Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We told you guys that they would come for the 2nd Amendment first...but the 1st Amendment is next......every part of the first Amendment....religion, speech, political speech....the left does not regard individual liberty as a serious concept......the power of the state must control every aspect of life....and the 1st and 2nd amendment prevent the accumulation of power in the central government....
NOt really. Neither amendment has ever been an absolute.
It's why you can't own that machine gun you've had your eye on
Who says you can't own a machine gun?
Eh, if people have private property then that private property is subject to the rules set forth by the owner.
Within reason.Eh, if people have private property then that private property is subject to the rules set forth by the owner.
Really?
- Open a fish market
- Open a bordello
- Open a slaughter house
- Grow opium poppies
- Grow MJ
- Burn garbage
- Own 24 cats
- 10 dogs
- 1 elephant
Nope, you don't get the call. Anyone can read your code words. Your denial is code that you do use code words.JakeStarkey said, "If what the Commissioner is true (and we have plenty of posters who here do just this with code words), then "discrimination, intolerance, racism, sexism, homophobia, Islamophobia, Christian supremacy or any form of intolerance" must be combatted.My remarks need no explaining to anyone. If a person has doubts, go back and read them. If you have trouble with the Commission, compost, I don't care.
Compost, sassy, onyx, etc., are walking examples of the truth of this."
Explain the highlighted portions. What code words have been used, and their definition, along with quotes that contain those words from something I, sassy and onyx have said. If you can't provide this, than you are a common slanderer.
no problem, as long as you understand, mistakes have consequences.
within reason. actually, I don't think they go far enough.
Grizz and Billly yammer on. Grizz you have learned to be on OP with me, and that's good. Billy, you are right in that every one who wants to buy a gun, whether a 22 or a machine gun, should be required to purchase and keep updated a federal firearms license. Make it mandatory for any and every purchase.
We told you guys that they would come for the 2nd Amendment first...but the 1st Amendment is next......every part of the first Amendment....religion, speech, political speech....the left does not regard individual liberty as a serious concept......the power of the state must control every aspect of life....and the 1st and 2nd amendment prevent the accumulation of power in the central government....
NOt really. Neither amendment has ever been an absolute.
It's why you can't own that machine gun you've had your eye on
Who says you can't own a machine gun?
The right to own a "machine gun" is (correctly) infringed by licensing, fees/taxation and background checks. Thus Scalia/Heller was and is correct, the 2nd A. is not an absolute prohibition of gun control; infringements exist!
See, you are entitled to your opinion.Grizz and Billly yammer on. Grizz you have learned to be on OP with me, and that's good. Billy, you are right in that every one who wants to buy a gun, whether a 22 or a machine gun, should be required to purchase and keep updated a federal firearms license. Make it mandatory for any and every purchase.
I have never expressed such a ridiculous notion.
"Congress shall make no law" applies to all amendments. It is a restricting document. It does not grant power.
We told you guys that they would come for the 2nd Amendment first...but the 1st Amendment is next......every part of the first Amendment....religion, speech, political speech....the left does not regard individual liberty as a serious concept......the power of the state must control every aspect of life....and the 1st and 2nd amendment prevent the accumulation of power in the central government....
NOt really. Neither amendment has ever been an absolute.
It's why you can't own that machine gun you've had your eye on
Who says you can't own a machine gun?
The right to own a "machine gun" is (correctly) infringed by licensing, fees/taxation and background checks. Thus Scalia/Heller was and is correct, the 2nd A. is not an absolute prohibition of gun control; infringements exist!
See #86
In fact, there is no ‘right’ to own a machine gun at all, as the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit determined last June:We told you guys that they would come for the 2nd Amendment first...but the 1st Amendment is next......every part of the first Amendment....religion, speech, political speech....the left does not regard individual liberty as a serious concept......the power of the state must control every aspect of life....and the 1st and 2nd amendment prevent the accumulation of power in the central government....
NOt really. Neither amendment has ever been an absolute.
It's why you can't own that machine gun you've had your eye on
Who says you can't own a machine gun?
The right to own a "machine gun" is (correctly) infringed by licensing, fees/taxation and background checks. Thus Scalia/Heller was and is correct, the 2nd A. is not an absolute prohibition of gun control; infringements exist!
