Creationists

[Youwerecreated]

Genetics have always been a problem for evolutionist,they just are not willing to admit to variations within a family can be due to genetics.

Genetic aren't a problem for Evolutionists. Genetics have always been a problem for Creationists, because they just are not willing to admit to variations in phenotype can be EVER be due to ANY variations in genetics caused by mutations.

---DISINGENUOUSLY INVENTED STRAWMAN ASSERTIONS THOUGHTLESSLY CUT/PASTED BECAUSE RETARDS DON'T LINK SNIPPED---​

Note here that your intellectual hero possess the same lack of intellectual integrity that you do as he presents his strawman (this "amateur evolutionist"), and attacks his strawman's argument as if it was the very best argument that an informed evolutionist would make or defend.

You and this asshat both avoid the actual position that Evolution actually holds on mutation is more like, "Mutation is a source of change in genotype, that could lead naturally to change in phenotype."

The reason you fucktards avoid it is because it's far more difficult to refute than the strawmen you erect in its place.

Creationists believe in natural selection but we doubt the role mutations play in evolution and know if we can show that mutations cannot be part of the engine, then evolution will have lost its power.

A patently retarded and intentional misrepresentation offered as if Evolutionary Theory denies the influences genetic drift, transposition, recombination, and duplication on genetic variation.

Creationists like you project your dismissal of mutation on Evolutionists in the form of requiring them to dismiss everything but mutation. You're disingenuous douche-bags like that.

In reality there are multiple mutation processes that can impact a genome but evolutionists only choose one.

See what I mean? This is a patent lie.

Evolutionists incorporate all of them.

The actual fact of the matter is that Creationists deny the validity of one type of mutation process, and that type of process is that which can successfully introduce new information into the genome to the organisms benefit. Whatever that (those) process(es) may be, doesn't exist. It can't, otherwise Creationists will have to resort to some other dishonestly retarded attempt at refuting evolution.

And, it's worth noting (again) that your dishonesty is magnified by your hypocrisy, manifested in your own continued refusal to answer the question directed at you.

You are really just ignorant.

 

[LOki]

Alright genius then point to one mutation that has been allowed to spread through the human population through natural selection ?

Remember these mutations must be found in the whole population For macro-evolution to occurr

Opposable thumbs.

And, now that your question has been answered again, it's worth noting (again) that your dishonesty is magnified by your hypocrisy, manifested in your own continued refusal to answer the question directed at you.

What is your proof again ?

You've got them, right? Everybody else has them, right? We all find them beneficial, right? End of proof.

And, now that your question has been answered again, it's worth noting (again) that your dishonesty is magnified by your hypocrisy, manifested in your own continued refusal to answer the question directed at you.

 

[LOki]

Funny how the timing of that ignore worked out...Dragon now has me on ignore, just in time to prevent him from answering the question.

Go figure.

Eventually Loki will to.

Keeps showing his ignorance on simple reasoning.

I guess if he keeps saying someone is dishonest that everyone will believe him,while ducking questions or giving an opinion with nothing as far as evidence to support it.

Talk about a TROLL.

Lying is the hallmark of dishonesty, and that's what you've been up to.

And, it's worth noting (again) that your dishonesty is magnified by your hypocrisy, manifested in your own continued refusal to answer the question directed at you.

 

[Youwerecreated]

Opposable thumbs.

And, now that your question has been answered again, it's worth noting (again) that your dishonesty is magnified by your hypocrisy, manifested in your own continued refusal to answer the question directed at you.

What is your proof again ?

You've got them, right? Everybody else has them, right? We all find them beneficial, right? End of proof.

And, now that your question has been answered again, it's worth noting (again) that your dishonesty is magnified by your hypocrisy, manifested in your own continued refusal to answer the question directed at you.

Evidence that they were a product of a mutation please ?

Or are you just gonna keep bloviating ?

