Cons have used gay rights to get people out to vote

And libs have used gay rights to get out their vote.

True. And conservatives seeking to deny gay Americans their civil liberties compel many moderate and independent voters, who might otherwise be inclined to vote republican, to vote democratic – simply in opposition to the hate and ignorance exhibited by many on the right.
Seeking to repress perversion within society and to keep it in the shadows is not 'hate and ignorance'. It is acting according to one's perceptions of society and its needs and beliefs and its future and best interests. The only 'hate' being manifested is by those falsely labeling Opposition as Hate, and engendering dislike and contempt in the process, which can, itself, very well lead to 'hate', but for very different reasons.
 
Last edited:
And libs have used gay rights to get out their vote.

expanding rights versus denying rights? hmm..tough choice, eh? :eusa_whistle:
Depends on whether we're talkin' about Normal Folk or Perverts, I expect... and whether accommodation legitimizes or encourages perversion and a creeping society-wide degeneracy and slow death of a vigorous and manly Nation-State in favor of a dissipated and emasculated nation in rapid decline, and an assault on its most precious asset - children - as some would speculate...
 
Last edited:
perversion?
And libs have used gay rights to get out their vote.

True. And conservatives seeking to deny gay Americans their civil liberties compel many moderate and independent voters, who might otherwise be inclined to vote republican, to vote democratic – simply in opposition to the hate and ignorance exhibited by many on the right.
Seeking to repress perversion within society and to keep it in the shadows is not 'hate and ignorance'. It is acting according to one's perceptions of society and its needs and beliefs and its future and best interests. The only 'hate' being manifested is by those falsely labeling Opposition as Hate, and engendering dislike and contempt in the process, which can, itself, very well lead to 'hate', but for very different reasons.

perversion?

Only if you believe love can and should only exist between a man and woman.

Yet one era's perversions become standard later.

go figure


the new generations consider you a troglodyte and I must agree
 
expanding rights versus denying rights? hmm..tough choice, eh? :eusa_whistle:
Depends on whether we're talkin' about Normal Folk or Perverts, I expect...

thing is you are definitely not normal. does that make you gay? :laugh2:
Wake me up when you've snapped out of your petulant hissy fit...
75_75.gif
 
Last edited:
Cons have used gay rights to get people out to vote for ages.

God, guns, and gays

You are probably right.

But how does that differ from the "liberals" using welfare rights to get people out to vote.

Food stamps, Obama hellcare, soak the rich.

.
 
Depends on whether we're talkin' about Normal Folk or Perverts, I expect... and whether accommodation legitimizes or encourages perversion and a creeping society-wide degeneracy and slow death of a vigorous and manly Nation-State in favor of a dissipated and emasculated nation in rapid decline, and an assault on its most precious asset - children - as some would speculate...

Being Gay is neither a "perversion" nor a "degeneracy".

And since you are obviously Gay, which is clear by your extreme angry over-hyper-compensation, you need to know that its ok that you are Gay.
 
Seeking to repress perversion within society and to keep it in the shadows is not 'hate and ignorance'. It is acting according to one's perceptions of society and its needs and beliefs and its future and best interests. The only 'hate' being manifested is by those falsely labeling Opposition as Hate, and engendering dislike and contempt in the process, which can, itself, very well lead to 'hate', but for very different reasons.

Your obvious homosexuality isn't a "perversion".
 
Depends on whether we're talkin' about Normal Folk or Perverts, I expect... and whether accommodation legitimizes or encourages perversion and a creeping society-wide degeneracy and slow death of a vigorous and manly Nation-State in favor of a dissipated and emasculated nation in rapid decline, and an assault on its most precious asset - children - as some would speculate...

Being Gay is neither a "perversion" nor a "degeneracy".

And since you are obviously Gay, which is clear by your extreme angry over-hyper-compensation, you need to know that its ok that you are Gay.
You are entitled to your opinion, which differs from mine.
 
Thank you for your feedback.

Yes, homosexuality does, indeed, equate to 'degeneracy', in the minds of very many millions of your own countrymen.

Again, your obviously repressed homosexuality is not "degenerate". Even though Hitler thought so.
 
[MENTION=20503]Contumacious[/MENTION]
Cons have used gay rights to get people out to vote for ages.

God, guns, and gays

You are probably right.

But how does that differ from the "liberals" using welfare rights to get people out to vote.

Food stamps, Obama hellcare, soak the rich.

.

Differ? Hmm...:eusa_whistle:

Scaring people and dividing them based on what should remain a private affair -- one's faith.

Scaring and lying about attempts to ban all guns and take guns away from people.

It's a matter of perspective. Scaring people about gays, trying to keep gays from sharing in rights -- broadening rights as opposed to inclusion.

versus

...................
 
[MENTION=20503]Contumacious[/MENTION]
Cons have used gay rights to get people out to vote for ages.

God, guns, and gays

You are probably right.

But how does that differ from the "liberals" using welfare rights to get people out to vote.

Food stamps, Obama hellcare, soak the rich.

.

Differ? Hmm...:eusa_whistle:

Scaring people and dividing them based on what should remain a private affair -- one's faith.

Why shouldn't one's wealth be considered a private affair?
Scaring and lying about attempts to ban all guns and take guns away from people.

Maybe you should read about this nation's history and the boiling frog syndrome.

Examples

1860's paper money constitutional if redeemable in gold and silver

1930's paper money constitutional even if isn't redeemable in gold and silver

2 example

1914 Harrison Narcotic Act merely TAXES opioid

1930 Harrison Narcotic Act criminalizes opiod use

1960 Harrison Narcotic Act also criminalizes THC and cocaine even though they are not narcotics

It's a matter of perspective. Scaring people about gays, trying to keep gays from sharing in rights -- broadening rights as opposed to inclusion.

So scaring the wealthy into relocating their wealth overseas is copacetic?

.
 
Cons have used gay rights to get people out to vote for ages.

God, guns, and gays

You are probably right.

But how does that differ from the "liberals" using welfare rights to get people out to vote.

Food stamps, Obama hellcare, soak the rich.

.

It’s different because there’s no ‘right’ to receive public assistance, as opposed to gay Americans’ right to equal protection and due process of the law. Consequently no one is ‘using’ public assistance to get anyone to vote. The notion that those who apply for or receive public assistance vote one particular way or the other is an ignorant partisan myth.

‘Soak the rich,’ ‘entitlement mentality,’ and ‘free stuff’ are all hateful contrivances of the partisan right seeking votes through fear and demagoguery instead of constructive ideas and solutions.
 

Forum List

Back
Top