Subject to necessary, proper, and Constitutional regulatory measures as authorized by the Commerce Clause, such as public accommodations laws.Within reason.Eh, if people have private property then that private property is subject to the rules set forth by the owner.
Really?
- Open a fish market
- Open a bordello
- Open a slaughter house
- Grow opium poppies
- Grow MJ
- Burn garbage
- Own 24 cats
- 10 dogs
- 1 elephant
There is no such thing as ‘enforced equality,’ the notion is ridiculous, ignorant nonsense.no problem, as long as you understand, mistakes have consequences.
Actually there is a problem.
Through the established law, mistakes are not allowed. Natural consequences I can get behind.
within reason. actually, I don't think they go far enough.
What level of enforced equality is desirable?
Understanding that the government is founded on inequality needs to be considered in that plan as well.
Nope, you don't get the call. Anyone can read your code words. Your denial is code that you do use code words.JakeStarkey said, "If what the Commissioner is true (and we have plenty of posters who here do just this with code words), then "discrimination, intolerance, racism, sexism, homophobia, Islamophobia, Christian supremacy or any form of intolerance" must be combatted.My remarks need no explaining to anyone. If a person has doubts, go back and read them. If you have trouble with the Commission, compost, I don't care.
Compost, sassy, onyx, etc., are walking examples of the truth of this."
Explain the highlighted portions. What code words have been used, and their definition, along with quotes that contain those words from something I, sassy and onyx have said. If you can't provide this, than you are a common slanderer.
Nope, you don't get the call. Anyone can read your code words. Your denial is code that you do use code words.JakeStarkey said, "If what the Commissioner is true (and we have plenty of posters who here do just this with code words), then "discrimination, intolerance, racism, sexism, homophobia, Islamophobia, Christian supremacy or any form of intolerance" must be combatted.My remarks need no explaining to anyone. If a person has doubts, go back and read them. If you have trouble with the Commission, compost, I don't care.
Compost, sassy, onyx, etc., are walking examples of the truth of this."
Explain the highlighted portions. What code words have been used, and their definition, along with quotes that contain those words from something I, sassy and onyx have said. If you can't provide this, than you are a common slanderer.
What a fucking moron.
Whoa, another angry old black man.
Now see this is some weird hypocritical crap here. We're all supposed to respect the belief of gay men that another guy's anus "isn't really an artificial vagina". And that a lesbian's dildo "doesn't really mean she has hetero leanings in her closet". And we're supposed to respect that it's OK for "gay marriage" to deprive children of either a mother or father for life.
And, we're supposed to respect their Church of LGBT's belief that girls in high school should be punished fiscally and have their education suffer if they don't agree to undress in their locker rooms with deranged boys.
We all have to respect the Church of LGBT's outrageous and transparently-deranged dogma. So why must they not respect other religions?
What level of enforced equality is desirable?
Understanding that the government is founded on inequality needs to be considered in that plan as well.
We told you guys that they would come for the 2nd Amendment first...but the 1st Amendment is next......every part of the first Amendment....religion, speech, political speech....the left does not regard individual liberty as a serious concept......the power of the state must control every aspect of life....and the 1st and 2nd amendment prevent the accumulation of power in the central government....
NOt really. Neither amendment has ever been an absolute.
It's why you can't own that machine gun you've had your eye on
Who says you can't own a machine gun?
The right to own a "machine gun" is (correctly) infringed by licensing, fees/taxation and background checks. Thus Scalia/Heller was and is correct, the 2nd A. is not an absolute prohibition of gun control; infringements exist!
See #86
See two hundred + years of Jurisprudence in America, esp. since Marbury v. Madison (1803) & most recently Heller. Understand the first issue discussed in ConLaw are First A. Issues.
What level of enforced equality is desirable?
Understanding that the government is founded on inequality needs to be considered in that plan as well.
I've know gay people who've lost their jobs because of homophobes, I've know gay people who've been beaten up because of homophobes.
"Waaah, I had to bake a cake after I offered to bake a cake and I got money for baking the cake and made a hefty profit" is NOT that much of a burden.
I agree. Smart businessmen never turn down cash.
However, they should be free to choose.
