Congress considering impeachment of Judge who reversed Trump travel ban

[MindWars]

Congress Considering Impeachment of Judge Who Reversed Trump Travel Ban
The White House issued a statement vowing to file for an emergency stay of a federal judge’s order to block President Donald Trump’s executive order restricting immigration and refugees from high risk countries from the Middle East.


Congress Considering Impeachment of Judge Who Reversed Trump Travel Ban

And he should be, it shows that being an American Governmental/Politcal ass kisser doesn't save you as it once did when you were rubbing elbows with the crooked side of politicians lets see if they save your azz.
Maybe they will maybe they won't. Hopefully they won't.

 

[william the wie]

There are simpler and more effective ways to neuter such judges without making a martyr out of the bozo.

 

[MindWars]

There are simpler and more effective ways to neuter such judges without making a martyr out of the bozo.

LAWS are LAWS
Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.

 

[Pogo]

Where do you see any evidence of what your headline claims?

In the article:

>> While the White House continues its legal fight at the Appellate Level, members of Congress have begun taking a very hard look at District Judge Robart, for what may be “impeachable bad behavior.” <<​

Notice two things: One, the vague language: "Members of Congress" (yet it can't name any). "Taking a very hard look" --- yeah right.
And two "what may be called 'impeachable bad behavior'" --- is the blogger talking, not a member of Congress. He simply picks an idea out of the air, attributed to nobody.

He then goes on an aimless ramble that makes it pretty clear he hasn't been around the legal process a whole lot.

"Congress" is never mentioned again.

Always read beyond the headlines. They lie. A lot.

 

[bodecea]

Congress Considering Impeachment of Judge Who Reversed Trump Travel Ban
The White House issued a statement vowing to file for an emergency stay of a federal judge’s order to block President Donald Trump’s executive order restricting immigration and refugees from high risk countries from the Middle East.


Congress Considering Impeachment of Judge Who Reversed Trump Travel Ban

And he should be, it shows that being an American Governmental/Politcal ass kisser doesn't save you as it once did when you were rubbing elbows with the crooked side of politicians lets see if they save your azz.
Maybe they will maybe they won't. Hopefully they won't.

Based on.........?

 

[Pogo]

Congress Considering Impeachment of Judge Who Reversed Trump Travel Ban
The White House issued a statement vowing to file for an emergency stay of a federal judge’s order to block President Donald Trump’s executive order restricting immigration and refugees from high risk countries from the Middle East.


Congress Considering Impeachment of Judge Who Reversed Trump Travel Ban

And he should be, it shows that being an American Governmental/Politcal ass kisser doesn't save you as it once did when you were rubbing elbows with the crooked side of politicians lets see if they save your azz.
Maybe they will maybe they won't. Hopefully they won't.

Based on.........?

"Wishful thinking".

 

[Care4all]

Congress Considering Impeachment of Judge Who Reversed Trump Travel Ban
The White House issued a statement vowing to file for an emergency stay of a federal judge’s order to block President Donald Trump’s executive order restricting immigration and refugees from high risk countries from the Middle East.


Congress Considering Impeachment of Judge Who Reversed Trump Travel Ban

And he should be, it shows that being an American Governmental/Politcal ass kisser doesn't save you as it once did when you were rubbing elbows with the crooked side of politicians lets see if they save your azz.
Maybe they will maybe they won't. Hopefully they won't.

there is NO SOURCE in the linked article comment on congress considering impeachment of the judge...they didn't say who said congress was considering such....

they seemed to simply make that statement up out of thin air.

 

[MindWars]

Where do you see any evidence of what your headline claims?

In the article:

>> While the White House continues its legal fight at the Appellate Level, members of Congress have begun taking a very hard look at District Judge Robart, for what may be “impeachable bad behavior.” <<​

Notice two things: One, the vague language: "Members of Congress" (yet it can't name any). "Taking a very hard look" --- yeah right.
And two "what may be called 'impeachable bad behavior'" --- is the blogger talking, not a member of Congress. He simply picks an idea out of the air, attributed to nobody.

He then goes on an aimless ramble that makes it pretty clear he hasn't been around the legal process a whole lot.

