The SLoT says otherwise.the universe is cyclical,
![lol :lol: :lol:](/styles/smilies/lol.gif)
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The SLoT says otherwise.the universe is cyclical,
Don’t blame me.You always are. I like you like you like me.It’s good to see I’m in your head.Cool, ding needs help!![]()
I see you brought in a bruiser, that thinks quantity is quality. I need to read.
How did God start?''god did it''
''it's in the bible ''
that's all folks--that's all they have...
I constantly ask for details and that's what I get
no theory, nothing ...
God created the possibility to make theories. So you are able to make a theory about the creation of the heavens and worlds. Tell me what had happened 15 billion years ago. What are we a able to say about this not existing time - except there was nothing? Absolutelly nothing - no idea what to say else about this not-time, not-space, ... . How was the universe be able to come from this nothing - not existing 15 billion years ago - and started "suddenly" to be in a first plank-time?
And you believe in a six thousand year old earth. 'nuff said...
And you believe in a six thousand year old earth. 'nuff said...
It's common sense and observation. We know rocks crack and crumble in time due to weathering, chemical, and mechanical processes. Even with synthetic rock, cement, we see our concrete driveways crack and chip in years time. Thus, the fossil record nor the sedimentary rock layers can't be that old. Especially, if we have soft tissue inside them like dinosaur fossils. It's common sense, but those who claim long time Earth has gone bonkers.
The Earth is suppose to be billions of years old based on a meteor. That would've have experienced collisions in space. You even have a hypothesis of the Earth being hit by a large asteroid and destroying it in no time. If that's common sense and astrophysics, then we couldn't have millions and billions of years Earth.
....let's zero in on the creation of man--if you don't believe in evolution,''god did it''
''it's in the bible ''
that's all folks--that's all they have...
I constantly ask for details and that's what I get
no theory, nothing ...
God created the possibility to make theories. So you are able to make a theory about the creation of the heavens and worlds. Tell me what had happened 15 billion years ago. What are we a able to say about this not existing time - except there was nothing? Absolutelly nothing - no idea what to say else about this not-time, not-space, ... . How was the universe be able to come from this nothing - not existing 15 billion years ago - and started "suddenly" to be in a first plank-time?
you must believe a fully formed human just appeared..and that's much more unbelievabe than evolution
No, you're absolutely wrong. period, full stop. Wow....And you believe in a six thousand year old earth. 'nuff said...
It's common sense and observation. We know rocks crack and crumble in time due to weathering, chemical, and mechanical processes. Even with synthetic rock, cement, we see our concrete driveways crack and chip in years time. Thus, the fossil record nor the sedimentary rock layers can't be that old. Especially, if we have soft tissue inside them like dinosaur fossils. It's common sense, but those who claim long time Earth has gone bonkers.
The Earth is suppose to be billions of years old based on a meteor. That would've have experienced collisions in space. You even have a hypothesis of the Earth being hit by a large asteroid and destroying it in no time. If that's common sense and astrophysics, then we couldn't have millions and billions of years Earth.
Incorrect. The fossils found in rock layers are an accurate reflection of what was living at the time the layers were deposited. If those fossils and their timing don't fit into the theory of evolution, the theory would be falsified, not the data. So far, of the trillions of fossils we have found, everyone fits neatly into the ToE. No circular reasoning.youre assuming that the rock layers are an accurate depiction of how life evolved on the planet,,,
which brings us back to is evolution even true,,,
thats called circular reasoning and fails as a fact based scientific practice,,
You mean, that's all you got. Why am I not surprised?Scientists are making you fool.I'm still unclear on the process of degeneration. Got an example?
That's all.
belief of what? intolerance?--who is intolerant of what? your post is nonsensical....realistic perception of god????!!!!! there is no god--your whole post there is worthless because you mention god
What's your belief. And one of the main reason for the intolerance of atheists is the problem not to be able to separate the own knowledge and the own belief. Unfortunatelly most atheists today seem to believe not to believe.
''seem to believe not to believe'' ---?????
belief of what? intolerance?--who is intolerant of what? your post is nonsensical....realistic perception of god????!!!!! there is no god--your whole post there is worthless because you mention god
What's your belief. And one of the main reason for the intolerance of atheists is the problem not to be able to separate the own knowledge and the own belief. Unfortunatelly most atheists today seem to believe not to believe.
''seem to believe not to believe'' ---?????
Atheism is a religious belief and atheists often deny that atheism is a religious belief => Atheists often believe not to believe. And because they "know", what they are not able to know, lots of atheists are intolerant. Some organized atheist (for example the Soviets) had by the way another reason to be intolerant against all other forms of religious beliefs. They needed atheists for their mass movements. And they knew very well that all serios religions all over the world have moral laws which exclude ideas like "The end justifies the means." or justify a 'pragmatism' like "Right or wrong, my party.", "Right or wrong, my people.", "Right or wrong, my country." and so on.