Clinton (Bill) and Trump both like extramarital affairs. What’s the difference?

[Erinwltr]

I'm pretty sure Slick Willy has no interest in water sports. Il Trumpino on the other hand...

That dossier is well known to be garbage.

No.

 

[sealybobo]

Clinton had sex with woman he knew.

Trump had unprotected sex with nasty porn stars, strumpets, tarts and tramps and spent maybe millions for a little 'tang.

Clinton used the power of his elected offices to get laid...it's commonly referred to as "SEXUAL HARASSMENT IN THE WORK PLACE!!!" and no different than what Matt Lauer, Charlie Rose and Harvey Weinstein did!

He was a wolf

He was a classic sexual predator.


That the left, the media and the feminists sided with him, made a complete mockery of their claim to care about women.

What the left allowed Bill Clinton to do made it OK for people like Matt Lauer, Charlie Rose and Harvey Weinstein to also sexually harass women who worked under them. It's the epitome of "farce" that you liberals then accused someone like Mitt Romney of waging a "war on women" when all he did was compile a list of possible women candidates for positions in government.

Actually, the Weinstein accusations go all the way back to 1980.


If true, then even before Clinton, libs were completely and utterly hypocritical as they conducted witch hunts against republicans and regular guys, while giving good liberals a pass.

What about the war on John McCain so many trump supporters have seemed to wage. Is that made up too?

 

[sealybobo]

I'm pretty sure Slick Willy has no interest in water sports. Il Trumpino on the other hand...

That dossier is well known to be garbage.

No.

The nunes memos are garbage

 

[Esmeralda]

What’s the difference?

Clinton raped at least 3 women an sexually assaulted about a dozen others......that is the difference.

How many women have come forward accusing Clinton of rape vs. Trump

Trump has far more accusers of sexual misconduct than Clinton. Four women have accused Clinton of sexual misconduct, one of whom accused him of rape and later recanted. Twenty-two women have accused Trump of sexual misconduct, two of whom have accused him of rape.

Although why Clinton is even the issue now is beyond reason. 1) He hasn't been president or held any public office for 17 years. 2) It was a different time and attitudes toward these issues were different.

You seem to be trying to beat a dead horse when you bring up these issues regarding Clinton.

 

[Oldstyle]

What’s the difference?

Clinton raped at least 3 women an sexually assaulted about a dozen others......that is the difference.

How many women have come forward accusing Clinton of rape vs. Trump

Trump has far more accusers of sexual misconduct than Clinton. Four women have accused Clinton of sexual misconduct, one of whom accused him of rape and later recanted. Twenty-two women have accused Trump of sexual misconduct, two of whom have accused him of rape.

Although why Clinton is even the issue now is beyond reason. 1) He hasn't been president or held any public office for 17 years. 2) It was a different time and attitudes toward these issues were different.

You seem to be trying to beat a dead horse when you bring up these issues regarding Clinton.

So let me see if I understand your "logic" here, Esmeralda...we don't talk about Clinton because that's ancient history but we do talk about Trump and Stormy even though it happened 11 years ago? And we excuse liberal males like Clinton, Weinstein, Lauer, Rose...etc...etc...who have been serial sexual harassers for decades because it was a "different time"? Should we also give those liberal males a pass when they had the nerve to accuse conservatives of waging a "war on women" when they were guilty of treating the women around them like street walkers?

 

[Correll]

Clinton used the power of his elected offices to get laid...it's commonly referred to as "SEXUAL HARASSMENT IN THE WORK PLACE!!!" and no different than what Matt Lauer, Charlie Rose and Harvey Weinstein did!

He was a wolf

He was a classic sexual predator.


That the left, the media and the feminists sided with him, made a complete mockery of their claim to care about women.

What the left allowed Bill Clinton to do made it OK for people like Matt Lauer, Charlie Rose and Harvey Weinstein to also sexually harass women who worked under them. It's the epitome of "farce" that you liberals then accused someone like Mitt Romney of waging a "war on women" when all he did was compile a list of possible women candidates for positions in government.

Actually, the Weinstein accusations go all the way back to 1980.


