Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
amp.cnn.com
I have something similar I like to sing to anyone trying to tell me what to do. It's a simple tune with easy to remember lyrics.After the current shit-show of threats and doxxing I expect the right-leaning justices to live by the feud on the dems.....If they don't they damn well should.
The majority opinion could, and should, be summed-up in five words....."Because fuck you, that's why".
That right there is some sound legal reasoning....."Because fuck you, that's why".
Well said...so you better vote for Democrats.
Thus, each opinion should close with....The SC justices have a lifetime appointment, so they don't have to give a damn about what anybody thinks. I would be very disappointed if any of them allowed themselves to be bullied into altering their opinions about any case before them. And we'd probably never know if that was the case anyway.
Thus, each opinion should close with....
Finally, we hold....because fuck you.
Thus, each opinion should close with....
Finally, we hold....because fuck you.
No, we couldn't "KNOW" but it will certainly lead to a belief that if they change their vote now, they are reacting to the intimidation efforts of the Left. If that happens, a huge number of Americans will begin to see that court as hyper-politicized and having lost its credibility. Ultimately, states may simply follow Cali, NY, IL, Or and others in simply ignoring the laws they disagree with. I can GUARANTEE that any ruling that weakens 2A substantially will be ignored in the South and Midwest and probably others. Sanctuary states will spring up everywhere.The SC justices have a lifetime appointment, so they don't have to give a damn about what anybody thinks. I would be very disappointed if any of them allowed themselves to be bullied into altering their opinions about any case before them. And we'd probably never know if that was the case anyway.
No, we couldn't "KNOW" but it will certainly lead to a belief that if they change their vote now, they are reacting to the intimidation efforts of the Left. If that happens, a huge number of Americans will begin to see that court as hyper-politicized and having lost its credibility. Ultimately, states may simply follow Cali, NY, IL, Or and others in simply ignoring the laws they disagree with. I can GUARANTEE that any ruling that weakens 2A substantially will be ignored in the South and Midwest and probably others. Sanctuary states will spring up everywhere.
It's simple. Decide this case the way we tell you or we will hurt your family.The SC justices have a lifetime appointment, so they don't have to give a damn about what anybody thinks. I would be very disappointed if any of them allowed themselves to be bullied into altering their opinions about any case before them. And we'd probably never know if that was the case anyway.
There will certainly be some procedural and security changes but I don't see this at all affecting how they come down on those cases.Roe leak may impact how Supreme Court decides gun rights, climate and immigration cases this spring
When Supreme Court justices gather on May 12 for their next closed-door conference to discuss pending petitions and outstanding opinions, everything will have changed.
Comment:
Excluded Silent Part:
...so you better vote for Democrats.
No, unless it's shown that the leaker was a member of the court they need to do as always and treat each other with respect and hear/decide the case on the merits and in line with the original meaning and intent of the applicable parts of The Constitution.After the current shit-show of threats and doxxing I expect the right-leaning justices to live by the feud on the dems.....If they don't they damn well should.
The majority opinion could, and should, be summed-up in five words....."Because fuck you, that's why".
Well we certainly know that not to be true, we were flat told so in Bush v Gore and other cases through the years where one or more justices worried about their decision eroding faith in the court because people will think the rulings were made ideologically rather than based on the merits of the cases, the law, and The Constitution.so they don't have to give a damn about what anybody thinks.
Or they'll see it as the court simply being compromised because of fear of such retaliation against themselves and their families.No, we couldn't "KNOW" but it will certainly lead to a belief that if they change their vote now, they are reacting to the intimidation efforts of the Left. If that happens, a huge number of Americans will begin to see that court as hyper-politicized and having lost its credibility. Ultimately, states may simply follow Cali, NY, IL, Or and others in simply ignoring the laws they disagree with. I can GUARANTEE that any ruling that weakens 2A substantially will be ignored in the South and Midwest and probably others. Sanctuary states will spring up everywhere.
Well I'm not some pussy that cares more about decorum than principle so I tend to take a much harsher view.No, unless it's shown that the leaker was a member of the court they need to do as always and treat each other with respect and hear/decide the case on the merits and in line with the original meaning and intent of the applicable parts of The Constitution.
