Complete Incompetence! White House blows cover of CIA’s Kabul station chief!!!

You, my friend, have brought up a subject worthy of a full scale, INDEPENDENT PROSECUTOR! THIS is so much more damaging than the bullshit Plame debacle, as to not be in the same room! It is DIRECTLY connected to INSIDE THE WHITE HOUSE!!!!

An inadvertent outing is more damaging than the Bush administration purposely outing an undercover CIA agent out of revenge for her husband's voiced disapproval of the war in Iraq?

So Plame was undercover, huh?
Sitting behind a desk is now underscover.......only in the liberal left world.

Yes, Plame was undercover ...

"Valerie Wilson was a CIA officer. In July 2003, the fact that Valerie Wilson was a CIA officer was classified. Not only was it classified, but it was not widely known outside the intelligence community. Valerie Wilson's friends, neighbors, college classmates had no idea she had another life. The fact that she was a CIA officer was not well-known, for her protection or for the benefit of all us. It's important that a CIA officer's identity be protected, that it be protected not just for the officer, but for the nation's security. Valerie Wilson's cover was blown in July 2003. The first sign of that cover being blown was when Mr. Novak published a column on July 14th, 2003." ~ Patrick Fitzgerald, 10.28.2005
 
Oh, I'm sorry Peaches, it's just that moderates are kissing cousins of subversives, especially when we right wingers drive you into the arms of the socialists... give me a fucking break, we DRIVE you...are you that stupid and shallow?

In your opinion, obviously. Conclusionary statements give no rationale, thus, it is tough to respond. Perhaps right wing insanity is broadcast to a greater extent. Who pray tell ISN'T subversive to you?

Well Peaches, I've been on the board for less than 3 months, and by the amount of GOOD, DECENT, Conservatives, and PATRIOTS that Rep me for what I say, and post, it seems that there are many people here that aren't subversives! IF you can't take a firm stand on issues, if you FENCE SIT, and look at the other party as if they have anything relevant to say, a MODERATE is just not worth the powder to blow him to hell at this current junction of our history! Social values are JUST AS IMPORTANT as fiscal values. The LEFT has NO ethics, morals or principles worth a hill of beans. You want to see babies killed? You want to see queers pushing their values on your children? You want MORE ILLEGALS here to soak up almost non-existing jobs, get YOUR TAX MONEY handed to them for free, and watch them get citizenship so they can VOTE THEMSELVES more entitlements? You want Atheists to DISALLOW YOU your religious freedom, watch the muslim hoards SLOWLY take over the high positions in the Fed gov't that the Manchurian muslim has appointed them to.... how many more things would you like to list that have sent this country, over the last 6+ decades into a swirling black hole? Either get your head screwed on straight, or get off the bus!:mad:

I desire little of that which you impute. Ascribe a position to your opponent, then attack that position is an old debate tactic. Rarely works.
 
In your opinion, obviously. Conclusionary statements give no rationale, thus, it is tough to respond. Perhaps right wing insanity is broadcast to a greater extent. Who pray tell ISN'T subversive to you?

Well Peaches, I've been on the board for less than 3 months, and by the amount of GOOD, DECENT, Conservatives, and PATRIOTS that Rep me for what I say, and post, it seems that there are many people here that aren't subversives! IF you can't take a firm stand on issues, if you FENCE SIT, and look at the other party as if they have anything relevant to say, a MODERATE is just not worth the powder to blow him to hell at this current junction of our history! Social values are JUST AS IMPORTANT as fiscal values. The LEFT has NO ethics, morals or principles worth a hill of beans. You want to see babies killed? You want to see queers pushing their values on your children? You want MORE ILLEGALS here to soak up almost non-existing jobs, get YOUR TAX MONEY handed to them for free, and watch them get citizenship so they can VOTE THEMSELVES more entitlements? You want Atheists to DISALLOW YOU your religious freedom, watch the muslim hoards SLOWLY take over the high positions in the Fed gov't that the Manchurian muslim has appointed them to.... how many more things would you like to list that have sent this country, over the last 6+ decades into a swirling black hole? Either get your head screwed on straight, or get off the bus!:mad:

I desire little of that which you impute. Ascribe a position to your opponent, then attack that position is an old debate tactic. Rarely works.

Since you desire little of what I "impute" it seems to me that my assessment of you was spot on, and I didn't have to attack your position without the mentioned ASCRIBING! I did enjoy the debating societies, learned much from the subversive left, and even their thought process. Once you know how they think, the rest is easy.
 
