Could Jack Smith seize millions of Trump's fraudulent campaign donations?

[Missourian]

Trump is under criminal indictments. He is out on bail; therefore, he does not have the same rights as people not under criminal indictments and not out on bail. Thus, he should be much more careful about what he says and does.

Democrat fascism strikes again.

Only a liberal fascist believes the first amendment can be limited by their one and only god...the government.

 

[Billiejeens]

Andrew Weissman and Jack Smith.

No couple in the US could be more corrupt.

 

[Billiejeens]

I feel reasonably certain that Jack Smith and Tanya Chutkin will have some nice surprises for Trump.

I am fully certain that you are a total fucking retard.

 

[Missourian]

Just FYI...

Polymarket - Markets

Trade on Polymarket

polymarket.com

 

[Billiejeens]

That wouldn't be election interference would it?

What hasn't been?

 

[The Banker]

BREAKING: Donald Trump gets the worst news to date about Jack Smith's investigation as legal experts announce that the Special Counsel might seize millions of dollars from his presidential campaign — a death knell for his White House run.

This one is just too perfect...

According to NBC News national security analyst Frank Figliuzzi — who was a former top FBI official — the Justice Department might seize huge amounts of money from Trump's campaign because much of it was raised off of fraudulent claims after the 2020 election.

The January 6th Committee revealed that the Trump campaign raked in $250 million in donations after the Capitol insurrection, claiming that the money would go to a legal fund to overturn the 2020 election. That fund was never created and instead the money was funneled to the Save America PAC.

"This isn’t over yet," said Figliuzzi. "When you raise millions based on a fraudulent claim, you’ve committed a crime. And, you just might have to give those millions back."

His remarks come in the wake of a new report from Politico which revealed that at least one of the interviews the Special Counsel conducted recently was "focused on fundraising and spending by Trump’s political action committee."

Bernard Kerk, the former NYPD commissioner who has been a longtime associate of Rudy Giuliani, was interviewed by investigators and "asked multiple questions about the Save America PAC’s enormous fundraising haul in the weeks between Election Day and the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol."

NYU Law School professor Andrew Weissmann appears to agree with Figliuzzi. He said that there could be a "criminal case about the Trump PAC and forfeiture allegations/seizures." Better still, the case would not even have to reach all the way up to Trump before Smith would be able to seize assets.

What do you think? Should the Justice Department seize Donald Trump's ill-gotten cash?



Sounds reasonable to me since Trump raised millions of dollars under false pretenses - based on the BIG LIE. What do you think?

Trump has a massive Web of Lies, and a massive Web of crime

They are all interconnect and related. Admitting there was no election fraud then means he incited a riot based on lies and made millions off of these lies.

Who's worse, Trump or the people dumb enough to give him money.

 

[Billiejeens]

Okay dude.

It’s bullshit but okay.

What is?

 

[Dadoalex]

BREAKING: Donald Trump gets the worst news to date about Jack Smith's investigation as legal experts announce that the Special Counsel might seize millions of dollars from his presidential campaign — a death knell for his White House run.

This one is just too perfect...

According to NBC News national security analyst Frank Figliuzzi — who was a former top FBI official — the Justice Department might seize huge amounts of money from Trump's campaign because much of it was raised off of fraudulent claims after the 2020 election.

The January 6th Committee revealed that the Trump campaign raked in $250 million in donations after the Capitol insurrection, claiming that the money would go to a legal fund to overturn the 2020 election. That fund was never created and instead the money was funneled to the Save America PAC.

"This isn’t over yet," said Figliuzzi. "When you raise millions based on a fraudulent claim, you’ve committed a crime. And, you just might have to give those millions back."

His remarks come in the wake of a new report from Politico which revealed that at least one of the interviews the Special Counsel conducted recently was "focused on fundraising and spending by Trump’s political action committee."

Bernard Kerk, the former NYPD commissioner who has been a longtime associate of Rudy Giuliani, was interviewed by investigators and "asked multiple questions about the Save America PAC’s enormous fundraising haul in the weeks between Election Day and the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol."

NYU Law School professor Andrew Weissmann appears to agree with Figliuzzi. He said that there could be a "criminal case about the Trump PAC and forfeiture allegations/seizures." Better still, the case would not even have to reach all the way up to Trump before Smith would be able to seize assets.

What do you think? Should the Justice Department seize Donald Trump's ill-gotten cash?



Sounds reasonable to me since Trump raised millions of dollars under false pretenses - based on the BIG LIE. What do you think?

TBH
The legalities of this are way over my head.
Trump obviously collected those donations fraudulently but campaign money is REALLY soft.

I guess smith could file the claim and freeze the funds till the courts work it out.

This is another instance where the SCOTUS advanced criminality.

 

[Dadoalex]

Fake News.

He'd just raise twice as much within days.

But way to prove this fake prosecution is nothing but a political ploy to rig a post Covid presidential election.

That's the only way Democrats can win.

Rigged 2020...now rigging 2024.

Democrats are trash.

