Look at you now backing up exactly what I stated all the while calling me a dumbass. watafuknmoron.Semantics my ass. Big difference between nominating someone and appointing someone. watafuknmoronTrump doesn't get to appoint anybody, he can nominate a Supreme Court Justice and then Congress can either confirm it or deny it. It is Congress who will hold the power of the next SCJ.It all depends on who he is talking to... If he's being interviewed by Hannity, he's going to appoint justices like Scalia... if he's talking to Wolf Blitzer, he's going to appoint a 'centrist-moderate' ...and we really don't know what he's going to appoint until he does so.
Semantics, the last bastion of a loser.
So John Roberts wasn't a Bush appointment? Or Sotomayor and Kagen aren't maobama appointments?
Just so you have a clue how the system works, an appointment is made after consent is given by the Senate. A judge isn't automatically seated after Senate consideration.
Read and learn dumbass.
Appointment and confirmation to the Supreme Court of the United States - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
So now you agree with me that what Boss stated was incorrect and your claim of semantics is nothing but your own idiocy.![]()
I didn't back up on anything, nomination is the first step in the appointment process, just a nomination doesn't get anyone a seat on the court, just ask the dear leader.
From my link:
My bold
"he shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint ... Judges of the supreme Court..."