 

[Dr.Drock]

Genetics have always been a problem for evolutionist,they just are not willing to admit to variations within a family can be due to genetics.

Genetic aren't a problem for Evolutionists. Genetics have always been a problem for Creationists, because they just are not willing to admit to variations in phenotype can be EVER be due to ANY variations in genetics caused by mutations.



Note here that your intellectual hero possess the same lack of intellectual integrity that you do as he presents his strawman (this "amateur evolutionist"), and attacks his strawman's argument as if it was the very best argument that an informed evolutionist would make or defend.

You and this asshat both avoid the actual position that Evolution actually holds on mutation is more like, "Mutation is a source of change in genotype, that could lead naturally to change in phenotype."

The reason you fucktards avoid it is because it's far more difficult to refute than the strawmen you erect in its place.

A patently retarded and intentional misrepresentation offered as if Evolutionary Theory denies the influences genetic drift, transposition, recombination, and duplication on genetic variation.

Creationists like you project your dismissal of mutation on Evolutionists in the form of requiring them to dismiss everything but mutation. You're disingenuous douche-bags like that.

In reality there are multiple mutation processes that can impact a genome but evolutionists only choose one.

See what I mean? This is a patent lie.

Evolutionists incorporate all of them.

The actual fact of the matter is that Creationists deny the validity of one type of mutation process, and that type of process is that which can successfully introduce new information into the genome to the organisms benefit. Whatever that (those) process(es) may be, doesn't exist. It can't, otherwise Creationists will have to resort to some other dishonestly retarded attempt at refuting evolution.

And, it's worth noting (again) that your dishonesty is magnified by your hypocrisy, manifested in your own continued refusal to answer the question directed at you.

You are really just ignorant.

It's always cute watching you, of all people, call others that.

You're on here denying evolution all the while being totally clueless on it. Having no clue what a mutation is, no clue that no scientist says humans evolved from chimps, you choose ignorance because the facts hurt the fundamentalist mindset you've based your life on.

 

[Youwerecreated]

Funny how the timing of that ignore worked out...Dragon now has me on ignore, just in time to prevent him from answering the question.

Go figure.

Eventually Loki will to.

Keeps showing his ignorance on simple reasoning.

I guess if he keeps saying someone is dishonest that everyone will believe him,while ducking questions or giving an opinion with nothing as far as evidence to support it.

Talk about a TROLL.

Lying is the hallmark of dishonesty, and that's what you've been up to.

And, it's worth noting (again) that your dishonesty is magnified by your hypocrisy, manifested in your own continued refusal to answer the question directed at you.

 

[koshergrl]

Opposable thumbs.

And, now that your question has been answered again, it's worth noting (again) that your dishonesty is magnified by your hypocrisy, manifested in your own continued refusal to answer the question directed at you.

What is your proof again ?

You've got them, right? Everybody else has them, right? We all find them beneficial, right? End of proof.

And, now that your question has been answered again, it's worth noting (again) that your dishonesty is magnified by your hypocrisy, manifested in your own continued refusal to answer the question directed at you.

So the fact that they exist proves a specific theory about how they came to be?

What planet do you live on? That's not an answer, nor is it any sort of evidence of anything except their current existence. The fact that they now exist does not confirm the way by which they came to be.

My 3rd grade daughter knows better than to try to fly such a ridiculous argument, incidentally.

 

[LOki]

Genetics have always been a problem for evolutionist,they just are not willing to admit to variations within a family can be due to genetics.

Genetic aren't a problem for Evolutionists. Genetics have always been a problem for Creationists, because they just are not willing to admit to variations in phenotype can be EVER be due to ANY variations in genetics caused by mutations.



Note here that your intellectual hero possess the same lack of intellectual integrity that you do as he presents his strawman (this "amateur evolutionist"), and attacks his strawman's argument as if it was the very best argument that an informed evolutionist would make or defend.