"Congress" is never mentioned again.

Always read beyond the headlines. They lie. A lot.

Judges are not suppose to have more power than the President.
They are using this bs line " Constitutional rights" these morons coming into the Country are NOT AMERICAN so they sure in the hell can't and shouldn't have any Constitutional rights to begin with . Thats a MSM liberal mind trap being used so the sheep stay stuck on it.


"Beyond Section 212(f), other provisions of the INA can also be seen to authorize the Executive to restrict aliens’ entry to the United States. Most notably, Section 214(a)(1) prescribes that the “admission of any alien to the United States as a nonimmigrant shall be for such time and under such conditions as [the Executive] may by regulations prescribe.”

Section 215(a)(1) similarly provides that “it shall be unlawful for any alien” to enter or depart the United States “except under such reasonable rules, regulations, and orders, and subject to such limitations and exceptions as the President may prescribe.” For example, President Carter cited Section 215(a)— rather than Section 212(f)—when authorizing the revocation of immigrant and nonimmigrant visas issued to Iranian citizens during the Iran Hostage Crisis.

Thus, US District Court Judge Robart seems to have usurped Presidential Power, made a ruling beyond his jurisdiction and granted legal standing to parties who don’t have any standing. This is what members of Congress are now reviewing to determine if Impeachment of the Judge is prudent."

 

[Pogo]

Judges are not suppose to have more power than the President.

Better go back to high school civics class. We have three branches; Executive, Legislative and Judicial. The latter --- the one removed from the white house web site when Rump arrived --- has the last word.

There's also this:

>> The order violates the law. Under the Immigration Act of 1965, the president may not refuse to give visas to immigrants coming to live in the United States permanently due to their nationality. The provision is unequivocal in stating that no person may “be discriminated against in the issuance of an immigrant visa because of the person’s race, sex, nationality, place of birth, or place of residence.” While this does not apply to temporary visitors or refugees, I have previously explained in detail why the president cannot legally enforce this order against immigrants who are sponsored by employers or family members in the United States. << --- Five Reasons Congress Should Repeal Rump's Immigrant & Refugee Ban".
​

Finally, you completely danced around my point. The idea that "Congress is considering impeachment" is entirely made up by the blogger. He tried to weasel-word it in but he can't back up the point.

 

[MindWars]

 

[bullwinkle]

Where do you see any evidence of what your headline claims?

In the article:

>> While the White House continues its legal fight at the Appellate Level, members of Congress have begun taking a very hard look at District Judge Robart, for what may be “impeachable bad behavior.” <<​

Notice two things: One, the vague language: "Members of Congress" (yet it can't name any). "Taking a very hard look" --- yeah right.
And two "what may be called 'impeachable bad behavior'" --- is the blogger talking, not a member of Congress. He simply picks an idea out of the air, attributed to nobody.

He then goes on an aimless ramble that makes it pretty clear he hasn't been around the legal process a whole lot.

"Congress" is never mentioned again.

Always read beyond the headlines. They lie. A lot.

Judges are not suppose to have more power than the President.
They are using this bs line " Constitutional rights" these morons coming into the Country are NOT AMERICAN so they sure in the hell can't and shouldn't have any Constitutional rights to begin with . Thats a MSM liberal mind trap being used so the sheep stay stuck on it.


"Beyond Section 212(f), other provisions of the INA can also be seen to authorize the Executive to restrict aliens’ entry to the United States. Most notably, Section 214(a)(1) prescribes that the “admission of any alien to the United States as a nonimmigrant shall be for such time and under such conditions as [the Executive] may by regulations prescribe.”

Section 215(a)(1) similarly provides that “it shall be unlawful for any alien” to enter or depart the United States “except under such reasonable rules, regulations, and orders, and subject to such limitations and exceptions as the President may prescribe.” For example, President Carter cited Section 215(a)— rather than Section 212(f)—when authorizing the revocation of immigrant and nonimmigrant visas issued to Iranian citizens during the Iran Hostage Crisis.

Thus, US District Court Judge Robart seems to have usurped Presidential Power, made a ruling beyond his jurisdiction and granted legal standing to parties who don’t have any standing. This is what members of Congress are now reviewing to determine if Impeachment of the Judge is prudent."

