CNN "reporter" banned from WH event for being rude and not listening to the rules

[BULLDOG]

That's almost as bad as fox showing pictures of a pregame prayer, and claiming it was the players during the National Anthem.

Who ever said I was a fan of Fox news? When you "assume" you make an ass out of yourself. I haven't owned a TV since 2012 and haven't missed it a bit.

Doesn't matter if you have a TV. You support Republican politicians. You follow the republican line. You are a republican. Fox is the media wing of the GOP. You can't have it both ways. Your actions place you in firmly within the fox bubble, and You are on the fox team.

I am a constitutionalist, so neither bought and paid for political party that is owned by USA.INC could ever represent me. I opted out of being one of their de-facto employees, got out from under the Uniform Commercial Code. Those like yourself just HAVE to put people into categories. Anyone that isn't a leftard MUST be a republican.......step outside of the bubble, Bulldog.

Damn Dale. If you suck dicks, it doesn't matter if you want to refer to yourself as a penile flavor tester. You would still be just be another dick sucker Works the same way. If you support republican politicians, and republican programs, and that disgusting republican president, then you're a republican. You can call yourself a fluffy bunny if you want to, you're still just another republican.

Save your queer talk for the bath-houses you frequent. I don't support the GOP, but I definitely like people like Rand Paul There isn't a single leftard politician that I have even the slightest bit of respect for because they believe that the Constitution is outdated, they believe in Fabian socialism and MANY of them have ties to commie front groups......so why in the HELL would I EVER support or tout the DNC? Better dead than red, Bulldog.........

So you think anyone who would think the constitution was less than perfectly suited for their time and should be modified to better fit a changing world is anti American? How about a strait yes or no answer this time?

 

[iceberg]

White House bans CNN reporter from open press event

Damn idiots at CNN need to learn obviously...having a hard time realizing that the American people don't give a shit if they are banned or not. Learn your place and things will go MUCH smoother.

What do you have against the US Constitution?

Why are you so in to authoritarian governments?

why must you use the constitution as a shield when it suits your purposes yet attack it when it doesn't (aka gun control)?

i fully agree that the president - regardless of which side they are on - needs to stay out of the media. not their job and it only causes divide among people on an already sensitive topic. i wish obama never would have called out fox like he did and as often as he did with far reaching implications, like he did.

let me get HIS quote for you:

Barack Obama Tried to Silence Political Speech in 2007 - www.independentsentinel.com

“And so, if we’re going to change how Rep. John Boehner (R-OH) and Sen. Mitch McConnell think, we’re going to have to change how our body politic thinks, which means we’re going to have to change how the media reports on these issues, and how people’s impressions of what it’s like to struggle in this economy looks like. And how budgets connect to that. And that’s a hard process because that requires a much broader conversation than typically we have on the nightly news.”

that's obama - change how the media reports on news and government issues.

what does obama have against the constitution? well he's already on record as saying the constitution gets in the way of what he wants to do.

Did Obama say that the Constitution was getting in his way?
As a Senator he said "Seven years before Barack Obama’s “spread the wealth” comment to Joe the Plumber became a GOP campaign theme, the Democratic presidential candidate said in a radio interview the U.S. has suffered from a fundamentally flawed Constitution that does not mandate or allow for redistribution of wealth.
--------------------
so you wanna keep at that "why do you not love the constitution" crap as a blanket and realize if you want to go there, obama was far worse than trump has been so far.

CNN has never given trump a fair shake. trump has never given CNN a reason to really but that doesn't mean CNN should also act the fool. both sides in this are playing some jr high pissing game and it's all stupid and pushing this divide between us further and further apart.

so if you want to "go there" go. i'll go with you. but be honest about it or i'll fart last nights mexican food on you and leave you in my stank.

 

[iceberg]

Who ever said I was a fan of Fox news? When you "assume" you make an ass out of yourself. I haven't owned a TV since 2012 and haven't missed it a bit.

Doesn't matter if you have a TV. You support Republican politicians. You follow the republican line. You are a republican. Fox is the media wing of the GOP. You can't have it both ways. Your actions place you in firmly within the fox bubble, and You are on the fox team.

