Constitution Says Trump Can Cut Off Funds to Sanctuary Cities

[Claudette]

Of course he's going to take that step. He can hurt them in a lot more ways than they think he can. Seems like people would have learned not to fuck with this guy by now... he's a smart cookie, you fuck with him and he's going to make you pay for it. He's demonstrated that time and time again through the primaries and general election.

Democrats are going to discover they are MUCH better off working WITH him rather than against him.

Hit those sanctuary cities in the residents pocket book. Once the Fed money dries up those cities will have to raise taxes to make up the difference.

Wonder how long it will take those tax payers to start screaming? Wonder how long before they start demanding that illegals be turned over to ICE?

 

[g5000]

Of course he's going to take that step. He can hurt them in a lot more ways than they think he can. Seems like people would have learned not to fuck with this guy by now... he's a smart cookie, you fuck with him and he's going to make you pay for it. He's demonstrated that time and time again through the primaries and general election.

Democrats are going to discover they are MUCH better off working WITH him rather than against him.

Hit those sanctuary cities in the residents pocket book. Once the Fed money dries up those cities will have to raise taxes to make up the difference.

Wonder how long it will take those tax payers to start screaming? Wonder how long before they start demanding that illegals be turned over to ICE?

Hit those marijuana sanctuary states in the residents pocket book. Once the Fed money dries up those states will have to raise taxes to make up the difference.

Wonder how long it will take those tax payers to start screaming? Wonder how long before they start demanding that marijuana be turned over to the DEA?

 

[ColonelAngus]

Of course he's going to take that step. He can hurt them in a lot more ways than they think he can. Seems like people would have learned not to fuck with this guy by now... he's a smart cookie, you fuck with him and he's going to make you pay for it. He's demonstrated that time and time again through the primaries and general election.

Democrats are going to discover they are MUCH better off working WITH him rather than against him.

Hit those sanctuary cities in the residents pocket book. Once the Fed money dries up those cities will have to raise taxes to make up the difference.

Wonder how long it will take those tax payers to start screaming? Wonder how long before they start demanding that illegals be turned over to ICE?

Hit those marijuana sanctuary states in the residents pocket book. Once the Fed money dries up those states will have to raise taxes to make up the difference.

Wonder how long it will take those tax payers to start screaming? Wonder how long before they start demanding that marijuana be turned over to the DEA?

Fed can certainly stop sending money to marijuana states.

As we know for certain for the past 8 years, POTUS has discretion.

ELECTIONS HAVE CONSEQUENCES, AND AT THE END OF THE DAY, TRUMP WON....remember that snowflakes. You did not vote for him and you don't like him and you are not going to agree with his policies.

Get a helmet.

 

[g5000]

Of course he's going to take that step. He can hurt them in a lot more ways than they think he can. Seems like people would have learned not to fuck with this guy by now... he's a smart cookie, you fuck with him and he's going to make you pay for it. He's demonstrated that time and time again through the primaries and general election.

Democrats are going to discover they are MUCH better off working WITH him rather than against him.

Hit those sanctuary cities in the residents pocket book. Once the Fed money dries up those cities will have to raise taxes to make up the difference.

Wonder how long it will take those tax payers to start screaming? Wonder how long before they start demanding that illegals be turned over to ICE?

Hit those marijuana sanctuary states in the residents pocket book. Once the Fed money dries up those states will have to raise taxes to make up the difference.

Wonder how long it will take those tax payers to start screaming? Wonder how long before they start demanding that marijuana be turned over to the DEA?

Fed can certainly stop sending money to marijuana states.

As we know for certain for the past 8 years, POTUS has discretion.

ELECTIONS HAVE CONSEQUENCES, AND AT THE END OF THE DAY, TRUMP WON....remember that snowflakes. You did not vote for him and you don't like him and you are not going to agree with his policies.

Get a helmet.

So you're cool with hypocrisy, as long as it's Trump doing it.

Check.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Of course he's going to take that step. He can hurt them in a lot more ways than they think he can. Seems like people would have learned not to fuck with this guy by now... he's a smart cookie, you fuck with him and he's going to make you pay for it. He's demonstrated that time and time again through the primaries and general election.

Democrats are going to discover they are MUCH better off working WITH him rather than against him.

You are very silly if you think it is only an one-way street.

Under the coming circumstances, it will very much be a one-way street.

The solid majority of America (it opposes Trump) will stick that street up the far right and alt right ass. Watch.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Of course he's going to take that step. He can hurt them in a lot more ways than they think he can. Seems like people would have learned not to fuck with this guy by now... he's a smart cookie, you fuck with him and he's going to make you pay for it. He's demonstrated that time and time again through the primaries and general election.

Democrats are going to discover they are MUCH better off working WITH him rather than against him.

You are very silly if you think it is only an one-way street.

It's a one way street with Trump. You either work with him or he will crush you.

He won't last his term, boss, if he tries that. He will be Nixoned.

 

[ColonelAngus]

Of course he's going to take that step. He can hurt them in a lot more ways than they think he can. Seems like people would have learned not to fuck with this guy by now... he's a smart cookie, you fuck with him and he's going to make you pay for it. He's demonstrated that time and time again through the primaries and general election.

