Cute story, but there's nothing scientific about it at all. The differences mentioned can be easily explained as the different routes species took in the evolutionary paths. No simplistic pooh-poohing of evolutionary theory proves anything.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Creation science is an oxymoron.
Creationism is religion, not science, its just as false and subjective as all other religion.
And we wonder why America is becoming the laughing stock of the world, with these Low IQ science illiterate buffoons trying to pass their magical thinking asshattery off as a science
I guess there's no such thing as a billionaire either. How long it takes to do something a billion times is irrelevant. What is relevant is the fact that earth's magnetic field has lasted this is due the heat provided by decaying radioactive isotopes. That wasn't known in the 1800s and is why earlier estimates of earth's age were in the millions rather than billions of years range.
Ahh, but we have this little problem call "entropy." The earth is in a constant state of decay. While evolutionists teach that life is "evolving" in an upward direction the laws of thermodynamics tell a different story.
If it was really a fact, there'd be no "probably" about it. The stories mentioned could easily have been concocted after fossils have been found.
We can all speculate until the cows come home but speculative conclusions are not facts. The fact of the matter is that any and all naysayers who abjectly and absolutely reject the Bible still have no concrete conclusions to counter what the Bible says. It all boils down to wishful thinking, speculations, and, usually, a hatred towards Christianity.
Interestingly, Torah actually substantiates the many at once idea since 1 man 1 woman who make 2 sons couldn't have started the human race without unprecedented inbreeding. Plus when Cain goes off into exile where'd he eventually wind up but among other humans who weren't his relations. (Genesis 4:14-16)
[MENTION=46449]Delta4Embassy[/MENTION] serious question delta, just for you, because I respect you when it comes to knowing the Torah.
Does Genesis 4:14-16 read different in other languages or does it mention anyone besides Cain's wife?
In all the versions I've read, it hints that others might find and kill Cain, but he could have been talking about his parents or siblings, and it is possible that Cain had already married his wife(yes his sister), before murdering Abel.
Also in verse 17, it says Cain built a city and named it after his son Enoch. If there were already people there, wouldn't they have already named the city?
I look forward to your response.
Interestingly, Torah actually substantiates the many at once idea since 1 man 1 woman who make 2 sons couldn't have started the human race without unprecedented inbreeding. Plus when Cain goes off into exile where'd he eventually wind up but among other humans who weren't his relations. (Genesis 4:14-16)
[MENTION=46449]Delta4Embassy[/MENTION] serious question delta, just for you, because I respect you when it comes to knowing the Torah.
Does Genesis 4:14-16 read different in other languages or does it mention anyone besides Cain's wife?
In all the versions I've read, it hints that others might find and kill Cain, but he could have been talking about his parents or siblings, and it is possible that Cain had already married his wife(yes his sister), before murdering Abel.
Also in verse 17, it says Cain built a city and named it after his son Enoch. If there were already people there, wouldn't they have already named the city?
I look forward to your response.
If it was really a fact, there'd be no "probably" about it. The stories mentioned could easily have been concocted after fossils have been found.
We can all speculate until the cows come home but speculative conclusions are not facts. The fact of the matter is that any and all naysayers who abjectly and absolutely reject the Bible still have no concrete conclusions to counter what the Bible says. It all boils down to wishful thinking, speculations, and, usually, a hatred towards Christianity.
Science isn't all about speculation. It's about acquiring data and deductive logic. If it appears that fossils have been laid down at different times over millions of years, you'd have to say God lies to us by making the claim that it happened in six days 6,000 years ago.
We can all speculate until the cows come home but speculative conclusions are not facts. The fact of the matter is that any and all naysayers who abjectly and absolutely reject the Bible still have no concrete conclusions to counter what the Bible says. It all boils down to wishful thinking, speculations, and, usually, a hatred towards Christianity.
Science isn't all about speculation. It's about acquiring data and deductive logic. If it appears that fossils have been laid down at different times over millions of years, you'd have to say God lies to us by making the claim that it happened in six days 6,000 years ago.
I have never understood where people get the idea that all Christians believe the world to be created a mere 6000 years ago or so.
Many people who interpret the Bible, take things that are not written and impose what they thought should be there. One of the best examples of that is the creation. The Bible lists Adam as 930 years old, when he died. The way it should be looked at, IMO, is that sin entered the world 6000 years ago and began to break the world down.
There is no time listed for how long Adam walked in the Garden of Eden with God. It doesn't say if it was a day or a million years, no time is ever given, yet many people, Christians included, believe that Adam only walked on the earth for 930 years. That is not the way I interpret it. I don't believe men had to number their years on earth before sin came into the world. Why? Because God made man perfect, and man was not going to die before sin came into the world, so why would there be any reason for man to count his days before he could die?
Interestingly, Torah actually substantiates the many at once idea since 1 man 1 woman who make 2 sons couldn't have started the human race without unprecedented inbreeding. Plus when Cain goes off into exile where'd he eventually wind up but among other humans who weren't his relations. (Genesis 4:14-16)
[MENTION=46449]Delta4Embassy[/MENTION] serious question delta, just for you, because I respect you when it comes to knowing the Torah.
