Constitutionalists to Independent voters

[Rebelitarian]

Dear Friend of the Constitution Party:

As a follow-up to last month’s report, our new Constitution Party newsletter features two very different but important articles.

First, our outstanding candidate for Congress in the Eighth District of Missouri’s special election tells why he ran and what happened along the campaign trail. Doug Enyart is blunt. He notes that it’s not easy to carry the Constitution Party flag in an election: resources are hard to come by, more volunteers are always needed, and it’s a struggle to get noticed by the media. But Doug’s story is different: yes, the electioneering was tough, but he had hundreds of yard signs, was invited to a TV debate with all the candidates (there were four), and earned over 3.6 percent of the vote — more than double than what the Libertarian Party nominee received.

What’s even better, is that Doug is still on the front lines — he now serves as Missouri’s Eighth District Constitution Party Chairman. He knows there are at least 1800 prospects, voters who supported his candidacy, as he canvasses for Party allies and members. That’s an excellent reason for anyone to consider running for office on the Constitution Party line.

And speaking of prospects, our National Communications Director gives an overview of how Facebook can be a useful tool in educating and motivating patriots. I urge you to read Karen Murray’s article and contact her about how you can become a more effective Constitutionalist by using Facebook. Donations specifically earmarked for Facebook ads — just $20, $30, or $40 — can be very effective in getting our message broadcast far and wide. You may give to our Facebook campaign using this link.

And there is progress to report — even in off years, the Constitution party’s activities go full speed:

• On January 31, 2013, the Ohio Secretary of State designated the Constitution Party as an official “minor party,” with ballot access provisions including, a “minimum number of signatures for candidates [being] one-half the minimum number of signatures required for candidates of major political parties.”

• In April, municipal elections were held in Illinois and the state affiliate of the Constitution Party elected its first officeholder in the party’s history. Phil Collins was elected Libertyville Township Trustee.

• It is an off year, but elections are being held. For example, in November we have a Constitution Party candidate for sheriff in New Jersey.

The Constitution Party is on the move. That’s because we have the financial support of grassroots patriots like you.

I hope you will read our August newsletter and then take a moment to support the Constitution Party with a donation whatever you can afford. This year, 2013, the Constitution Party faces important political battles. The time to join the fight is now.

Sincerely,

Frank Fluckiger

National Chairman

 

[g5000]

With a name like Frank Fluckiger, you can't go wrong.


This is why I stopped voting. After being a lifetime Republican, I now hate both parties. Voting for a party sends a message you approve of what they are doing. I do not approve of what the GOP or the Democratic Party are doing. My vote has to be earned. The sooner the assholes learn this, the better off we will all be.

That does not mean I am going to sign up with propellerheads like the Constitution or Libertarian parties.

It comes back to sending the message you approve of what they are doing by voting for them. Not gonna do it.

I'll wait for the GOP to come back to its senses (I despair this is some time off) or until someone creates a new sane party comprised of disillusioned centrist Republicans and Democrats.

 

[Rebelitarian]

Yeah right, follow those who choose to hide behind a newly dusted off label?

No thank you.

How is the 2 party Globalist voting going for America ?

Tired of seeing the mass unemployment ?

Tired of seeing educated people work peon jobs ?

Tired of neighborhoods falling apart ?

Do you remember a time when America was prosperous ?

What job do you work in that you don't see any of the suffering of the middle class ?

 

[Rebelitarian]

With a name like Frank Fluckiger, you can't go wrong.


This is why I stopped voting. After being a lifetime Republican, I now hate both parties. Voting for a party sends a message you approve of what they are doing. I do not approve of what the GOP or the Democratic Party are doing.

That does not mean I am going to sign up with propellerheads like the Constitution or Libertarian parties.

It comes back to sending the message you approve of what they are doing by voting for them.

Not gonna do it.

I'll wait for the GOP to come back to its senses (I despair this is some time off) or until someone creates a new sane party comprised of disillusioned centrist Republicans and Democrats.

Well there's no such thing as the perfect party... however the Constitution Party is more in line with what the Founding-Fathers wanted for America than any of the Other parties out there.