So you call it fake news then agree with the premise?

Weird.

 

[The Duke]

What is?

This:

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.618763/gov.uscourts.flsd.618763.48.1_7.pdf

Read page 9. Biden demanded Trump's documents, that's what got this whole shitball rolling.

Now, he was perfectly within his rights to do so legally. Ethically? Not at all.

No other president ever did that. He did it precisely to get this shitball rolling, and it wasn't even him, I bet.

I bet it was Obammer. He didn't need Trump's documents to do his job, he wanted to demand them like

an asshole to kick this thing off. It's a subject worthy of its own OP if you'd like to start one.

I don't feel like it.

 

[Billiejeens]

TBH
The legalities of this are way over my head.
Trump obviously collected those donations fraudulently but campaign money is REALLY soft.

I guess smith could file the claim and freeze the funds till the courts work it out.

This is another instance where the SCOTUS advanced criminality.

Describe the "fraudulently" that you see.
Fraudulently is a legal term.
Go.

 

[Dadoalex]

Depends, most of the people who donated that money would have probably donated to his campaign anyway, so, if the people who donated demand action, the sure, seize them, otherwise, it’s just going to look like at further attempts to interfere with trumps campaign.

Of course they can.
The money would be returned to the donors and they're free to do what they will with it.

 

[jknowgood]

BREAKING: Donald Trump gets the worst news to date about Jack Smith's investigation as legal experts announce that the Special Counsel might seize millions of dollars from his presidential campaign — a death knell for his White House run.

This one is just too perfect...

According to NBC News national security analyst Frank Figliuzzi — who was a former top FBI official — the Justice Department might seize huge amounts of money from Trump's campaign because much of it was raised off of fraudulent claims after the 2020 election.

The January 6th Committee revealed that the Trump campaign raked in $250 million in donations after the Capitol insurrection, claiming that the money would go to a legal fund to overturn the 2020 election. That fund was never created and instead the money was funneled to the Save America PAC.

"This isn’t over yet," said Figliuzzi. "When you raise millions based on a fraudulent claim, you’ve committed a crime. And, you just might have to give those millions back."

His remarks come in the wake of a new report from Politico which revealed that at least one of the interviews the Special Counsel conducted recently was "focused on fundraising and spending by Trump’s political action committee."

Bernard Kerk, the former NYPD commissioner who has been a longtime associate of Rudy Giuliani, was interviewed by investigators and "asked multiple questions about the Save America PAC’s enormous fundraising haul in the weeks between Election Day and the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol."

NYU Law School professor Andrew Weissmann appears to agree with Figliuzzi. He said that there could be a "criminal case about the Trump PAC and forfeiture allegations/seizures." Better still, the case would not even have to reach all the way up to Trump before Smith would be able to seize assets.

What do you think? Should the Justice Department seize Donald Trump's ill-gotten cash?



Sounds reasonable to me since Trump raised millions of dollars under false pretenses - based on the BIG LIE. What do you think?

Be careful what you wish for. How much did Democrats get off of campaigning on Russia collusion in 2018? That was fraudulent also, since your party made that lie up. Prosecute all democrats!

 

[Missourian]

So you call it fake news then agree with the premise?

Weird.

It's fake news, My Dude.

Even Ballsack Jack isn't dumb enough to attempt this.

BECAUSE...Trump would raise twice as much by the end of the day...and that would undermine the clearly political motivation behind this prosecution.

Can't have that.

Let me know if that is not clear enough...I'll draw you a picture.

Or better yet...a venn diagram.

 

[Dadoalex]

Describe the "fraudulently" that you see.
Fraudulently is a legal term.
Go.

Suspect says need donations to A
Knowing A is false
Divert donations to B
B provides personal benefit to suspect.
Fraud.

 

[Dadoalex]

It's fake news, My Dude.

Even Ballsack Jack isn't dumb enough to attempt this.

BECAUSE...Trump would raise twice as much by the end of the day...and that would undermine the clearly political motivation behind this prosecution.

Can't have that.

Let me know if that is not clear enough...I'll draw you a picture.

Or better yet...a venn diagram.

So why call it "FAKE NEWS" then go on to admit the premise is correct?

 

[DGS49]

It must be nice to be part of a political movement that can make words mean anything they want them to mean.

Fraud, corrupt, Fascist, democracy, racist, woman, marriage, you name it. It means whatever they want it to mean. Burn your fucking dictionary; it don't mean shit.

 

[Missourian]

So why call it "FAKE NEWS" then go on to admit the premise is correct?

Please post where I state the premise is correct.

Hint...

^^^^Enroll today.

 

[BluesLegend]

Trump laughs at the corrupt Dems threat to seize millions...as he sits atop his billions. Come here demwits

That's before we have the SCOTUS weigh in on Democrats seizing the campaign funds of their opponents. Dems see determined to go to prison.

 

[Dadoalex]

Please post where I state the premise is correct.

Hint...

View attachment 812950

^^^^Enroll today.

Read your own posts marshmallow.
Start with #2