If true, then even before Clinton, libs were completely and utterly hypocritical as they conducted witch hunts against republicans and regular guys, while giving good liberals a pass.

They were all wolves. Then republicans decided to go after bill for it. That’s when Larry flint exposed dozens of your parties leaders having affairs, getting abortions, molesting kids, doing drugs, having gay sex in bathrooms.

All men are dogs. That's different than being a sexual predator. Lumping affairs in with child molestation is not right.


Republicans didn't start the witch hunt. But they accepted the rules of the witch hunt as normal and tried to hold BIll to the same standards that they had been held too.

We know better now. It won't happen again.

BUT, don't ever expect us to take any complaints on this issue seriously, EVER AGAIN.

Your party said it was the moral party so we held you to a higher standard.

Well, isn't THAT convenient for you.

What do people hate worse than cheaters? Tattle tales. Lol

People don't hate cheaters. They proved that with Bill.


But they can be led by massive propaganda. Which is what the current sexual harassment hype is all about.

Anyways Fox News is the perfect example of how republicans treat women as second class citizens.

Yeah, despite hearing your reasoning on this, and I thank you for actually having reasoning and explaining it,

I'm not feeling any ownership of this.

That and you refuse to pay them the same as you pay men for the exact same job

THe difference in pay, is A. not true, and B. not limited to republicans.

 

[Correll]

I’m re

Fox sided with the Establishment. That did undermine their claim of objectivity.


What hypocrisy? Are you doing that thing where libs sometimes pretend that the Religious Right is all the GOP and visa versa?

I’m referring to how Fox News treated women who worked there. You want to get on the air roger ailes said? Give me a blowjob.

That’s your propaganda machine proving the war you have on women does exist.

Did Bill Clinton prove that a dem war on women existed?

An entire organization that’s dedicated to representing what it means to be a conservative. If you were going to point to the dnc or rnc or msnbc or any liberal or conservative organization and find an atmosphere that made women give blowjobs to get on tv or get ahead, that would be big news.

It shows what it’s like to work for guys like trump. Kellyanne Conway is a me too. Sarah huckabee Sanders has probably me too’Ed some guys.

Fox is a cable news show. It targeted under served conservative viewers.


That is not, "dedicated to representing what it means to be a conservative".


HOLLYWOOD, is a liberal organization, and the recent Wienstein scandals show that women had to give to get.


You think Weinstein was the only one?

Are you sure Harvey Weinstein is a Democrat? I’m not

I promise you, that I know nothing about him, other than him being a rich hollywood jew, who is a friend of Oprah's.

And I am willing to bet you actual money, that he is a dem, if you reply quickly enough to not have time to check.

20 bucks.

And he’s just one guy. Fox News is the mouthpiece for republicans. It gives you your marching orders. And how many times have they tried to spin it so that there is no war on women? Meanwhile bill o is sexually harassing co-workers in a corporate culture that told women to get ahead you have to suck old man dick.

Sorry, that's just silly partisan ness.

I never worshipped Harvey or Hollywood. Fox News is yours though no denying that. It sounds exactly like you. No spin zone my ass. Lol

You might not. But they are Pillars of the lib power structure, far more so that a late comer like Fox News.

 

[Oldstyle]

Clinton used the power of his elected offices to get laid...it's commonly referred to as "SEXUAL HARASSMENT IN THE WORK PLACE!!!" and no different than what Matt Lauer, Charlie Rose and Harvey Weinstein did!

He was a wolf

He was a classic sexual predator.


That the left, the media and the feminists sided with him, made a complete mockery of their claim to care about women.

What the left allowed Bill Clinton to do made it OK for people like Matt Lauer, Charlie Rose and Harvey Weinstein to also sexually harass women who worked under them. It's the epitome of "farce" that you liberals then accused someone like Mitt Romney of waging a "war on women" when all he did was compile a list of possible women candidates for positions in government.

Actually, the Weinstein accusations go all the way back to 1980.


If true, then even before Clinton, libs were completely and utterly hypocritical as they conducted witch hunts against republicans and regular guys, while giving good liberals a pass.

