WTF? What is it with you guys? So if you dont have a right to something then ipso facto it is forbidden? Do you have a right to drink red wine? A right to wear a hat? Do you get to do those things anyway even though you dont have a right to it?Rights are a social construct. They certainly do not come from 5 unelected lawyers in DC.Where do "Human Rights" come from? What part of the US COnstitution authorizes or describes "human rights"?So you have no answer. Ergo there is no "right to marry." It is an invention of courts.
I did answer. You just don't like the answer.
It is a human right, that should obvious, but if it isn't: consult constitutional case law:
The right to marry and the Constitution
That some lawyer pulled it out of his ass is not proof of anything.
I don't understand your line of reasoning. From where do you think human rights come? So far as I know, the Constitution limits to authority of the government, not the rights of citizens.
So, no one should be allowed to marry?