Clown show: Dems threaten AG Barr with contempt over Mueller report they can already read

Barr is investigating Dems. That’s obstruction of Justice.

I made that point the other day, only with additional mockery. Dem's demand Comey be fired, then demand Trump be charged with obstruction for firing Comey. Barr starts multiple criminal investigations, Dem's demand Barr be charged with obstruction. Its a Saturday Night Live skit. :auiqs.jpg:
I don't think the Democrats are playing fair, and it's not funny to a lot of people, but I'm glad someone is getting a kick out of them. On a really good day, someone will come with a straight jacket for Dowager Pelosi and two for Toady Nadler. It will be the best thing that's happened since Trump took office. :muahaha:
 
So they ask him why he came up with comments that don’t match what they would come up with If they were him?

Lot of “what ifs” with Dems and not much real fact.
 
Clown show: Dems threaten AG Barr with contempt over Mueller report they can already read



Clown show: Dems threaten AG Barr with contempt over Mueller report they can already read (Video)
5/6/19 ~ By Jon Dougherty
On Sunday, a top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee said that Attorney General William Barr was given a Monday morning deadline to produce the entire unredacted report from special counsel Robert Mueller, or face a charge of contempt of Congress. But once again, this is nothing more than a cheap political stunt by Democrats who have already been provided a far-less-redacted version of the report — that they refuse to review.
“The Attorney General also voluntarily released the Special Counsel’s confidential report with minimal redactions to Congress and the public, made an even-less redacted report available to Chairman Nadler and congressional leadership (which they have refused to review), and made himself available to the Committee by volunteering to testify this week,” spokeswoman Kerri Kupec said.
Assistant Attorney General Stephen Boyd, in the letter to Nadler last week, added that the less-redacted version already available to key members “would permit review of 98.5 percent of the report, including 99.9 percent of Volume II, which discusses the investigation of the President’s actions.”



~~~~~~
A completely unredacted report would be illegal. Nadler and his gang are demanding A.G. Barr commit a Federal crime. It isn't going to happen.
You've gotta get yer head outta tRump's ass and look at some real news. They want an unredacted report, not a less redacted report.





They can go read it in the secure room. The reason why they don't is when they would leak the item they wanted it would be real obvious who broke the law.

They are crazy, but they are not quite stupid enough to do that.

The full unredacted report will eventually be released, but in the mean time, almost 500 ex-federal prosecutors and high ranking officials who served both parties all the way back to Eisenhower signed on to an open letter that
said Attorney General William Barr's decision not to charge Trump with obstruction "runs counter to logic and our experience."

The letter added, “Each of us believes that the conduct of President Trump described in Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report would, in the case of any other person not covered by the Office of Legal Counsel policy against indicting a sitting President, result in multiple felony charges for obstruction of justice.”
Hundreds of former prosecutors say Trump would have been indicted if he were not president
How many Republicans were there, two?

Here's their list of "Republicans."

"It also includes the signature of Jeffrey Harris, who worked for Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani when he was the then-associate attorney general under President Ronald Reagan."

It doesn't say he was a Republican. It says he worked for a Republican. You don't have to be a Republican to become Associate AG under a Republican. You can get that job simply by being a Career DOJ employee.

That's why they used the term "served both parties." They weren't from both parties. Weld ran as a libertarian in the 2016 election. The libertarian party disgraced itself when they nominated this statist douchebag to be their vice presidential candidate.

"Bill Weld, a former assistant U.S. attorney during the Reagan administration running as a Republican against Trump in 2020, also signed the letter."
Bill Weld is a Romney style Republican, which means he is indistinguishable from a Democrat. He was also a governor of Massachusetts, just like Romney.

Jeff Harris (politician) - Wikipedia

Jeff Harris (born October 7, 1964) is an attorney and a Missouri Democratic politician. He represented the 23rd District of Missouri in the Missouri House of Representatives from 2003–2009 and ran unsuccessfully for the office of attorney general in 2008. He served as Minority Floor Leader before giving up the post in order to focus more time on the attorney general race.

You're grabbing at straws there dumb ass. The signers represented every administration all the way back Eisenhower.
 
Clown show: Dems threaten AG Barr with contempt over Mueller report they can already read



Clown show: Dems threaten AG Barr with contempt over Mueller report they can already read (Video)
5/6/19 ~ By Jon Dougherty
On Sunday, a top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee said that Attorney General William Barr was given a Monday morning deadline to produce the entire unredacted report from special counsel Robert Mueller, or face a charge of contempt of Congress. But once again, this is nothing more than a cheap political stunt by Democrats who have already been provided a far-less-redacted version of the report — that they refuse to review.
“The Attorney General also voluntarily released the Special Counsel’s confidential report with minimal redactions to Congress and the public, made an even-less redacted report available to Chairman Nadler and congressional leadership (which they have refused to review), and made himself available to the Committee by volunteering to testify this week,” spokeswoman Kerri Kupec said.
Assistant Attorney General Stephen Boyd, in the letter to Nadler last week, added that the less-redacted version already available to key members “would permit review of 98.5 percent of the report, including 99.9 percent of Volume II, which discusses the investigation of the President’s actions.”