Seven Principles Of The Constitution Party:

■Life: For all human beings, from conception to natural death;
■Liberty: Freedom of conscience and actions for the self-governed individual;
■Family: One husband and one wife with their children as divinely instituted;
■Property: Each individual's right to own and steward personal property without government burden;
■Constitution And Bill Of Rights: interpreted according to the actual intent of the founding fathers;
■State's Rights: Everything not specifically delegated by the Constitution to the federal government, nor prohibited by the Constitution to the states, is reserved to the states or to the people.
■American Sovereignty: American government committed to the protection of the borders, trade, and common defense of Americans, and not entangled in foreign alliances.

 

[Rebelitarian]

The mission of the Constitution Party is to secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity through the election, at all levels of government, of Constitution Party candidates who will uphold the principles of the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution of the United States, and the Bill of Rights. It is our goal to limit the federal government to its delegated, enumerated, Constitutional functions.

 

[TNHarley]

lol got ya. party demographics have changed. I dont know if I would go off the deep end and call him a liberal though.. demograohics have changed, ideology has changed and the narrative.
then again, he did set the precedent for the shredding of the COTUS, so u might be on to something

Conservative Democrats were mostly Conservative Slave Holding defenders...Southerners and some conservative Republicans were with them on slavery being a territorial or state issu and not a national one.

Make no mistake about it, the Grand Old Party was for a long time a very liberal party.

Like I've explained to you before, facts have a way of getting in the way of your arguments

wtf does that have to do with lincoln not being a liberal?
did I even disagree with u saying 19th century cons hated lincoln?
are u talking to yourself?
and that last statement was VERY ironic coming from u
got to remember, u are now known for saying people are full of it, then running like a chicken shit.

 

[Rebelitarian]

We declare the platform of the Constitution Party to be predicated on the principles of

THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE,

THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES,

AND THE BILL OF RIGHTS

according to the original intent of the Founding Fathers. These founding documents are the foundation of our Liberty and the Supreme Law of the Land.

The sole purpose of government, as stated in the Declaration of Independence, is to secure our unalienable rights given us by our Creator. When Government grows beyond this scope, it is usurpation, and liberty is compromised.

We believe the major issues we face today are best solved by a renewed allegiance to the original intent of these founding documents.



Preamble
Sanctity of Life
Bring Government Back Home
Character and Moral Conduct
Congressional Reform
Conscription
Constitutional Convention
Copyrights and Patents
Cost of Big Government
Crime
Defense
Domestic Federal Aid
Drug Abuse



Education
Election Reform
Electoral College
Energy
Environment
Executive Orders
Family
Foreign Policy
Gambling
Government/ Private Partnership
Gun Control
Health Care and Government
Immigration
The Judiciary






Money and Banking
Personal and Private Property Security
Pornography, Obscenity and Sexually Oriented Businesses
Religious Freedom
Social Security
Statehood
State Sovereignty
Tariffs and Trade
Taxes
Terrorism and Personal Liberty
Veterans
Wage and Price Control
Welfare

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

lol got ya. party demographics have changed. I dont know if I would go off the deep end and call him a liberal though.. demograohics have changed, ideology has changed and the narrative.
then again, he did set the precedent for the shredding of the COTUS, so u might be on to something

Conservative Democrats were mostly Conservative Slave Holding defenders...Southerners and some conservative Republicans were with them on slavery being a territorial or state issu and not a national one.

Make no mistake about it, the Grand Old Party was for a long time a very liberal party.

Like I've explained to you before, facts have a way of getting in the way of your arguments

wtf does that have to do with lincoln not being a liberal?
did I even disagree with u saying 19th century cons hated lincoln?
are u talking to yourself?
and that last statement was VERY ironic coming from u
got to remember, u are now known for saying people are full of it, then running like a chicken shit.

Whatever in the whacky world of web crap are you talking about?

 

[Rebelitarian]

Seriously Reb I just got done posting on this in yet another thread. How many times are you going to spam the forum with the exact same post? And looking at some of your other comments you sure sound like someone else we know.

