Chuck Schumer Calls Police Over Forged Sexual Harassment Document

[bripat9643]

Should we just take him at his word that he is innocent?

Holyfuckingshit!

You rightards are such dupes. How about taking the word of the alleged complaintant, a former staffer of Schumer who says the allegations in the complaint in her name are false, Schumer never did what is in the complaint, and that it’s not her signature on the complaint?

I'm with you that if this is fake, bogus, whatever, there should be consequences.

I will also remind you and others that this is why people like me get so upset at fake news from all sides. The Russian Collusion investigation, if you ask me, is a scam. What's worse, it has propped up Putin to near God status in Russia. Here is this guy being given credit for stealing an election from America! They think he is the greatest mind in history. So, if you are going to try and impeach a guy and steal your citizens Will, you had better be careful and you had better be honest and absolutely sure. Now, the ability for the CIA and others to undermine Putins power is significantly reduced.

We see CNN in particular attack Trump on all kinds of bs. Why? To them the ends justify the means. Just as this guy seems to believe...ALL are wrong.

No one asked you if the Russian collusion investigation is a scam. There is all kinds of evidence that it isn’t, including two guilty pleas from people in the campaign who are now cooperating with Mueller’s investigation.

You're a complete moron, of course. The guilty pleas have nothing to do with Russian collusion. There is no evidence to support it. None. It's all a giant hoax, a con, a scam.

There’s lots of evidence to support it but you have to open your eyes and ears to see and hear it. You’ve had your eyes closed with your fingers in your ears singing “lalalalalalala I cant hear you” now for the past year and a half.

And the giant hoax, the con, the scam is guy in the White House as the 45th President of the United States.

What you really mean is that you have to be especially gullible and mistake inuendo for facts to believe it.

Lefties call every criticism of their tactics a "conspiricy theory," but the Russian "collusion" scam is the biggest conspicy theory ever perpetrated.

 

[bripat9643]

You aren't capable of committing logic, and you have no facts to support your case, so you resort to personal asttacks. That's all you have ever proven in this forum. I make one error, and you harp on it for 6 months. That shows how desperate, bitter and pathetic you are.

LOLOL as if that’s your only error.

In fact, your post I responded to was even factually incorrect— there as not been just one person “botching” such a scandal, as you falsely claim.

But again, you’re a flaming idiot whose proven you never have a clue what you’re talking about and can’t be taken seriously.

I'm talking about the Project Veritas attempt to expose the Washington Post, you fucking dumbass. You can't even follow a thread for a couple of posts before you forget what it's about. It takes a lot of chutzpah for a clueless moron like you to be calling me stupid.

Holyfuckingshit!

I point out how ignorant you are and how your post I responded to was flat out wrong .... and you prove me right with that unhinged response of yours.

Dumbfuck... you said, ”Horseshit. The fact that one perso botched the job doesn't prove it's difficult.”

Moron... the Project Veritas job isn’t the only botched scam..........

Do you know what thread you’re on??

HOLYFUCKINGSHIT!
Talk about herbole!

It doesn't matter whether it's the only botched job, you fucking moron.

"herbole"?

Need a dictionary?

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

LOLOL as if that’s your only error.

In fact, your post I responded to was even factually incorrect— there as not been just one person “botching” such a scandal, as you falsely claim.

But again, you’re a flaming idiot whose proven you never have a clue what you’re talking about and can’t be taken seriously.

I'm talking about the Project Veritas attempt to expose the Washington Post, you fucking dumbass. You can't even follow a thread for a couple of posts before you forget what it's about. It takes a lot of chutzpah for a clueless moron like you to be calling me stupid.

Holyfuckingshit!

I point out how ignorant you are and how your post I responded to was flat out wrong .... and you prove me right with that unhinged response of yours.

Dumbfuck... you said, ”Horseshit. The fact that one perso botched the job doesn't prove it's difficult.”

Moron... the Project Veritas job isn’t the only botched scam..........

Do you know what thread you’re on??

HOLYFUCKINGSHIT!
Talk about herbole!

It doesn't matter whether it's the only botched job, you fucking moron.

"herbole"?

Need a dictionary?

I'm guessing they meant hyperbole?

