Could you take your AR15, walk through a hostile BLM protest . . .

That’s not true. There have been 30 murders during the BLM rage of terrorism. You just don’t hear about them because….reasons.


The MSM has covered up the number of murders in the six months of the destructive Negro Innsurection in over 200 American cities.

You know, because it doesn't fi into their narrative of mostly "peaceful protest".
 
Don't be an ass.

Did you hear the testimony of the four guys and one chick that you claim were "the militia"?

All of them said the same thing. They went there to protect property that the police refused to protect. However, all of them said they took their weapons for self defense and not to be used to be used to protect property.

Meanwhile many of the street thugs were armed. In fact the first person to shoot that night was a street thug protester. One of the viglaties that attacked Kyle was illegally carrying a loaded Glock that he aimed at Kyle.
 

Could you take your AR15, walk through a hostile BLM protest . . .​

get harassed, kill a bunch of people, claim you thought you were going to die, claim self-defense and get off Scott free?

Probably not... but, you can stand your ground in a riot, get attacked by armed rioters, defend yourself ... then go through a long, protracted, politically-motivated trial ... THEN get off scot-free.

Because THIS is a great country.
 
Probably not... but, you can stand your ground in a riot, get attacked by armed rioters, defend yourself ... then go through a long, protracted, politically-motivated trial ... THEN get off scot-free.

Because THIS is a great country.

He shouldn't have killed them boys.
 
What I mean that a random person could do essentially the same thing that Kyle Rittenhouse did. Take a gun, walk through an angry crowd, get harassed, kill people, say he was afraid for his life, claim self defense and get off Scott free.

We could get a whole rash of these shootings.
Do rioters have the right to attack people with the intention of putting them in the hospital for a long time or six feet under?
 
I know I am very worried about the slippery slope.

How many people are going to think it's okay to shoot a child rapist when he's trying to kill you? What kind of anarchy does that lead to?

I mean, what does it say about us as a nation when a child rapist can't be safe trying to kill someone without that person getting all uppity and shooting him in so-called, "self defense"?

I don't want to have our children growing up in such a country.
 
He had Zimmerman on the ground hitting him in the head. That's considered deadly force. If Martin had just kept walking, it wouldn't have happened.

He was afraid.. Zimmerman had been stalking him for more than a half hour.

Zimmerman is absurdly stupid.. He could have spoken to the boy and completely diffused the situation. He was playing "secret agent man" or some other juvenile shit.
 
He was afraid.. Zimmerman had been stalking him for more than a half hour.

Zimmerman is absurdly stupid.. He could have spoken to the boy and completely diffused the situation. He was playing "secret agent man" or some other juvenile shit.
He wasn't afraid. He just east going to get dissed by some white boy. He was too gangsta for day. Looks he fucked with the wrong white boy...lol
 
Did you hear the testimony of the four guys and one chick that you claim were "the militia"?

All of them said the same thing. They went there to protect property that the police refused to protect. However, all of them said they took their weapons for self defense and not to be used to be used to protect property.

Meanwhile many of the street thugs were armed. In fact the first person to shoot that night was a street thug protester. One of the viglaties that attacked Kyle was illegally carrying a loaded Glock that he aimed at Kyle.

LOL.. They claimed the Kenosha police refused to protect the property? Really? Where were these hero vigilantes from?
 

Forum List

Back
Top