I am a constitutionalist, so neither bought and paid for political party that is owned by USA.INC could ever represent me. I opted out of being one of their de-facto employees, got out from under the Uniform Commercial Code. Those like yourself just HAVE to put people into categories. Anyone that isn't a leftard MUST be a republican.......step outside of the bubble, Bulldog.

Damn Dale. If you suck dicks, it doesn't matter if you want to refer to yourself as a penile flavor tester. You would still be just be another dick sucker Works the same way. If you support republican politicians, and republican programs, and that disgusting republican president, then you're a republican. You can call yourself a fluffy bunny if you want to, you're still just another republican.

Save your queer talk for the bath-houses you frequent. I don't support the GOP, but I definitely like people like Rand Paul There isn't a single leftard politician that I have even the slightest bit of respect for because they believe that the Constitution is outdated, they believe in Fabian socialism and MANY of them have ties to commie front groups......so why in the HELL would I EVER support or tout the DNC? Better dead than red, Bulldog.........

So you think anyone who would think the constitution was less than perfectly suited for their time and should be modified to better fit a changing world is anti American? How about a strait yes or no answer this time?

it's sure a dangerous game, is it not?

Honor The Fallen - Home Page| Military Times

head on out there and go tell the families of these fallen soldiers that what they believed in, signed up to do and in the end paid the highest price possible for our freedoms that they were fighting for an outdated topic that simply needs to be changed to fit the whims of people who find our freedoms inconvenient to their lifestyle.

i'll be glad to talk with whatever is left of you when you return from that fun run.

 

[BULLDOG]

Doesn't matter if you have a TV. You support Republican politicians. You follow the republican line. You are a republican. Fox is the media wing of the GOP. You can't have it both ways. Your actions place you in firmly within the fox bubble, and You are on the fox team.

I am a constitutionalist, so neither bought and paid for political party that is owned by USA.INC could ever represent me. I opted out of being one of their de-facto employees, got out from under the Uniform Commercial Code. Those like yourself just HAVE to put people into categories. Anyone that isn't a leftard MUST be a republican.......step outside of the bubble, Bulldog.

Damn Dale. If you suck dicks, it doesn't matter if you want to refer to yourself as a penile flavor tester. You would still be just be another dick sucker Works the same way. If you support republican politicians, and republican programs, and that disgusting republican president, then you're a republican. You can call yourself a fluffy bunny if you want to, you're still just another republican.

Save your queer talk for the bath-houses you frequent. I don't support the GOP, but I definitely like people like Rand Paul There isn't a single leftard politician that I have even the slightest bit of respect for because they believe that the Constitution is outdated, they believe in Fabian socialism and MANY of them have ties to commie front groups......so why in the HELL would I EVER support or tout the DNC? Better dead than red, Bulldog.........

So you think anyone who would think the constitution was less than perfectly suited for their time and should be modified to better fit a changing world is anti American? How about a strait yes or no answer this time?

it's sure a dangerous game, is it not?

Honor The Fallen - Home Page| Military Times

head on out there and go tell the families of these fallen soldiers that what they believed in, signed up to do and in the end paid the highest price possible for our freedoms that they were fighting for an outdated topic that simply needs to be changed to fit the whims of people who find our freedoms inconvenient to their lifestyle.

i'll be glad to talk with whatever is left of you when you return from that fun run.

That would be a hard thing to do, but it has nothing to do with my question. Perhaps you would care to read what I asked again and answer that instead of making insinuations that don't apply.

 

[blastoff]

Even Fox News stands by CNN. They know that they must also stand up to the corrupt and miserable Trump Administration. The only people apparently backing the Trump Administration on this matter are Trump's mindless minions.

Fox News announces support of CNN after White House bans reporter

So, I guess you’re either ignorant or acting a bit disingenuous about past instances of media supporting cohorts they deem being treated unfairly by a president, as they did in Barry vs. Fox News a few years back.