They were all wolves. Then republicans decided to go after bill for it. That’s when Larry flint exposed dozens of your parties leaders having affairs, getting abortions, molesting kids, doing drugs, having gay sex in bathrooms.

Your party said it was the moral party so we held you to a higher standard.

What do people hate worse than cheaters? Tattle tales. Lol

Anyways Fox News is the perfect example of how republicans treat women as second class citizens. That and you refuse to pay them the same as you pay men for the exact same job

You know what people REALLY hate, Sealy? People who accuse others of doing something that they themselves are guilty of! Harvey Weinstein speaking at a NOW rally? Matt Lauer grilling Bill O'Reilly about sexual harassment? All of you declaring that Mitt Romney somehow treated women badly? Mitt a woman hater? That's got to be one of the most outrageously false narratives ever put forth in politics but you liberals managed to sell that to the public with help from your pals in the main stream media...pals that it turned out really WERE women haters!

 

[Correll]

I'm pretty sure Slick Willy has no interest in water sports. Il Trumpino on the other hand...

That dossier is well known to be garbage.

No.

Yes,

 

[Correll]

Clinton used the power of his elected offices to get laid...it's commonly referred to as "SEXUAL HARASSMENT IN THE WORK PLACE!!!" and no different than what Matt Lauer, Charlie Rose and Harvey Weinstein did!

He was a wolf

He was a classic sexual predator.


That the left, the media and the feminists sided with him, made a complete mockery of their claim to care about women.

What the left allowed Bill Clinton to do made it OK for people like Matt Lauer, Charlie Rose and Harvey Weinstein to also sexually harass women who worked under them. It's the epitome of "farce" that you liberals then accused someone like Mitt Romney of waging a "war on women" when all he did was compile a list of possible women candidates for positions in government.

Actually, the Weinstein accusations go all the way back to 1980.


If true, then even before Clinton, libs were completely and utterly hypocritical as they conducted witch hunts against republicans and regular guys, while giving good liberals a pass.

What about the war on John McCain so many trump supporters have seemed to wage. Is that made up too?

John McCain is a moderate Republican who has repeatedly sabotaged the conservative, or even Republican agendas.


That he gets pushback because of his actions, is a GOOD THING.

 

[Esmeralda]

What’s the difference?

Clinton raped at least 3 women an sexually assaulted about a dozen others......that is the difference.

How many women have come forward accusing Clinton of rape vs. Trump

Trump has far more accusers of sexual misconduct than Clinton. Four women have accused Clinton of sexual misconduct, one of whom accused him of rape and later recanted. Twenty-two women have accused Trump of sexual misconduct, two of whom have accused him of rape.

Although why Clinton is even the issue now is beyond reason. 1) He hasn't been president or held any public office for 17 years. 2) It was a different time and attitudes toward these issues were different.

You seem to be trying to beat a dead horse when you bring up these issues regarding Clinton.

So let me see if I understand your "logic" here, Esmeralda...we don't talk about Clinton because that's ancient history but we do talk about Trump and Stormy even though it happened 11 years ago? And we excuse liberal males like Clinton, Weinstein, Lauer, Rose...etc...etc...who have been serial sexual harassers for decades because it was a "different time"? Should we also give those liberal males a pass when they had the nerve to accuse conservatives of waging a "war on women" when they were guilty of treating the women around them like street walkers?

Trump is president NOW. He is relevant. Clinton has not been president for 17 years. What he did or didn't do has been hashed over ad infinitum. It is no longer relevant as he is not a public official. Bringing him up is just deflection from Trump's behavior. Pretty pathetic.

 

[Oldstyle]

What’s the difference?

Clinton raped at least 3 women an sexually assaulted about a dozen others......that is the difference.

How many women have come forward accusing Clinton of rape vs. Trump

Trump has far more accusers of sexual misconduct than Clinton. Four women have accused Clinton of sexual misconduct, one of whom accused him of rape and later recanted. Twenty-two women have accused Trump of sexual misconduct, two of whom have accused him of rape.

Although why Clinton is even the issue now is beyond reason. 1) He hasn't been president or held any public office for 17 years. 2) It was a different time and attitudes toward these issues were different.

