CNBC Exposed As Biased 'Pooh-Throwing Monkeys'

[easyt65]

[QUOTE="NYcarbineer, post: 12680699, member: 18701
So what? Like I said, it's not the Court's concern who called it what. Lawyers call their clients innocent all the time and courts still find them guilty.[/QUOTE]
You CONTINUE to demonstrate you have no FRiGGIN' CLUE what you're talking about.

Congress' job is to pass legislation.
The Lawyer's job is to present the argument - their argument was that the ACA contained a PUNATIVE FINE
The COURT'S job is to determine if that legislation is Constitutional.

Kennedy pointed out that the SCOTUS heard the government's / lawyer's argument and came to the decision that they were WRONG, that a 'punative FINE' was UN-CONSTITUTIONAL... and at THAT point Roberts over-stepped his authority by CHANGING THE GOVT LAWYER'S ARGUMENT.

YOU ARE WRONG! Dude, stop while you're BEHIND....you're embarrassing yourself!

 

[rightwinger]

It was up to the Court to determine whether the payment is a tax or fine, no matter who called it what.

WRONG! You are insisting that it is up to the court to write legislation! The court's job is to determine if the law CONGRESS wrote and passed is CONSTITUTIONAL. Obama and Liberal's declaration that it was a PUNATIVE FINE was UN-CONSTITUTUIONAL, that the government's claim was WRONG!

As Kennedy points out, it is NOT within the SCOTUS's authority to CHANGE the government's legal case / filing / argument as Robert's did.

Obamacare is the law of the land and is Constitutional

 

[NYcarbineer]

obama said REPEATEDLY that obamare isnt a tax while his team of lawyers were writing papers and preparing an to argue in front of the supreme court that is IS A TAX

obama "won" when the SCOTUS AGREED WITH OBAMA'S LAYWERS IT IS A TAX

So what? Like I said, it's not the Court's concern who called it what. Lawyers call their clients innocent all the time and courts still find them guilty.

YOU HEARD IT HERE FOLKS!!

leftard admits obama LIED; says "so what?"

idiots and hypocrites

And you agreed with Obama. What does that make you?

 

[Meathead]

It was up to the Court to determine whether the payment is a tax or fine, no matter who called it what.

WRONG! You are insisting that it is up to the court to write legislation! The court's job is to determine if the law CONGRESS wrote and passed is CONSTITUTIONAL. Obama and Liberal's declaration that it was a PUNATIVE FINE was UN-CONSTITUTUIONAL, that the government's claim was WRONG!

As Kennedy points out, it is NOT within the SCOTUS's authority to CHANGE the government's legal case / filing / argument as Robert's did.

Obamacare is the law of the land and is Constitutional

So was slavery and prohibition. What's your point? That it's here to stay?

 

[NYcarbineer]

[QUOTE="NYcarbineer, post: 12680699, member: 18701
So what? Like I said, it's not the Court's concern who called it what. Lawyers call their clients innocent all the time and courts still find them guilty.

You CONTINUE to demonstrate you have no FRiGGIN' CLUE what you're talking about.

Congress' job is to pass legislation.
The Lawyer's job is to present the argument - their argument was that the ACA contained a PUNATIVE FINE
The COURT'S job is to determine if that legislation is Constitutional.

Kennedy pointed out that the SCOTUS heard the government's / lawyer's argument and came to the decision that they were WRONG, that a 'punative FINE' was UN-CONSTITUTIONAL... and at THAT point Roberts over-stepped his authority by CHANGING THE GOVT LAWYER'S ARGUMENT.

YOU ARE WRONG! Dude, stop while you're BEHIND....you're embarrassing yourself![/QUOTE]

If Congress misidentifies something in a bill it is not the Court's obligation to accept Congress's mistake.

Kennedy is wrong. Are you trying to tell us that Kennedy is infallible?

 

[rightwinger]

It was up to the Court to determine whether the payment is a tax or fine, no matter who called it what.

WRONG! You are insisting that it is up to the court to write legislation! The court's job is to determine if the law CONGRESS wrote and passed is CONSTITUTIONAL. Obama and Liberal's declaration that it was a PUNATIVE FINE was UN-CONSTITUTUIONAL, that the government's claim was WRONG!

As Kennedy points out, it is NOT within the SCOTUS's authority to CHANGE the government's legal case / filing / argument as Robert's did.

Obamacare is the law of the land and is Constitutional

So was slavery and prohibition. What's your point? That it's here to stay?

Evidently

 

[NYcarbineer]

It was up to the Court to determine whether the payment is a tax or fine, no matter who called it what.

WRONG! You are insisting that it is up to the court to write legislation! The court's job is to determine if the law CONGRESS wrote and passed is CONSTITUTIONAL. Obama and Liberal's declaration that it was a PUNATIVE FINE was UN-CONSTITUTUIONAL, that the government's claim was WRONG!

