County by County Count...

This shows the brilliance of The Founders to overcome the tyranny of majority rules. This is a federation of states and this is the epitome of that form of government.
 
15135841_1215421015205010_2647113324350039607_n.png

Every election we get this retarded shit from the retarded Right.

Yes, Trump won lots of counties,

he won, for example, Niobrara County in Wyoming.

Population 2,456.

Clinton won Kings County (Brooklyn)

Population 2,636,735.

Now it's up to you to tell us why one equals the other, in a democratic election.
Anyone studying Dunning-Kruger effect would have a field day with the right wingers on these boards.



And anyone studying Alinsky or Cloward-Piven understands the tactics of the left.
 
This shows the brilliance of The Founders to overcome the tyranny of majority rules. This is a federation of states and this is the epitome of that form of government.



Exactly. The left pretends to support the minorities but only when it suits them. Most of Hillary votes came from anchor babies and other radicals who hate this country. Anchor babies want amnesty for their relatives and open borders so more of their relatives can invade us. Radicals just want to take us down because the hate capitalism. Muslims want to advance their agenda so voted for more Muslims to come in.

Few on the left will support our constitution. Those on the left range from socialist/communist to dictatorship. Some believe in "benevolent dictators." What they want is to dictate how the rest of us should live.

They would jump at the chance to silence those in what they arrogantly call "flyover country." They support liberal elites and imported radicals who can't wait to shred the constitution.

Democracy is evil and allows the majority to push around the minority. They want the wolves to have say over the lambs.
 
The Libs in this thread are just exhibiting their EPIC BUTTHURT that our system worked according to the design. If hiLIARy had won the electoral votes, they would be celebrating the wisdom of the design. But they lost, so they want to change the rules.

That's the mentality of Participation Trophy Losers.
I think you don't understand why there's the EC.

PS, nor does your analysis account for Trump getting half of the six biggest states, and that's not counting Mich.
 
The Libs in this thread are just exhibiting their EPIC BUTTHURT that our system worked according to the design. If hiLIARy had won the electoral votes, they would be celebrating the wisdom of the design. But they lost, so they want to change the rules.

That's the mentality of Participation Trophy Losers.
I think you don't understand why there's the EC.

PS, nor does your analysis account for Trump getting half of the six biggest states, and that's not counting Mich.

I don't think you understand my knowledge of the Constitution.

And I also understand that this is true:

when_everyone_gets_a_trophy_11-10-16-1.jpg
 
The Libs in this thread are just exhibiting their EPIC BUTTHURT that our system worked according to the design. If hiLIARy had won the electoral votes, they would be celebrating the wisdom of the design. But they lost, so they want to change the rules.

That's the mentality of Participation Trophy Losers.
I think you don't understand why there's the EC.

PS, nor does your analysis account for Trump getting half of the six biggest states, and that's not counting Mich.

I don't think you understand my knowledge of the Constitution.

And I also understand that this is true:

View attachment 99388
LOL. Look, what happened was Hillary won CA, NY, 62 and 59 % respectively, while Trump' wins in Fla and PA were less than 50%, and even Tex was only by 53%, so factually you're analysis of this somehow being a big v. little election is just bullshit, and typical of your bias.

The EC is in part to give each small state the weight of two senators v. popular vote. However, if the FOUNDERs were really primarily concerned with size, they'd have just allocated EV by state %'s. It was an anti-populist measure.

Out.
 
The Libs in this thread are just exhibiting their EPIC BUTTHURT that our system worked according to the design. If hiLIARy had won the electoral votes, they would be celebrating the wisdom of the design. But they lost, so they want to change the rules.

That's the mentality of Participation Trophy Losers.
I think you don't understand why there's the EC.

PS, nor does your analysis account for Trump getting half of the six biggest states, and that's not counting Mich.

I don't think you understand my knowledge of the Constitution.

And I also understand that this is true:

View attachment 99388
LOL. Look, what happened was Hillary won CA, NY, 62 and 59 % respectively, while Trump' wins in Fla and PA were less than 50%, and even Tex was only by 53%, so factually you're analysis of this somehow being a big v. little election is just bullshit, and typical of your bias.

The EC is in part to give each small state the weight of two senators v. popular vote. However, if the FOUNDERs were really primarily concerned with size, they'd have just allocated EV by state %'s. It was an anti-populist measure.

Out.


*sigh* Yes, the EC is working as designed. I have NEVER claimed it was intended for direct purely proportional representation. You must have me confused with someone else.
 
The Libs in this thread are just exhibiting their EPIC BUTTHURT that our system worked according to the design. If hiLIARy had won the electoral votes, they would be celebrating the wisdom of the design. But they lost, so they want to change the rules.

That's the mentality of Participation Trophy Losers.
I think you don't understand why there's the EC.

PS, nor does your analysis account for Trump getting half of the six biggest states, and that's not counting Mich.

I don't think you understand my knowledge of the Constitution.

And I also understand that this is true:

View attachment 99388
LOL. Look, what happened was Hillary won CA, NY, 62 and 59 % respectively, while Trump' wins in Fla and PA were less than 50%, and even Tex was only by 53%, so factually you're analysis of this somehow being a big v. little election is just bullshit, and typical of your bias.