You and this asshat both avoid the actual position that Evolution actually holds on mutation is more like, "Mutation is a source of change in genotype, that could lead naturally to change in phenotype."

The reason you fucktards avoid it is because it's far more difficult to refute than the strawmen you erect in its place.

A patently retarded and intentional misrepresentation offered as if Evolutionary Theory denies the influences genetic drift, transposition, recombination, and duplication on genetic variation.

Creationists like you project your dismissal of mutation on Evolutionists in the form of requiring them to dismiss everything but mutation. You're disingenuous douche-bags like that.

In reality there are multiple mutation processes that can impact a genome but evolutionists only choose one.

See what I mean? This is a patent lie.

Evolutionists incorporate all of them.

The actual fact of the matter is that Creationists deny the validity of one type of mutation process, and that type of process is that which can successfully introduce new information into the genome to the organisms benefit. Whatever that (those) process(es) may be, doesn't exist. It can't, otherwise Creationists will have to resort to some other dishonestly retarded attempt at refuting evolution.

And, it's worth noting (again) that your dishonesty is magnified by your hypocrisy, manifested in your own continued refusal to answer the question directed at you.

You are really just ignorant.

Well then, why don't you enlighten me with your answer the question I asked of you?

 

[Youwerecreated]

Genetic aren't a problem for Evolutionists. Genetics have always been a problem for Creationists, because they just are not willing to admit to variations in phenotype can be EVER be due to ANY variations in genetics caused by mutations.



Note here that your intellectual hero possess the same lack of intellectual integrity that you do as he presents his strawman (this "amateur evolutionist"), and attacks his strawman's argument as if it was the very best argument that an informed evolutionist would make or defend.

You and this asshat both avoid the actual position that Evolution actually holds on mutation is more like, "Mutation is a source of change in genotype, that could lead naturally to change in phenotype."

The reason you fucktards avoid it is because it's far more difficult to refute than the strawmen you erect in its place.

A patently retarded and intentional misrepresentation offered as if Evolutionary Theory denies the influences genetic drift, transposition, recombination, and duplication on genetic variation.

Creationists like you project your dismissal of mutation on Evolutionists in the form of requiring them to dismiss everything but mutation. You're disingenuous douche-bags like that.

See what I mean? This is a patent lie.

Evolutionists incorporate all of them.

The actual fact of the matter is that Creationists deny the validity of one type of mutation process, and that type of process is that which can successfully introduce new information into the genome to the organisms benefit. Whatever that (those) process(es) may be, doesn't exist. It can't, otherwise Creationists will have to resort to some other dishonestly retarded attempt at refuting evolution.

And, it's worth noting (again) that your dishonesty is magnified by your hypocrisy, manifested in your own continued refusal to answer the question directed at you.

You are really just ignorant.

It's always cute watching you, of all people, call others that.

You're on here denying evolution all the while being totally clueless on it. Having no clue what a mutation is, no clue that no scientist says humans evolved from chimps, you choose ignorance because the facts hurt the fundamentalist mindset you've based your life on.

I have made it clear I know what a mutation is

 

[LOki]

What is your proof again ?

You've got them, right? Everybody else has them, right? We all find them beneficial, right? End of proof.

And, now that your question has been answered again, it's worth noting (again) that your dishonesty is magnified by your hypocrisy, manifested in your own continued refusal to answer the question directed at you.

Evidence that they were a product of a mutation please ?

Or are you just gonna keep bloviating ?

I will happily provide evidence. Answer my question first.

 

[koshergrl]

Opposable thumbs.

And, now that your question has been answered again, it's worth noting (again) that your dishonesty is magnified by your hypocrisy, manifested in your own continued refusal to answer the question directed at you.

What is your proof again ?

You've got them, right? Everybody else has them, right? We all find them beneficial, right? End of proof.

And, now that your question has been answered again, it's worth noting (again) that your dishonesty is magnified by your hypocrisy, manifested in your own continued refusal to answer the question directed at you.

