended.
What other people "push" as you say is their business. As for what I "push", if you do not like what it is that I have a right to "push", it isn't my issue.The lord? Fuck that..keep your shit in your pants. Seriously fucking god people always pushing this shit on other people. You know what other people like to push? Drugs.
And all that the shop owner did was refuse to make what was asked for which is also well within their state rights.Where you born in 1903 or something? Go make a a spectacle? Ugh seriously.all this couple did was ask for a cake that was well within their state rights.
I am aware you cannot discriminate against people because of their orientation, but if I was a baker, and a person came in wanting a cake celebrating Hitler or something, I would refuse - no matter what the consequences. It might be acceptable to discriminate against that person, but it shouldn't matter.
His business, he can do what he likes. Just put a sign on the door stating his beliefs so people don't get offended.
Political affiliations are not part of the non-discriminatory class. Pedophilia is a criminal act so he doesn't have to bake a cake celebrating pediophilia or necrophilia.
Sexual orientation is part of the non-discriminatory class. The baker doesn't have to bake a Nazi cake, but he does have to bake a cake for a gay wedding. Putting a sign on his door saying he won't make cakes for gay weddings is also illegal.
And all that the shop owner did was refuse to make what was asked for which is also well within their state rights.Where you born in 1903 or something? Go make a a spectacle? Ugh seriously.all this couple did was ask for a cake that was well within their state rights.
God bless you and them always!!!![]()
![]()
Holly
P.S. I was born in 1982.![]()
![]()
![]()
When has liking hitler been a sexual orientation?Read the law..sexual orientation. ...As much I loathe this poster, he has a point.
I am aware you cannot discriminate against people because of their orientation, but if I was a baker, and a person came in wanting a cake celebrating Hitler or something, I would refuse - no matter what the consequences. It might be acceptable to discriminate against that person, but it shouldn't matter.
His business, he can do what he likes. Just put a sign on the door stating his beliefs so people don't get offended.
What other people "push" as you say is their business. As for what I "push", if you do not like what it is that I have a right to "push", it isn't my issue.The lord? Fuck that..keep your shit in your pants. Seriously fucking god people always pushing this shit on other people. You know what other people like to push? Drugs.
And all that the shop owner did was refuse to make what was asked for which is also well within their state rights.Where you born in 1903 or something? Go make a a spectacle? Ugh seriously.all this couple did was ask for a cake that was well within their state rights.
God bless you and them always!!!![]()
![]()
Holly
P.S. I was born in 1982.![]()
![]()
![]()
I'm sorry, but your breath smells of santorum and therefore I don't want you in my shop.
In a better world, that would be the law.
Unless used as an obvious excuse to circumvent discrimination laws, offensive odor, inappropriate dress, obnoxous behavior, use of offensive language, threatening attitude, and other disturbing or offensive behavoir are generaly accepted as valid reasons to refuse service and demand exit from the premises.
When we look at the relevant section of the law as stated above, yes the judge was well within the law to force the bakery shop owner to provide gay cakes. However, a part of the 1st Amendment of the U.S constitution states:I still say the judge was wrong...
Here is the relevant section of the law...
Colorado Revised Statutes
23-34-601 Discrimination in places of public accommodation
(2) It is a discriminatory practice and unlawful for a person, directly or indirectly, to refuse, withhold from, or deny to an individual or a group, because of disability, race, creed, color, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, or ancestry, the full and equal enjoyment of the goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, or accommodations of a place of public accommodation or, directly or indirectly, to publish, circulate, issue, display, post, or mail any written, electronic, or printed communication, notice, or advertisement that indicates that the full and equal enjoyment of the goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, or accommodations of a place of public accommodation will be refused, withheld from, or denied an individual or that an individual's patronage or presence at a place of public accommodation is unwelcome, objectionable, unacceptable, or undesirable because of disability, race, creed, color, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, or ancestry.
1. This is the law passed by the Legislature of Colorado, the case was reviewed by a State Judge in Colorado.
2. The Bakery operated a public business and therefore was subject to the Public Accommodation laws of the State.
3. The Bakery advertized for and routinely supplied wedding cakes to it's customers.
4. The Bakery refused to fulfill a similar order for a couple based on the sexual orientation of the couple
*****************************
Question #1: Please explain why the State Judge was in error for ruling that a place of Public Accommodation was in violation of the State law that required them not to discriminate based on sexual orientation.
Question #2: Do you routinely support "activist judges" and having them ignore the law an rule based on their whim?
>>>>
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof...
Also the 1st Amendment supersedes any state laws:
Furthermore, the Court has interpreted, the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment as protecting the rights in the First Amendment from interference by state governments.
First Amendment | LII / Legal Information Institute
Therefore, I believe that the bakery shop owner could still appeal this decision with a good lawyer. He has every right to his religious beliefs without any interference from any judge. I'll bet that he will win this one. No way could they force a man to choose between his faith or his livelihood.
Does he have to make a nazi cake for nazi customers or a pedophile themed cake for pedos or a yassir Arafat themed cake? Will they order a gay cake shop to make a cake celebrating banning gay marriage?
As much I loathe this poster, he has a point.
And all that the shop owner did was refuse to make what was asked for which is also well within their state rights.