You seem to be trying to beat a dead horse when you bring up these issues regarding Clinton.

So let me see if I understand your "logic" here, Esmeralda...we don't talk about Clinton because that's ancient history but we do talk about Trump and Stormy even though it happened 11 years ago? And we excuse liberal males like Clinton, Weinstein, Lauer, Rose...etc...etc...who have been serial sexual harassers for decades because it was a "different time"? Should we also give those liberal males a pass when they had the nerve to accuse conservatives of waging a "war on women" when they were guilty of treating the women around them like street walkers?

Trump is president NOW. He is relevant. Clinton has not been president for 17 years. What he did or didn't do has been hashed over ad infinitum. It is no longer relevant as he is not a public official. Bringing him up is just deflection from Trump's behavior. Pretty pathetic.

Clinton's wife just ran for President of the United States last year! He campaigned for her. Pretty pathetic that you think he's no longer "relevant" when Hillary basically ran on HIS economic record!

 

[Oldstyle]

What's "deflection" was the progressive narrative that the Trump campaign did something illegal with foreign interests to affect the election! It's deflection because that's EXACTLY what the Clinton campaign did!

 

[Thinker101]

Clinton raped at least 3 women an sexually assaulted about a dozen others......that is the difference.

How many women have come forward accusing Clinton of rape vs. Trump

Trump has far more accusers of sexual misconduct than Clinton. Four women have accused Clinton of sexual misconduct, one of whom accused him of rape and later recanted. Twenty-two women have accused Trump of sexual misconduct, two of whom have accused him of rape.

Although why Clinton is even the issue now is beyond reason. 1) He hasn't been president or held any public office for 17 years. 2) It was a different time and attitudes toward these issues were different.

You seem to be trying to beat a dead horse when you bring up these issues regarding Clinton.

So let me see if I understand your "logic" here, Esmeralda...we don't talk about Clinton because that's ancient history but we do talk about Trump and Stormy even though it happened 11 years ago? And we excuse liberal males like Clinton, Weinstein, Lauer, Rose...etc...etc...who have been serial sexual harassers for decades because it was a "different time"? Should we also give those liberal males a pass when they had the nerve to accuse conservatives of waging a "war on women" when they were guilty of treating the women around them like street walkers?

Trump is president NOW. He is relevant. Clinton has not been president for 17 years. What he did or didn't do has been hashed over ad infinitum. It is no longer relevant as he is not a public official. Bringing him up is just deflection from Trump's behavior. Pretty pathetic.

Clinton's wife just ran for President of the United States last year! He campaigned for her. Pretty pathetic that you think he's no longer "relevant" when Hillary basically ran on HIS economic record!

You know how short the liberal memory is, especially when it doesn't fit their agenda.

 

[sealybobo]

I’m re
I’m referring to how Fox News treated women who worked there. You want to get on the air roger ailes said? Give me a blowjob.

That’s your propaganda machine proving the war you have on women does exist.

Did Bill Clinton prove that a dem war on women existed?

An entire organization that’s dedicated to representing what it means to be a conservative. If you were going to point to the dnc or rnc or msnbc or any liberal or conservative organization and find an atmosphere that made women give blowjobs to get on tv or get ahead, that would be big news.

It shows what it’s like to work for guys like trump. Kellyanne Conway is a me too. Sarah huckabee Sanders has probably me too’Ed some guys.

Fox is a cable news show. It targeted under served conservative viewers.


That is not, "dedicated to representing what it means to be a conservative".


HOLLYWOOD, is a liberal organization, and the recent Wienstein scandals show that women had to give to get.


You think Weinstein was the only one?

Are you sure Harvey Weinstein is a Democrat? I’m not

I promise you, that I know nothing about him, other than him being a rich hollywood jew, who is a friend of Oprah's.

And I am willing to bet you actual money, that he is a dem, if you reply quickly enough to not have time to check.

20 bucks.

And he’s just one guy. Fox News is the mouthpiece for republicans. It gives you your marching orders. And how many times have they tried to spin it so that there is no war on women? Meanwhile bill o is sexually harassing co-workers in a corporate culture that told women to get ahead you have to suck old man dick.

