‘Covid Is A Miserable Way To Die’: Alabama Doctor Refuses To Treat Anyone Who Is Unvaccinated

In what way? You seem con-fused that masks protect the wearer. Masks are to protect others....if you live in a 3rd world area like the Red states, you are surrounded by non-mask wearers......not much protection for you there.
You are obviously retarded. Here is the fact a dumbfuck like you will avoid at all costs. If you can get it through a mask, you can spread it through the mask. Return to your hole under the bridge.
 
Correct.

It helps someone who is infected from spreading the virus to others.

That’s what’s alien to the selfish, self-centered right: taking measures to the benefit of others.
Another retard. Again, for you slow witted Dim lemmings, if you can catch it through the mask, you can spread it through the mask. Run away now.
 
The trump Nazis have no understanding of fascism, which can be seen daily on these message boards.

If the trump Nazis had a modicum of understanding of fascism, they would realize they are model fascists. Their seething hatred of liberals is a major tenet of fascism, as well as their racial hatred and ethnic bigotry.

This lack of understanding by the trump Nazis isn't limited to fascism. Just as their misuse and error-filled throwing around of "fascist" and "fascism", it is the same with their condemnation of, socialism and socialists.

The trump Nazis' decades of brainwashing by their politicians, FOX Noise and the like, coupled with the bullsh!t told them by their Christian clergy, blinds them to the fact there are many successful social democracies around the world.

These nations also practice capitalism, but, unfortunately, the brainwashing received by the trump Nazis forces them to believe capitalism and socialism cannot coexist.

The trump Nazis have been convinced the predatory, unregulated capitalism practiced in the U.S. is the only way to go. That is why so many trump Nazis live paycheck to paycheck, constantly dreaming that someday... they'll strike it rich. A dream that rarely, if ever, comes true for any of them.


.
One Langley shill to another Langley shill.
 
So then, why is he refusing to treat unvaccinated if there are no guarantees?

According to the stats I’ve been able to find, the fatality rate is only about 1.7%. That means that a vast majority of the infected recover. And, having recovered, these patients now have natural antibodies.

A question that occurred to me is, if refusing patients is a doctor’s right and if it is a common practice, why did this make the news?

My view on this is that this is more a statement to the unvaccinated. The reason I say this is because we’re seeing everywhere urgings for people to get vaccinated, articles and social media memes and tweets criticizing the unvaccinated and celebrity rants in attempts to shame people into getting vaccinated.

If it wasn’t for all the hype about vaccines, I would have no doubts about the doctor’s motives.
I believe he explained why he decided not to treat the unvaccinated. He said, he was tired of seeing people sick and dying needlessly. If his actions persuade patients to get vaccinated, I would guess it would be worth the money he loss as he will be fulfilling his oath as a doctor, "to prevent disease whenever he can". I wish there were more doctors like this.

Although the chance of dying if you catch covid=19 is not that high the chance of getting serious ill with covid-19, particular if you are unvaccinated is about 1 in 6. Covid-19 can be a pretty horrible disease however most people see it as just nothing at all or deadly but there is a wide gap in between. As my neighbor described it, it was day after day of chocking and being short of breath, not having the strength to make it to the bathroom. Even after a week or ten days, he still was week and felt like shit. About 1 out every 10 that have serious symptoms will have long-lasting fatigue, lung problems, joint pain, brain fog and other symptoms. It makes no sense to take the chance when there is a vaccine that significantly lower your chance of getting a serious ill or dying with few if any side effects.
 
Maybe, maybe not. But this vaccine was rolled out in record time and this made my antennas twitch. It further caught my attention when people started turning it into a political and moral issue. When they started cajoling and badgering us relentlessly to GET VACCINATED!!, I instinctively drew back.

