easyt65
Diamond Member
- Aug 4, 2015
- 90,307
- 61,186
- 2,645
- Thread starter
- #361
[QUOTE="NYcarbineer, post: 12680699, member: 18701
So what? Like I said, it's not the Court's concern who called it what. Lawyers call their clients innocent all the time and courts still find them guilty.[/QUOTE]
You CONTINUE to demonstrate you have no FRiGGIN' CLUE what you're talking about.
Congress' job is to pass legislation.
The Lawyer's job is to present the argument - their argument was that the ACA contained a PUNATIVE FINE
The COURT'S job is to determine if that legislation is Constitutional.
Kennedy pointed out that the SCOTUS heard the government's / lawyer's argument and came to the decision that they were WRONG, that a 'punative FINE' was UN-CONSTITUTIONAL... and at THAT point Roberts over-stepped his authority by CHANGING THE GOVT LAWYER'S ARGUMENT.
YOU ARE WRONG! Dude, stop while you're BEHIND....you're embarrassing yourself!
So what? Like I said, it's not the Court's concern who called it what. Lawyers call their clients innocent all the time and courts still find them guilty.[/QUOTE]
You CONTINUE to demonstrate you have no FRiGGIN' CLUE what you're talking about.
Congress' job is to pass legislation.
The Lawyer's job is to present the argument - their argument was that the ACA contained a PUNATIVE FINE
The COURT'S job is to determine if that legislation is Constitutional.
Kennedy pointed out that the SCOTUS heard the government's / lawyer's argument and came to the decision that they were WRONG, that a 'punative FINE' was UN-CONSTITUTIONAL... and at THAT point Roberts over-stepped his authority by CHANGING THE GOVT LAWYER'S ARGUMENT.
YOU ARE WRONG! Dude, stop while you're BEHIND....you're embarrassing yourself!