Could Trump ever be convicted in a Court of Law?

[sartre play]

Not being a third-world country, yet. We don't subject our opposition leaders to elaborate, politicially-motivated prosecutions.

Sorry but yes we do.

 

[bripat9643]

Sorry but yes we do.

Only Republicans

 

[Marener]

well that’s great for the defense. Do you have a copy of the transcript?

wonder why the prosecutor called that witness??

The prosecutor doesn't care about winning the case anymore. The trial is just a venue to air Durham's conspiracy theories.

That's why it's an unethical prosecution. Far worse than almost anything Trump supporters complain of.

 

[Independent thinker]

Republicans in Congress have already shown a willingness to ignore Trumps transgressions no matter how egregious

Is it possible to form a Jury without at least one member who is willing to accept whatever lie Trump is telling?

So far, most all of the prosecutors who look at Trump stuff have decided there is not enough actual solid evidence to convict, therefore no charges are ever filed. The question is more of, if Trump is ever charged with something, would Trump get a fair trial? The left are not in favor of anything that would be fair, which is why Trump is never charged. It's all done for political purposes.

 

[sartre play]

Only in DC, dumbass. They will swallow anything the corrupt Dims feed them.

Like a pooped in his pants right wing corrupt & dishonest feed?

 

[Marener]

sorry no that’s not enough…the clinton standard isn’t met

Clinton didn't meet #2.

But worse for Trump is the fact that he tried to obstruct the investigation into them.

 

[Marener]

Wrong again, douchebag. People with security clearances are given extensive training on what's allowed and what isn't.

It seems like you didn't actually read my post.

 

[rightwinger]

So far, most all of the prosecutors who look at Trump stuff have decided there is not enough actual solid evidence to convict, therefore no charges are ever filed. The question is more of, if Trump is ever charged with something, would Trump get a fair trial? The left are not in favor of anything that would be fair, which is why Trump is never charged. It's all done for political purposes.

Like I said, you will never find 12 jurors who would convict him

 

[struth]

Not even close

Trump was so pissed that Hillary was not charged that he removed all the exemptions

Now, he can face his own law

haha trump did no such thing.

 

[struth]

The prosecutor doesn't care about winning the case anymore. The trial is just a venue to air Durham's conspiracy theories.

That's why it's an unethical prosecution. Far worse than almost anything Trump supporters complain of.

haha speaking of conspiracy theories!

 

[struth]

Clinton didn't meet #2.

But worse for Trump is the fact that he tried to obstruct the investigation into them.

hahah yeah clinton didn’t know she had 1000s of documents on her illegal server!

trump fully cooperated with the NA

 

[Marener]

haha speaking of conspiracy theories!

Sure. Because calling a witness who damages your case is entirely consistent with wanting to succeed in the prosecution.

There's a history here. The judge has had to specifically prevent Durham from introducing unnecessary information whose only purpose is to attack people who aren't on trial.

Same can be said with the extent of his indictments. They were narratives of his conspiracy theory, not facts relevant to prosecution. He can't prove his little conspiracy in court so he has to be creative about how to put it into the public sphere.

 

[Marener]

hahah yeah clinton didn’t know she had 1000s of documents on her illegal server!

trump fully cooperated with the NA

That's what Clinton claims and the prosecutors would have had a very hard time proving she did.

It's not like they were labeled with big bold red lettering that said Top Secret, like someone we know.

 

[Independent thinker]

Like I said, you will never find 12 jurors who would convict him

Yes, that would be correct. When you charge someone with nothing but witch hunt investigations and there is actually a fair trial with fair jurors, you aren't going to get a conviction. That's what I said. The left don't want a fair trial with fair jurors. They want all anti-Trumpers on the jury.

 

[struth]

Sure. Because calling a witness who damages your case is entirely consistent with wanting to succeed in the prosecution.

There's a history here. The judge has had to specifically prevent Durham from introducing unnecessary information whose only purpose is to attack people who aren't on trial.

Same can be said with the extent of his indictments. They were narratives of his conspiracy theory, not facts relevant to prosecution. He can't prove his little conspiracy in court so he has to be creative about how to put it into the public sphere.

Sure. Because calling a witness who damages your case is entirely consistent with wanting to succeed in the prosecution.

There's a history here. The judge has had to specifically prevent Durham from introducing unnecessary information whose only purpose is to attack people who aren't on trial.

Same can be said with the extent of his indictments. They were narratives of his conspiracy theory, not facts relevant to prosecution. He can't prove his little conspiracy in court so he has to be creative about how to put it into the public sphere.

can you please provided the transcript?

how does calling that witness push your conspiracy theory? how does the agents testimony attack people not on trial?

 

[struth]

That's what Clinton claims and the prosecutors would have had a very hard time proving she did.

It's not like they were labeled with big bold red lettering that said Top Secret, like someone we know.

yes they were labeled in some cases others it was so obvious according to comey and the IG…moreover there was evidence others removed labeling

trump has claimed he turned it all over months ago…hard to prove that he didn’t believe that was the case. Empty files are just empty files

 

[BluesLegend]

Breaking: Dems charge Trump with jaywalking, fine him $25, Trump points and laughs.

 

[Marener]

yes they were labeled in some cases others it was so obvious according to comey and the IG…moreover there was evidence others removed labeling

trump has claimed he turned it all over months ago…hard to prove that he didn’t believe that was the case. Empty files are just empty files

Nothing was properly labeled which is exactly why it would have been next to impossible to prove she knew.

Trump claims lots of things which aren't true. They found highly classified documents in his desk next to his passports. I'd say that's rather compelling evidence that he clearly knew he hadn't turned it all over.

And that's just based on what we know. The DoJ is talking to people inside Trump's operation that could be telling them a lot more.

 

[struth]

Nothing was properly labeled which is exactly why it would have been next to impossible to prove she knew.

Trump claims lots of things which aren't true. They found highly classified documents in his desk next to his passports. I'd say that's rather compelling evidence that he clearly knew he hadn't turned it all over.

And that's just based on what we know. The DoJ is talking to people inside Trump's operation that could be telling them a lot more.

what are you talking about? numerous doc were properly labeled. Some had their labels removed before being scanned and emailed to her as well

clinton has a long history of lying, specially about her illegal server.

the passport along with his bday party plans were all snatched up in the raid to cover for the xiden admin getting his attorney client priv material

 

[bripat9643]

Clinton didn't meet #2.

But worse for Trump is the fact that he tried to obstruct the investigation into them.

Another prog lie. The FBI has already admitted the whole thing was a scam.