 

[bripat9643]

I'm talking about the Project Veritas attempt to expose the Washington Post, you fucking dumbass. You can't even follow a thread for a couple of posts before you forget what it's about. It takes a lot of chutzpah for a clueless moron like you to be calling me stupid.

Holyfuckingshit!

I point out how ignorant you are and how your post I responded to was flat out wrong .... and you prove me right with that unhinged response of yours.

Dumbfuck... you said, ”Horseshit. The fact that one perso botched the job doesn't prove it's difficult.”

Moron... the Project Veritas job isn’t the only botched scam..........

Do you know what thread you’re on??

HOLYFUCKINGSHIT!
Talk about herbole!

It doesn't matter whether it's the only botched job, you fucking moron.

"herbole"?

Need a dictionary?

I'm guessing they meant hyperbole?

Ah, yes. I didn't notice the misspelling.

 

[Faun]

Of course it does. It proves you’re a brain-dead cult member of the rightwing herd who posts shit without ever bothering to check the validity of what you post. Your only use here is to either be ignored or scoffed at for being such an abject imbecile. I myself choose the latter because it’s more entertaining.

You aren't capable of committing logic, and you have no facts to support your case, so you resort to personal asttacks. That's all you have ever proven in this forum. I make one error, and you harp on it for 6 months. That shows how desperate, bitter and pathetic you are.

LOLOL as if that’s your only error.

In fact, your post I responded to was even factually incorrect— there as not been just one person “botching” such a scandal, as you falsely claim.

But again, you’re a flaming idiot whose proven you never have a clue what you’re talking about and can’t be taken seriously.

I'm talking about the Project Veritas attempt to expose the Washington Post, you fucking dumbass. You can't even follow a thread for a couple of posts before you forget what it's about. It takes a lot of chutzpah for a clueless moron like you to be calling me stupid.

Holyfuckingshit!

I point out how ignorant you are and how your post I responded to was flat out wrong .... and you prove me right with that unhinged response of yours.

Dumbfuck... you said, ”Horseshit. The fact that one perso botched the job doesn't prove it's difficult.”

Moron... the Project Veritas job isn’t the only botched scam..........

Do you know what thread you’re on??

HOLYFUCKINGSHIT!
Talk about herbole!

It doesn't matter whether it's the only botched job, you fucking moron.

^^^ too triggered to interrupt.

 

[Faun]

Where have you been? Sexual harassment accusations have been mainstream since Clinton’s presidency. The right salivated over it then. Now that it’s happening to them, not so much.

The difference is, today's women are less willing to look the other way than the last generation, who wanted abortion more than preventing and punishing sexual harrassment.

There’s no difference. In any of these cases, it’s women going public with unsubstantiated, unprovable claims of sexual abuse. It may become more prevalent in the future given its effectiveness, but the overall goal is the same in all cases — take down a politician.

It’s not as much fun when it happens to someone on your side of the aisle, is it?

It's not good for anyone really, is it?

And yes, I fully expect it to happen a lot more in the future.

No, it’s not. But the right is full of hypocrites who supported it when it was against Clinton but bitch about it now that the tables have been turned on them. Hell, even during last year’s debate, Trump paraded some of Clinton’s abusers on a national stage.

See if you can link to any rightwinger on this forum who criticized him for doing that....

Clinton’s abusers

Really? Don't you mean Clinton victims, both of Bill and the bitch?


.

No, didn’t mean that either. Meant, Clinton’s accusers.

 

[Faun]

Schumer is just attacking the victims! How deplorable

Oh? What victim is Schumer attacking?

Who knows? What we do know is a denial is just calling victims liars. At least according to the left.

Then why are you on this thread if you don’t know what’s going on?

 

[Faun]

Where have you been? Sexual harassment accusations have been mainstream since Clinton’s presidency. The right salivated over it then. Now that it’s happening to them, not so much.

The difference is, today's women are less willing to look the other way than the last generation, who wanted abortion more than preventing and punishing sexual harrassment.

There’s no difference. In any of these cases, it’s women going public with unsubstantiated, unprovable claims of sexual abuse. It may become more prevalent in the future given its effectiveness, but the overall goal is the same in all cases — take down a politician.

