Clarence Thomas and the Billionaire.

Crooked Donald was the most corrupt President in my lifetime and likely everyone's that walks on earth today.

He is a man, of pure lawlessness and has gotten away with every crime and wrong doing he ever did.

Teflon Don.

Nothing, zip, nada was ever done to him, that he didn't create. It's hard to believe you're unable to see what is so clear....


No, he isn't......biden is making a run for that with Chinese communist money, and money from every country in the world with a check book.......as did the clinton's and their funny money charity.
 
This is not about the IRS, it is not about taxes.

It is about ethics regulations.

How fucking stupid can you be? Never mind, do not answer your every post is answer enough


No....this is about the democrats consolidating power, trying to remove and replace Thomas and use that extra legal attack to intimidate every other federal judge in the system....
 
No....this is about the democrats consolidating power, trying to remove and replace Thomas and use that extra legal attack to intimidate every other federal judge in the system....

You keep projecting things that you own party is doing.

But then again, there is no difference between the two so it does make sense for you to do so.
 
4dn1cbqnqksa1.jpg

6esqtzlgcosa1.jpg
What do you imagine cartoons prove?
 
Democrats are clinging to this narrative in the face of facts. Maybe one can explain exactly when the supposed violation of eithical rules by Thosmas occurred. Here is what happened:

Ethical rules required that gifts to justices be reported. The rules had an exception for personal hospitality.

Justice Thomas had a wealthy friend.

Thomas' wealthy friend showed personal hospitality by inviting Thomas on trips on his yacht.

The rules were recently changed to tighten up the personal hospitality exception.

Propublica published a story that Justice Thomas' yacht trips would have been a violation if the new rules had been in place when he took them.

Justice Thomas responded that he will comply with the new rules in the future (and showed great restraint by not adding "DUH!").


So where did the ethical violation occur exactly?

In reality, for Demoklans, the eithical violation occurred with the part in blue "Justice Thomas." That a black man had the audacity to be nominated by a Republican and not immediately renounce the Republican party is an ethical violation akin to a House Slave being named head housekeeper, when that job was previously held by a white woman.

For Democommies, the ethical violation occurred with the part in green, "had a wealthy friend," provided that the wealthy person did not become wealthy by being married to a powerful (D) lawmaker passing laws to enrich him.
 
Pretty sure I know more than you, chimp. At least I've read a Constitutional Law text book. Keep crying little bitch because criminals are going to keep getting arrested. We know how much your kind hates the rule of law.
Yes, eventually the Biden criminal crime family will be arrested. Again, those doing the arresting are arresting political prisoners and are just like Mao, Stalin....
 
vnpl0xcg9osa1.png

enough evidence of bribes is already there, the point of these is to give perspective.
There's absolutely no evidence of bribes. Yet, all you brain damaged turds ,belive hunter didn't break any laws!
 
vnpl0xcg9osa1.png

enough evidence of bribes is already there, the point of these is to give perspective.
The IRS makes a distinction between gifts and hospitality. That's why they had to change the law a few months ago.
 
iu


I know you don't undertand how stupid that statement was



So you believe that how the term gift is defined has no bearing on this issue?

Really?
They also don’t mention that Thomas has been friends with this man for decades. He also has no business before SCOTUS. Rather important points that partisan goofs like Gator shove aside to attack a black man.
 
The IRS makes a distinction between gifts and hospitality. That's why they had to change the law a few months ago.
The Dems used that very argument to try to defend Bob Menendez (who did a lot worse things, many involving underage girls). A hung jury saved him using the argument that it was hospitality from a friend. There goes any case against Thomas. The racist left loses again.
 
They also don’t mention that Thomas has been friends with this man for decades. He also has no business before SCOTUS.

Thomas was a Justice before they became friends.

He is a business man, the court hears lots of business related cases.

Organizations he donates to and is on the board of have cases before the court on a regulars basis.
 
They also don’t mention that Thomas has been friends with this man for decades. He also has no business before SCOTUS. Rather important points that partisan goofs like Gator shove aside to attack a black man.
so SC judges can't have friend? I know, only if they are Republicans.
 
Thomas was a Justice before they became friends.

He is a business man, the court hears lots of business related cases.

Organizations he donates to and is on the board of have cases before the court on a regulars basis.
Lies, lies, and more lies. It’s nice when you show your absolute racism.
 

Forum List

Back
Top