Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I agree about Gore and I think carbon taxes are unnecessary, probably ineffective and costly to average Americans who are already taxed enough. But that doesn't mean his documentary isn't factual and based on tons of scientific research and evidence, and are the polar bear in trouble ? Yes and I would suggest relocating some of them to Antarctica.Didn't the brilliant environmentalist Al "Snake Oil Salesman" Gore promise us the Arctic would be free of Ice by 2010 or thereabouts? Oh, and Polar Bears were going to be extinct. Are they?
Did you believe Al Gore's film, "An Inconvenient Truth"?
Cool animation! Here's today.
Very impressive Jacques Cousteau.
"What would you think if your government didn't believe in gravity? If your senator alleged that, because they couldn't see it, perhaps it didn't exist. To many, this might seem absurd—the science is enough to know that it's real."
The Climate Change Deniers in Congress
"Almost 30 years ago, a NASA scientist named James Hansen pleaded with Congress, under the Reagan Administration, to accept the evidence and do something about it. "It is already happening now," Hansen said before a Congressional committee in 1988."
"Fast-forward three decades, and the United States is facing one of its most anti-science Congresses in history. Many members of the Senate and House of Representatives have gone on-record to denounce climate change as a hoax. Others have proven through their votes that regulating greenhouse gas emissions is not a priority. And still, some state representatives claim to believe in human-made climate change, but consistently support policies that would erode initiatives to combat it."
The colors used here are no mistake. The alignment between a representatives position on AGW and his political party is almost perfect. And you can see many instances of the same reasoning you'll find here on this forum, in the halls of our Congress. The most common answer seen from our representatives is that the Earth's climate has always been dynamic and that the changes over the last century and a half are simply Mother Nature at work. Unsurprisingly, that reasoning is as easily refuted as all the rest. Of course the Earth's climate is dynamic, but through its very long history, that dynamicism has resulted in changes orders of magnitude slower than the changes we are witnessing now. And the various variable factors that naturally control our climate: ex solar irradiance and orbital mechanics, indicate that we should be cooling now. But, of course, we are not.
So, once again, would you vote for a representative that didn't believe in gravity? What if he thought we were all actually held down by magnetism or by wee demons trying to drag us to Hell? Would you vote for a senate candidate that believed the Earth was flat, that humans had never traveled to space, much less the moon? Would you vote for a presidential candidate who believed that modern medicine was an evil to be eliminated from modern society? The belief that the rate of warming we are currently experiencing is a natural climatic change (or a lie constructed by thousands of corrupt scientists) and that human GHG emissions have no involvement, is just as false and just as dangerous.
Over in France cities are burning, thus producing plenty of CO2, because they, the common Frenchman is pissed off at the Carbon Taxes on fuel. Do you want that type of government here?"What would you think if your government didn't believe in gravity? If your senator alleged that, because they couldn't see it, perhaps it didn't exist. To many, this might seem absurd—the science is enough to know that it's real."
The Climate Change Deniers in Congress
"Almost 30 years ago, a NASA scientist named James Hansen pleaded with Congress, under the Reagan Administration, to accept the evidence and do something about it. "It is already happening now," Hansen said before a Congressional committee in 1988."
"Fast-forward three decades, and the United States is facing one of its most anti-science Congresses in history. Many members of the Senate and House of Representatives have gone on-record to denounce climate change as a hoax. Others have proven through their votes that regulating greenhouse gas emissions is not a priority. And still, some state representatives claim to believe in human-made climate change, but consistently support policies that would erode initiatives to combat it."
The colors used here are no mistake. The alignment between a representatives position on AGW and his political party is almost perfect. And you can see many instances of the same reasoning you'll find here on this forum, in the halls of our Congress. The most common answer seen from our representatives is that the Earth's climate has always been dynamic and that the changes over the last century and a half are simply Mother Nature at work. Unsurprisingly, that reasoning is as easily refuted as all the rest. Of course the Earth's climate is dynamic, but through its very long history, that dynamicism has resulted in changes orders of magnitude slower than the changes we are witnessing now. And the various variable factors that naturally control our climate: ex solar irradiance and orbital mechanics, indicate that we should be cooling now. But, of course, we are not.