I just found this site maybe a week or so ago from one of the posters at Prison Planet. I am Geniocrat over there.

We are putting the kybosh on the Globalists but finding new forums to post in is always fun and informative.

I have an arsenal of information in this infowar and the more forums the better.

If you know someone else just as informed as I then great.

I am not spamming just breaking up the idiotic left/right paradyme that political people are brainwashed into believing.

 

[PrometheusBound]

The problem with purists and strict ideologues is they forget principles are there to serve man, not the other way around. People like Ron/Rand Paul and the Tea Party would support a principle to its logical conclusion no matter the cost. Thonk fascosm and totalitarianism masked as freedom and liberty

I saw Ron Paul in a movie once. He was the obstetrician who delivered Rosemary's Baby.

 

[PrometheusBound]

America is a centrist country and the Constitutionalists are just too extreme right wing for most to stomach.

This.

But, hey. If you are against the Constitutionalists you must hate the Constitution!!!

That would be me. The rest of you have not thrown off the yoke of lifelong brainwashing that this is the secular version of having a Bible. No free nation needs an overlord on its laws; it should have been a temporary start-up document to be superseded by all subsequent legislation. Instead, we got shoved down our throats 18th Century anti-democratic manifesto that had been written behind closed doors, devised by clever lawyers for the 1% and its posterity.

 

[The2ndAmendment]

There exists only two remedies to Restore the Constitution of the United States:

Mass jury nullification.

Second Amendment.

Let's try the first option.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

America is a centrist country and the Constitutionalists are just too extreme right wing for most to stomach.

This.

But, hey. If you are against the Constitutionalists you must hate the Constitution!!!

That would be me. The rest of you have not thrown off the yoke of lifelong brainwashing that this is the secular version of having a Bible. No free nation needs an overlord on its laws; it should have been a temporary start-up document to be superseded by all subsequent legislation. Instead, we got shoved down our throats 18th Century anti-democratic manifesto that had been written behind closed doors, devised by clever lawyers for the 1% and its posterity.

You'd have a few valid points worth serious discussion if you didn't drag it all one step beyond into the twilight zone

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

The problem with purists and strict ideologues is they forget principles are there to serve man, not the other way around. People like Ron/Rand Paul and the Tea Party would support a principle to its logical conclusion no matter the cost. Thonk fascosm and totalitarianism masked as freedom and liberty

I saw Ron Paul in a movie once. He was the obstetrician who delivered Rosemary's Baby.

And Rand Paul played a character named Damian in some movie...

 

[PrometheusBound]

This.

But, hey. If you are against the Constitutionalists you must hate the Constitution!!!

That would be me. The rest of you have not thrown off the yoke of lifelong brainwashing that this is the secular version of having a Bible. No free nation needs an overlord on its laws; it should have been a temporary start-up document to be superseded by all subsequent legislation. Instead, we got shoved down our throats 18th Century anti-democratic manifesto that had been written behind closed doors, devised by clever lawyers for the 1% and its posterity.

You'd have a few valid points worth serious discussion if you didn't drag it all one step beyond into the twilight zone

Just like the Constitutionazis, the characters in the Twilight Zone don't recognize that they are in the twilight zone. All you've got is, "Someone in authority told me that the Constitution is the supreme law of the land," which is good enough logic for the Internet, but doesn't prove anything in real life.

 

[zeke]

America is a centrist country and the Constitutionalists are just too extreme right wing for most to stomach.

This.

But, hey. If you are against the Constitutionalists you must hate the Constitution!!!

That would be me. The rest of you have not thrown off the yoke of lifelong brainwashing that this is the secular version of having a Bible. No free nation needs an overlord on its laws; it should have been a temporary start-up document to be superseded by all subsequent legislation. Instead, we got shoved down our throats 18th Century anti-democratic manifesto that had been written behind closed doors, devised by clever lawyers for the 1% and its posterity.

That is a very interesting take on the founding of this nation. Can't say that I have read where it has been explained quite like that.