Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And you are the one lying. Every Scientific Society, every National Academia of Sciences, and every major University in the world states that AGW is real, and a clear and present danger Only morons like you try to pretend that there is some great international conspiracy to fool the rest of us. Don't forget the tinfoil for your little tin hats."i am one of the 97% of scientists that believe man is destroying our planet despite this cycle happening naturally. Now please excuse me while i go jump on my private jumbo jet that spews more co2 in 8 hours than you do all year, and be disingenuous to another group of useful idiots. Dont forget to sign the checks!"
If climate scientists are in it for the money, they’re doing it wrong
So, are there big bucks to be had in climate science? Since it doesn't have a lot of commercial appeal, most of the people working in the area, and the vast majority of those publishing the scientific literature, work in academic departments or at government agencies. Penn State, home of noted climatologists Richard Alley and Michael Mann, has a strong geosciences department and, conveniently, makes the department's salary information available. It's easy to check, and find that the average tenured professor earned about $120,000 last year, and a new hire a bit less than $70,000. That's a pretty healthy salary by many standards, but it's hardly a racket.
$70-120K is a lot better than $20K a year flipping burgers, which is what a lot of these people would be making if they weren't scamming.
Climategate I & II exposed the scam. The principal scientists were all manipulating and fabricating data to make it fit their screwed up computer modeling. Under the Obama Administration we found out that NOAA and NASA were doing the same damn thing. Also the UN Climate Committee.
If this AGW was real and significant then there would be no reason to lie about it, would it?
First, have faith in Jesus Christ. Then, anything we ask of you will be acceptable, right?First accept that human activity emitted greenhouse gases are the primary driver of climate change, then all will be clear.
And Al Gore is a what ?Just like the propaganda in the WSJ from a conservative columnist, not a scientist.Riiiight.
Good lord, you are truly one fucked up liar.The number of claims is DIRECTLY related to the number of insured.God, the longer they come, the stupider they get. Note that is number of events. Just how does an increasing global population increase the number of events?
Scientists have fronted up with evidence of what is happening.You [Confounding] want me to have faith in the great AGW god.
And, I am perfectly fine with that.It is great to see it has gone from the political sphere to consumer demand as folks have taken interest in environmental impact of the products and goods they buy. Its success mirrors the anti-cigarettes campaign. The government primed the pump, but business and industry has learned by now that the demand for energy efficiency and environmental friendliness has become a marketable selling point.
And they get big grant money too.And you are the one lying. Every Scientific Society, every National Academia of Sciences, and every major University in the world states that AGW is real, and a clear and present danger Only morons like you try to pretend that there is some great international conspiracy to fool the rest of us. Don't forget the tinfoil for your little tin hats."i am one of the 97% of scientists that believe man is destroying our planet despite this cycle happening naturally. Now please excuse me while i go jump on my private jumbo jet that spews more co2 in 8 hours than you do all year, and be disingenuous to another group of useful idiots. Dont forget to sign the checks!"
If climate scientists are in it for the money, they’re doing it wrong
So, are there big bucks to be had in climate science? Since it doesn't have a lot of commercial appeal, most of the people working in the area, and the vast majority of those publishing the scientific literature, work in academic departments or at government agencies. Penn State, home of noted climatologists Richard Alley and Michael Mann, has a strong geosciences department and, conveniently, makes the department's salary information available. It's easy to check, and find that the average tenured professor earned about $120,000 last year, and a new hire a bit less than $70,000. That's a pretty healthy salary by many standards, but it's hardly a racket.
$70-120K is a lot better than $20K a year flipping burgers, which is what a lot of these people would be making if they weren't scamming.
Climategate I & II exposed the scam. The principal scientists were all manipulating and fabricating data to make it fit their screwed up computer modeling. Under the Obama Administration we found out that NOAA and NASA were doing the same damn thing. Also the UN Climate Committee.
If this AGW was real and significant then there would be no reason to lie about it, would it?
A journalist that put the information that the scientists gave him into layman's terms, and did an excellent job of it.And Al Gore is a what ?Just like the propaganda in the WSJ from a conservative columnist, not a scientist.Riiiight.
maybe we would like a second opinion.
What will happen if we do nothing?
What must we do to prevent it?
Wait do you know the point of science is to prove it exists.....Gravity.....works every time...the sun is there and we know a lot about it......black holes are theoretical...no one has actually ever seen one.....no one can "prove" they exist.....it's all mathematics and probability.......so while I think they may exist...I'm not going to want to pay higher prices or give up products or even freedoms over one....sorrySo, a hypothesis with evidence to back it up, that hasn't been falsified. Right?Just so you know, black holes are still theoretical.
You are asking me to accept the conclusions and suffer the consequences of those conclusions without clearly explaining the consequences of doing nothing, and without clearly explaining what your plan is and how it will actually work.Do you have evidence to the contrary? If not, why do you not accept this evidence?
It is great to see it has gone from the political sphere to consumer demand as folks have taken interest in environmental impact of the products and goods they buy. Its success mirrors the anti-cigarettes campaign. The government primed the pump, but business and industry has learned by now that the demand for energy efficiency and environmental friendliness has become a marketable selling point.