You know, the link to your question doesn't take us to anywhere except the beginning of this page, you lying pos.

So again, for like the third time..kindly ask the question again, without the self-aggrandizing bullshit. Just post the question you allege hasn't been answered. And provide a REAL link to the post where you asked it in the first place.

 

[Dr.Drock]

You are really just ignorant.

It's always cute watching you, of all people, call others that.

You're on here denying evolution all the while being totally clueless on it. Having no clue what a mutation is, no clue that no scientist says humans evolved from chimps, you choose ignorance because the facts hurt the fundamentalist mindset you've based your life on.

I have made it clear I know what a mutation is

No you haven't, the definition of mutation includes providing beneficial features, which every link you've provided agrees with, even the most hardcore fundamentalist bible blogs.

 

[daws101]

What is your proof again ?

You've got them, right? Everybody else has them, right? We all find them beneficial, right? End of proof.

And, now that your question has been answered again, it's worth noting (again) that your dishonesty is magnified by your hypocrisy, manifested in your own continued refusal to answer the question directed at you.

Evidence that they were a product of a mutation please ?

Or are you just gonna keep bloviating ?

I'll give you the short version. we are all products of mutation going all the way back to the first creature with a spine. as stated many times before, mutation caused us and our ape cousin's evolutionary paths to diverge
away from our common ancestor.
if all life were created separately there would be no inter breeding of anything.
since this is not so ...then it's smoking gun proof that there is no intelligent design.

 

[koshergrl]

Genetics have always been a problem for evolutionist,they just are not willing to admit to variations within a family can be due to genetics.

Genetic aren't a problem for Evolutionists. Genetics have always been a problem for Creationists, because they just are not willing to admit to variations in phenotype can be EVER be due to ANY variations in genetics caused by mutations.



Note here that your intellectual hero possess the same lack of intellectual integrity that you do as he presents his strawman (this "amateur evolutionist"), and attacks his strawman's argument as if it was the very best argument that an informed evolutionist would make or defend.

You and this asshat both avoid the actual position that Evolution actually holds on mutation is more like, "Mutation is a source of change in genotype, that could lead naturally to change in phenotype."

The reason you fucktards avoid it is because it's far more difficult to refute than the strawmen you erect in its place.

A patently retarded and intentional misrepresentation offered as if Evolutionary Theory denies the influences genetic drift, transposition, recombination, and duplication on genetic variation.

Creationists like you project your dismissal of mutation on Evolutionists in the form of requiring them to dismiss everything but mutation. You're disingenuous douche-bags like that.

In reality there are multiple mutation processes that can impact a genome but evolutionists only choose one.

See what I mean? This is a patent lie.

Evolutionists incorporate all of them.

The actual fact of the matter is that Creationists deny the validity of one type of mutation process, and that type of process is that which can successfully introduce new information into the genome to the organisms benefit. Whatever that (those) process(es) may be, doesn't exist. It can't, otherwise Creationists will have to resort to some other dishonestly retarded attempt at refuting evolution.

And, it's worth noting (again) that your dishonesty is magnified by your hypocrisy, manifested in your own continued refusal to answer the question directed at you.

You are really just ignorant.

This is the post Liki keeps linking to.

I don't see a question, at all... Just trolling.

 

[Youwerecreated]

Genetic aren't a problem for Evolutionists. Genetics have always been a problem for Creationists, because they just are not willing to admit to variations in phenotype can be EVER be due to ANY variations in genetics caused by mutations.



Note here that your intellectual hero possess the same lack of intellectual integrity that you do as he presents his strawman (this "amateur evolutionist"), and attacks his strawman's argument as if it was the very best argument that an informed evolutionist would make or defend.

You and this asshat both avoid the actual position that Evolution actually holds on mutation is more like, "Mutation is a source of change in genotype, that could lead naturally to change in phenotype."

