NYcarbineer
Diamond Member
Were these not your words? What were you implying?
I was not "implying" anything. I was stating a fact.
Come now. A fact isn't just randomly stated for no reason if not to infer a point.
What I understood was
"if the video is responsible for those attacks, then it is possible that it caused the attack on the consulate in Benghazi."
I can't read your intentions from the other side of an internet connection.
You have, once again, added to my statement with your own imagination.
I mentioned the fact that 5 other embassies were attacked directly due to the internet video to add context to your Hillary Clinton quote:
"This has been a difficult week for the State Department and for our country. We’ve seen the heavy assault on our post in Benghazi that took the lives of those brave men. We’ve seen rage and violence directed at American embassies over an awful Internet video that we had nothing do to with.”
Why the need for context? It was easy to see she was blaming Benghazi on the video, irregardless of the five other attacks.
As you have proven......they just don't care.
Everyone knows she was lying.
Everyone knows they sent the vid maker to jail....contrary to the Liberal mantra 'better 100 guilty go free rather than one innocent blah blah blah...'
The truth is summed up here:
"Principle is nothing to liberals. Winning is everything."
Coulter
If there is a God who rewards rectitude, or karma, the same.....
...then Liberals have doomed us all.
When you are right - winning is your duty.