Democrats are going to discover they are MUCH better off working WITH him rather than against him.

Hit those sanctuary cities in the residents pocket book. Once the Fed money dries up those cities will have to raise taxes to make up the difference.

Wonder how long it will take those tax payers to start screaming? Wonder how long before they start demanding that illegals be turned over to ICE?

Hit those marijuana sanctuary states in the residents pocket book. Once the Fed money dries up those states will have to raise taxes to make up the difference.

Wonder how long it will take those tax payers to start screaming? Wonder how long before they start demanding that marijuana be turned over to the DEA?

Fed can certainly stop sending money to marijuana states.

As we know for certain for the past 8 years, POTUS has discretion.

ELECTIONS HAVE CONSEQUENCES, AND AT THE END OF THE DAY, TRUMP WON....remember that snowflakes. You did not vote for him and you don't like him and you are not going to agree with his policies.

Get a helmet.

So you're cool with hypocrisy, as long as it's Trump doing it.

Check.

Sucks to lose, doesn't it?

Trump is POTUS. He's got you there. Elections have consequences, and at the end of the day, he won.

If he wants to cut FEDERAL FUNDS to marijuana states, he can. You don't want him to, do why are you pretending you do?

 

[bravoactual]

I would be very surprised if he does not take that step.

Can Trump cut off funds for sanctuary cities? The Constitution says yes.

An Opinion Piece....zero facts and full of shit.

Seig Heil GroppenFuhrer Pussy Grabber.

 

[owebo]

I would be very surprised if he does not take that step.

Can Trump cut off funds for sanctuary cities? The Constitution says yes.

An Opinion Piece....zero facts and full of shit.

Seig Heil GroppenFuhrer Pussy Grabber.

Your Hillary salute rings hollow you fascist LWNJ fascist.....

 

[miketx]

A statist interp by Weatherman, yes.

Always approving of democratic crime. Typical.

 

[kaz]

A statist interp by Weatherman, yes.

Um ... what? Statist? I do not think it means what you think it means ...

 

[kaz]

Can someone tell me why it is a bad thing to defund sanctuary cities? Why is the American taxpayer on the hook? If a state, town or city wants illegals let them fund them themselves. That seems fair to me.

It's bad because it's screwing with the Democrat voter drive

 

[easyt65]

I would be very surprised if he does not take that step.

Can Trump cut off funds for sanctuary cities? The Constitution says yes.

HUAH! Pull the plug.

 

[JakeStarkey]

A statist interp by Weatherman, yes.

Always approving of democratic crime. Typical.

Republicans and Dems do it, both, kiddo. But, yes, Weatherman must be a statist criminal.

 

[kaz]

A statist interp by Weatherman, yes.

Always approving of democratic crime. Typical.

Republicans and Dems do it, both, kiddo. But, yes, Weatherman must be a statist criminal.

Weatherman is no where near as statist as you are, Jake

 

[ColonelAngus]

States that legalized dope knew going in that they could lose federal funding. I always assumed that was part of their calculus on the issue.

If they lose Federal funding, so be it.

 

[WillowTree]

Is there any federal law that the states cannot ignore? I mean really is it a smorgesboard?

 

[miketx]

A statist interp by Weatherman, yes.

Always approving of democratic crime. Typical.

Republicans and Dems do it, both, kiddo. But, yes, Weatherman must be a statist criminal.

Weatherman is no where near as statist as you are, Jake

He's just playing pretend until he has to get a real job.

 

[Maryland Patriot]

Can someone tell me why it is a bad thing to defund sanctuary cities? Why is the American taxpayer on the hook? If a state, town or city wants illegals let them fund them themselves. That seems fair to me.

thats the problem right there.
Take annapolis, Because its the only one I know for sure because its pretty much where I live. Same county as Im in, maybe 10 minutes away.
But, Martin OweMalley decided he wanted to run for president a few years back and realized that he would need the illegals vote, so he made annapolis a sanctuary city. The people that actually live in Annapolis and Anne Arundel county wanted no part of the illegals, yet OweMalley and his administration basically told the citizens to Fuck Off, and went with his plans anyway.
Then he robbed the road funds to pay for all the illegals upkeep. Later down the road when he realized that the actual roads and bridges needed work and there was now no money, he raised taxes again, and tripled the tolls on bridges and roads in order to try and raise money fast to cover the fact that he depleted the funds that were meant for that purpose.
In this case, and I would assume its the same in many sanctuary cities, I think the citizens would be happy to see the federal government step in and help us get rid of the cancer that is destroying our county. But, I fail to see where the citizens of Annapolis should be on the hook for something they wanted no part in to start with. Maybe grab owemalley and shake him for his pocket change or something?
Owe Malley is the perfect example of why its a danger to vote for someone based only on party affiliation.
I cant wait for the feds to snatch the money from Annapolis. The illegals are going to have to end up moving to another state if they want to keep eating. It will be a glorious day in the state when the last of those diseased pieces of shit slithers back across the state line.

 

[bodecea]

I would be very surprised if he does not take that step.

Can Trump cut off funds for sanctuary cities? The Constitution says yes.

Perhaps the Sanctuary cities can stop sending tax revenues to Washington too.