RollingThunder
Gold Member
- Mar 22, 2010
- 4,818
- 525
- 155
THe chart I posted HAS NOTHING TO DO with "solar flares".. That's just your juvenile interpretation or what you been instructed to do by your warmer handlers.. Look at the chart again... A 200 year HIGH for the SUN'S TSI. I don't care about 10 year time spans or sun spots or ANYTHING that you clipped and pasted.. You have not commented on the 300 year TSI chart that I posted...
And perhaps you're too stupid to realize (no perhaps) that the chart you posted showing the bulk of the surface warming occurs in oceans is INTIMATELY related to this solar forcing.. With lags of 100 years to reach equilibrium at least..
You just told me this morning that what happens in a 10 or 20 yr time span is dishonest in a climate discussion... I give you a 300 yr chart of solar forcing -- and you shoot back with what the sun did last year.. Are YOU being dishonest?
Again you demonstrate that you have no real idea what you're talking about. You just throw stuff at the wall and hope something sticks. But you're a clueless retard so all of your speculations are just unscientific nonsense.
Climate forcing from greenhouse gases = about 3 W/m2
"The increase in solar-cycle averaged TSI from the Maunder Minimum to the present amounts to (0.9 ± 0.4) Wm−2." - Total solar irradiance during the Holocene -
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, VOL. 36, L19704, 5 PP., 2009 - doi:10.1029/2009GL040142