Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I hate to break this to you but lots of major sports stadiums built in the US have been built on land taken by eminent domain.
Bush is and was a spoiled little bitch getting away with crimes and making millions for nothing...
Bush Condemned Property Via Eminent Domain to Build Rangers Stadium – And Made $14 Million Off the Deal
“It was the first time in Texas history that the power of eminent domain has been used to assist a private organization like a baseball team.”
Those emails were not subpoenaed by congress in the way you suggest for either Clinton or State. So maybe congress should exert their authority and force State to do what you suggest. They haven't. So it seems your beef is more with the committee. You are making assertions that are not currently part of the process.The State dept is releasing the emails. Not Hillary. She turned them over to State quite a while ago. State has to scrutinize each one and redact if necessary.
Are you now claiming that Hillary has turned over ALL of her emails? I ask that because she has repeatedly made that claim...only to have other emails surface after the fact. If you will remember, Clinton was directed by Congressional investigators to turn over all documentation and emails having to do with Benghazi. Clinton turned over NOTHING to them from her private email servers.
You are completely wrong.
There has been no new emails released by Hillary. The State dept asked her to submit all work related communications. She did. Anything that was personal was deleted.
The server was also turned over. If mails are recovered from the server they aren't being released from Hillary.
If you are going to be so eager to post on this subject, you should really try to know what you're talking about.
Are your serious? The Congressional investigators asked her to submit all communications related to Benghazi a year and a half ago...Hillary declared that she had...then investigators discovered that she had private email servers containing communications related to Benghazi and demanded that Clinton turn those over. That was when Clinton informed them that she had erased over 50,000 of those emails. Your claim that Hillary has been forthcoming on Benghazi is a joke. To go even further and claim that it isn't Hillary's fault that all the emails haven't yet been turned over because the State Department now controls them is laughable.
Your juvenile zeal to destroy HRC is laughable. Those emails fall under the purview of the State dept and not a congressional committee. State is the sole arbiter of what emails are released, in what form and when. If the committee feels they need more then they can subpoena State dept officials to testify directly about any redacted or incomplete emails. Let's remember that none of this correspondence was ever meant to be public. The State dept needs to protect their diplomatic channels and practices.
That is an absolute crock, Hutch! If the State Department has concerns about protecting their channels and practices then they could have provided that information in closed session to Congressional investigators. As for those emails falling under the "purview" of the State Department? Not if Congress is demanding them them don't. Part of what Congress is there for is to keep tabs on what the Executive Branch is doing which is exactly why emails and correspondence is supposed to be done through official channels and not on private servers where what is being done can be hidden from Congressional scrutiny. Once again...there is a pattern of hiding how business is being conducted with this Administration by working through private email accounts using aliases.
There is a pattern of behavior when it comes to transparency with this Administration. You saw the same thing with the IRS emails.
No you didn't.
That was another baked "scandal" that went absolutely nowhere.
It went nowhere because the Obama Administration stonewalled the investigations. We're STILL waiting for the IRS to comply with requests for all of Lois Lerner's emails!
Those emails were not subpoenaed by congress in the way you suggest for either Clinton or State. So maybe congress should exert their authority and force State to do what you suggest. They haven't. So it seems your beef is more with the committee. You are making assertions that are not currently part of the process.Are you now claiming that Hillary has turned over ALL of her emails? I ask that because she has repeatedly made that claim...only to have other emails surface after the fact. If you will remember, Clinton was directed by Congressional investigators to turn over all documentation and emails having to do with Benghazi. Clinton turned over NOTHING to them from her private email servers.
You are completely wrong.
There has been no new emails released by Hillary. The State dept asked her to submit all work related communications. She did. Anything that was personal was deleted.
The server was also turned over. If mails are recovered from the server they aren't being released from Hillary.
If you are going to be so eager to post on this subject, you should really try to know what you're talking about.
Are your serious? The Congressional investigators asked her to submit all communications related to Benghazi a year and a half ago...Hillary declared that she had...then investigators discovered that she had private email servers containing communications related to Benghazi and demanded that Clinton turn those over. That was when Clinton informed them that she had erased over 50,000 of those emails. Your claim that Hillary has been forthcoming on Benghazi is a joke. To go even further and claim that it isn't Hillary's fault that all the emails haven't yet been turned over because the State Department now controls them is laughable.
Your juvenile zeal to destroy HRC is laughable. Those emails fall under the purview of the State dept and not a congressional committee. State is the sole arbiter of what emails are released, in what form and when. If the committee feels they need more then they can subpoena State dept officials to testify directly about any redacted or incomplete emails. Let's remember that none of this correspondence was ever meant to be public. The State dept needs to protect their diplomatic channels and practices.
That is an absolute crock, Hutch! If the State Department has concerns about protecting their channels and practices then they could have provided that information in closed session to Congressional investigators. As for those emails falling under the "purview" of the State Department? Not if Congress is demanding them them don't. Part of what Congress is there for is to keep tabs on what the Executive Branch is doing which is exactly why emails and correspondence is supposed to be done through official channels and not on private servers where what is being done can be hidden from Congressional scrutiny. Once again...there is a pattern of hiding how business is being conducted with this Administration by working through private email accounts using aliases.
how many millions of taxpayer $$$ has that rw witch hunt wasted so far? The party of fiscal responsibility haw hawMcCarthy never said the real objective of the Benghazi hearing was to bring Hillary's numbers down. He said the Benghazi hearing brought Hillary's numbers down.