 

[iceberg]

I am a constitutionalist, so neither bought and paid for political party that is owned by USA.INC could ever represent me. I opted out of being one of their de-facto employees, got out from under the Uniform Commercial Code. Those like yourself just HAVE to put people into categories. Anyone that isn't a leftard MUST be a republican.......step outside of the bubble, Bulldog.

Damn Dale. If you suck dicks, it doesn't matter if you want to refer to yourself as a penile flavor tester. You would still be just be another dick sucker Works the same way. If you support republican politicians, and republican programs, and that disgusting republican president, then you're a republican. You can call yourself a fluffy bunny if you want to, you're still just another republican.

Save your queer talk for the bath-houses you frequent. I don't support the GOP, but I definitely like people like Rand Paul There isn't a single leftard politician that I have even the slightest bit of respect for because they believe that the Constitution is outdated, they believe in Fabian socialism and MANY of them have ties to commie front groups......so why in the HELL would I EVER support or tout the DNC? Better dead than red, Bulldog.........

So you think anyone who would think the constitution was less than perfectly suited for their time and should be modified to better fit a changing world is anti American? How about a strait yes or no answer this time?

it's sure a dangerous game, is it not?

Honor The Fallen - Home Page| Military Times

head on out there and go tell the families of these fallen soldiers that what they believed in, signed up to do and in the end paid the highest price possible for our freedoms that they were fighting for an outdated topic that simply needs to be changed to fit the whims of people who find our freedoms inconvenient to their lifestyle.

i'll be glad to talk with whatever is left of you when you return from that fun run.

That would be a hard thing to do, but it has nothing to do with my question. Perhaps you would care to read what I asked again and answer that instead of making insinuations that don't apply.

i did read what you said. my take on it is you wish to write the constitution to fit todays society.

am i wrong there?

 

[jon_berzerk]

Who ever said I was a fan of Fox news? When you "assume" you make an ass out of yourself. I haven't owned a TV since 2012 and haven't missed it a bit.

Doesn't matter if you have a TV. You support Republican politicians. You follow the republican line. You are a republican. Fox is the media wing of the GOP. You can't have it both ways. Your actions place you in firmly within the fox bubble, and You are on the fox team.

I am a constitutionalist, so neither bought and paid for political party that is owned by USA.INC could ever represent me. I opted out of being one of their de-facto employees, got out from under the Uniform Commercial Code. Those like yourself just HAVE to put people into categories. Anyone that isn't a leftard MUST be a republican.......step outside of the bubble, Bulldog.

You are not a constitutionalist. A free and unfettered press is part of the Constitution. Trump violated that because he didn't like the question.

--LOL he has not stopped CNN from continuing with their lies

They had every right to be there. Trump violated their first amendment rights.

no they dont

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

I could care less WHO is standing behind the little ****. She was told to shut up and respect the office she decided to scream and yell and she was removed and banned rightfully so.

Amen to this. Everyone has the right to speak their mind, but if they can't do it in a civil manner, prepare to be thrown out.

God bless you always!!!

Holly

Why do you hate the Constitution?

The dumb Left Wing crackpot Reporters have not lost their Freedom of the Press or Freedom of Speech.
They can say anything that they want and they will.

 

[BULLDOG]

Damn Dale. If you suck dicks, it doesn't matter if you want to refer to yourself as a penile flavor tester. You would still be just be another dick sucker Works the same way. If you support republican politicians, and republican programs, and that disgusting republican president, then you're a republican. You can call yourself a fluffy bunny if you want to, you're still just another republican.

Save your queer talk for the bath-houses you frequent. I don't support the GOP, but I definitely like people like Rand Paul There isn't a single leftard politician that I have even the slightest bit of respect for because they believe that the Constitution is outdated, they believe in Fabian socialism and MANY of them have ties to commie front groups......so why in the HELL would I EVER support or tout the DNC? Better dead than red, Bulldog.........

So you think anyone who would think the constitution was less than perfectly suited for their time and should be modified to better fit a changing world is anti American? How about a strait yes or no answer this time?

it's sure a dangerous game, is it not?

