Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No, it's none of your business. It's like asking someone who they voted for. I'd tell you to go pound sand. Security guards aren't cops and no way 28 cops are going to be against the 2nd amendment, you're full of shit.You said arm criminals, rights are reserved for those that haven't lost them through their own misdeeds. You are also mischaracterizing what I said. I said if you were asking them about rights they were sworn to uphold, that were absolutely none of your business I can't see a cop working there. I doubt you even have a business.Nobody wants criminals armed. You are spinning like a top. And you asked all 28 security cops what they thought about the 2nd amendment, why? I doubt any cop would work in such an environment. You might have security guards working for you but I doubt any cops.I don't care what you doubt, the ignorance is all yours since LEOs are sworn to uphold the Constitution. Nor did I claim no LEO would work part time security. At least learn how to read.
Yes LEO are sworn to to uphold the constitution .......... That doesn't mean all stupid people like you want to armed all civilian criminals. And you are a LEO board member?
You said cops protect 2nd amendment and I agreed. That doesn't mean they want to armed all civilians. You brought 2nd not me. Yes I talked to them about 2nd amendment and all gun issues and violence.
Actually they love working for me because it's peaceful and safe. Their wives know that they will come home alive. I also know and met their families. I also have waiting list who wants to work as back up when someone is sick or go on vacation.
Why would they stop them from working part time because of 2nd amendment?
Oh my boss is asking me about 2nd amendment I should not work for him....... Do you realize how dumb that is?
Who are you to tell its none of my business? My company my rule. I also do NOT accommodate Muslim prayers but I allow them to pray during their breaks or lunch time and not during working time.
Why in the world they I will offend them by talking about 2nd amendment? I never said I ask them directly about 2nd amendment. We talked about arming civilians and self/home defense. But they do not agree in arming all civilians.
Are you saying that they will make financial decisions based on 2nd amendment? Are you saying just bc of 2nd amendment or guns I do not have a business? Do you realize how dumb you are talking to me?
And I don't give a flying fuck if you believe me or not.
Many things. Being a liar is one of them. He ran from my request for facts to back up his bullshit, then he flipped around and made lying accusations against me.what's he wrong about?
Spread the hate then run and deny you are spreading hate.One thing is clear, the Police State will benefit from these tragedies. It gives em justification for taking more Citizen's rights away. More control and domination. A Win-Win for Big Brother.
funny, still no comment on the 60 blacks shot in Chicago over the weekend. Doesn't that piss you off? I mean what's a cop supposed to do if called to one of those shootings? I'm sure there was. It's like static, I'd be afraid to touch anything for fear of getting shocked or shot in their world. But you treat them as if they aren't human and that's sick.One thing is clear, the Police State will benefit from these tragedies. It gives em justification for taking more Citizen's rights away. More control and domination. A Win-Win for Big Brother.
Agreed. Do you agree this ability exists regardless of politics, race, creed, nationality, religion or any other human differences?It is the ability of the internet to keep those racists hidden behind a keyboard. In public, they'd never do anything close to what they do in here. NEVER, they are all talk behind a keyboard filtered internet.
definitelyAgreed. Do you agree this ability exists regardless of politics, race, creed, nationality, religion or any other human differences?It is the ability of the internet to keep those racists hidden behind a keyboard. In public, they'd never do anything close to what they do in here. NEVER, they are all talk behind a keyboard filtered internet.
An assumption which causes me to believe you are not only uneducated, but on the backside of this curve:See, I believe the opposite. I believe 80% of the people who post here are in fact stupid, and that is perfectly representative of the population in general. I offer the moron members of Congress who repeatedly get elected and reelected as evidence of this.
Once again you are spreading the hate and advocating violence.Two separate incidents. The cop who executed the innocent man in Minnesota has to be held accountable. And those who murdered the police will have to be as well. And btw, how much media time is being spent on the 5 dead officers? Quite a bit, no?
"Going for something" is not sufficient reason to use deadly force.the cop says he was going for something
the girl says he was going for his license
in a still photo though
you can see what looks like his billfold and a paper
That's correct and the LEO knew this fact when he ran the tags.some sites are saying the victim was a gang member
the crips
That's why he had drawn his gun.
The average person has no clue how much information comes up on a LEO's screen. Now thousands of patrol cars are equipped with highly sophisticated 'black boxes' which record hundreds of pieces of information about where the patrol vehicle is, it's speed, cornering speeds, stopping speeds, acceleration 'Gs'. Everything you can think of.
There are cameras which take a photo of every oncoming vehicle's license plate. If the car's owner has any warrants, if the insurance has expired, if the vehicle is stolen, if the vehicle's owner has been reported missing etc etc.
No. But when the screen shows the vehicle owner has gang affiliations, a criminal record AND has a CCW any LEO is going to approach that vehicle with an extra sense of possible danger.The LEO had run the vehicle's tag and that's why he approached the vehicle with his gun drawn.not all states but true in minnesota
the cop would normally ask if the CC was currently carrying
however was it his car or the girls
My state is not a must inform sate but I would tell any cop who pulled me over anyway.
And if I'm carrying I hand my CC Permit to him along with my license
yes indeed i agree
from what i gathered it may be dated
but the cop approached the vehicle with his pistol already drawn
is that true and if so why
but why
in Minnesota do they approach all CC holders with gun drawn
Doesn't it strike you as odd or funny that RWers bitch and moan about "state's rights" and "let each state decide" the jump back to a Federally mandated and controlled government when it suits them?or is it
it certainly was good enough in the lavoy finnicum shooting earlier this year ..
Doesn't it strike you as odd or funny that RWers bitch and moan about "state's rights" and "let each state decide" the jump back to a Federally mandated and controlled government when it suits them?or is it
it certainly was good enough in the lavoy finnicum shooting earlier this year ..
Finnicum: Oregon
Castile: Minnesota
Sterling: Lousiana
Yet assholes on this forum justify shooting 11 police officers, murdering 5, in Dallas, Texas? How fucked up are those people who advocate this?
paulitician, as a "revenge" leader, do you have an answer?
Doesn't matter. I don't give a shit if he was suspected of machine gunning a busload of nuns and assfucking every dog in a pound, the fact remains you can't shoot American citizens simply because you suspect them.
Doesn't matter. I don't give a shit if he was suspected of machine gunning a busload of nuns and assfucking every dog in a pound, the fact remains you can't shoot American citizens simply because you suspect them.
http://constitutioncenter.org/media/files/constitution.pdf
Amendment V. No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
IMHO, the extremists on both ends regularly seek to violate the rights of others, but are quick to complain on perceived violations of their own rights. They are fucking hypocrites and liars which means they can't be trusted.obviously you can
that is exactly what happened to lavoy finnicum
and the left cheered
the leftards want due process done away with
you heard them on the hill calling for it loudly and clearly
they even had a sit in at the capital pouting about
not getting due process shut down
the idea of individual rights is going out the window fast
BLM Activists would disagree with your latter statement. Ask them.The issue is that Black Lives Matter...too
Everyone already knows that white lives matter
I believe 80% of the people who post here are in fact stupid