Sorry, that's just silly partisan ness.

I never worshipped Harvey or Hollywood. Fox News is yours though no denying that. It sounds exactly like you. No spin zone my ass. Lol

You might not. But they are Pillars of the lib power structure, far more so that a late comer like Fox News.

Will Republicans Return Donations From Their Harvey Weinstein, a Guy Named Trump?
Okay, from what we know, Weinstein was worse. But sexual assault is sexual assault, and the president has admitted it. So why is his money okay?

RNC Chairwoman Ronna Romney McDaniel recently demanded that Democrats and Democratic organizations return any donations they had received from sexual predator Harvey Weinstein. “During three-decades worth of sexual harassment allegations, Harvey Weinstein lined the pockets of Democrats to the tune of three-quarters of a million dollars,” she thundered. “If Democrats and the DNC truly stand up for women like they say they do, then returning this dirty money should be a no brainer.”

In response, Democrats like Chuck Schumer, Elizabeth Warren, and others donated Weinstein’s contributions to charity. The DNC has also donated a portion of the funds it received over the years to political organizations that empower women.

Well now it’s time for the Republican organizations to follow RNC chair’s directive and return the donations they received from Donald Trump, a man who like Weinstein has admitted to sexually assaulting women. In fact, McDaniel’s original statement can be applied precisely to Trump by simply swapping in the underlined words: “During three-decades worth of sexual harassment allegations, Donald Trump lined the pockets of Republicans to the tune of nearly one million dollars.” Adding, “If Republicans and the RNC truly stand up for women like they say they do, then returning this dirty money should be a no brainer.” (Trump has donated more than $950,000 to the GOP organizations and Republican candidates over the past 26 years.)

In Trump’s case, 11 women came forward last year to publicly detail how Trump sexually assaulted them dating back to the late 1980s. (The BBC documents each incident in detail.)

Will Republicans Return Donations From Their Harvey Weinstein, a Guy Named Trump?

 

[Oldstyle]

Did Bill Clinton prove that a dem war on women existed?

An entire organization that’s dedicated to representing what it means to be a conservative. If you were going to point to the dnc or rnc or msnbc or any liberal or conservative organization and find an atmosphere that made women give blowjobs to get on tv or get ahead, that would be big news.

It shows what it’s like to work for guys like trump. Kellyanne Conway is a me too. Sarah huckabee Sanders has probably me too’Ed some guys.

Fox is a cable news show. It targeted under served conservative viewers.


That is not, "dedicated to representing what it means to be a conservative".


HOLLYWOOD, is a liberal organization, and the recent Wienstein scandals show that women had to give to get.


You think Weinstein was the only one?

Are you sure Harvey Weinstein is a Democrat? I’m not

I promise you, that I know nothing about him, other than him being a rich hollywood jew, who is a friend of Oprah's.

And I am willing to bet you actual money, that he is a dem, if you reply quickly enough to not have time to check.

20 bucks.

And he’s just one guy. Fox News is the mouthpiece for republicans. It gives you your marching orders. And how many times have they tried to spin it so that there is no war on women? Meanwhile bill o is sexually harassing co-workers in a corporate culture that told women to get ahead you have to suck old man dick.

Sorry, that's just silly partisan ness.

I never worshipped Harvey or Hollywood. Fox News is yours though no denying that. It sounds exactly like you. No spin zone my ass. Lol

You might not. But they are Pillars of the lib power structure, far more so that a late comer like Fox News.

Will Republicans Return Donations From Their Harvey Weinstein, a Guy Named Trump?
Okay, from what we know, Weinstein was worse. But sexual assault is sexual assault, and the president has admitted it. So why is his money okay?

RNC Chairwoman Ronna Romney McDaniel recently demanded that Democrats and Democratic organizations return any donations they had received from sexual predator Harvey Weinstein. “During three-decades worth of sexual harassment allegations, Harvey Weinstein lined the pockets of Democrats to the tune of three-quarters of a million dollars,” she thundered. “If Democrats and the DNC truly stand up for women like they say they do, then returning this dirty money should be a no brainer.”