The reason you fucktards avoid it is because it's far more difficult to refute than the strawmen you erect in its place.

A patently retarded and intentional misrepresentation offered as if Evolutionary Theory denies the influences genetic drift, transposition, recombination, and duplication on genetic variation.

Creationists like you project your dismissal of mutation on Evolutionists in the form of requiring them to dismiss everything but mutation. You're disingenuous douche-bags like that.

See what I mean? This is a patent lie.

Evolutionists incorporate all of them.

The actual fact of the matter is that Creationists deny the validity of one type of mutation process, and that type of process is that which can successfully introduce new information into the genome to the organisms benefit. Whatever that (those) process(es) may be, doesn't exist. It can't, otherwise Creationists will have to resort to some other dishonestly retarded attempt at refuting evolution.

And, it's worth noting (again) that your dishonesty is magnified by your hypocrisy, manifested in your own continued refusal to answer the question directed at you.

You are really just ignorant.

Well then, why don't you enlighten me with your answer the question I asked of you?

How many times have I answered this question.I can't help it you do not like my honest answer.

Well are you gonna put your big boy pants on and provide proof of that mutation being spread through the human population by natural selection ?

 

[LOki]

What is your proof again ?

You've got them, right? Everybody else has them, right? We all find them beneficial, right? End of proof.

And, now that your question has been answered again, it's worth noting (again) that your dishonesty is magnified by your hypocrisy, manifested in your own continued refusal to answer the question directed at you.

So the fact that they exist proves a specific theory about how they came to be?

What planet do you live on? That's not an answer, nor is it any sort of evidence of anything except their current existence. The fact that they now exist does not confirm the way by which they came to be.

My 3rd grade daughter knows better than to try to fly such a ridiculous argument, incidentally.

I hope you know that I will be referring to this argument if you ever decide to assert "Creation" is evidence of your "Creator" to me. Thanks!

 

[Youwerecreated]

You've got them, right? Everybody else has them, right? We all find them beneficial, right? End of proof.

And, now that your question has been answered again, it's worth noting (again) that your dishonesty is magnified by your hypocrisy, manifested in your own continued refusal to answer the question directed at you.

Evidence that they were a product of a mutation please ?

Or are you just gonna keep bloviating ?

I'll give you the short version. we are all products of mutation going all the way back to the first creature with a spine. as stated many times before, mutation caused us and our ape cousin's evolutionary paths to diverge
away from our common ancestor.
if all life were created separately there would be no inter breeding of anything.
since this is not so ...then it's smoking gun proof that there is no intelligent design.

Evidence please.

 

[koshergrl]

What the hell IS the question? Because that link doesn't take you to one. It just takes you to yet another meandering diatribe about how stupid people are for not accepting his opinion about a variety of different things.

 

[Youwerecreated]

You've got them, right? Everybody else has them, right? We all find them beneficial, right? End of proof.

And, now that your question has been answered again, it's worth noting (again) that your dishonesty is magnified by your hypocrisy, manifested in your own continued refusal to answer the question directed at you.

So the fact that they exist proves a specific theory about how they came to be?

What planet do you live on? That's not an answer, nor is it any sort of evidence of anything except their current existence. The fact that they now exist does not confirm the way by which they came to be.

My 3rd grade daughter knows better than to try to fly such a ridiculous argument, incidentally.

I hope you know that I will be referring to this argument if you ever decide to assert "Creation" is evidence of your "Creator" to me. Thanks!

There is all kinds of evidence for intelligent design.

I can provide evdence for my belief but you on the other hand cannot.

 

[Youwerecreated]

What the hell IS the question? Because that link doesn't take you to one. It just takes you to yet another meandering diatribe about how stupid people are for not accepting his opinion about a variety of different things.

He wants to know the evidence for a creator. There is plenty of evidence for intelligent design that allows a rational person to rationalize a designer.

We can point to all things that are created by the mind.