Honor The Fallen - Home Page| Military Times

head on out there and go tell the families of these fallen soldiers that what they believed in, signed up to do and in the end paid the highest price possible for our freedoms that they were fighting for an outdated topic that simply needs to be changed to fit the whims of people who find our freedoms inconvenient to their lifestyle.

i'll be glad to talk with whatever is left of you when you return from that fun run.

That would be a hard thing to do, but it has nothing to do with my question. Perhaps you would care to read what I asked again and answer that instead of making insinuations that don't apply.

i did read what you said. my take on it is you wish to write the constitution to fit todays society.

am i wrong there?

Yes. Your take is completely wrong. Answer the question and quit trying to fit it into some talking point you might be wanting to spout.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

White House bans CNN reporter from open press event

Damn idiots at CNN need to learn obviously...having a hard time realizing that the American people don't give a shit if they are banned or not. Learn your place and things will go MUCH smoother.

You would be the "damn idiot". Banning her from the Rose Garden event WAS retaliatory. She WAS being punished for questions Trump didn't want to hear. Trump is doing his damnedest to throttle our "Free Press". He's the one telling lie after lie after lie after lie. PS: the American people DO give a shit about this sort of stuff. These are the reasons we are utterly convinced that Donald Trump is an ignorant, childish, amoral ass and, without the slightest doubt, the worst president in the history of this nation.

The dumb liberal reporters have not lost their Freedom of the Press.
They can still trash Trump, and they will.
BTW CNN is pure left wing hate, lies and unwatchable for intelligent voters.

 

[BULLDOG]

Doesn't matter if you have a TV. You support Republican politicians. You follow the republican line. You are a republican. Fox is the media wing of the GOP. You can't have it both ways. Your actions place you in firmly within the fox bubble, and You are on the fox team.

I am a constitutionalist, so neither bought and paid for political party that is owned by USA.INC could ever represent me. I opted out of being one of their de-facto employees, got out from under the Uniform Commercial Code. Those like yourself just HAVE to put people into categories. Anyone that isn't a leftard MUST be a republican.......step outside of the bubble, Bulldog.

You are not a constitutionalist. A free and unfettered press is part of the Constitution. Trump violated that because he didn't like the question.

--LOL he has not stopped CNN from continuing with their lies

They had every right to be there. Trump violated their first amendment rights.

no they dont

Yes. The first amendment gives them the right to be there. As a courtesy, and for convenience, the press has agreed to use the pool system but that doesn't eliminate the tight of the press to freely ask questions.

 

[iceberg]

Save your queer talk for the bath-houses you frequent. I don't support the GOP, but I definitely like people like Rand Paul There isn't a single leftard politician that I have even the slightest bit of respect for because they believe that the Constitution is outdated, they believe in Fabian socialism and MANY of them have ties to commie front groups......so why in the HELL would I EVER support or tout the DNC? Better dead than red, Bulldog.........

So you think anyone who would think the constitution was less than perfectly suited for their time and should be modified to better fit a changing world is anti American? How about a strait yes or no answer this time?

it's sure a dangerous game, is it not?

Honor The Fallen - Home Page| Military Times

head on out there and go tell the families of these fallen soldiers that what they believed in, signed up to do and in the end paid the highest price possible for our freedoms that they were fighting for an outdated topic that simply needs to be changed to fit the whims of people who find our freedoms inconvenient to their lifestyle.

i'll be glad to talk with whatever is left of you when you return from that fun run.

That would be a hard thing to do, but it has nothing to do with my question. Perhaps you would care to read what I asked again and answer that instead of making insinuations that don't apply.

i did read what you said. my take on it is you wish to write the constitution to fit todays society.

am i wrong there?