As Kennedy points out, it is NOT within the SCOTUS's authority to CHANGE the government's legal case / filing / argument as Robert's did.

Obamacare is the law of the land and is Constitutional

So was slavery and prohibition. What's your point? That it's here to stay?

You think slavery is coming back?

Whoa. That's today's winner.

 

[NYcarbineer]

[
You CONTINUE to demonstrate you have no FRiGGIN' CLUE what you're talking about.

Congress' job is to pass legislation.
The Lawyer's job is to present the argument - their argument was that the ACA contained a PUNATIVE FINE
The COURT'S job is to determine if that legislation is Constitutional.

Kennedy pointed out that the SCOTUS heard the government's / lawyer's argument and came to the decision that they were WRONG, that a 'punative FINE' was UN-CONSTITUTIONAL... and at THAT point Roberts over-stepped his authority by CHANGING THE GOVT LAWYER'S ARGUMENT.

YOU ARE WRONG! Dude, stop while you're BEHIND....you're embarrassing yourself!

So you agree that if Congress banned assault rifles and in the bill said they were not guns so they were not covered by the 2nd Amendment,

the Court would have to accept that?

Wow. That might be today's winner.

 

[bedowin62]

obama said REPEATEDLY that obamare isnt a tax while his team of lawyers were writing papers and preparing an to argue in front of the supreme court that is IS A TAX

obama "won" when the SCOTUS AGREED WITH OBAMA'S LAYWERS IT IS A TAX

So what? Like I said, it's not the Court's concern who called it what. Lawyers call their clients innocent all the time and courts still find them guilty.

YOU HEARD IT HERE FOLKS!!

leftard admits obama LIED; says "so what?"

idiots and hypocrites

And you agreed with Obama. What does that make you?

something you wouldnt understand, truthful

 

[Flopper]

That was a very deliberate answer. And she knew exactly what would happen.

The woman either knows Sun Tzu very well or it's part of her DNA.

If your opponent is of choleric temperament, seek to irritate him. -Sun Tzu

IF so, i disagree that that is her best approach right now. she needs to appeal to those voters who aren't sure if they will vote for her. getting the echo chamber cheap shot approval from petty partisans should not be her priority right now...

she could have simply said, well cooper i wouldn't use the word enemies but my most challenging opposition has been this or that...

I'll have to disagree with you here.

Bill tried to make nice with these folks and they impeached him.

Obama? They've come close but the shut down the government, have gummed legislation and have put up endless investigations.

With Hillary they've accused her of murder and colluding with terrorists.

It's really about time to start calling the crazy faction of the Republican party what they are..

Enemies.

Yep, a lot of republicans are certainly going off the deep end. Just listen to what they've been saying in the debates. Trump thinks he can round up 11 million undocumented immigrants and dump them in Mexico or some other countries. Rand Paul thinks he can eliminate half the federal government. Carly Fiorina suggest we reduce the the Federal Tax Code to 3 pages. Carson thinks we can put a 15% tax on GDP which of course includes government spending. And Bush seems to be concerned with regulating Fantasy Football. No wonder republican debates are so entertaining that they can attract 14 million viewers.

 

[bedowin62]

It was up to the Court to determine whether the payment is a tax or fine, no matter who called it what.

WRONG! You are insisting that it is up to the court to write legislation! The court's job is to determine if the law CONGRESS wrote and passed is CONSTITUTIONAL. Obama and Liberal's declaration that it was a PUNATIVE FINE was UN-CONSTITUTUIONAL, that the government's claim was WRONG!

As Kennedy points out, it is NOT within the SCOTUS's authority to CHANGE the government's legal case / filing / argument as Robert's did.

Obamacare is the law of the land and is Constitutional

So was slavery and prohibition. What's your point? That it's here to stay?

You think slavery is coming back?

Whoa. That's today's winner.

Bidens seems to thinks so



Joe Biden Says Republicans Will Put Black People Back In ...
â–¶ 0:35

Aug 14, 2012 - Uploaded by TrendingNewsNowJoe Biden Says Republicans Will Put Black People Back In Chains .... the only thing he isn't saying is that ...


libs are losers who lie to themselves

 

[bedowin62]

That was a very deliberate answer. And she knew exactly what would happen.

The woman either knows Sun Tzu very well or it's part of her DNA.

If your opponent is of choleric temperament, seek to irritate him. -Sun Tzu

IF so, i disagree that that is her best approach right now. she needs to appeal to those voters who aren't sure if they will vote for her. getting the echo chamber cheap shot approval from petty partisans should not be her priority right now...

she could have simply said, well cooper i wouldn't use the word enemies but my most challenging opposition has been this or that...