~~~~~~
A completely unredacted report would be illegal. Nadler and his gang are demanding A.G. Barr commit a Federal crime. It isn't going to happen.
You've gotta get yer head outta tRump's ass and look at some real news. They want an unredacted report, not a less redacted report.





They can go read it in the secure room. The reason why they don't is when they would leak the item they wanted it would be real obvious who broke the law.

They are crazy, but they are not quite stupid enough to do that.

The full unredacted report will eventually be released, but in the mean time, almost 500 ex-federal prosecutors and high ranking officials who served both parties all the way back to Eisenhower signed on to an open letter that
said Attorney General William Barr's decision not to charge Trump with obstruction "runs counter to logic and our experience."

The letter added, “Each of us believes that the conduct of President Trump described in Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report would, in the case of any other person not covered by the Office of Legal Counsel policy against indicting a sitting President, result in multiple felony charges for obstruction of justice.”
Hundreds of former prosecutors say Trump would have been indicted if he were not president
And if and buts and beer and nuts.

Trump and his supporters don't seem to know yet, but NOBODY is above the law.
 
Clown show: Dems threaten AG Barr with contempt over Mueller report they can already read



Clown show: Dems threaten AG Barr with contempt over Mueller report they can already read (Video)
5/6/19 ~ By Jon Dougherty
On Sunday, a top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee said that Attorney General William Barr was given a Monday morning deadline to produce the entire unredacted report from special counsel Robert Mueller, or face a charge of contempt of Congress. But once again, this is nothing more than a cheap political stunt by Democrats who have already been provided a far-less-redacted version of the report — that they refuse to review.
“The Attorney General also voluntarily released the Special Counsel’s confidential report with minimal redactions to Congress and the public, made an even-less redacted report available to Chairman Nadler and congressional leadership (which they have refused to review), and made himself available to the Committee by volunteering to testify this week,” spokeswoman Kerri Kupec said.
Assistant Attorney General Stephen Boyd, in the letter to Nadler last week, added that the less-redacted version already available to key members “would permit review of 98.5 percent of the report, including 99.9 percent of Volume II, which discusses the investigation of the President’s actions.”



~~~~~~
A completely unredacted report would be illegal. Nadler and his gang are demanding A.G. Barr commit a Federal crime. It isn't going to happen.
You've gotta get yer head outta tRump's ass and look at some real news. They want an unredacted report, not a less redacted report.





They can go read it in the secure room. The reason why they don't is when they would leak the item they wanted it would be real obvious who broke the law.

They are crazy, but they are not quite stupid enough to do that.

The full unredacted report will eventually be released, but in the mean time, almost 500 ex-federal prosecutors and high ranking officials who served both parties all the way back to Eisenhower signed on to an open letter that
said Attorney General William Barr's decision not to charge Trump with obstruction "runs counter to logic and our experience."

The letter added, “Each of us believes that the conduct of President Trump described in Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report would, in the case of any other person not covered by the Office of Legal Counsel policy against indicting a sitting President, result in multiple felony charges for obstruction of justice.”
Hundreds of former prosecutors say Trump would have been indicted if he were not president
At least that's what NBC says.

Lots of sources reporting the same thing. I'm not surprised if fox didn't.
 
Clown show: Dems threaten AG Barr with contempt over Mueller report they can already read



Clown show: Dems threaten AG Barr with contempt over Mueller report they can already read (Video)
5/6/19 ~ By Jon Dougherty
On Sunday, a top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee said that Attorney General William Barr was given a Monday morning deadline to produce the entire unredacted report from special counsel Robert Mueller, or face a charge of contempt of Congress. But once again, this is nothing more than a cheap political stunt by Democrats who have already been provided a far-less-redacted version of the report — that they refuse to review.
“The Attorney General also voluntarily released the Special Counsel’s confidential report with minimal redactions to Congress and the public, made an even-less redacted report available to Chairman Nadler and congressional leadership (which they have refused to review), and made himself available to the Committee by volunteering to testify this week,” spokeswoman Kerri Kupec said.
Assistant Attorney General Stephen Boyd, in the letter to Nadler last week, added that the less-redacted version already available to key members “would permit review of 98.5 percent of the report, including 99.9 percent of Volume II, which discusses the investigation of the President’s actions.”