"Judges are not suppose to have more power than the President." Nor is the President supposed to have more power than judges. You're looking at the wrong 'usurper'.

 

[Silhouette]

Congress considering impeachment of Judge who reversed Trump travel ban

Now there's an idea!

 

[Political Junky]

Congress Considering Impeachment of Judge Who Reversed Trump Travel Ban
The White House issued a statement vowing to file for an emergency stay of a federal judge’s order to block President Donald Trump’s executive order restricting immigration and refugees from high risk countries from the Middle East.


Congress Considering Impeachment of Judge Who Reversed Trump Travel Ban

And he should be, it shows that being an American Governmental/Politcal ass kisser doesn't save you as it once did when you were rubbing elbows with the crooked side of politicians lets see if they save your azz.
Maybe they will maybe they won't. Hopefully they won't.

LOL, good luck with that.

 

[Toro]

Congress Considering Impeachment of Judge Who Reversed Trump Travel Ban
The White House issued a statement vowing to file for an emergency stay of a federal judge’s order to block President Donald Trump’s executive order restricting immigration and refugees from high risk countries from the Middle East.


Congress Considering Impeachment of Judge Who Reversed Trump Travel Ban

And he should be, it shows that being an American Governmental/Politcal ass kisser doesn't save you as it once did when you were rubbing elbows with the crooked side of politicians lets see if they save your azz.
Maybe they will maybe they won't. Hopefully they won't.

#altfacts

 

[Old Rocks]

Where do you see any evidence of what your headline claims?

In the article:

>> While the White House continues its legal fight at the Appellate Level, members of Congress have begun taking a very hard look at District Judge Robart, for what may be “impeachable bad behavior.” <<​

Notice two things: One, the vague language: "Members of Congress" (yet it can't name any). "Taking a very hard look" --- yeah right.
And two "what may be called 'impeachable bad behavior'" --- is the blogger talking, not a member of Congress. He simply picks an idea out of the air, attributed to nobody.

He then goes on an aimless ramble that makes it pretty clear he hasn't been around the legal process a whole lot.

"Congress" is never mentioned again.

Always read beyond the headlines. They lie. A lot.

It's called 'Alternative Facts', a nice euphemism for stinky lies pulled out of their ass.

 

[MindWars]

Congress Considering Impeachment of Judge Who Reversed Trump Travel Ban
The White House issued a statement vowing to file for an emergency stay of a federal judge’s order to block President Donald Trump’s executive order restricting immigration and refugees from high risk countries from the Middle East.


Congress Considering Impeachment of Judge Who Reversed Trump Travel Ban

And he should be, it shows that being an American Governmental/Politcal ass kisser doesn't save you as it once did when you were rubbing elbows with the crooked side of politicians lets see if they save your azz.
Maybe they will maybe they won't. Hopefully they won't.

there is NO SOURCE in the linked article comment on congress considering impeachment of the judge...they didn't say who said congress was considering such....

they seemed to simply make that statement up out of thin air.

Because it is from the link of the article which goes to show how many DONT BOTHER READING IT ALL IF AT ALL................. Mostly meaning the two smart asses above. " based on" and wishful thinking..

 

[Correll]

There are simpler and more effective ways to neuter such judges without making a martyr out of the bozo.

LAWS are LAWS
Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.

If the judge is the type of piece of shit activist leftist we have come to expect, impeachment should be considered.

 

[bodecea]

View attachment 110890

That's one cray cray lady.

 

[Political Junky]

There are simpler and more effective ways to neuter such judges without making a martyr out of the bozo.

LAWS are LAWS
Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.

If the judge is the type of piece of shit activist leftist we have come to expect, impeachment should be considered.

Appointed by Bush, Jr. LOL

 

[Correll]

There are simpler and more effective ways to neuter such judges without making a martyr out of the bozo.

LAWS are LAWS
Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.

If the judge is the type of piece of shit activist leftist we have come to expect, impeachment should be considered.

Appointed by Bush, Jr. LOL

Don't care. If he can't justify his actions, impeach the fucker.