bripat9643
Diamond Member
- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,163
- 47,312
- 2,180
- Thread starter
- #81
"Accusations backed by nothing."Actually believes the mental patient’s propaganda piece.Total corrupted Demrat scum.
All I want to know is
When these garbage is going to jail.
That's all.
You were gullible enough to vote for Crooked Donny so you’ll believe anything.
Again, debate the actual topic.
Prove the topic wrong.
Insulting members only shows the height (low?) of your debating skills.
No, the OP needs to prove itself right. And they've offered nothing but accusation, conjecture and a profoundly stupid conspiracy.
The theory is that any contract that Lockheed Martin received while either Mueller or Comey were FBI directors was because Comey and Mueller 'funneled' contracts to them. They had no actual evidence of impropriety. Nor could they factually establish that an FBI director even could 'funnel' billion dollar contracts to an aerospace company.
And of course, their conspiracy is a disjointed mess. As Comey hasn't worked for Lockheed Martin in 8 years. And Mueller NEVER worked for them. Which begs the question, why would Mueller funnel contracts to a company he didn't work for.
The 'report' has no explanations. It has no evidence. It merely has narrative that might as well begin with 'once up on a time'. Backed by nothing.
We aren't obligated to prove Steve Bannon's report 'wrong'. Its Bannon's responsibility to prove his allegations right.
That is why we need a special counsel because "the accusations are so serious".
Accusations backed by nothing. Where as the special counsel was created because of the testimony of FBI director James Comey before congress. With the President and his people caught lying again and again about contacts with Russia.
Sworn testimony of the FBI director v. a no-name blog........not the same thing.
Sort of like the Russian collusion witch hunt? Comey's testimony was entirely perjury.