It’s not as much fun when it happens to someone on your side of the aisle, is it?

It's not good for anyone really, is it?

And yes, I fully expect it to happen a lot more in the future.

No, it’s not. But the right is full of hypocrites who supported it when it was against Clinton but bitch about it now that the tables have been turned on them. Hell, even during last year’s debate, Trump paraded some of Clinton’s abusers on a national stage.

See if you can link to any rightwinger on this forum who criticized him for doing that....

And next year, when the same tactics are used against democrats, the lefties will become all outraged and resort to the same attacks made famous by Hillary and crew decades ago. And you will see none of the usual suspects criticizing them for it.

Like we saw the right do against Moore’s accusers?

 

[BULLDOG]

Throw whoever did it in the slammer. False accusations of sexual harassment or sexual assault should earn the lying accuser some time wearing orange behind bars just like they do in Britain.

Anyone can make any kind of accusation. Intentionally falsified documents are fraud.

like the Dossier is. so why no outrage for that faked document?

Which parts do you think are fake?

 

[Faun]

LOLOL as if that’s your only error.

In fact, your post I responded to was even factually incorrect— there as not been just one person “botching” such a scandal, as you falsely claim.

But again, you’re a flaming idiot whose proven you never have a clue what you’re talking about and can’t be taken seriously.

I'm talking about the Project Veritas attempt to expose the Washington Post, you fucking dumbass. You can't even follow a thread for a couple of posts before you forget what it's about. It takes a lot of chutzpah for a clueless moron like you to be calling me stupid.

Holyfuckingshit!

I point out how ignorant you are and how your post I responded to was flat out wrong .... and you prove me right with that unhinged response of yours.

Dumbfuck... you said, ”Horseshit. The fact that one perso botched the job doesn't prove it's difficult.”

Moron... the Project Veritas job isn’t the only botched scam..........

Do you know what thread you’re on??

HOLYFUCKINGSHIT!
Talk about herbole!

It doesn't matter whether it's the only botched job, you fucking moron.

"herbole"?

Need a dictionary?

No, but you do.

 

[Weatherman2020]

The senator’s office and a former staffer have said the document is fake and the allegations in it are “completely false.”

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) contacted Capitol Police on Tuesday after his office became aware that news networks had received copies of a forged document accusing the senator of sexual harassment.

Schumer contacted police after multiple news organizations approached his office for comment. Axios was the first to report on the existence of the fake document and the senator’s response.

“This was an apparent effort to dupe reporters and smear a senator — both symptoms of an amped-up news environment where harassment charges are proliferating and reporters have become targets for fraud,” Axios’ Mike Allen reported.

Over the summer, MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow had a similar experience and told viewers that her show had received a forged National Security Agency document seemingly filled with explosive allegations. The document, Maddow believes, was sent to her in an effort to discredit her show and other news organizations reporting on Russia’s interference with the 2016 presidential election.

The fake document about Schumer was purportedly signed by a former staffer accusing the senator of sexual harassment. Axios reported the former staffer said her signature on the 13-page document, which was meant to look like a lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court, was a forgery.

The document had “obvious red flags,” according to BuzzFeed News’ Kate Nocera, who said she had also seen the document.

More: Chuck Schumer Calls Police Over Forged Sexual Harassment Document

Looks and smells like another NaziCon smear campaign. Why can't they play fair without cheating and lying?

And Schumer does not pay taxes

 

[bripat9643]

I'm talking about the Project Veritas attempt to expose the Washington Post, you fucking dumbass. You can't even follow a thread for a couple of posts before you forget what it's about. It takes a lot of chutzpah for a clueless moron like you to be calling me stupid.

Holyfuckingshit!

I point out how ignorant you are and how your post I responded to was flat out wrong .... and you prove me right with that unhinged response of yours.

Dumbfuck... you said, ”Horseshit. The fact that one perso botched the job doesn't prove it's difficult.”

Moron... the Project Veritas job isn’t the only botched scam..........

Do you know what thread you’re on??

HOLYFUCKINGSHIT!
Talk about herbole!

It doesn't matter whether it's the only botched job, you fucking moron.

"herbole"?

Need a dictionary?

No, but you do.

I knew you were going to harp on my syntax error because that's exactly the kind of asshole you are.