~~~~~~
A completely unredacted report would be illegal. Nadler and his gang are demanding A.G. Barr commit a Federal crime. It isn't going to happen.
You've gotta get yer head outta tRump's ass and look at some real news. They want an unredacted report, not a less redacted report.





They can go read it in the secure room. The reason why they don't is when they would leak the item they wanted it would be real obvious who broke the law.

They are crazy, but they are not quite stupid enough to do that.

The full unredacted report will eventually be released, but in the mean time, almost 500 ex-federal prosecutors and high ranking officials who served both parties all the way back to Eisenhower signed on to an open letter that
said Attorney General William Barr's decision not to charge Trump with obstruction "runs counter to logic and our experience."

The letter added, “Each of us believes that the conduct of President Trump described in Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report would, in the case of any other person not covered by the Office of Legal Counsel policy against indicting a sitting President, result in multiple felony charges for obstruction of justice.”
Hundreds of former prosecutors say Trump would have been indicted if he were not president
And the only problem with the opinion of those TDS afflicted idiots is the total lack of any evidence of obstruction.
 
Clown show: Dems threaten AG Barr with contempt over Mueller report they can already read



Clown show: Dems threaten AG Barr with contempt over Mueller report they can already read (Video)
5/6/19 ~ By Jon Dougherty
On Sunday, a top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee said that Attorney General William Barr was given a Monday morning deadline to produce the entire unredacted report from special counsel Robert Mueller, or face a charge of contempt of Congress. But once again, this is nothing more than a cheap political stunt by Democrats who have already been provided a far-less-redacted version of the report — that they refuse to review.
“The Attorney General also voluntarily released the Special Counsel’s confidential report with minimal redactions to Congress and the public, made an even-less redacted report available to Chairman Nadler and congressional leadership (which they have refused to review), and made himself available to the Committee by volunteering to testify this week,” spokeswoman Kerri Kupec said.
Assistant Attorney General Stephen Boyd, in the letter to Nadler last week, added that the less-redacted version already available to key members “would permit review of 98.5 percent of the report, including 99.9 percent of Volume II, which discusses the investigation of the President’s actions.”



~~~~~~
A completely unredacted report would be illegal. Nadler and his gang are demanding A.G. Barr commit a Federal crime. It isn't going to happen.
You've gotta get yer head outta tRump's ass and look at some real news. They want an unredacted report, not a less redacted report.





They can go read it in the secure room. The reason why they don't is when they would leak the item they wanted it would be real obvious who broke the law.

They are crazy, but they are not quite stupid enough to do that.

The full unredacted report will eventually be released, but in the mean time, almost 500 ex-federal prosecutors and high ranking officials who served both parties all the way back to Eisenhower signed on to an open letter that
said Attorney General William Barr's decision not to charge Trump with obstruction "runs counter to logic and our experience."

The letter added, “Each of us believes that the conduct of President Trump described in Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report would, in the case of any other person not covered by the Office of Legal Counsel policy against indicting a sitting President, result in multiple felony charges for obstruction of justice.”
Hundreds of former prosecutors say Trump would have been indicted if he were not president
And if and buts and beer and nuts.

Trump and his supporters don't seem to know yet, but NOBODY is above the law.






Tell that to your hero, the shrilary, and her 13 destroyed smart phones, and 30,000 emails that were under subpoena and magically vanished.
 
Clown show: Dems threaten AG Barr with contempt over Mueller report they can already read



Clown show: Dems threaten AG Barr with contempt over Mueller report they can already read (Video)
5/6/19 ~ By Jon Dougherty
On Sunday, a top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee said that Attorney General William Barr was given a Monday morning deadline to produce the entire unredacted report from special counsel Robert Mueller, or face a charge of contempt of Congress. But once again, this is nothing more than a cheap political stunt by Democrats who have already been provided a far-less-redacted version of the report — that they refuse to review.
“The Attorney General also voluntarily released the Special Counsel’s confidential report with minimal redactions to Congress and the public, made an even-less redacted report available to Chairman Nadler and congressional leadership (which they have refused to review), and made himself available to the Committee by volunteering to testify this week,” spokeswoman Kerri Kupec said.
Assistant Attorney General Stephen Boyd, in the letter to Nadler last week, added that the less-redacted version already available to key members “would permit review of 98.5 percent of the report, including 99.9 percent of Volume II, which discusses the investigation of the President’s actions.”



