Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
Read my post again. You're not scaring me. You're scaring the children.
But what people seem to forget is that it is perfectly legal to lie, if it is to avoid prosecution.
Everyone has the 5th amendment right to not incriminate themselves.
www.shouselaw.com
www.simmrinlawgroup.com
Absolutely wrong.But what people seem to forget is that it is perfectly legal to lie, if it is to avoid prosecution.
The President can declassify with his word, dick breath. He isn't just someone. Once again you reveal your nasty hate. You're angry because President Trump had the same rights and privileges as every other President. Cocksucker. Oh and by the way, rodeo clowns are some of the toughest guys around and much respected by cowboys. You wouldn't understand that because you probably live in an apartment in some democrat run cesspool like Chicago or NYC.You are a child pal. You think someone can declassify something just by saying it. Yeah...you're either 8 years old or severely brain damaged. If that is you in the picture; you're dressed like a rodeo clown so maybe you've suffered some traumatic brain injury at some point to post the bullshit you continuously post.
The president can do just that, BUT.... there is actually much more to it. That in and of itself doesn't declassify anything. The president has to tell someone like his chief of staff, or the white house counsels office, Attorney General, etc. who prepare the paperwork, they send to the originator of the document, informing them of the presidents decision. And only after that agency declassifies the document, does it become declassified.You are a child pal. You think someone can declassify something just by saying it.
The prosecution DOES have unlimited funding. DefeProsecution doesn't have "unlimited" funding.
Hire more public defenders and pay them more. Easy peasy.
she is also on record instructing aides to delete the classifications so items could be sent to her private server. That’s willful violation.He doesn't have to prove that. Simply having them on her server was a crime, whether she knew they were there or not.
She's the SOS. She's supposed to know when documents are classified, moron.
No, the attempts at slandering Trump are generally very easy. It's like Trump wants it.
Yes, his impeachment was ridiculous, mostly because the Democrats KNEW they'd lose.
The "insurrection" is not "absurb", it wasn't a full blown coup or anything like that, however what it was, was very dangerous for the fragile democracy the US has.
The search of Mar-al-Lago was not "completely illegal" either. Procedure was followed.
No one has done such things to a President before? Are you sure? Can you go through all 45 other presidents and tick off that nothing bad happened. What about, say, John Quincy Adams?
That's the problem with political trials. That's why they are considered corrupt just like this Jan 6 committee.The problem I see with selecting a jury for a Trump trial, is that there are partisans for Trump who would lie about their political beliefs, and their ability to set them aside.
Remember, that most of the people caught for voter fraud in 2020, were republicans voting for Trump.
The president can do just that, BUT.... there is actually much more to it. That in and of itself doesn't declassify anything. The president has to tell someone like his chief of staff, or the white house counsels office, Attorney General, etc. who prepare the paperwork, they send to the originator of the document, informing them of the presidents decision. And only after that agency declassifies the document, does it become declassified.
Any break in the chain, VOIDS the declassification statement.
I noticed in the Jan 6 'show' today, the inquisitors were referring to Jan 6 as a 'riot.' Of course, there was no representative from the defense to object to such prejudiced inquiry of the witnesses.I agree the Jan 6 was unprecedented, but disagree it was dangerous.
When Ashlii Babbitt was shot, we saw dozens of shock troops waiting in the basement.
There was zero risk at any time.
The search of Mar-a-lago was totally illegal because there was not only no evidence of any crime, but it clearly was and is just a political stunt, since everyone knows president are completely above and exempt from any and all classified document laws or executive order regulations.
If anyone has testified to enough presidential crimes to justify a search warrant, it would have HUGE in the history books. And I have read the histories of all the presidents. The only one who was treated this badly before was Andrew Johnson, and I can over look that since he was not voted in.
John Quincy Adams was never abused that I know of.
He was elected to Congress after his term as president.
The president can do just that, BUT.... there is actually much more to it. That in and of itself doesn't declassify anything. The president has to tell someone like his chief of staff, or the white house counsels office, Attorney General, etc. who prepare the paperwork, they send to the originator of the document, informing them of the presidents decision. And only after that agency declassifies the document, does it become declassified.
Any break in the chain, VOIDS the declassification statement.
That's why the president has the power to fire and replace the chief of staff at will. So if one chief of staff won't carry out his declassification order, the president can replace him almost instantaneously.But that would leave the declassification of documents up to someone other than the president. So I'm not buying that. For instance, what if he had a chief of staff that hated him and refused to prepare the paperwork? Then he couldn't declassify anything, ever?
You are being absolutely stupid. Declassification like Classification is a "for everybody" process.WRONG.
What you are describing is if the president wants do declassify a document for EVERYONE.
And he does not have to do that.
All he has to do is declassify it for all those who work for him at Mar-a-lago, and would be likely to see it.
That's why the president has the power to fire and replace the chief of staff at will. So if one chief of staff won't carry out his declassification order, the president can replace him almost instantaneously.
There is a declassification process, not just an invocation. And it is the same for other presidential powers, like pardoning people, or commissioning military officers.
I didn't say the agencies had the power to stop the process. But as the Supreme Court has ruled in several cases, if the agency fails to complete the process, then the presidents order becomes null and void.Yea, there is and it has nothing to do with the chief of staff. You just kinda make stuff up.
This official gov't document, the federal register national archives and records list, under 2001.32 explains the process. And it only states that agencies should be NOTIFIED. Not that these agencies can "stop the process" as you stated.
Read and learn.
I didn't say the agencies had the power to stop the process. But as the Supreme Court has ruled in several cases, if the agency fails to complete the process, then the presidents order becomes null and void.
Trump can tell someone on national TV that he's pardoned, but if the DOJ doesn't create the actual pardon document, and deliver it to the person being pardoned, the presidents order becomes null and void.
I agree the Jan 6 was unprecedented, but disagree it was dangerous.
When Ashlii Babbitt was shot, we saw dozens of shock troops waiting in the basement.
There was zero risk at any time.
The search of Mar-a-lago was totally illegal because there was not only no evidence of any crime, but it clearly was and is just a political stunt, since everyone knows president are completely above and exempt from any and all classified document laws or executive order regulations.
If anyone has testified to enough presidential crimes to justify a search warrant, it would have HUGE in the history books. And I have read the histories of all the presidents. The only one who was treated this badly before was Andrew Johnson, and I can over look that since he was not voted in.
John Quincy Adams was never abused that I know of.
He was elected to Congress after his term as president.
What about Clinton? Impeached because... I mean, get this, a consenting adult sucked his dick.
What you leave out is that the actual declassification isn't carried out by the president but by the department or agency with primary responsibility.Can presidents declassify matters directly?
Yes, because it is ultimately their constitutional authority.
Normally, presidents who want something declassified direct subordinates overseeing the department or agency with primary responsibility for the information to review the matter with an eye to making more of it public. But on rare occasions, presidents declassify something directly.