Yes. Your take is completely wrong. Answer the question and quit trying to fit it into some talking point you might be wanting to spout.

then please tell me what you meant when i read:
"So you think anyone who would think the constitution was less than perfectly suited for their time and should be modified to better fit a changing world is anti American? How about a strait yes or no answer this time?"

you're 100% right in that i dove into the middle of this one but i took off ignore and wow, there you were! but that is my mistake in interpretation so going back to catch up as i can to try and be fair, i'll just say it depends.

how do they wish to "change" the constitution? rewrite it or amend it? if we follow the process and keep it there, great. if you want to rewrite it from scratch, then yes we have issues.

anti-american? that's a stretch call so soon in this type of a conversation as you don't know why or what the person wants to change. on the surface most people would think those wanting to change it are sinister people. well they would be if they forced the changes and that to me would be anti-american.

but if they work through the process and include all sides in the creation of it, maybe. i still wouldn't see a need and would need to greatly understand the point behind the change. is this led by a singular mindset upset their group doesn't have a bigger role in it?

sit down and shut up then. not anti american in as much as selfish and stupid. let's stop using only extremes to be the way to describe someone.

so there is no valid yes or no answer to such a base question and anyone giving that to you isn't putting enough thought into the question to be sincere in their answer which makes their answer a reaction, not a thoughtful reply.

now - can you give me a yes/no on that? do you wish to rewrite the constitution for todays environment?

 

[jon_berzerk]

I am a constitutionalist, so neither bought and paid for political party that is owned by USA.INC could ever represent me. I opted out of being one of their de-facto employees, got out from under the Uniform Commercial Code. Those like yourself just HAVE to put people into categories. Anyone that isn't a leftard MUST be a republican.......step outside of the bubble, Bulldog.

You are not a constitutionalist. A free and unfettered press is part of the Constitution. Trump violated that because he didn't like the question.

--LOL he has not stopped CNN from continuing with their lies

They had every right to be there. Trump violated their first amendment rights.

no they dont

Yes. The first amendment gives them the right to be there. As a courtesy, and for convenience, the press has agreed to use the pool system but that doesn't eliminate the tight of the press to freely ask questions.

no it doesnt

no one is stopping them from spreading their lies

 

[BULLDOG]

I could care less WHO is standing behind the little ****. She was told to shut up and respect the office she decided to scream and yell and she was removed and banned rightfully so.

Amen to this. Everyone has the right to speak their mind, but if they can't do it in a civil manner, prepare to be thrown out.

God bless you always!!!

Holly

Why do you hate the Constitution?

The dumb Left Wing crackpot Reporters have not lost their Freedom of the Press or Freedom of Speech.
They can say anything that they want and they will.

Yes, they have the freedom to say what they want. That's covered under freedom of speech. The freedom of the press is not the same thing.

 

[BULLDOG]

White House bans CNN reporter from open press event

Damn idiots at CNN need to learn obviously...having a hard time realizing that the American people don't give a shit if they are banned or not. Learn your place and things will go MUCH smoother.

You would be the "damn idiot". Banning her from the Rose Garden event WAS retaliatory. She WAS being punished for questions Trump didn't want to hear. Trump is doing his damnedest to throttle our "Free Press". He's the one telling lie after lie after lie after lie. PS: the American people DO give a shit about this sort of stuff. These are the reasons we are utterly convinced that Donald Trump is an ignorant, childish, amoral ass and, without the slightest doubt, the worst president in the history of this nation.

The dumb liberal reporters have not lost their Freedom of the Press.
They can still trash Trump, and they will.
BTW CNN is pure left wing hate, lies and unwatchable for intelligent voters.

I'm not sure you know any intelligent voters. I suspect your entire circle consists of Trump supporters.

 

[iceberg]

I am a constitutionalist, so neither bought and paid for political party that is owned by USA.INC could ever represent me. I opted out of being one of their de-facto employees, got out from under the Uniform Commercial Code. Those like yourself just HAVE to put people into categories. Anyone that isn't a leftard MUST be a republican.......step outside of the bubble, Bulldog.

You are not a constitutionalist. A free and unfettered press is part of the Constitution. Trump violated that because he didn't like the question.

