NightFox
Wildling
None that I can see, those three cover everything; as in every other natural human right can be derived from them. You have the right to life (and thus self defense), liberty (as in making your own choices as long as they don't infringe upon the life, liberty of property of others) and pursuit of happiness (otherwise known as property aka exclusive use and enjoyment of the fruits of your own labor). According to which historian(s) you trust Jefferson's use of the word among portrays his acknowledgement that he did not know everything and that there may be certain rights endowed by the creator that he was not aware of or could not foresee, others I have read insist that "among" was just an example of Jefferson's propensity for flowery prose... hard to say which is accurate.Did Jefferson identify them in the Declaration of Independence? Or are they only the Rights delineated in COTUS?
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness"
What other Rights might be among the three noted in this seminal document?
You can't "infer" rights from the 9th Amendment as it's a statement intended to clarify the scope of the Bill of Rights; just because the Bill of Rights explicitly protects certain rights doesn't mean that all other rights are surrendered to the government.What Rights can we infer from the 9th Amendment?
Or as Madison puts it
"It has been objected also against a Bill of Rights that, by enumerating particular exceptions to the grant of power, it would disparage those rights which were not placed in that enumeration; and it might follow by implication, that those rights which were not singled out, were intended to be assigned into the hands of the General Government, and were consequently insecure. This is one of the most plausible arguments I have ever heard against the admission of a bill of rights into this system; but, I conceive, that it may be guarded against. I have attempted it, as gentlemen may see by turning to the last clause of the fourth resolution."
Yeah, it's the downside of democracy aka as the "tyranny of the majority", whereby the majority can vote away the rights of themselves and the minority, it's one of the reasons the founders saw fit to explicitly protect certain crucial rights contained in the Bill of Rights.Can Rights be abridged by "The People"?