Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
/-----/ "What party was George Washington in?"What party was George Washington in?Which party was that?Revolution and single party rule are not economic systems. The US began with revolution and single party rule.
And you cannot separate the economic system and the political system from communism, it's the same with socialism.
Can you separate the economic system and the political system from capitalism?
A party of one? Anyway, you seem to have your own views and definitions, not sure if anyone else would agree with you. In the end, it doesn't really matter since every country, even our own, has elements of communism, socialism, and capitalism.What party was George Washington in?Which party was that?Revolution and single party rule are not economic systems. The US began with revolution and single party rule.
And you cannot separate the economic system and the political system from communism, it's the same with socialism.
Can you separate the economic system and the political system from capitalism?
Yes, because by their nature they are separate. In socialism the economic system is the political system.
No party isn't one party.
If unions were worth a shit they would keep their unions to themselves.... lolThe Democrat Frontrunner would outlaw right to work laws that preserve the right of US workers to be employed even if they aren't dues paying members of Big Labor.
Good news for the folks in the La Cosa Nostra who control the US union scene.
Sanders calls for ban on state right-to-work laws
Apparently GW was a member of a party that didn't exist when he became president?/-----/ "What party was George Washington in?"
What Political Party Did George Washington Belong To ...
What Political Party Did George Washington Belong To?
George Washington, the first president of the United States, belonged to the Federalist Party. The Federalist Party was one of the first two political parties in the United States. The party originated in opposition to the Democratic-Republican party during Washington's first term as President (1789-1793).
A party of one? Anyway, you seem to have your own views and definitions, not sure if anyone else would agree with you. In the end, it doesn't really matter since every country, even our own, has elements of communism, socialism, and capitalism.What party was George Washington in?Which party was that?Revolution and single party rule are not economic systems. The US began with revolution and single party rule.
And you cannot separate the economic system and the political system from communism, it's the same with socialism.
Can you separate the economic system and the political system from capitalism?
Yes, because by their nature they are separate. In socialism the economic system is the political system.
No party isn't one party.
Apparently GW was a member of a party that didn't exist when he became president?/-----/ "What party was George Washington in?"
What Political Party Did George Washington Belong To ...
George Washington, the first president of the United States, belonged to the Federalist Party. The Federalist Party was one of the first two political parties in the United States. The party originated in opposition to the Democratic-Republican party during Washington's first term as President (1789-1793).
A party of one? Anyway, you seem to have your own views and definitions, not sure if anyone else would agree with you. In the end, it doesn't really matter since every country, even our own, has elements of communism, socialism, and capitalism.What party was George Washington in?Which party was that?Revolution and single party rule are not economic systems. The US began with revolution and single party rule.
And you cannot separate the economic system and the political system from communism, it's the same with socialism.
Can you separate the economic system and the political system from capitalism?
Yes, because by their nature they are separate. In socialism the economic system is the political system.
No party isn't one party.
You confuse systems for components.
Government isn't socialist, it's government. It becomes socialist when it becomes socialist.
All you are doing is trying to be an apologist for something you don't have the balls to support out in the open.
/---- Not sure what the argument here is.Apparently GW was a member of a party that didn't exist when he became president?/-----/ "What party was George Washington in?"
What Political Party Did George Washington Belong To ...
George Washington, the first president of the United States, belonged to the Federalist Party. The Federalist Party was one of the first two political parties in the United States. The party originated in opposition to the Democratic-Republican party during Washington's first term as President (1789-1793).
You claimed the US started out with single-party rule. This entry clearly shows that wasn't true.
--- Not sure what the argument here is.
Revolution and single party rule are not economic systems. The US began with revolution and single party rule.Usually communism comes from revolution, and single party rule starts from the beginning. It is also just the most extreme form of socialism.
Thanks for clearing that up. I'm not a socialist, I'm a firm supporter of capitalism, I just think it needs to be ruled and regulated by the government for the benefit of society. Capitalism is my preference, however I don't have an ideological axe to grind, if communism works for a specific part of society than I'd go with communism, same for socialism. Labels don't scare me.You confuse systems for components.
Government isn't socialist, it's government. It becomes socialist when it becomes socialist.
All you are doing is trying to be an apologist for something you don't have the balls to support out in the open.
Thanks for clearing that up. I'm not a socialist, I'm a firm supporter of capitalism, I just think it needs to be ruled and regulated by the government for the benefit of society. Capitalism is my preference, however I don't have an ideological axe to grind, if communism works for a specific part of society than I'd go with communism, same for socialism. Labels don't scare me.You confuse systems for components.
Government isn't socialist, it's government. It becomes socialist when it becomes socialist.
All you are doing is trying to be an apologist for something you don't have the balls to support out in the open.
Socialism has been tried countless times and in countless forms and it has 100% failure rate… Long-termThanks for clearing that up. I'm not a socialist, I'm a firm supporter of capitalism, I just think it needs to be ruled and regulated by the government for the benefit of society. Capitalism is my preference, however I don't have an ideological axe to grind, if communism works for a specific part of society than I'd go with communism, same for socialism. Labels don't scare me.You confuse systems for components.
Government isn't socialist, it's government. It becomes socialist when it becomes socialist.
All you are doing is trying to be an apologist for something you don't have the balls to support out in the open.
The end results of authoritarianism scare me, socialism and communism, not so much.The end results should scare you when it comes to actual socialism and communism.
And I call bullshit on you not being a socialist at heart.
The end results of authoritarianism scare me, socialism and communism, not so much.The end results should scare you when it comes to actual socialism and communism.
And I call bullshit on you not being a socialist at heart.
Anyone who can write "Government isn't socialist, it's government. It becomes socialist when it becomes socialist" doesn't get to call BS on anyone.
/—-/ This doesn’t scare you about Communism? People with Facebook on phones in China sent to 'concentration camps'The end results of authoritarianism scare me, socialism and communism, not so much.The end results should scare you when it comes to actual socialism and communism.
And I call bullshit on you not being a socialist at heart.
Anyone who can write "Government isn't socialist, it's government. It becomes socialist when it becomes socialist" doesn't get to call BS on anyone.
Democratic socialism, Sanders said, is not tied to any Marxist belief or the abolition of capitalism. “I don’t believe government should own the means of production, but I do believe that the middle class and the working families who produce the wealth of America deserve a fair deal,” he said. Maybe he is not really a socialist by more of a social welfare proponent along the lines of Europe.Socialism has been tried countless times and in countless forms and it has 100% failure rate… Long-term
The Democrat Frontrunner would outlaw right to work laws that preserve the right of US workers to be employed even if they aren't dues paying members of Big Labor.
Good news for the folks in the La Cosa Nostra who control the US union scene.
Sanders calls for ban on state right-to-work laws
China is a one-party, authoritarian state. That is what scares me./—-/ This doesn’t scare you about Communism? People with Facebook on phones in China sent to 'concentration camps'The end results of authoritarianism scare me, socialism and communism, not so much.The end results should scare you when it comes to actual socialism and communism.
And I call bullshit on you not being a socialist at heart.
Anyone who can write "Government isn't socialist, it's government. It becomes socialist when it becomes socialist" doesn't get to call BS on anyone.
The Democrat Frontrunner would outlaw right to work laws that preserve the right of US workers to be employed even if they aren't dues paying members of Big Labor.
Good news for the folks in the La Cosa Nostra who control the US union scene.
Sanders calls for ban on state right-to-work laws