In response, Democrats like Chuck Schumer, Elizabeth Warren, and others donated Weinstein’s contributions to charity. The DNC has also donated a portion of the funds it received over the years to political organizations that empower women.

Well now it’s time for the Republican organizations to follow RNC chair’s directive and return the donations they received from Donald Trump, a man who like Weinstein has admitted to sexually assaulting women. In fact, McDaniel’s original statement can be applied precisely to Trump by simply swapping in the underlined words: “During three-decades worth of sexual harassment allegations, Donald Trump lined the pockets of Republicans to the tune of nearly one million dollars.” Adding, “If Republicans and the RNC truly stand up for women like they say they do, then returning this dirty money should be a no brainer.” (Trump has donated more than $950,000 to the GOP organizations and Republican candidates over the past 26 years.)

In Trump’s case, 11 women came forward last year to publicly detail how Trump sexually assaulted them dating back to the late 1980s. (The BBC documents each incident in detail.)

Will Republicans Return Donations From Their Harvey Weinstein, a Guy Named Trump?

Of those 11 women who came forward during the campaign to smear Donald Trump...how many of them continued to make those allegations once the election was over? So tell me, Sealy...do you think those were politically motivated accusations?

 

[sealybobo]

An entire organization that’s dedicated to representing what it means to be a conservative. If you were going to point to the dnc or rnc or msnbc or any liberal or conservative organization and find an atmosphere that made women give blowjobs to get on tv or get ahead, that would be big news.

It shows what it’s like to work for guys like trump. Kellyanne Conway is a me too. Sarah huckabee Sanders has probably me too’Ed some guys.

Fox is a cable news show. It targeted under served conservative viewers.


That is not, "dedicated to representing what it means to be a conservative".


HOLLYWOOD, is a liberal organization, and the recent Wienstein scandals show that women had to give to get.


You think Weinstein was the only one?

Are you sure Harvey Weinstein is a Democrat? I’m not

I promise you, that I know nothing about him, other than him being a rich hollywood jew, who is a friend of Oprah's.

And I am willing to bet you actual money, that he is a dem, if you reply quickly enough to not have time to check.

20 bucks.

And he’s just one guy. Fox News is the mouthpiece for republicans. It gives you your marching orders. And how many times have they tried to spin it so that there is no war on women? Meanwhile bill o is sexually harassing co-workers in a corporate culture that told women to get ahead you have to suck old man dick.

Sorry, that's just silly partisan ness.

I never worshipped Harvey or Hollywood. Fox News is yours though no denying that. It sounds exactly like you. No spin zone my ass. Lol

You might not. But they are Pillars of the lib power structure, far more so that a late comer like Fox News.

Will Republicans Return Donations From Their Harvey Weinstein, a Guy Named Trump?
Okay, from what we know, Weinstein was worse. But sexual assault is sexual assault, and the president has admitted it. So why is his money okay?

RNC Chairwoman Ronna Romney McDaniel recently demanded that Democrats and Democratic organizations return any donations they had received from sexual predator Harvey Weinstein. “During three-decades worth of sexual harassment allegations, Harvey Weinstein lined the pockets of Democrats to the tune of three-quarters of a million dollars,” she thundered. “If Democrats and the DNC truly stand up for women like they say they do, then returning this dirty money should be a no brainer.”

In response, Democrats like Chuck Schumer, Elizabeth Warren, and others donated Weinstein’s contributions to charity. The DNC has also donated a portion of the funds it received over the years to political organizations that empower women.

Well now it’s time for the Republican organizations to follow RNC chair’s directive and return the donations they received from Donald Trump, a man who like Weinstein has admitted to sexually assaulting women. In fact, McDaniel’s original statement can be applied precisely to Trump by simply swapping in the underlined words: “During three-decades worth of sexual harassment allegations, Donald Trump lined the pockets of Republicans to the tune of nearly one million dollars.” Adding, “If Republicans and the RNC truly stand up for women like they say they do, then returning this dirty money should be a no brainer.” (Trump has donated more than $950,000 to the GOP organizations and Republican candidates over the past 26 years.)