The EC is in part to give each small state the weight of two senators v. popular vote. However, if the FOUNDERs were really primarily concerned with size, they'd have just allocated EV by state %'s. It was an anti-populist measure.

Out.


*sigh* Yes, the EC is working as designed. I have NEVER claimed it was intended for direct purely proportional representation. You must have me confused with someone else.



Before the election, when Soros was claiming that Trump would win the popular but Hillary would win the EC, the left immediately pressed Trump and wanted him to promise to accept the results. They didn't want any excuses, accusations of cheating, or claims that the EC was unfair. Of course, they changed their tune when Hillary lost miserably.

Even though they now claim that the majority of the country should prevail, they have no respect for the majority of people in each state who didn't want Hillary.

Libs, take your own advice and accept it and move on. What Soros' radical groups are doing is trying to overturn the election by bullying. He has his hired thugs stirring up trouble and these groups don't speak for the majority. I don't give a shit what radical immigrants think this country should do. I don't give a shit what criminals destroying the streets think about anything.

"Before the election, when all of the so-called political experts were certain that Democrat presidential candidate Hillary Clinton would defeat Republican Donald Trump, conservatives were constantly lectured by liberals about respecting the outcome of the race.

Since Trump’s victory on Nov. 8, however, the liberal tune has changed, and electors in some states have even been harassed about not casting their vote for the GOP candidate on Dec. 19 when the 538 state electors will officially select our country’s next president.

Electors in Arizona have been particularly flooded with emails and phone calls from activists demanding that they defy the will of their state’s voters by choosing Clinton instead of President-elect Trump, and one of the state’s 11 electors reported that most of the demands have come from out of state, according to Fox News."

ALERT: Mainstream Media Blackout as Shock Source of AZ Elector Harassment Found
 
Von Fuckstick ...sticking it to the Rubes who though "swamp drainage" was real

Trump quipped that Clinton would be in jail if he was elected....ROFLMAO ...poor rubes who voted for him

Top aide: Trump won’t pursue Clinton investigation


President-elect Donald Trump will not follow through on his campaign pledge to pursue an investigation into Hillary Clinton, one of his aides told MSNBC's "Morning Joe."

"I think when the President-elect, who's also the head of your party, tells you before he's even inaugurated that he doesn't wish to pursue these charges, it sends a very strong message, tone, and content" to other Republicans, former Trump campaign manager Kellyanne Conway said Tuesday.

Trump had routinely attacked Clinton on the campaign trail over her use of a private server as secretary of State and for foreign donations to the Clinton Foundation while she was in the Obama administration.

"Lock her up" was a common chant among supporters at his rallies.

During one of the presidential debates, Trump quipped that Clinton would be in jail if he was elected.
 
The Libs in this thread are just exhibiting their EPIC BUTTHURT that our system worked according to the design. If hiLIARy had won the electoral votes, they would be celebrating the wisdom of the design. But they lost, so they want to change the rules.

That's the mentality of Participation Trophy Losers.
I think you don't understand why there's the EC.

PS, nor does your analysis account for Trump getting half of the six biggest states, and that's not counting Mich.

I don't think you understand my knowledge of the Constitution.

And I also understand that this is true:

View attachment 99388
LOL. Look, what happened was Hillary won CA, NY, 62 and 59 % respectively, while Trump' wins in Fla and PA were less than 50%, and even Tex was only by 53%, so factually you're analysis of this somehow being a big v. little election is just bullshit, and typical of your bias.

The EC is in part to give each small state the weight of two senators v. popular vote. However, if the FOUNDERs were really primarily concerned with size, they'd have just allocated EV by state %'s. It was an anti-populist measure.

Out.
funny 306 to 232 and Trump kicked Clinton's ass.
 
Von Fuckstick ...sticking it to the Rubes who though "swamp drainage" was real

Trump quipped that Clinton would be in jail if he was elected....ROFLMAO ...poor rubes who voted for him

Top aide: Trump won’t pursue Clinton investigation


President-elect Donald Trump will not follow through on his campaign pledge to pursue an investigation into Hillary Clinton, one of his aides told MSNBC's "Morning Joe."

"I think when the President-elect, who's also the head of your party, tells you before he's even inaugurated that he doesn't wish to pursue these charges, it sends a very strong message, tone, and content" to other Republicans, former Trump campaign manager Kellyanne Conway said Tuesday.

Trump had routinely attacked Clinton on the campaign trail over her use of a private server as secretary of State and for foreign donations to the Clinton Foundation while she was in the Obama administration.

"Lock her up" was a common chant among supporters at his rallies.

During one of the presidential debates, Trump quipped that Clinton would be in jail if he was elected.
or not. you have no idea what's coming. How do you know it isn't a ploy to stop a pardon? do you know for certain? is he in office yet? I love how this guy keeps showing his genius.
 
or not. you have no idea what's coming. How do you know it isn't a ploy to stop a pardon? do you know for certain? is he in office yet? I love how this guy keeps showing his genius.
I think you like Von Fuckstick and his ploys like the fraudulent Trump U scam that cost him $25 million to avoid embarrassing testimony to come ...plus Von Fuck paid a one million dollar fine for "being a Rip off"
 

Forum List

Back
Top