You, my friend, have brought up a subject worthy of a full scale, INDEPENDENT PROSECUTOR! THIS is so much more damaging than the bullshit Plame debacle, as to not be in the same room! It is DIRECTLY connected to INSIDE THE WHITE HOUSE!!!!

An inadvertent outing is more damaging than the Bush administration purposely outing an undercover CIA agent out of revenge for her husband's voiced disapproval of the war in Iraq?

results are the same, their is blown. now lets see all you liberals pounce on Obama with the same hate and intensity you jumped on bush. if you don't, you're just hypocrites

Whomever is responsible should be held accountable. If anyone broke the law, they should go to jail over it; and if that were to happen, Obama should not pull a Bush and commute their sentence.
 
You, my friend, have brought up a subject worthy of a full scale, INDEPENDENT PROSECUTOR! THIS is so much more damaging than the bullshit Plame debacle, as to not be in the same room! It is DIRECTLY connected to INSIDE THE WHITE HOUSE!!!!

An inadvertent outing is more damaging than the Bush administration purposely outing an undercover CIA agent out of revenge for her husband's voiced disapproval of the war in Iraq?

So Plame was undercover, huh?
Sitting behind a desk is now underscover.......only in the liberal left world.
Ahhhhh, but she was a Covert officer and a NOC for the CIA Meister....?
WASHINGTON — An unclassified summary of outed CIA officer Valerie Plame's employment history at the spy agency, disclosed for the first time today in a court filing by Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald, indicates that Plame was "covert" when her name became public in July 2003.
The summary is part of an attachment to Fitzgerald's memorandum to the court supporting his recommendation that I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, Vice President Cheney's former top aide, spend 2-1/2 to 3 years in prison for obstructing the CIA leak investigation.
The nature of Plame's CIA employment never came up in Libby's perjury and obstruction of justice trial.


Undercover travel
The unclassified summary of Plame's employment with the CIA at the time that syndicated columnist Robert Novak published her name on July 14, 2003 says, "Ms. Wilson was a covert CIA employee for who the CIA was taking affirmative measures to conceal her intelligence relationship to the United States."
Plame worked as an operations officer in the Directorate of Operations and was assigned to the Counterproliferation Division (CPD) in January 2002 at CIA headquarters in Langley, Virginia.
The employment history indicates that while she was assigned to CPD, Plame, "engaged in temporary duty travel overseas on official business." The report says, "she traveled at least seven times to more than ten times." When overseas Plame traveled undercover, "sometimes in true name and sometimes in alias -- but always using cover -- whether official or non-official (NOC) -- with no ostensible relationship to the CIA.
Plame was ?covert? agent at time of name leak - politics | NBC News
 
Last edited:
Why it was the same guy that gave us the Benghazi attack was caused by a video....you know...what's his name....:badgrin::badgrin::badgrin:

and here i thought it was the guy who gave us 13 benghazis and 50 dead when baby bush was president. "cuckoo:

and could be worse... they could out a CIA agent in retaliation for her husband ratting out administration lies to get us into an unnecessary war.

oops.

Do you know who Victoria Toensing is? I'll take her word over yours. Plame wasn't covert.
 
Why it was the same guy that gave us the Benghazi attack was caused by a video....you know...what's his name....:badgrin::badgrin::badgrin:

and here i thought it was the guy who gave us 13 benghazis and 50 dead when baby bush was president. "cuckoo:

and could be worse... they could out a CIA agent in retaliation for her husband ratting out administration lies to get us into an unnecessary war.

oops.

Do you know who Victoria Toensing is? I'll take her word over yours. Plame wasn't covert.
Toensing claimed to qualify as covert, Plame needed to "reside" overseas for at least 5 years. However, that is not how the law, which she contributed to, reads. The statute actually states one has to "serve" outside the U.S. within the previous 5 years to qualify as "covert."

Title 50 › Chapter 44 › Subchapter IV › § 3126 - Definitions

(4) The term “covert agent” means—
(A) a present or retired officer or employee of an intelligence agency or a present or retired member of the Armed Forces assigned to duty with an intelligence agency—
(i) whose identity as such an officer, employee, or member is classified information, and

(ii) who is serving outside the United States or has within the last five years served outside the United States; or​

(B) a United States citizen whose intelligence relationship to the United States is classified information, and—
(i) who resides and acts outside the United States as an agent of, or informant or source of operational assistance to, an intelligence agency, or

(ii) who is at the time of the disclosure acting as an agent of, or informant to, the foreign counterintelligence or foreign counterterrorism components of the Federal Bureau of Investigation; or​

(C) an individual, other than a United States citizen, whose past or present intelligence relationship to the United States is classified information and who is a present or former agent of, or a present or former informant or source of operational assistance to, an intelligence agency.​
 
It's being reported that a Washington Post reporter caught this? Is this correct?