--LOL he has not stopped CNN from continuing with their lies

They had every right to be there. Trump violated their first amendment rights.

no they dont

Yes. The first amendment gives them the right to be there. As a courtesy, and for convenience, the press has agreed to use the pool system but that doesn't eliminate the tight of the press to freely ask questions.

freedom of the press is a right. much like all rights, they need to be respect or you lose them. why would the press be above the loss of rights when the rest of us are not, once we abuse them?

i worked my way through college as a photo journalist for a small town in western oklahoma. my final year i left the newspaper and worked for the college to finish my minor in journalism and my other degree. what is being done today is far from journalism in the traditional sense. but even then i had to abide by police and other laws when i did my reporting. if i went to a city council meeting and acted the fool to embarrass someone, i would be escorted out and called into my editors office the next day and seriously cussed out. you see, i am there at these meetings by invite and if i don't respect that, i lose the invite.

now this wasn't to say i couldn't write or report negative news. can, did, no issues. but i had to act professionally in these meetings or i was out the door. period. end of story. journalism today has pushed any semblance of respect out the door and they WANT the drama. sure fire hits, ya know?

"“At the conclusion of a press event in the Oval Office a reporter shouted questions and refused to leave despite repeatedly being asked to do so,” Sanders said. “Subsequently, our staff informed her she was not welcome to participate in the next event, but made clear that any other journalist from her network could attend.”"

the event was over. the reporter kept on and on and after being asked to stop, he refused. if someone isn't going to cooperate with the rules, boot their happy ass out. there needs to be consequences for bad behavior and i'm sorry that upsets you and others but this reporter brought it upon herself in this instance and *this* reporter here has zero sympathy for those who think they are above common courtesy.

i have no sympathy for ANYONE who can't conduct themselves in a proper manner regardless of the event. you wanna act 12, you get treated that way. end of story.

so if she lost her "rights" due to her own behaviors, good. next time maybe she'll not do that and follow the rules everyone else doesn't seem to have an issue following. maybe you should ask yourself why she can't or what puts her above all else in this instance.

 

[BULLDOG]

So you think anyone who would think the constitution was less than perfectly suited for their time and should be modified to better fit a changing world is anti American? How about a strait yes or no answer this time?

it's sure a dangerous game, is it not?

Honor The Fallen - Home Page| Military Times

head on out there and go tell the families of these fallen soldiers that what they believed in, signed up to do and in the end paid the highest price possible for our freedoms that they were fighting for an outdated topic that simply needs to be changed to fit the whims of people who find our freedoms inconvenient to their lifestyle.

i'll be glad to talk with whatever is left of you when you return from that fun run.

That would be a hard thing to do, but it has nothing to do with my question. Perhaps you would care to read what I asked again and answer that instead of making insinuations that don't apply.

i did read what you said. my take on it is you wish to write the constitution to fit todays society.

am i wrong there?

Yes. Your take is completely wrong. Answer the question and quit trying to fit it into some talking point you might be wanting to spout.

then please tell me what you meant when i read:
"So you think anyone who would think the constitution was less than perfectly suited for their time and should be modified to better fit a changing world is anti American? How about a strait yes or no answer this time?"

you're 100% right in that i dove into the middle of this one but i took off ignore and wow, there you were! but that is my mistake in interpretation so going back to catch up as i can to try and be fair, i'll just say it depends.

how do they wish to "change" the constitution? rewrite it or amend it? if we follow the process and keep it there, great. if you want to rewrite it from scratch, then yes we have issues.

anti-american? that's a stretch call so soon in this type of a conversation as you don't know why or what the person wants to change. on the surface most people would think those wanting to change it are sinister people. well they would be if they forced the changes and that to me would be anti-american.

but if they work through the process and include all sides in the creation of it, maybe. i still wouldn't see a need and would need to greatly understand the point behind the change. is this led by a singular mindset upset their group doesn't have a bigger role in it?

sit down and shut up then. not anti american in as much as selfish and stupid. let's stop using only extremes to be the way to describe someone.

so there is no valid yes or no answer to such a base question and anyone giving that to you isn't putting enough thought into the question to be sincere in their answer which makes their answer a reaction, not a thoughtful reply.

now - can you give me a yes/no on that? do you wish to rewrite the constitution for todays environment?