~~~~~~
A completely unredacted report would be illegal. Nadler and his gang are demanding A.G. Barr commit a Federal crime. It isn't going to happen.


Don't be so ridiculous. Congress does not have access to the unredacted report. Barr offered to show the full report to just 12 members of congress (6 Republicans, 6 Democrats) Those select few would be allowed to read the report, but not take any notes. 400+ pages with no notes allowed. That is obstruction of it's self.

What is Mueller hiding? The Trump death camp for gays in Iowa?
 
Clown show: Dems threaten AG Barr with contempt over Mueller report they can already read



Clown show: Dems threaten AG Barr with contempt over Mueller report they can already read (Video)
5/6/19 ~ By Jon Dougherty
On Sunday, a top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee said that Attorney General William Barr was given a Monday morning deadline to produce the entire unredacted report from special counsel Robert Mueller, or face a charge of contempt of Congress. But once again, this is nothing more than a cheap political stunt by Democrats who have already been provided a far-less-redacted version of the report — that they refuse to review.
“The Attorney General also voluntarily released the Special Counsel’s confidential report with minimal redactions to Congress and the public, made an even-less redacted report available to Chairman Nadler and congressional leadership (which they have refused to review), and made himself available to the Committee by volunteering to testify this week,” spokeswoman Kerri Kupec said.
Assistant Attorney General Stephen Boyd, in the letter to Nadler last week, added that the less-redacted version already available to key members “would permit review of 98.5 percent of the report, including 99.9 percent of Volume II, which discusses the investigation of the President’s actions.”



~~~~~~
A completely unredacted report would be illegal. Nadler and his gang are demanding A.G. Barr commit a Federal crime. It isn't going to happen.
You've gotta get yer head outta tRump's ass and look at some real news. They want an unredacted report, not a less redacted report.





They can go read it in the secure room. The reason why they don't is when they would leak the item they wanted it would be real obvious who broke the law.

They are crazy, but they are not quite stupid enough to do that.

The full unredacted report will eventually be released, but in the mean time, almost 500 ex-federal prosecutors and high ranking officials who served both parties all the way back to Eisenhower signed on to an open letter that
said Attorney General William Barr's decision not to charge Trump with obstruction "runs counter to logic and our experience."

The letter added, “Each of us believes that the conduct of President Trump described in Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report would, in the case of any other person not covered by the Office of Legal Counsel policy against indicting a sitting President, result in multiple felony charges for obstruction of justice.”
Hundreds of former prosecutors say Trump would have been indicted if he were not president
How many Republicans were there, two?

Here's their list of "Republicans."

"It also includes the signature of Jeffrey Harris, who worked for Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani when he was the then-associate attorney general under President Ronald Reagan."

It doesn't say he was a Republican. It says he worked for a Republican. You don't have to be a Republican to become Associate AG under a Republican. You can get that job simply by being a Career DOJ employee.

That's why they used the term "served both parties." They weren't from both parties. Weld ran as a libertarian in the 2016 election. The libertarian party disgraced itself when they nominated this statist douchebag to be their vice presidential candidate.

"Bill Weld, a former assistant U.S. attorney during the Reagan administration running as a Republican against Trump in 2020, also signed the letter."
Bill Weld is a Romney style Republican, which means he is indistinguishable from a Democrat. He was also a governor of Massachusetts, just like Romney.

Jeff Harris (politician) - Wikipedia

Jeff Harris (born October 7, 1964) is an attorney and a Missouri Democratic politician. He represented the 23rd District of Missouri in the Missouri House of Representatives from 2003–2009 and ran unsuccessfully for the office of attorney general in 2008. He served as Minority Floor Leader before giving up the post in order to focus more time on the attorney general race.

You're grabbing at straws there dumb ass. The signers represented every administration all the way back Eisenhower.
Name one Republican, you lying piece of shit. The phrase "represented every administration all the way back Eisenhower" doesn't mean jack shit. It's obviously a carefully worded weasel.
 
Barr is like a mob boss. no matter what real accusations you make against him, he remains calm!
 
From what I've read only two have read the report. Both are Reps.

If the Dems want the report that badly seems to me the six who were given that report would read it.

Strange?? You bet.
 
Clown show: Dems threaten AG Barr with contempt over Mueller report they can already read



Clown show: Dems threaten AG Barr with contempt over Mueller report they can already read (Video)
5/6/19 ~ By Jon Dougherty
On Sunday, a top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee said that Attorney General William Barr was given a Monday morning deadline to produce the entire unredacted report from special counsel Robert Mueller, or face a charge of contempt of Congress. But once again, this is nothing more than a cheap political stunt by Democrats who have already been provided a far-less-redacted version of the report — that they refuse to review.
“The Attorney General also voluntarily released the Special Counsel’s confidential report with minimal redactions to Congress and the public, made an even-less redacted report available to Chairman Nadler and congressional leadership (which they have refused to review), and made himself available to the Committee by volunteering to testify this week,” spokeswoman Kerri Kupec said.
Assistant Attorney General Stephen Boyd, in the letter to Nadler last week, added that the less-redacted version already available to key members “would permit review of 98.5 percent of the report, including 99.9 percent of Volume II, which discusses the investigation of the President’s actions.”