No media outlets have released the name that I am aware of; not intentional, as was the Plame "payback". This is a MISTAKE, albeit it may be a serious one. Any source that reveals the name must be ready for serious consequences.
 
I see the subversive left has CHANGED the OP to some shit about Plame, instead of the current administrations fuck up.... it must be good to have subversive friends that can turn you away from the topic...."LOOK AT THE SHINY OBJECT OVER THERE!"
 
Well Peaches, I've been on the board for less than 3 months, and by the amount of GOOD, DECENT, Conservatives, and PATRIOTS that Rep me for what I say, and post, it seems that there are many people here that aren't subversives! IF you can't take a firm stand on issues, if you FENCE SIT, and look at the other party as if they have anything relevant to say, a MODERATE is just not worth the powder to blow him to hell at this current junction of our history! Social values are JUST AS IMPORTANT as fiscal values. The LEFT has NO ethics, morals or principles worth a hill of beans. You want to see babies killed? You want to see queers pushing their values on your children? You want MORE ILLEGALS here to soak up almost non-existing jobs, get YOUR TAX MONEY handed to them for free, and watch them get citizenship so they can VOTE THEMSELVES more entitlements? You want Atheists to DISALLOW YOU your religious freedom, watch the muslim hoards SLOWLY take over the high positions in the Fed gov't that the Manchurian muslim has appointed them to.... how many more things would you like to list that have sent this country, over the last 6+ decades into a swirling black hole? Either get your head screwed on straight, or get off the bus!:mad:

I desire little of that which you impute. Ascribe a position to your opponent, then attack that position is an old debate tactic. Rarely works.

Since you desire little of what I "impute" it seems to me that my assessment of you was spot on, and I didn't have to attack your position without the mentioned ASCRIBING! I did enjoy the debating societies, learned much from the subversive left, and even their thought process. Once you know how they think, the rest is easy.

The amorphous "they" can create a muddle you will never work through. I have read some slop by so called progressive media that isn't worth lining a bird cage with. I found Buckley reliable despite disagreement, now George Will, Coulter is useless, as is Buttpimple.
 
Armitage was never prosecuted. He was the one claiming Joe Wilson was running around and yakking about his wife to give himself credibility. Don't forget he signed on to the Kerry campaign and the buzz was he could potentially become Kerry's Secretary of State.

Armitage even told Bob Woodward/ Washington Post about the Val and Joe show about a month before the Novak article.
 
I see the subversive left has CHANGED the OP to some shit about Plame, instead of the current administrations fuck up.... it must be good to have subversive friends that can turn you away from the topic...."LOOK AT THE SHINY OBJECT OVER THERE!"

What's truly stunning is that they still believe the lie that the Bush administration outed Plame. It's nothing short of jaw dropping insanity.
 
I see the subversive left has CHANGED the OP to some shit about Plame, instead of the current administrations fuck up.... it must be good to have subversive friends that can turn you away from the topic...."LOOK AT THE SHINY OBJECT OVER THERE!"

What's truly stunning is that they still believe the lie that the Bush administration outed Plame. It's nothing short of jaw dropping insanity.

It truly is, I expect it from little punks like swallow though.
 
Armitage was never prosecuted. He was the one claiming Joe Wilson was running around and yakking about his wife to give himself credibility. Don't forget he signed on to the Kerry campaign and the buzz was he could potentially become Kerry's Secretary of State.

Armitage even told Bob Woodward/ Washington Post about the Val and Joe show about a month before the Novak article.
Armitage was not prosecuted because it could not be proven that he "knowingly" outed a covert CIA operative. Whether or not he did or didn't will possibly never be known since the investigation was obstructed. Still, it couldn't be proven so he was never charged.
 
I see the subversive left has CHANGED the OP to some shit about Plame, instead of the current administrations fuck up.... it must be good to have subversive friends that can turn you away from the topic...."LOOK AT THE SHINY OBJECT OVER THERE!"
Imbecile ... it was one of the subversives from your side of the aisle who brought Plame into this thread. :eusa_whistle:
 
Armitage was telling everyone and their mother that Joe Wilson was telling everyone and their mother that Joe was pissed off at being classified as low level. So Wilson was running around shooting his mouth off about Valerie's position in the agency to enhance his credibility.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top