So, once again, would you vote for a representative that didn't believe in gravity? What if he thought we were all actually held down by magnetism or by wee demons trying to drag us to Hell? Would you vote for a senate candidate that believed the Earth was flat, that humans had never traveled to space, much less the moon? Would you vote for a presidential candidate who believed that modern medicine was an evil to be eliminated from modern society? The belief that the rate of warming we are currently experiencing is a natural climatic change (or a lie constructed by thousands of corrupt scientists) and that human GHG emissions have no involvement, is just as false and just as dangerous.
The bad news, them, is that nearly half of all our elected representatives in both houses of Congress have fallen for this ridiculous hoax. The good news is that these gullible suckers remain a minority, albeit a slim one at this time.
Over in France cities are burning, thus producing plenty of CO2, because they, the common Frenchman is pissed off at the Carbon Taxes on fuel. Do you want that type of government here?"What would you think if your government didn't believe in gravity? If your senator alleged that, because they couldn't see it, perhaps it didn't exist. To many, this might seem absurd—the science is enough to know that it's real."
The Climate Change Deniers in Congress
"Almost 30 years ago, a NASA scientist named James Hansen pleaded with Congress, under the Reagan Administration, to accept the evidence and do something about it. "It is already happening now," Hansen said before a Congressional committee in 1988."
"Fast-forward three decades, and the United States is facing one of its most anti-science Congresses in history. Many members of the Senate and House of Representatives have gone on-record to denounce climate change as a hoax. Others have proven through their votes that regulating greenhouse gas emissions is not a priority. And still, some state representatives claim to believe in human-made climate change, but consistently support policies that would erode initiatives to combat it."
The colors used here are no mistake. The alignment between a representatives position on AGW and his political party is almost perfect. And you can see many instances of the same reasoning you'll find here on this forum, in the halls of our Congress. The most common answer seen from our representatives is that the Earth's climate has always been dynamic and that the changes over the last century and a half are simply Mother Nature at work. Unsurprisingly, that reasoning is as easily refuted as all the rest. Of course the Earth's climate is dynamic, but through its very long history, that dynamicism has resulted in changes orders of magnitude slower than the changes we are witnessing now. And the various variable factors that naturally control our climate: ex solar irradiance and orbital mechanics, indicate that we should be cooling now. But, of course, we are not.
So, once again, would you vote for a representative that didn't believe in gravity? What if he thought we were all actually held down by magnetism or by wee demons trying to drag us to Hell? Would you vote for a senate candidate that believed the Earth was flat, that humans had never traveled to space, much less the moon? Would you vote for a presidential candidate who believed that modern medicine was an evil to be eliminated from modern society? The belief that the rate of warming we are currently experiencing is a natural climatic change (or a lie constructed by thousands of corrupt scientists) and that human GHG emissions have no involvement, is just as false and just as dangerous.
The bad news, them, is that nearly half of all our elected representatives in both houses of Congress have fallen for this ridiculous hoax. The good news is that these gullible suckers remain a minority, albeit a slim one at this time.
I'm sure that when millions have become refugees, are starving or dying of thirst, boredom will be a big part of their suffering.
And, among the scientists of the world, there is no longer a debate. YOURS is precisely the strategy that was employed by the tobacco industry to create a false impression that there was some debate as to whether or not cigarettes were harmful. Not surprising since the false debate scam was brought about by the exact same people.
Do you touch your children with the hands that type that shit?
We're in the US. where denial-propaganda has been full throttle for decades and already dumbed-down Americans are very easily snookered. And the rest are too busy to worry about it.Wait a minute....I'm told all the time in here that the skeptic view is fringe and not accepted by many!!
Then why isnt climate change action at full throttle? Instead....we see a great deal of apathy!
Hmmm.....why would that be?
We're in the US. where denial-propaganda has been full throttle for decades and already dumbed-down Americans are very easily snookered. And the rest are too busy to worry about it.Wait a minute....I'm told all the time in here that the skeptic view is fringe and not accepted by many!!
Then why isnt climate change action at full throttle? Instead....we see a great deal of apathy!
Hmmm.....why would that be?
That about sum it up ?
View attachment 250698
France is a democracy.
Do you NOT want a democracy here?
I agree about Gore and I think carbon taxes are unnecessary, probably ineffective and costly to average Americans who are already taxed enough. But that doesn't mean his documentary isn't factual and based on tons of scientific research and evidence, and are the polar bear in trouble ? Yes and I would suggest relocating some of them to Antarctica.
So you think this
has no effect there?