~~~~~~
A completely unredacted report would be illegal. Nadler and his gang are demanding A.G. Barr commit a Federal crime. It isn't going to happen.
You've gotta get yer head outta tRump's ass and look at some real news. They want an unredacted report, not a less redacted report.





They can go read it in the secure room. The reason why they don't is when they would leak the item they wanted it would be real obvious who broke the law.

They are crazy, but they are not quite stupid enough to do that.

The full unredacted report will eventually be released, but in the mean time, almost 500 ex-federal prosecutors and high ranking officials who served both parties all the way back to Eisenhower signed on to an open letter that
said Attorney General William Barr's decision not to charge Trump with obstruction "runs counter to logic and our experience."

The letter added, “Each of us believes that the conduct of President Trump described in Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report would, in the case of any other person not covered by the Office of Legal Counsel policy against indicting a sitting President, result in multiple felony charges for obstruction of justice.”
Hundreds of former prosecutors say Trump would have been indicted if he were not president
And the only problem with the opinion of those TDS afflicted idiots is the total lack of any evidence of obstruction.

Yet, almost 500 ex DOJ prosecutors signed an open letter disagreeing with you.
 
You've gotta get yer head outta tRump's ass and look at some real news. They want an unredacted report, not a less redacted report.





They can go read it in the secure room. The reason why they don't is when they would leak the item they wanted it would be real obvious who broke the law.

They are crazy, but they are not quite stupid enough to do that.

The full unredacted report will eventually be released, but in the mean time, almost 500 ex-federal prosecutors and high ranking officials who served both parties all the way back to Eisenhower signed on to an open letter that
said Attorney General William Barr's decision not to charge Trump with obstruction "runs counter to logic and our experience."

The letter added, “Each of us believes that the conduct of President Trump described in Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report would, in the case of any other person not covered by the Office of Legal Counsel policy against indicting a sitting President, result in multiple felony charges for obstruction of justice.”
Hundreds of former prosecutors say Trump would have been indicted if he were not president
And if and buts and beer and nuts.

Trump and his supporters don't seem to know yet, but NOBODY is above the law.






Tell that to your hero, the shrilary, and her 13 destroyed smart phones, and 30,000 emails that were under subpoena and magically vanished.


I heard you had "BUT HILLARY" tattooed on your forehead.
 
