Faun
Diamond Member
- Nov 14, 2011
- 124,443
- 81,359
- 2,635
Hmm, that would be one who took him to court and had her case thrown out due to lack of merit .... and the other engaging in consensual sex. Translation: no valid claims of sexual abuse.No, didn’t mean that either. Meant, Clinton’s accusers.No, it’s not. But the right is full of hypocrites who supported it when it was against Clinton but bitch about it now that the tables have been turned on them. Hell, even during last year’s debate, Trump paraded some of Clinton’s abusers on a national stage.There’s no difference. In any of these cases, it’s women going public with unsubstantiated, unprovable claims of sexual abuse. It may become more prevalent in the future given its effectiveness, but the overall goal is the same in all cases — take down a politician.
It’s not as much fun when it happens to someone on your side of the aisle, is it?
It's not good for anyone really, is it?
And yes, I fully expect it to happen a lot more in the future.
See if you can link to any rightwinger on this forum who criticized him for doing that....
Really? Don't you mean Clinton victims, both of Bill and the bitch?Clinton’s abusers
.
Would those be the ones he paid a settlement to, blew off on her blue dress or committed perjury over?
.
But thanks for demonstrating what I said earlier about how the right is full of hypocrites who bitch and moan about what happened to Moore while they attack Clinton for the same.
<smh>