CO2 Has Almost No Effect on Global Temperature, Says Leading Climate Scientist

[Sunsettommy]

A change from 300ppm to 414 ppm in just 50 years is not miniscule and we know from Carbon isotope ratios the increase is from burning fossil fuels. Yes CC is killing people right now.

Now that is profound ignorance since the death rate for weather events have PLUMMETED and known for a long time.

 

[Sunsettommy]

Only in the imagination of right wing conservatives. CO2 is a GHG, fact, CO2 conc is now 415ppm, fact, Climate change is occurring right now, fact.

You need to stop pushing that tired worn out red herring since hardly anyone disputes that CO2 is a GHG, but it is a weak IR absorber with a very small warm forcing effect after the first 100 pm rise.

The doubling of CO2 from 280 ppm to 560 ppm will produce a very small warm forcing amount which is piddling:

"Next, here is the radical change in downwelling radiation at the surface from the increase in CO2 that is supposed to be driving the “CLIMATE EMERGENCY!!!” What I’ve shown is the change that in theory would have occurred from the changes in CO2 from 1750 to the present, and the change that in theory will occur in the future when CO2 increases from its present value to twice the 1750 value. This is using the generally accepted (although not rigorously derived) claim that the downwelling radiation change from a doubling of CO2 is 3.7 watts per square metre (W/m2). The purpose is to show how small these CO2-caused changes are compared to total downwelling radiation.

The changes in downwelling radiation from the increase in CO2 are trivially small, lost in the noise …

=====

No, it is still the same in most of the world, you confuse periodic weather trends with long term climate trend.

The climate in my area is the SAME now as it was in 1964 and that is true for most areas of the world.

 

[Leo123]

Bull shit if you're a denier of Climate change.

Stop with your semantic bullshit. No one denies the Earth’s climate changes but it does so without human intervention.

 

[Sunsettommy]

It was 300ppm when I was at school and now it's 415ppm. Don't call me a liar, I'm not a CC denier or Trumper.

According to this CO2 chart LINK you were born around 1895 thus your stupidity and ignorance is exposed.

It was 300 ppm in 1909 and 1910.

You are so far off it is pathetic.

 

[Sunsettommy]

A change from 300ppm to 414 ppm in just 50 years is not miniscule and we know from Carbon isotope ratios the increase is from burning fossil fuels. Yes CC is killing people right now.

You are openly LYING since the last year it was 300 ppm was in 1910 it was first over 414 ppm in 2020 which is 112 years you should slow and count slower.

LINK

 

[Sunsettommy]

CO2 causes temperature on Earth, without GHGs the planet would radiate too much heat.

Now that is plain stupid since most of the TERRESTRIAL OLWIR falls outside the main CO2 band, this is 101 stuff you should have long ago learned.

 

[Sunsettommy]

CO2. CH4, N2O, H20 and a number of lesser

Ha ha ha ha ha, you left out the biggest GHG of all do you know what you didn't list?

 

[Sunsettommy]

It doesn't. You must be a Trumpter.

Bull shit if you're a denier of Climate change.

You can't even begin to make a science-based reply while you keep ignoring his over and over, you behave like a drone.

 

[Sunsettommy]

Kininmonth's article has never been peer reviewed and the GWPF is a AGW denier think tank. Bripat's comment about rats is absolutely laughable.

Translation: I can't make an easy counterpoint to the article because it is too hard.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

It doesn't. You must be a Trumpter.

What determines the amount of energy the Earth radiates?

 

[Sunsettommy]

It certainly was not Man burning fossil fuels as is happening right now.

What is a "fossil Fuel"?

 

[Sunsettommy]

How do you know this? Is this like another Donald Trump CC is a Chinese hoax rant ?

You have yet to get started showing that increased CO2 since the late 1800's is driving the warming trend, when will you post it?

 

[Sunsettommy]

Only a real dumbass would believe garbage like this!

Yet you Crick, Shareprofit and YOU can't make a decent counterpoint to it.

 

[Sunsettommy]

My stance is backed up by 95% of the scientists on the planet. Your stance is from a bunch of fossil fuel whores!

Yet you amazingly can't post it HERE.

 

[Sunsettommy]

Only dumbass cons think that.

Your inability to make counterpoints has reached legendary status, I am impressed at your continual Dead-on arrival replies.

What school did you learn this ability from?

 

[Sunsettommy]

Experiment to show, I have but you can't comprehend simple science. I'm not repeating what I've already posted. You prove your denial. You must have proof for your denial, show me.

You haven't posted jack shit but your hilarious OPNIONS some of them so dumb that I wonder if you do it on purpose.

 

[Sunsettommy]

You are just ignorant of the science.

Hey, be nice he is about 130 years old since he started going to school around 1895-1900.

 

[Billy_Bob]

It was 300ppm when I was at school and now it's 415ppm. Don't call me a liar, I'm not a CC denier or Trumper.

Your facts are lacking. I gave you the FACTS found in the lab about CO2, absent any other forcings. When we remove the know other forcings what is left behind is what CO2 is actually doing.

We, according to that Log Graph, should have seen a 2.1 deg C rise in temperature absent any other forcings or enhancement. We have seen just 0.6 deg C rise in temperature. This means that CO2 is being dampened by our atmosphere and is not being enhanced by water vapor. After we remove the other active forcings, CO2's ability to warm is exposed. That warming cannot be discerned from noise in our climatic system.

Time to use the grey matter between your ears for more than a damn hat rack.

 

[Shareprofit]

You haven't posted jack shit but your hilarious OPNIONS some of them so dumb that I wonder if you do it on purpose.

What bit I posted was dumb.

 

[Shareprofit]

Yet you Crick, Shareprofit and YOU can't make a decent counterpoint to it.

That you can understand, you never will, I bet you're a Trumper.