I refuse to live in fear of this disease and in fact, I’m not worried at all because I’m confident I will weather it just fine. And even if I was 100% convinced the vaccine is not dangerous, I probably still would not get it.
I read an article the other day, I think it was in Psychology today in which a clinical a psychologist answered the question of why intelligent people refuse to take the vaccine in spite of all the scientific evidence. He maintained that most of those that actually refuse to take the vaccine do so for exactly the same reason, a 6 year old refuses to eat his spinach regardless of the threats, reasoning, and cajoling of the parents. Many people never grow out of rebelling against authority, employers, landlords, or goverment. Charge them $100 for the vaccine, and they will jump in long line to get the vaccine while government pleads with people that there will plenty for all.
 
We are far and away mostly secure. It is you who wishes to try to force the fake panic and compliance upon all and we aren’t buying it which throws your safe space emotions into a dither.
No one is panicking. There is no need to. Most people have taken a vaccine that that reduces their chance of serious illness or death by 90%. Those that haven't taken the vaccine aren't panicking because they know it's just a hoax. So it will never effect them.
 
Last edited:
That doesn’t make any sense. Why would a mask filter out the virus in one direction but not the other?
The filtering is same on both sides. However, the mask is most effective at preventing repertory droplets being expelled by the wearer because the cloud of droplets being expelled, sneezed or coughed by the wearer are very dense and are expelled directly into the mask filtering where filtering is most effective. The viral load being received by a person wearing a mask will be much less dense due to dispersion and will enter the mask from front and on the sides where masks tend to leak. Thus, "I wear a mask for you and you wear a mask for me." Mask are very effective at reducing the density of a viral load being coughed, sneezed, or breathed out by the wearer.
 
I believe he explained why he decided not to treat the unvaccinated. He said, he was tired of seeing people sick and dying needlessly. If his actions persuade patients to get vaccinated, I would guess it would be worth the money he loss as he will be fulfilling his oath as a doctor, "to prevent disease whenever he can". I wish there were more doctors like this.

I’m not sure that applies. Refusing to treat the already-diseased is not preventing disease.
 
More doctors should do this. Let the idiots die if they are not vaxxed. Just think. These idiots are taking time away from people that have other issues.
As usual, scumbag leftists demonstrate disdain for human life.
 
I read an article the other day, I think it was in Psychology today in which a clinical a psychologist answered the question of why intelligent people refuse to take the vaccine in spite of all the scientific evidence. He maintained that most of those that actually refuse to take the vaccine do so for exactly the same reason, a 6 year old refuses to eat his spinach regardless of the threats, reasoning, and cajoling of the parents. Many people never grow out of rebelling against authority, employers, landlords, or goverment. Charge them $100 for the vaccine, and they will jump in long line to get the vaccine while government pleads with people that there will plenty for all.

I don’t so much have a problem with authority, I have a problem with mobs screaming at me.

I don’t respond well to that kind of exhortation.
 
The filtering is same on both sides. However, the mask is most effective at preventing repertory droplets being expelled by the wearer because the cloud of droplets being expelled, sneezed or coughed by the wearer are very dense and are expelled directly into the mask filtering where filtering is most effective. The viral load being received by a person wearing a mask will be much less dense due to dispersion and will enter the mask from front and on the sides where masks tend to leak. Thus, "I wear a mask for you and you wear a mask for me." Mask are very effective at reducing the density of a viral load being coughed, sneezed, or breathed out by the wearer.

I can’t help but wonder if this theory was actually tested or if it’s just a theory.

I would guess that there is maybe some merit to the theory but in actuality the difference is most likely negligible.
 
I’m not sure that applies. Refusing to treat the already-diseased is not preventing disease.
The doctor is not refusing these people treatment if they follow doctors orders which includes being vaccinated. Doctors refuse to see patients that refuse to wear a mask. Doctors have dropped patents that refuse medical advice for centuries. Pediatricians will not accept patients that will not be vaccinated. Doctors have drop patient that refuse to stop smoking. The primary duty of all doctors is for the care and safety of patients. Patients that refuse to follow medical advice simply have to seek help elsewhere.
 
Last edited:
I’ve heard transplant doctors will begin to remove the transplants if the recipient was not vaccinated
 

Forum List

Back
Top