 

[Faun]

Holyfuckingshit!

I point out how ignorant you are and how your post I responded to was flat out wrong .... and you prove me right with that unhinged response of yours.

Dumbfuck... you said, ”Horseshit. The fact that one perso botched the job doesn't prove it's difficult.”

Moron... the Project Veritas job isn’t the only botched scam..........

Do you know what thread you’re on??

HOLYFUCKINGSHIT!
Talk about herbole!

It doesn't matter whether it's the only botched job, you fucking moron.

"herbole"?

Need a dictionary?

No, but you do.

I knew you were going to harp on my syntax error because that's exactly the kind of asshole you are.

Why wouldn’t I when you’re spelling words like, “herbole,” and telling others to use a dictionary?

 

[paperview]

The two people behind the forged docs are two of the biggest right wing trolls - are glorified in the MAGA alt-Right world, and Trump has been known to retweet them.

And they did a realllllllllllly piss poor job of a forgery.

Fucknut Central.

 

[Lumpy 1]

mmm.. a lot more Democrats running in 2018 and all you need is Democrat style false allegations to win now .. and oops Democrats have been introduced to morality ... interesting..

I wonder if Roy Moore with file charges on the cabal of accusers/fake media/Democratic Party...

Politics is fun...

I remember the owner of a fake news outlet saying that the right are easy to fool because they’ll believe anything if it aligns with their previously held beliefs. The left fact checks everything and fake news directed to left wing voters is debunked within 10 minutes of posting.

Moore lost because the women were telling the truth, and they had evidence and 30 corroborating witnesses. WAPO scrutinized their claims with great care before publishing.

They also scrutinized the woman who tried to claim Moore forced her to have an abortion and found inconsistencies in her story, and no supporting evidence.

Until right wingers pay more attention to facts and stop believing everything that issues out of the mouths of liars like Donald Trump, Sean Hannity, and the other dishonest politicians on the right, you’re going to be continually fooled into voting for people who are only in it for their own personal gain.

Bottom line you hate anything Republican, you're dedicated and biased and life goes on. Soooo Merry Christmas..

 

[OKTexas]

The difference is, today's women are less willing to look the other way than the last generation, who wanted abortion more than preventing and punishing sexual harrassment.

There’s no difference. In any of these cases, it’s women going public with unsubstantiated, unprovable claims of sexual abuse. It may become more prevalent in the future given its effectiveness, but the overall goal is the same in all cases — take down a politician.

It’s not as much fun when it happens to someone on your side of the aisle, is it?

It's not good for anyone really, is it?

And yes, I fully expect it to happen a lot more in the future.

No, it’s not. But the right is full of hypocrites who supported it when it was against Clinton but bitch about it now that the tables have been turned on them. Hell, even during last year’s debate, Trump paraded some of Clinton’s abusers on a national stage.

See if you can link to any rightwinger on this forum who criticized him for doing that....

Clinton’s abusers

Really? Don't you mean Clinton victims, both of Bill and the bitch?


.

No, didn’t mean that either. Meant, Clinton’s accusers.

Would those be the ones he paid a settlement to, blew off on her blue dress or committed perjury over?


.

 

[OKTexas]

The difference is, today's women are less willing to look the other way than the last generation, who wanted abortion more than preventing and punishing sexual harrassment.

There’s no difference. In any of these cases, it’s women going public with unsubstantiated, unprovable claims of sexual abuse. It may become more prevalent in the future given its effectiveness, but the overall goal is the same in all cases — take down a politician.

It’s not as much fun when it happens to someone on your side of the aisle, is it?

It's not good for anyone really, is it?

And yes, I fully expect it to happen a lot more in the future.

No, it’s not. But the right is full of hypocrites who supported it when it was against Clinton but bitch about it now that the tables have been turned on them. Hell, even during last year’s debate, Trump paraded some of Clinton’s abusers on a national stage.

See if you can link to any rightwinger on this forum who criticized him for doing that....

And next year, when the same tactics are used against democrats, the lefties will become all outraged and resort to the same attacks made famous by Hillary and crew decades ago. And you will see none of the usual suspects criticizing them for it.

Like we saw the right do against Moore’s accusers?

