There's no proof of any rocks being thrown. They didn't capture it on video, so it never happened.
Ummn, that is crazy talk.
Video is not the only standard of proof anywhere for anything, except in your head, right now, to give yourself an excuse to dismiss the more credible scenario.
In your opinion, would the blacks, hypothetically, been justified in throwing rocks at the trucks?
It's a "he said, she said" situation.
The only thing we know for sure is that a convoy of Confederate flag-bearing pickup trucks and their passengers somehow ended up at a black child’s birthday party, who then yelled racial slurs.
From the link in the OP
Bush said, admitting that a specific racial slur was likely used by members of his group.
Yes, it is a "he said, she said" situation.
So in such a case one must compare both stories and judge likely hood.
Would the blacks, hypothetically, been justified in throwing rocks at the trucks?
The answer is obviously yes. THat is why you will not give it.
Thus, the white guys story becomes the more credible.
And once you realize that the blacks threw rocks,caused the accident, then went over to harass and threaten the lone truck's occupant(s) and then the other trucks came back to protect them,
then the question is, how does harsh language compare to that, as to whom the bad guy is here?
Oh, and btw, what kind of language do you think the outraged blacks were using?
Has anyone asked the lady from the party about that?
I doubt it.
It is ok for blacks to use racial slurs against whites.
What racial slurs were used by the black people at the party? I listened to the video, and I didn't hear any.
His entire act is to take what the white people who don't live there say as fact while ignoring the entire video.
Again, if he had to defend only the video he couldnt, but add in a tale of blacks made me do it and everything is justified.
Take out the 3 or 4 different stories the white boys told and what do you have? Whites dudes on tape using racial slurs at a child's birthday party. Then those same guys threatening to shoot people in front of the police. That's infefensible...unless Correll can make up some BS for why thats ok
it is a "he said, she said" situation.
So in such a case one must compare both stories and judge likely hood.
Would the blacks, hypothetically, been justified in throwing rocks at the trucks? In your opinion?
The answer is obviously yes. THat is why you will not give it.
Thus, the white guys story becomes the more credible.
And once you realize that the blacks threw rocks,caused the accident, then went over to harass and threaten the lone truck's occupant(s) and then the other trucks came back to protect them,
then the question is, how does harsh language compare to that, as to whom the bad guy is here?