You're free to ignore who you will, but if you respond to my post, please do me the courtesy of something other than a bullshit answer. Do you think the constitution adequately covers all areas pertaining to current society as well as it did when it was first written?

So you think anyone who would think the constitution was less than perfectly suited for their time and should be modified to better fit a changing world is anti American? How about a strait yes or no answer this time?

it's sure a dangerous game, is it not?

Honor The Fallen - Home Page| Military Times

head on out there and go tell the families of these fallen soldiers that what they believed in, signed up to do and in the end paid the highest price possible for our freedoms that they were fighting for an outdated topic that simply needs to be changed to fit the whims of people who find our freedoms inconvenient to their lifestyle.

i'll be glad to talk with whatever is left of you when you return from that fun run.

That would be a hard thing to do, but it has nothing to do with my question. Perhaps you would care to read what I asked again and answer that instead of making insinuations that don't apply.

i did read what you said. my take on it is you wish to write the constitution to fit todays society.

am i wrong there?

Yes. Your take is completely wrong. Answer the question and quit trying to fit it into some talking point you might be wanting to spout.

then please tell me what you meant when i read:
"So you think anyone who would think the constitution was less than perfectly suited for their time and should be modified to better fit a changing world is anti American? How about a strait yes or no answer this time?"

you're 100% right in that i dove into the middle of this one but i took off ignore and wow, there you were! but that is my mistake in interpretation so going back to catch up as i can to try and be fair, i'll just say it depends.

how do they wish to "change" the constitution? rewrite it or amend it? if we follow the process and keep it there, great. if you want to rewrite it from scratch, then yes we have issues.

anti-american? that's a stretch call so soon in this type of a conversation as you don't know why or what the person wants to change. on the surface most people would think those wanting to change it are sinister people. well they would be if they forced the changes and that to me would be anti-american.

but if they work through the process and include all sides in the creation of it, maybe. i still wouldn't see a need and would need to greatly understand the point behind the change. is this led by a singular mindset upset their group doesn't have a bigger role in it?

sit down and shut up then. not anti american in as much as selfish and stupid. let's stop using only extremes to be the way to describe someone.

so there is no valid yes or no answer to such a base question and anyone giving that to you isn't putting enough thought into the question to be sincere in their answer which makes their answer a reaction, not a thoughtful reply.

now - can you give me a yes/no on that? do you wish to rewrite the constitution for todays environment?

Perhaps you should read the post I was responding to before you took off on this tangent.

 

[LeftofLeft]

This kind of behavior towards the media by s President is not new. I remember Fox being left out of Conference calls by the last President. I think leaving out the media is childish. Calling them out in their bullshit bias is more fun.

 

[iceberg]

it's sure a dangerous game, is it not?

Honor The Fallen - Home Page| Military Times

head on out there and go tell the families of these fallen soldiers that what they believed in, signed up to do and in the end paid the highest price possible for our freedoms that they were fighting for an outdated topic that simply needs to be changed to fit the whims of people who find our freedoms inconvenient to their lifestyle.

i'll be glad to talk with whatever is left of you when you return from that fun run.

That would be a hard thing to do, but it has nothing to do with my question. Perhaps you would care to read what I asked again and answer that instead of making insinuations that don't apply.

i did read what you said. my take on it is you wish to write the constitution to fit todays society.

am i wrong there?

Yes. Your take is completely wrong. Answer the question and quit trying to fit it into some talking point you might be wanting to spout.

then please tell me what you meant when i read:
"So you think anyone who would think the constitution was less than perfectly suited for their time and should be modified to better fit a changing world is anti American? How about a strait yes or no answer this time?"

you're 100% right in that i dove into the middle of this one but i took off ignore and wow, there you were! but that is my mistake in interpretation so going back to catch up as i can to try and be fair, i'll just say it depends.

how do they wish to "change" the constitution? rewrite it or amend it? if we follow the process and keep it there, great. if you want to rewrite it from scratch, then yes we have issues.