The claims against wild willie weren't 38 years old and roughly 10 elections later.


.

 

[tyroneweaver]

The senator’s office and a former staffer have said the document is fake and the allegations in it are “completely false.”

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) contacted Capitol Police on Tuesday after his office became aware that news networks had received copies of a forged document accusing the senator of sexual harassment.

Schumer contacted police after multiple news organizations approached his office for comment. Axios was the first to report on the existence of the fake document and the senator’s response.

“This was an apparent effort to dupe reporters and smear a senator — both symptoms of an amped-up news environment where harassment charges are proliferating and reporters have become targets for fraud,” Axios’ Mike Allen reported.

Over the summer, MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow had a similar experience and told viewers that her show had received a forged National Security Agency document seemingly filled with explosive allegations. The document, Maddow believes, was sent to her in an effort to discredit her show and other news organizations reporting on Russia’s interference with the 2016 presidential election.

The fake document about Schumer was purportedly signed by a former staffer accusing the senator of sexual harassment. Axios reported the former staffer said her signature on the 13-page document, which was meant to look like a lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court, was a forgery.

The document had “obvious red flags,” according to BuzzFeed News’ Kate Nocera, who said she had also seen the document.

More: Chuck Schumer Calls Police Over Forged Sexual Harassment Document

Looks and smells like another NaziCon smear campaign. Why can't they play fair without cheating and lying?

Lol the guys a cry baby just like you
Trump has lies said about him every day
Time to toughen up old man

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

The senator’s office and a former staffer have said the document is fake and the allegations in it are “completely false.”

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) contacted Capitol Police on Tuesday after his office became aware that news networks had received copies of a forged document accusing the senator of sexual harassment.

Schumer contacted police after multiple news organizations approached his office for comment. Axios was the first to report on the existence of the fake document and the senator’s response.

“This was an apparent effort to dupe reporters and smear a senator — both symptoms of an amped-up news environment where harassment charges are proliferating and reporters have become targets for fraud,” Axios’ Mike Allen reported.

Over the summer, MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow had a similar experience and told viewers that her show had received a forged National Security Agency document seemingly filled with explosive allegations. The document, Maddow believes, was sent to her in an effort to discredit her show and other news organizations reporting on Russia’s interference with the 2016 presidential election.

The fake document about Schumer was purportedly signed by a former staffer accusing the senator of sexual harassment. Axios reported the former staffer said her signature on the 13-page document, which was meant to look like a lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court, was a forgery.

The document had “obvious red flags,” according to BuzzFeed News’ Kate Nocera, who said she had also seen the document.

More: Chuck Schumer Calls Police Over Forged Sexual Harassment Document

Looks and smells like another NaziCon smear campaign. Why can't they play fair without cheating and lying?

Should we just take him at his word that he is innocent?

Yes. Schumer, like all politicians, is a fine man of courage, impeccable character and honor. I would put my life in his hands without a second thought.

You forgot the [/sarcasm] at the end of your post!

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

mmm.. a lot more Democrats running in 2018 and all you need is Democrat style false allegations to win now .. and oops Democrats have been introduced to morality ... interesting..

I wonder if Roy Moore with file charges on the cabal of accusers/fake media/Democratic Party...

Politics is fun...

I remember the owner of a fake news outlet saying that the right are easy to fool because they’ll believe anything if it aligns with their previously held beliefs. The left fact checks everything and fake news directed to left wing voters is debunked within 10 minutes of posting.

Moore lost because the women were telling the truth, and they had evidence and 30 corroborating witnesses. WAPO scrutinized their claims with great care before publishing.

They also scrutinized the woman who tried to claim Moore forced her to have an abortion and found inconsistencies in her story, and no supporting evidence.

Until right wingers pay more attention to facts and stop believing everything that issues out of the mouths of liars like Donald Trump, Sean Hannity, and the other dishonest politicians on the right, you’re going to be continually fooled into voting for people who are only in it for their own personal gain.

For about the 10th time, will you please learn the definition of "corroborating" and witness". You still haven't figured it out!

The WAPO should have demanded the yearbook and submitted it for testing, or dropped the whole story because if it proved she was lying, (which she was) the whole story falls apart!