I'll have to disagree with you here.

Bill tried to make nice with these folks and they impeached him.

Obama? They've come close but the shut down the government, have gummed legislation and have put up endless investigations.

With Hillary they've accused her of murder and colluding with terrorists.

It's really about time to start calling the crazy faction of the Republican party what they are..

Enemies.

Yep, a lot of republicans are certainly going off the deep end. Just listen to what they've been saying in the debates. Trump thinks he can round up 11 million undocumented immigrants and dump them in Mexico or some other countries. Rand Paul thinks he can eliminate half the federal government. Carly Fiorina suggest we reduce the the Federal Tax Code to 3 pages. Carson thinks we can put a 15% tax on GDP which of course includes government spending. And Bush seems to be concerned with regulating Fantasy Football. No wonder republican debates are so entertaining that they can attract 14 million viewers.

look at the "FOWARD!" losers and their cant-do attitude!

lol

libs are losers who lie to themselves

 

[HappyJoy]

One of the moderators accurately stated that Trump said Rubio was Zuckerberg's personal senator and then when challenged she apologized, why? It's on his campaign website?

Immigration Reform

"Hispanic and female workers in Silicon Valley who have been passed over in favor of the H-1B program. Mark Zuckerberg’s personal Senator, Marco Rubio, has a bill to triple H-1Bs that would decimate women and minorities."

There was absolutely no follow up at all.

No, you can't read. They put it on his web site, it wasn't his words. You see, words mean things.

There is no difference, if it's on his campaign website then he did indeed "say" that, he just didn't use his bloated face.

I called you a dumb fuck yesterday for a reason. No, that isn't what words mean.

Stop being ridiculous, Trump is accountable for his own website.

 

[easyt65]

So you agree...

You CONTINUE to demonstrate you have no FRIGGIN' CLUE what you're talking about. Being completely proven wrong about the ACA SCOTUS Case and exposed as having no friggin' clue about the supreme Court and Law you sought / seek to quickly change the subject to hide your ignorance....

YOU ARE WRONG! Dude, stop while you're BEHIND....you're embarrassing yourself!

 

[Meathead]

It was up to the Court to determine whether the payment is a tax or fine, no matter who called it what.

WRONG! You are insisting that it is up to the court to write legislation! The court's job is to determine if the law CONGRESS wrote and passed is CONSTITUTIONAL. Obama and Liberal's declaration that it was a PUNATIVE FINE was UN-CONSTITUTUIONAL, that the government's claim was WRONG!

As Kennedy points out, it is NOT within the SCOTUS's authority to CHANGE the government's legal case / filing / argument as Robert's did.

Obamacare is the law of the land and is Constitutional

So was slavery and prohibition. What's your point? That it's here to stay?

You think slavery is coming back?

Whoa. That's today's winner.

The point is not slavery or prohibition coming back, rather it is the country can recognize mistakes and rectify them. There is little doubt since its rollout, Obamacare was a mistake

 

[bedowin62]

It was up to the Court to determine whether the payment is a tax or fine, no matter who called it what.

WRONG! You are insisting that it is up to the court to write legislation! The court's job is to determine if the law CONGRESS wrote and passed is CONSTITUTIONAL. Obama and Liberal's declaration that it was a PUNATIVE FINE was UN-CONSTITUTUIONAL, that the government's claim was WRONG!

As Kennedy points out, it is NOT within the SCOTUS's authority to CHANGE the government's legal case / filing / argument as Robert's did.

Obamacare is the law of the land and is Constitutional

except that obama and dems themselves have changed it almost 50 times right/??

and it still isnt fully implemented yet right??
and it doesnt HAVE to be funded right???

and still more challenges await it right??

you were saying??????????????????????

 

[NLT]

if rubio or cruz gets the nomination they will destroy hildabeast in a debate....fact.

 

[Nosmo King]

Fire up the base by citing the "Liberal Biased Main Stream Media" boogeyman.

Meanwhile, listen to the Conservatives crow about how Fox News dominates cable ratings, Limbaugh owns talk radio

Is their magic stronger than our magic. or are they in constant search of a scapegoat?

 

[NYcarbineer]

if rubio or cruz gets the nomination they will destroy hildabeast in a debate....fact.

No chance if the debate is about the issues because the Democrats win on the issues, according to public opinion.

 

[bedowin62]

Fiore up the base by citing the "Liberal Biased Main Stream Media" boogeyman.

Meanwhile, listen to the Conservatives crow about how Fox News dominates cable ratings, Limbaugh owns talk radio

Is their magic stronger than our magic. or are they in constant search of a scapegoat?

YAWN
Republicans claims about Fox News and Rush are true

republican's claims about left-wingers controlling almost every single other major news outlets are also true

what part are you too stupid to understand?????