anti-american? that's a stretch call so soon in this type of a conversation as you don't know why or what the person wants to change. on the surface most people would think those wanting to change it are sinister people. well they would be if they forced the changes and that to me would be anti-american.

but if they work through the process and include all sides in the creation of it, maybe. i still wouldn't see a need and would need to greatly understand the point behind the change. is this led by a singular mindset upset their group doesn't have a bigger role in it?

sit down and shut up then. not anti american in as much as selfish and stupid. let's stop using only extremes to be the way to describe someone.

so there is no valid yes or no answer to such a base question and anyone giving that to you isn't putting enough thought into the question to be sincere in their answer which makes their answer a reaction, not a thoughtful reply.

now - can you give me a yes/no on that? do you wish to rewrite the constitution for todays environment?

You're free to ignore who you will, but if you respond to my post, please do me the courtesy of something other than a bullshit answer. Do you think the constitution adequately covers all areas pertaining to current society as well as it did when it was first written?

it's sure a dangerous game, is it not?

Honor The Fallen - Home Page| Military Times

head on out there and go tell the families of these fallen soldiers that what they believed in, signed up to do and in the end paid the highest price possible for our freedoms that they were fighting for an outdated topic that simply needs to be changed to fit the whims of people who find our freedoms inconvenient to their lifestyle.

i'll be glad to talk with whatever is left of you when you return from that fun run.

That would be a hard thing to do, but it has nothing to do with my question. Perhaps you would care to read what I asked again and answer that instead of making insinuations that don't apply.

i did read what you said. my take on it is you wish to write the constitution to fit todays society.

am i wrong there?

Yes. Your take is completely wrong. Answer the question and quit trying to fit it into some talking point you might be wanting to spout.

then please tell me what you meant when i read:
"So you think anyone who would think the constitution was less than perfectly suited for their time and should be modified to better fit a changing world is anti American? How about a strait yes or no answer this time?"

you're 100% right in that i dove into the middle of this one but i took off ignore and wow, there you were! but that is my mistake in interpretation so going back to catch up as i can to try and be fair, i'll just say it depends.

how do they wish to "change" the constitution? rewrite it or amend it? if we follow the process and keep it there, great. if you want to rewrite it from scratch, then yes we have issues.

anti-american? that's a stretch call so soon in this type of a conversation as you don't know why or what the person wants to change. on the surface most people would think those wanting to change it are sinister people. well they would be if they forced the changes and that to me would be anti-american.

but if they work through the process and include all sides in the creation of it, maybe. i still wouldn't see a need and would need to greatly understand the point behind the change. is this led by a singular mindset upset their group doesn't have a bigger role in it?

sit down and shut up then. not anti american in as much as selfish and stupid. let's stop using only extremes to be the way to describe someone.

so there is no valid yes or no answer to such a base question and anyone giving that to you isn't putting enough thought into the question to be sincere in their answer which makes their answer a reaction, not a thoughtful reply.

now - can you give me a yes/no on that? do you wish to rewrite the constitution for todays environment?

Perhaps you should read the post I was responding to before you took off on this tangent.

did you miss my saying:

"you're 100% right in that i dove into the middle of this one but i took off ignore and wow, there you were! but that is my mistake in interpretation so going back to catch up as i can to try and be fair, i'll just say it depends."

so i fully admit i misstepped in how i came into this conversation. i then backed up to try and understand and better answer to be fair to you and the conversation at hand. if i'm still wrong then tell me what you feel about rewriting the constitution and we'll go from there cause i missed when i stepped in initially and apparently after going back to read previous posts i'm still not getting your point.

so i'll just ask you - is someone who wants to rewrite the constitution anti-american?

 

[Circe]

What do you have against the US Constitution?

Why are you so in to authoritarian governments?

Why are you so into yelling and screaming and mobbing anyone who doesn't do or think exactly as you want?

These CNN reporters are exactly the same as the Maxine Waters mobs and the Red Hen staff that mobbed and shrieked at their customers. Leftists are such incredibly bad people these days.