Yeah....that's what Republican/conservatives are trying to get everyone to believe. It was obvious way before McCarthy admitted it.......that the reason for this 9th investigation on Benghazi was to see if somehow they could tie the "server" issue to the "Benghazi" non-issue and make a formidable "scandal" to finally bring Hillary down.
Those emails were not subpoenaed by congress in the way you suggest for either Clinton or State. So maybe congress should exert their authority and force State to do what you suggest. They haven't. So it seems your beef is more with the committee. You are making assertions that are not currently part of the process.You are completely wrong.
There has been no new emails released by Hillary. The State dept asked her to submit all work related communications. She did. Anything that was personal was deleted.
The server was also turned over. If mails are recovered from the server they aren't being released from Hillary.
If you are going to be so eager to post on this subject, you should really try to know what you're talking about.
Are your serious? The Congressional investigators asked her to submit all communications related to Benghazi a year and a half ago...Hillary declared that she had...then investigators discovered that she had private email servers containing communications related to Benghazi and demanded that Clinton turn those over. That was when Clinton informed them that she had erased over 50,000 of those emails. Your claim that Hillary has been forthcoming on Benghazi is a joke. To go even further and claim that it isn't Hillary's fault that all the emails haven't yet been turned over because the State Department now controls them is laughable.
Your juvenile zeal to destroy HRC is laughable. Those emails fall under the purview of the State dept and not a congressional committee. State is the sole arbiter of what emails are released, in what form and when. If the committee feels they need more then they can subpoena State dept officials to testify directly about any redacted or incomplete emails. Let's remember that none of this correspondence was ever meant to be public. The State dept needs to protect their diplomatic channels and practices.
That is an absolute crock, Hutch! If the State Department has concerns about protecting their channels and practices then they could have provided that information in closed session to Congressional investigators. As for those emails falling under the "purview" of the State Department? Not if Congress is demanding them them don't. Part of what Congress is there for is to keep tabs on what the Executive Branch is doing which is exactly why emails and correspondence is supposed to be done through official channels and not on private servers where what is being done can be hidden from Congressional scrutiny. Once again...there is a pattern of hiding how business is being conducted with this Administration by working through private email accounts using aliases.
So what you're saying is that because Congress didn't subpoena Hillary Clinton's emails...only requested that she provide them...that she's acted in a proper manner by hiding them from Congress? Is that what you're claiming, Hutch?
hiding them from Congress? Is that what you're claiming,HutchOldstyle?
The chance for Republicans to damage Hillary before the 2016 blew up in smoke when McCarthy revealed the real objective of the latest Benghazi committee - "to bring Hillary's poll numbers down".
The CIA strikes yet another blow and embarrasses the Republicans in Congress, that were so sure they had finally found something to bring Hillary down, when it informed the committee that the agency does not view that e-mail (as well as 127 previously undisclosed messages) sent to them by committee chairman, Rep Gowdy, as having any portions that need to be redacted because they include classified information.
Republicans need to hurry and try to find another scandal.....they are running out of time and Hillary is still standing.
CIA shrugs off Clinton’s “classified” email
The credibility of the Republican-led Benghazi committee came under fresh attack Sunday after the CIA informed the panel that it does not view a 2011 email forwarded by then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton as including any classified information. The committee chairman, Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., had cited Clinton’s handling of the March 18, 2011, email as a prime example of her misusing her private email server to receive and send highly classified information.
But late Saturday night, a CIA official informed the committee that the agency does not view that email, among 127 previously undisclosed messages sent by Blumenthal to Clinton that the panel plans to release this week, as having any portions that need to be redacted because they include classified information.
CIA shrugs off Clinton’s “classified” email
how many millions of taxpayer $$$ has that rw witch hunt wasted so far? The party of fiscal responsibility haw hawMcCarthy never said the real objective of the Benghazi hearing was to bring Hillary's numbers down. He said the Benghazi hearing brought Hillary's numbers down.
Yeah....that's what Republican/conservatives are trying to get everyone to believe. It was obvious way before McCarthy admitted it.......that the reason for this 9th investigation on Benghazi was to see if somehow they could tie the "server" issue to the "Benghazi" non-issue and make a formidable "scandal" to finally bring Hillary down.
WTF? LMAO Grasping for air, bro?She isn't being investigated by the FBI? WTF Come on Sallow.. SMHHuh? You dumb?Your claim remains. For it to be a point, you need some credible reason to believe it. So far, you got zilch.
My point was that she is being investigated by the FBI. She is. Nothing to argue unless you are a complete fuckin moron.
No, she is not.
hillary investigated by fbi - Bing
Name the FBI resource that said the investigation is focusing on her.
What they are focusing on is 2 things.