Does Genesis 4:14-16 read different in other languages or does it mention anyone besides Cain's wife?
In all the versions I've read, it hints that others might find and kill Cain, but he could have been talking about his parents or siblings, and it is possible that Cain had already married his wife(yes his sister), before murdering Abel.
Also in verse 17, it says Cain built a city and named it after his son Enoch. If there were already people there, wouldn't they have already named the city?
I look forward to your response.
The only appropriate response is that the bible was written by men, consequently its subjective and irrelevant, where quoting bible passages is pointless and proves nothing.
Science isn't all about speculation. It's about acquiring data and deductive logic. If it appears that fossils have been laid down at different times over millions of years, you'd have to say God lies to us by making the claim that it happened in six days 6,000 years ago.
I have never understood where people get the idea that all Christians believe the world to be created a mere 6000 years ago or so.
Many people who interpret the Bible, take things that are not written and impose what they thought should be there. One of the best examples of that is the creation. The Bible lists Adam as 930 years old, when he died. The way it should be looked at, IMO, is that sin entered the world 6000 years ago and began to break the world down.
There is no time listed for how long Adam walked in the Garden of Eden with God. It doesn't say if it was a day or a million years, no time is ever given, yet many people, Christians included, believe that Adam only walked on the earth for 930 years. That is not the way I interpret it. I don't believe men had to number their years on earth before sin came into the world. Why? Because God made man perfect, and man was not going to die before sin came into the world, so why would there be any reason for man to count his days before he could die?
Always thought the notion of a ~6000 year-old Earth came from the Hebrew calender since there the year is 5774. I've also read and heard on docs that Christian leaders went through the Bible and came to the figure independently matching up historically known rulers and such and coming up with best guesses.
Btw, post-dating a check using the Hebrew calendar is a bad idea.
Interestingly, Torah actually substantiates the many at once idea since 1 man 1 woman who make 2 sons couldn't have started the human race without unprecedented inbreeding. Plus when Cain goes off into exile where'd he eventually wind up but among other humans who weren't his relations. (Genesis 4:14-16)
[MENTION=46449]Delta4Embassy[/MENTION] serious question delta, just for you, because I respect you when it comes to knowing the Torah.
Does Genesis 4:14-16 read different in other languages or does it mention anyone besides Cain's wife?
In all the versions I've read, it hints that others might find and kill Cain, but he could have been talking about his parents or siblings, and it is possible that Cain had already married his wife(yes his sister), before murdering Abel.
Also in verse 17, it says Cain built a city and named it after his son Enoch. If there were already people there, wouldn't they have already named the city?
I look forward to your response.
The only appropriate response is that the bible was written by men, consequently its subjective and irrelevant, where quoting bible passages is pointless and proves nothing.
Interestingly, Torah actually substantiates the many at once idea since 1 man 1 woman who make 2 sons couldn't have started the human race without unprecedented inbreeding. Plus when Cain goes off into exile where'd he eventually wind up but among other humans who weren't his relations. (Genesis 4:14-16)
@Delta4Embassy serious question delta, just for you, because I respect you when it comes to knowing the Torah.
Does Genesis 4:14-16 read different in other languages or does it mention anyone besides Cain's wife?
In all the versions I've read, it hints that others might find and kill Cain, but he could have been talking about his parents or siblings, and it is possible that Cain had already married his wife(yes his sister), before murdering Abel.
Also in verse 17, it says Cain built a city and named it after his son Enoch. If there were already people there, wouldn't they have already named the city?
I look forward to your response.
The only appropriate response is that the bible was written by men, consequently its subjective and irrelevant, where quoting bible passages is pointless and proves nothing.
Let's read Genesis 2:5 from a non-corrupt version of the Bible...
We can all speculate until the cows come home but speculative conclusions are not facts. The fact of the matter is that any and all naysayers who abjectly and absolutely reject the Bible still have no concrete conclusions to counter what the Bible says. It all boils down to wishful thinking, speculations, and, usually, a hatred towards Christianity.
Science isn't all about speculation. It's about acquiring data and deductive logic. If it appears that fossils have been laid down at different times over millions of years, you'd have to say God lies to us by making the claim that it happened in six days 6,000 years ago.
I have never understood where people get the idea that all Christians believe the world to be created a mere 6000 years ago or so.
Many people who interpret the Bible, take things that are not written and impose what they thought should be there. One of the best examples of that is the creation. The Bible lists Adam as 930 years old, when he died. The way it should be looked at, IMO, is that sin entered the world 6000 years ago and began to break the world down.
There is no time listed for how long Adam walked in the Garden of Eden with God. It doesn't say if it was a day or a million years, no time is ever given, yet many people, Christians included, believe that Adam only walked on the earth for 930 years. That is not the way I interpret it. I don't believe men had to number their years on earth before sin came into the world. Why? Because God made man perfect, and man was not going to die before sin came into the world, so why would there be any reason for man to count his days before he could die?