Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Anyone studying Dunning-Kruger effect would have a field day with the right wingers on these boards.
Every election we get this retarded shit from the retarded Right.
Yes, Trump won lots of counties,
he won, for example, Niobrara County in Wyoming.
Population 2,456.
Clinton won Kings County (Brooklyn)
Population 2,636,735.
Now it's up to you to tell us why one equals the other, in a democratic election.
This shows the brilliance of The Founders to overcome the tyranny of majority rules. This is a federation of states and this is the epitome of that form of government.
I think you don't understand why there's the EC.The Libs in this thread are just exhibiting their EPIC BUTTHURT that our system worked according to the design. If hiLIARy had won the electoral votes, they would be celebrating the wisdom of the design. But they lost, so they want to change the rules.
That's the mentality of Participation Trophy Losers.
I think you don't understand why there's the EC.The Libs in this thread are just exhibiting their EPIC BUTTHURT that our system worked according to the design. If hiLIARy had won the electoral votes, they would be celebrating the wisdom of the design. But they lost, so they want to change the rules.
That's the mentality of Participation Trophy Losers.
PS, nor does your analysis account for Trump getting half of the six biggest states, and that's not counting Mich.
LOL. Look, what happened was Hillary won CA, NY, 62 and 59 % respectively, while Trump' wins in Fla and PA were less than 50%, and even Tex was only by 53%, so factually you're analysis of this somehow being a big v. little election is just bullshit, and typical of your bias.I think you don't understand why there's the EC.The Libs in this thread are just exhibiting their EPIC BUTTHURT that our system worked according to the design. If hiLIARy had won the electoral votes, they would be celebrating the wisdom of the design. But they lost, so they want to change the rules.
That's the mentality of Participation Trophy Losers.
PS, nor does your analysis account for Trump getting half of the six biggest states, and that's not counting Mich.
I don't think you understand my knowledge of the Constitution.
And I also understand that this is true:
View attachment 99388
LOL. Look, what happened was Hillary won CA, NY, 62 and 59 % respectively, while Trump' wins in Fla and PA were less than 50%, and even Tex was only by 53%, so factually you're analysis of this somehow being a big v. little election is just bullshit, and typical of your bias.I think you don't understand why there's the EC.The Libs in this thread are just exhibiting their EPIC BUTTHURT that our system worked according to the design. If hiLIARy had won the electoral votes, they would be celebrating the wisdom of the design. But they lost, so they want to change the rules.
That's the mentality of Participation Trophy Losers.
PS, nor does your analysis account for Trump getting half of the six biggest states, and that's not counting Mich.
I don't think you understand my knowledge of the Constitution.
And I also understand that this is true:
View attachment 99388
The EC is in part to give each small state the weight of two senators v. popular vote. However, if the FOUNDERs were really primarily concerned with size, they'd have just allocated EV by state %'s. It was an anti-populist measure.
Out.
LOL. Look, what happened was Hillary won CA, NY, 62 and 59 % respectively, while Trump' wins in Fla and PA were less than 50%, and even Tex was only by 53%, so factually you're analysis of this somehow being a big v. little election is just bullshit, and typical of your bias.I think you don't understand why there's the EC.The Libs in this thread are just exhibiting their EPIC BUTTHURT that our system worked according to the design. If hiLIARy had won the electoral votes, they would be celebrating the wisdom of the design. But they lost, so they want to change the rules.
That's the mentality of Participation Trophy Losers.
PS, nor does your analysis account for Trump getting half of the six biggest states, and that's not counting Mich.
I don't think you understand my knowledge of the Constitution.
And I also understand that this is true:
View attachment 99388
The EC is in part to give each small state the weight of two senators v. popular vote. However, if the FOUNDERs were really primarily concerned with size, they'd have just allocated EV by state %'s. It was an anti-populist measure.
Out.
*sigh* Yes, the EC is working as designed. I have NEVER claimed it was intended for direct purely proportional representation. You must have me confused with someone else.
[ got anything else?
ooh that 306 to 232 thumping by Trump? Thanks for reminding me.[ got anything else?
U.S. Total Popular vote Today
Clinton 63,757,077
Trump 62,004,178
Clinton + 1,752,899
funny 306 to 232 and Trump kicked Clinton's ass.LOL. Look, what happened was Hillary won CA, NY, 62 and 59 % respectively, while Trump' wins in Fla and PA were less than 50%, and even Tex was only by 53%, so factually you're analysis of this somehow being a big v. little election is just bullshit, and typical of your bias.I think you don't understand why there's the EC.The Libs in this thread are just exhibiting their EPIC BUTTHURT that our system worked according to the design. If hiLIARy had won the electoral votes, they would be celebrating the wisdom of the design. But they lost, so they want to change the rules.
That's the mentality of Participation Trophy Losers.
PS, nor does your analysis account for Trump getting half of the six biggest states, and that's not counting Mich.
I don't think you understand my knowledge of the Constitution.
And I also understand that this is true:
View attachment 99388
The EC is in part to give each small state the weight of two senators v. popular vote. However, if the FOUNDERs were really primarily concerned with size, they'd have just allocated EV by state %'s. It was an anti-populist measure.
Out.
or not. you have no idea what's coming. How do you know it isn't a ploy to stop a pardon? do you know for certain? is he in office yet? I love how this guy keeps showing his genius.Von Fuckstick ...sticking it to the Rubes who though "swamp drainage" was real
Trump quipped that Clinton would be in jail if he was elected....ROFLMAO ...poor rubes who voted for him
Top aide: Trump won’t pursue Clinton investigation
President-elect Donald Trump will not follow through on his campaign pledge to pursue an investigation into Hillary Clinton, one of his aides told MSNBC's "Morning Joe."
"I think when the President-elect, who's also the head of your party, tells you before he's even inaugurated that he doesn't wish to pursue these charges, it sends a very strong message, tone, and content" to other Republicans, former Trump campaign manager Kellyanne Conway said Tuesday.
Trump had routinely attacked Clinton on the campaign trail over her use of a private server as secretary of State and for foreign donations to the Clinton Foundation while she was in the Obama administration.
"Lock her up" was a common chant among supporters at his rallies.
During one of the presidential debates, Trump quipped that Clinton would be in jail if he was elected.
He is Minority President of the rural whites ...funny 306 to 232 and Trump kicked Clinton's ass.
I think you like Von Fuckstick and his ploys like the fraudulent Trump U scam that cost him $25 million to avoid embarrassing testimony to come ...plus Von Fuck paid a one million dollar fine for "being a Rip off"or not. you have no idea what's coming. How do you know it isn't a ploy to stop a pardon? do you know for certain? is he in office yet? I love how this guy keeps showing his genius.
306 to 232 and the next president of the United States, dont, dont, dont, dont........Donald Trump!!!!! Yay!!!!!!!!!!He is Minority President of the rural whites ...funny 306 to 232 and Trump kicked Clinton's ass.
Lost popular vote to a woman ..