The2ndAmendment
Gold Member
- Feb 16, 2013
- 13,383
- 3,659
- Thread starter
- #81
You gonna answer my question or not?Does Hillary Clinton have that innocence, then, that she trusted the voting system when she won the popular vote by 3 million and lost the EC by 80,000 votes in three states? Where were you door watchers then, BlackSand, saying there must have been fraud? The only fraud I ever hear of being committed is by Dems, over and over. It is an orchestrated push by the President to steal the election, and it's been coming for over two years now, starting with that failed Voting Commission that dismally bombed with no findings.
I agree with investigating real voter fraud, and there are people who work very hard to keep our voting system fair. You're right that there will always be some clever folks who try to cheat, but those people who have worked so hard to uncover it have never come up with numbers that would change voting results. Ever. Because it is not widespread and endemic to our system. There are too many checks built into the system.
I don't know, maybe you believe this role of yours, as a protector of the foolish and innocent, but in this case, in 2020, imo the fight is actually about destroying a fair election.
I guess we'll see. I could be wrong.
.
No one, including Hillary Clinton, that walks the razor's edge between the light and the darkness, still has their innocence.
We know what's on the other side, we know it cannot be defeated, and we know that no matter our efforts it will always return.
Your faith and goodness is the only thing that helps keep the people who walk the edge from embracing the darkness and being lost to the abyss.
Don't be seduced by the darkness ... You are not equipped to handle it.
That's what makes you special and our job worth doing.
I don't just see it as being my job, I have literally served this country doing it.
.
NO one has to answer to you.
If you (or g5000 ) want to allege that Republicans engage in voter fraud then you have to post links supporting your claims; or, conversely, if you want to deny or disparage or neutralize our claims (that are supported by links), then you have provide your own substantive link as well.
We have fulfilled our burden to provide links to our claims, now you fulfill yours.