Procrustes Stretched
"intuition and imagination and intelligence"
Cons have used gay rights to get people out to vote for ages.
God, guns, and gays
God, guns, and gays
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There were always gay Republicans and most knew it. Closets served a purpose.Would assume both sides use polarizing issues like this. Of course, in recent years many Republicans have been discovered to be gay so I wouldn't be surprised if they gradually move away from it as something they condemn, glass houses n all.
wonder if gays will ever get tired of being used by dems?
for decades they've been promised the moon, only to get put back in the closet after the election is over.
rememeber how obamas view on gays evolved? What came of that? jack or squat?
wonder if gays will ever get tired of being used by dems?
for decades they've been promised the moon, only to get put back in the closet after the election is over.
rememeber how obamas view on gays evolved? What came of that? jack or squat?
DADT gone, DOMA all but gone. I believe we've done a lot better with a Dem president than we would have with a Rep president. Sounds like we're getting "used" just fine.
![]()
wonder if gays will ever get tired of being used by dems?
for decades they've been promised the moon, only to get put back in the closet after the election is over.
rememeber how obamas view on gays evolved? What came of that? jack or squat?
DADT gone, DOMA all but gone. I believe we've done a lot better with a Dem president than we would have with a Rep president. Sounds like we're getting "used" just fine.
![]()
Not really. But progress does not ipso facto mean legitimizing degeneracy.Oy vey! Stuck in the past the cons are and static...everything has to stay the way it is for their world view to be relevant and credible
Cons have used gay rights to get people out to vote
Not really. But progress does not ipso facto mean legitimizing degeneracy.Oy vey! Stuck in the past the cons are and static...everything has to stay the way it is for their world view to be relevant and credible
Not when it elevates 3% at the expense of 97%.Not really. But progress does not ipso facto mean legitimizing degeneracy.Oy vey! Stuck in the past the cons are and static...everything has to stay the way it is for their world view to be relevant and credible
Progress always has victims
Not when it elevates 3% at the expense of 97%.Not really. But progress does not ipso facto mean legitimizing degeneracy.
Progress always has victims
That's called 'un-sustainable'.
Not really. But progress does not ipso facto mean legitimizing degeneracy.Oy vey! Stuck in the past the cons are and static...everything has to stay the way it is for their world view to be relevant and credible
I rarely do that and cannot recall the last time that I did.[MENTION=20204]Kondor3[/MENTION]Not when it elevates 3% at the expense of 97%.Progress always has victims
That's called 'un-sustainable'.
posting before thinking through what you have written again?
Yes...Not really. But progress does not ipso facto mean legitimizing degeneracy.Oy vey! Stuck in the past the cons are and static...everything has to stay the way it is for their world view to be relevant and credible
legitimizing degeneracy?
We live in a republic.![]()