In Trump’s case, 11 women came forward last year to publicly detail how Trump sexually assaulted them dating back to the late 1980s. (The BBC documents each incident in detail.)

Will Republicans Return Donations From Their Harvey Weinstein, a Guy Named Trump?

Of those 11 women who came forward during the campaign to smear Donald Trump...how many of them continued to make those allegations once the election was over? So tell me, Sealy...do you think those were politically motivated accusations?

No I think he truly molested them. He admitted to just grabbing pussies. What do you think?

 

[Oldstyle]

Fox is a cable news show. It targeted under served conservative viewers.


That is not, "dedicated to representing what it means to be a conservative".


HOLLYWOOD, is a liberal organization, and the recent Wienstein scandals show that women had to give to get.


You think Weinstein was the only one?

Are you sure Harvey Weinstein is a Democrat? I’m not

I promise you, that I know nothing about him, other than him being a rich hollywood jew, who is a friend of Oprah's.

And I am willing to bet you actual money, that he is a dem, if you reply quickly enough to not have time to check.

20 bucks.

And he’s just one guy. Fox News is the mouthpiece for republicans. It gives you your marching orders. And how many times have they tried to spin it so that there is no war on women? Meanwhile bill o is sexually harassing co-workers in a corporate culture that told women to get ahead you have to suck old man dick.

Sorry, that's just silly partisan ness.

I never worshipped Harvey or Hollywood. Fox News is yours though no denying that. It sounds exactly like you. No spin zone my ass. Lol

You might not. But they are Pillars of the lib power structure, far more so that a late comer like Fox News.

Will Republicans Return Donations From Their Harvey Weinstein, a Guy Named Trump?
Okay, from what we know, Weinstein was worse. But sexual assault is sexual assault, and the president has admitted it. So why is his money okay?

RNC Chairwoman Ronna Romney McDaniel recently demanded that Democrats and Democratic organizations return any donations they had received from sexual predator Harvey Weinstein. “During three-decades worth of sexual harassment allegations, Harvey Weinstein lined the pockets of Democrats to the tune of three-quarters of a million dollars,” she thundered. “If Democrats and the DNC truly stand up for women like they say they do, then returning this dirty money should be a no brainer.”

In response, Democrats like Chuck Schumer, Elizabeth Warren, and others donated Weinstein’s contributions to charity. The DNC has also donated a portion of the funds it received over the years to political organizations that empower women.

Well now it’s time for the Republican organizations to follow RNC chair’s directive and return the donations they received from Donald Trump, a man who like Weinstein has admitted to sexually assaulting women. In fact, McDaniel’s original statement can be applied precisely to Trump by simply swapping in the underlined words: “During three-decades worth of sexual harassment allegations, Donald Trump lined the pockets of Republicans to the tune of nearly one million dollars.” Adding, “If Republicans and the RNC truly stand up for women like they say they do, then returning this dirty money should be a no brainer.” (Trump has donated more than $950,000 to the GOP organizations and Republican candidates over the past 26 years.)

In Trump’s case, 11 women came forward last year to publicly detail how Trump sexually assaulted them dating back to the late 1980s. (The BBC documents each incident in detail.)

Will Republicans Return Donations From Their Harvey Weinstein, a Guy Named Trump?

Of those 11 women who came forward during the campaign to smear Donald Trump...how many of them continued to make those allegations once the election was over? So tell me, Sealy...do you think those were politically motivated accusations?

No I think he truly molested them. He admitted to just grabbing pussies. What do you think?

I think the majority of that was yet another dirty tricks campaign by the Clinton campaign to smear Trump. Have you ever wondered why those women didn't come forward during the GOP primaries yet did once Trump was the nominee for the Republicans? Clinton and her campaign ran about as dirty a race as I've ever seen. What they did to Bernie Sanders...Bill meeting with Loretta Lynch to squelch a Justice Department criminal case against Hillary...paying all that money to have a phony dossier made up about Trump and hiding their involvement behind a law firm cut out?

 

[sealybobo]

An entire organization that’s dedicated to representing what it means to be a conservative. If you were going to point to the dnc or rnc or msnbc or any liberal or conservative organization and find an atmosphere that made women give blowjobs to get on tv or get ahead, that would be big news.