1. Whether or not classified material was included in the emails.
2. The distribution of the emails.
The funny thing is that Colin Powell, who was involved in the criminal invasion of Iraq, and used a personal email server, was never subject to this sort of scrutiny, even though 4000 Americans were lost, over 30K wounded, over 250K Iraqi civilians killed and over a trillion dollars spent.
The position of the Communists is "you'll never convict Hillary."
My response is "Fine, I don't care. BUT you'll never elect Hillary." Hillary is liar, a fraud, and a crook. The entire nation knows it.
That seems to be the position of the Republican Black Booted StormTroopers and their sham committees as well.
They don't want an election.
how many millions of taxpayer $$$ has that rw witch hunt wasted so far? The party of fiscal responsibility haw hawMcCarthy never said the real objective of the Benghazi hearing was to bring Hillary's numbers down. He said the Benghazi hearing brought Hillary's numbers down.
Yeah....that's what Republican/conservatives are trying to get everyone to believe. It was obvious way before McCarthy admitted it.......that the reason for this 9th investigation on Benghazi was to see if somehow they could tie the "server" issue to the "Benghazi" non-issue and make a formidable "scandal" to finally bring Hillary down.
same party that spent 70 million investigating a blue dress.
how many millions of taxpayer $$$ has that rw witch hunt wasted so far? The party of fiscal responsibility haw hawMcCarthy never said the real objective of the Benghazi hearing was to bring Hillary's numbers down. He said the Benghazi hearing brought Hillary's numbers down.
Yeah....that's what Republican/conservatives are trying to get everyone to believe. It was obvious way before McCarthy admitted it.......that the reason for this 9th investigation on Benghazi was to see if somehow they could tie the "server" issue to the "Benghazi" non-issue and make a formidable "scandal" to finally bring Hillary down.
same party that spent 70 million investigating a blue dress.
I don't understand their logic. Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State is somehow to blame for Benghazi and the death of 4 Americans.
Condoleeza Rice as Secretary of State, however, is not to blame for 9/11 and the death of 3000+ Americans, and the ensuing senseless war that cost us another 4000+ Americans, and caused the formation of ISIS and still more Americans dying.
What's wrong with that picture?
Must be Republican Logic 101, or Republican logic for Dummies.
Hillary has no control over her emails? Did you really just make that claim? Remind me again who it was that erased 50,000 emails? For you to claim that the State Department HASN'T been stonewalling the release of Clinton's emails is laughable!
Another Right-Wing Claim About Clinton's Email Collapses
Media from Fox News to Morning Joe ran with a claim from Republicans on the Benghazi committee that claimed that Hillary Clinton revealed the name of a CIA source in an email. But the CIA has informed the committee that the email in question did not contain any classified information.
Here's my problem with your claim that nothing has been found at this point which would be classified as top secret, Tyrone...Hillary is doing her usual slow release of documents...telling us that she's given it all...then releasing more...telling us THAT is all of it...then releasing more...then swearing THAT was really all of it...then releasing even more. One can only assume that the really bad emails are the ones we haven't seen yet and one can also assume those won't be released until after the next election. That's what the Clintons DO!
How can you blatantly lie? Oh, I forgot, you're a conservative. Hillary has no control on how the e-mails are released, so quit with the lies, already.
Where do you all come up with such absurd charges?
A federal judge on Tuesday instructed the State Department to release former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's emails on a rolling basis rather than all at once after they have been cleared.
Judge Orders Clinton Emails Released on a Rolling Basis
Hillary Clinton and the State Department on Tuesday insisted they are not slow-walking the public release of her emails during her time as secretary of state, while a federal judge ordered up a plan for a rolling release of the hotly anticipated documents.
Clinton said in March that she wanted the State Department to release the emails, and since then, the agency has assigned 12 staffers full-time to reviewing the Clinton emails, according to an official.
The State Department on Monday night proposed a deadline of January 2016 to complete its review and publicly release the whole set of documents, but a federal judge on Tuesday rejected such a plan.
U.S. District Court Judge Rudolph Contreras on Tuesday said in a written order State must propose a new schedule by next Tuesday that involves disclosing the records batch-by-batch on a regular basis and updating the court every 60 days on the releases.
Hillary Clinton on her emails: I want them out, too!
What I find rather amusing is watching you on the Left defend this Administration's actions simply because they aren't "illegal"! This was a group that took office promising to be the most "transparent" administration in US history and then proceeded to become one of the LEAST transparent administrations ever as they tried to cover up scandal after scandal. That's going to be one of the legacies of the Obama Presidency.
New Poll Reveals 59% Of Americans Are Sick Of Hearing About Clinton’s Damn Emails
A new Monmouth University poll dropped some seriously bad news for Republicans. Just a day ahead of her testimony..............
hmmmm, does conservative Teabags ring a bell?
Anyone who wants her in charge of the US of A is one fucking idiot.
Anyone who wants her in charge of the US of A is one fucking idiot.
That is too fucking funny.......considering the large number of conservative Teabags that think T-Chump is Presidential material.....they wouldn't know intelligence if it hit them on the head with a two-by-four.