Once again proving what an ignorant cocksuck you are. Grants do not provide salaries or pay to the person that gets them, only the funds to pursue the research. All too many scientists get grants, then put their own money into the research to make up the difference between what they got and what is needed. This is exactly the same as saying that people join the armed forces only for the big bucks they receive.And they get big grant money too.And you are the one lying. Every Scientific Society, every National Academia of Sciences, and every major University in the world states that AGW is real, and a clear and present danger Only morons like you try to pretend that there is some great international conspiracy to fool the rest of us. Don't forget the tinfoil for your little tin hats."i am one of the 97% of scientists that believe man is destroying our planet despite this cycle happening naturally. Now please excuse me while i go jump on my private jumbo jet that spews more co2 in 8 hours than you do all year, and be disingenuous to another group of useful idiots. Dont forget to sign the checks!"
If climate scientists are in it for the money, they’re doing it wrong
So, are there big bucks to be had in climate science? Since it doesn't have a lot of commercial appeal, most of the people working in the area, and the vast majority of those publishing the scientific literature, work in academic departments or at government agencies. Penn State, home of noted climatologists Richard Alley and Michael Mann, has a strong geosciences department and, conveniently, makes the department's salary information available. It's easy to check, and find that the average tenured professor earned about $120,000 last year, and a new hire a bit less than $70,000. That's a pretty healthy salary by many standards, but it's hardly a racket.
$70-120K is a lot better than $20K a year flipping burgers, which is what a lot of these people would be making if they weren't scamming.
Climategate I & II exposed the scam. The principal scientists were all manipulating and fabricating data to make it fit their screwed up computer modeling. Under the Obama Administration we found out that NOAA and NASA were doing the same damn thing. Also the UN Climate Committee.
If this AGW was real and significant then there would be no reason to lie about it, would it?
So, what is the AGW gang wanting from me to "reverse" this "planet-destroying" phenomenon? What will be my obligations and burdens?
Of course, you are suspicious because you are too damned lazy to research the subject. Wind mills and utility solar that produce electricity cheaper than coal or natural gas is Communistic? LOL!!!!!!!!!!!! And without the extreme expense and dangers of nuclear?You are asking me to accept the conclusions and suffer the consequences of those conclusions without clearly explaining the consequences of doing nothing, and without clearly explaining what your plan is and how it will actually work.Do you have evidence to the contrary? If not, why do you not accept this evidence?
Of course I am suspicious. Especially when, so far, the plan to correct AGW has been world communism.
If we can't stop it, why bother?It's possible that we can't stop or even mitigate what's happening. The long term impact will be our planet becoming less and less comfortable for us.
He's still alive dipshit.....and I am no illiterate....I'm just not a sheep that follows some spoonfed socialist agenda. you guys use so many coercive tactics because people don't buy your bullshit......holly wood celebs cant move the ball, some made up consensus (again because many are afraid to speak out), and the fact that you guys have no data..Your father will be rolling in his grave. He produced a scientific illiterate.I believe in science, my father is a chemist.......you know real science...chemistry, biology, physics, stuff that can be proven, not studies with "consensus" there was scientific consensus the Sun revolved around the Earth at one point........doesn't make it real......Now gravity....that is real, I can prove it every time
Really dumb. Over the life of the light, LEDs are far cheaper than incandescent bulbs. Use far less electricity, last several times as long.It is great to see it has gone from the political sphere to consumer demand as folks have taken interest in environmental impact of the products and goods they buy. Its success mirrors the anti-cigarettes campaign. The government primed the pump, but business and industry has learned by now that the demand for energy efficiency and environmental friendliness has become a marketable selling point.
Not really, most people would still buy incandescent light bulbs...because they are cheaper......expensive green products, people don't want......they just don't care
What action????So, what is the AGW gang wanting from me to "reverse" this "planet-destroying" phenomenon? What will be my obligations and burdens?
That you tend to vote for politicians who believe action needs to be taken to reduce CO2 emissions.
Climate Change Has Run Its Course
"Climate change is over. No, I’m not saying the climate will not change in the future, or that human influence on the climate is negligible. I mean simply that climate change is no longer a pre-eminent policy issue. All that remains is boilerplate rhetoric from the political class, frivolous nuisance lawsuits, and bureaucratic mandates on behalf of special-interest renewable-energy rent seekers."
Al Gore was the face of 'Global Warming' and the sole reason it became a global political 'phenomenon'.
Al Gore was also a scam artist, a con man who sought to make millions off of the idea of 'Carbon Credits'. What were Carbon Credits' and the idea behind it?
The concept was that there was too much carbon being produced by countries around the world, so 'THEY' (people like Gore) wanted to dictate to all the nations that they could only produce so much carbon each year. Each nation would have an allotted number of 'carbon credits - if they were going to produce any more carbon than that amount they would have to BUY more 'carbon credits'.
That is sort of like ME deciding to tell everyone in the world that they are using too much OXYGEN, that they are allowed only so many breaths a day, and if they use / need to use any more breaths than their allotted amount they would have to BUY 'oxygen credits' from ME.
The concept of carbon credits did little to nothing to reduce the amount of carbon, but it would make a WHOLE lot of money for whoever controlled the Carbon Credits.
But I digress...
From the 'hockey stick' to NASA data manipulation to crating non-existent alien races to ponder how they would deal with Global Warming, despite the 'Global Warming Warriors' claiming 'The Science Is Settled', the science used to back up their every claim was never settled...so much so that they were forced to change the title / name of 'Global Warming' to 'Climate change'.
As the WSJ points out, the Climate Change / Global Warming 'crusade' has 'petered out', lost its momentum, and is no longer 'a pre-eminent policy issue'.