It shows what it’s like to work for guys like trump. Kellyanne Conway is a me too. Sarah huckabee Sanders has probably me too’Ed some guys.

Fox is a cable news show. It targeted under served conservative viewers.


That is not, "dedicated to representing what it means to be a conservative".


HOLLYWOOD, is a liberal organization, and the recent Wienstein scandals show that women had to give to get.


You think Weinstein was the only one?

Are you sure Harvey Weinstein is a Democrat? I’m not

I promise you, that I know nothing about him, other than him being a rich hollywood jew, who is a friend of Oprah's.

And I am willing to bet you actual money, that he is a dem, if you reply quickly enough to not have time to check.

20 bucks.

And he’s just one guy. Fox News is the mouthpiece for republicans. It gives you your marching orders. And how many times have they tried to spin it so that there is no war on women? Meanwhile bill o is sexually harassing co-workers in a corporate culture that told women to get ahead you have to suck old man dick.

Sorry, that's just silly partisan ness.

I never worshipped Harvey or Hollywood. Fox News is yours though no denying that. It sounds exactly like you. No spin zone my ass. Lol

You might not. But they are Pillars of the lib power structure, far more so that a late comer like Fox News.

Will Republicans Return Donations From Their Harvey Weinstein, a Guy Named Trump?
Okay, from what we know, Weinstein was worse. But sexual assault is sexual assault, and the president has admitted it. So why is his money okay?

RNC Chairwoman Ronna Romney McDaniel recently demanded that Democrats and Democratic organizations return any donations they had received from sexual predator Harvey Weinstein. “During three-decades worth of sexual harassment allegations, Harvey Weinstein lined the pockets of Democrats to the tune of three-quarters of a million dollars,” she thundered. “If Democrats and the DNC truly stand up for women like they say they do, then returning this dirty money should be a no brainer.”

In response, Democrats like Chuck Schumer, Elizabeth Warren, and others donated Weinstein’s contributions to charity. The DNC has also donated a portion of the funds it received over the years to political organizations that empower women.

Well now it’s time for the Republican organizations to follow RNC chair’s directive and return the donations they received from Donald Trump, a man who like Weinstein has admitted to sexually assaulting women. In fact, McDaniel’s original statement can be applied precisely to Trump by simply swapping in the underlined words: “During three-decades worth of sexual harassment allegations, Donald Trump lined the pockets of Republicans to the tune of nearly one million dollars.” Adding, “If Republicans and the RNC truly stand up for women like they say they do, then returning this dirty money should be a no brainer.” (Trump has donated more than $950,000 to the GOP organizations and Republican candidates over the past 26 years.)

In Trump’s case, 11 women came forward last year to publicly detail how Trump sexually assaulted them dating back to the late 1980s. (The BBC documents each incident in detail.)

Will Republicans Return Donations From Their Harvey Weinstein, a Guy Named Trump?

Of those 11 women who came forward during the campaign to smear Donald Trump...how many of them continued to make those allegations once the election was over? So tell me, Sealy...do you think those were politically motivated accusations?

Actually, like Clinton accusers, they aren't going away “It all happened at Trump Tower,” she said. “I had just moved to New York, and I was working as a secretary for another company in the building. That’s where he forced himself on me.”

Trump accuser keeps telling her story, hoping someone will finally listen

Hopefully whoever runs against Trump gives Trump's accusers front row seats at the debates right in eye shot of Melania
https://www.google.com/imgres?imgur...aAhVNn-AKHUTqAssQxiAoAHoECAEQFw&iact=c&ictx=1
https://www.google.com/imgres?imgur...aAhVNn-AKHUTqAssQxiAoAnoECAEQGQ&iact=c&ictx=1

 

[sakinago]

Clinton had sex with woman he knew.

Trump had unprotected sex with nasty porn stars, strumpets, tarts and tramps and spent maybe millions for a little 'tang.

He also did so while being president with a subordinate intern, and lied under oath about it. Daniels happened what 13 years ago, with a porn Star. You can try to church it up, that’s not any better.