Clown show: Dems threaten AG Barr with contempt over Mueller report they can already read



Clown show: Dems threaten AG Barr with contempt over Mueller report they can already read (Video)
5/6/19 ~ By Jon Dougherty
On Sunday, a top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee said that Attorney General William Barr was given a Monday morning deadline to produce the entire unredacted report from special counsel Robert Mueller, or face a charge of contempt of Congress. But once again, this is nothing more than a cheap political stunt by Democrats who have already been provided a far-less-redacted version of the report — that they refuse to review.
“The Attorney General also voluntarily released the Special Counsel’s confidential report with minimal redactions to Congress and the public, made an even-less redacted report available to Chairman Nadler and congressional leadership (which they have refused to review), and made himself available to the Committee by volunteering to testify this week,” spokeswoman Kerri Kupec said.
Assistant Attorney General Stephen Boyd, in the letter to Nadler last week, added that the less-redacted version already available to key members “would permit review of 98.5 percent of the report, including 99.9 percent of Volume II, which discusses the investigation of the President’s actions.”



~~~~~~
A completely unredacted report would be illegal. Nadler and his gang are demanding A.G. Barr commit a Federal crime. It isn't going to happen.


Don't be so ridiculous. Congress does not have access to the unredacted report. Barr offered to show the full report to just 12 members of congress (6 Republicans, 6 Democrats) Those select few would be allowed to read the report, but not take any notes. 400+ pages with no notes allowed. That is obstruction of it's self.

What is Mueller hiding? The Trump death camp for gays in Iowa?

Mueller isn't hiding anything. Barr is trying to hide quite a lot.
 
They can go read it in the secure room. The reason why they don't is when they would leak the item they wanted it would be real obvious who broke the law.

They are crazy, but they are not quite stupid enough to do that.

The full unredacted report will eventually be released, but in the mean time, almost 500 ex-federal prosecutors and high ranking officials who served both parties all the way back to Eisenhower signed on to an open letter that
said Attorney General William Barr's decision not to charge Trump with obstruction "runs counter to logic and our experience."

The letter added, “Each of us believes that the conduct of President Trump described in Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report would, in the case of any other person not covered by the Office of Legal Counsel policy against indicting a sitting President, result in multiple felony charges for obstruction of justice.”
Hundreds of former prosecutors say Trump would have been indicted if he were not president
And if and buts and beer and nuts.

Trump and his supporters don't seem to know yet, but NOBODY is above the law.






Tell that to your hero, the shrilary, and her 13 destroyed smart phones, and 30,000 emails that were under subpoena and magically vanished.


I heard you had "BUT HILLARY" tattooed on your forehead.
Backwards, to remind himself every morning when he brushes his teeth.
 
The democrats turned on Mueller and he and Barr are in their cross hairs.

This is like the Kavanaugh hearing. Their minds are made up. Don't confuse them with facts.
 
Clown show: Dems threaten AG Barr with contempt over Mueller report they can already read



Clown show: Dems threaten AG Barr with contempt over Mueller report they can already read (Video)
5/6/19 ~ By Jon Dougherty
On Sunday, a top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee said that Attorney General William Barr was given a Monday morning deadline to produce the entire unredacted report from special counsel Robert Mueller, or face a charge of contempt of Congress. But once again, this is nothing more than a cheap political stunt by Democrats who have already been provided a far-less-redacted version of the report — that they refuse to review.
“The Attorney General also voluntarily released the Special Counsel’s confidential report with minimal redactions to Congress and the public, made an even-less redacted report available to Chairman Nadler and congressional leadership (which they have refused to review), and made himself available to the Committee by volunteering to testify this week,” spokeswoman Kerri Kupec said.
Assistant Attorney General Stephen Boyd, in the letter to Nadler last week, added that the less-redacted version already available to key members “would permit review of 98.5 percent of the report, including 99.9 percent of Volume II, which discusses the investigation of the President’s actions.”



~~~~~~
A completely unredacted report would be illegal. Nadler and his gang are demanding A.G. Barr commit a Federal crime. It isn't going to happen.


Don't be so ridiculous. Congress does not have access to the unredacted report. Barr offered to show the full report to just 12 members of congress (6 Republicans, 6 Democrats) Those select few would be allowed to read the report, but not take any notes. 400+ pages with no notes allowed. That is obstruction of it's self.

What is Mueller hiding? The Trump death camp for gays in Iowa?

Mueller isn't hiding anything. Barr is trying to hide quite a lot.

Barr will be uncovering a coup attempt. Stay tuned
 
They want to grill him about why he did not come to the conclusions that they did. He’s not subject to that.
 

Forum List

Back
Top